Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 14-1663
JORGE MARIO
Prudente,
GALEAN-PRUDENTE,
a/k/a
Jorge
Mario
Galeana
Jorge
Mario
Galeana
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-2343
JORGE MARIO
Prudente,
GALEAN-PRUDENTE,
a/k/a
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
Submitted:
June 1, 2015
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
DAVIS,
Senior
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Jorge Mario Galean-Prudente,
a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his
appeal from the immigration judges denial of his application
for cancellation of removal (No. 14-1663) and for review of the
Boards order denying his motion to reconsider (No. 14-2343).
We
review
legal
issues
de
novo,
affording
appropriate
v.
Mukasey,
Administrative
517
F.3d
findings
of
685,
fact
691-92
are
(4th
Li Fang
Cir.
conclusive
2008).
unless
any
findings
under
the
We defer to the
substantial
evidence
cancellation
of
removal.
See
U.S.C.
1101(f)(3)
(2012); Ramos v. Holder, 660 F.3d 200, 203-06 (4th Cir. 2011).
We further conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion
in denying Galean-Prudentes motion to reconsider the denial of
3
We therefore deny
the petitions for review in part for the reasons stated by the
Board.
2014).
We lack jurisdiction * to review Galean-Prudentes challenges
to
the
Boards
refusal
to
reinstate
his
grant
of
voluntary
See
U.S.C.
1229c(f)
(2012);
U.S.C.
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
PETITIONS DENIED IN PART,
DISMISSED IN PART