Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 12-4764
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:12-cr-00217-FL-1)
Submitted:
March 8, 2013
Decided:
April 5, 2013
PER CURIAM:
sentence
release.
Antonio
Demon
imposed
following
Blevins
Blevins
the
claims
appeals
his
revocation
that
his
of
fourteen
his
month
supervised
sentence
is
plainly
18 U.S.C.
affirm.
A district court has broad discretion when imposing
sentence upon revoking a term of supervised release.
United
We will
we
then
decide
Id. at 438.
whether
the
Only if we so find,
sentence
is
plainly
Id. at 439.
(unpreserved
claim
that
2
district
court
considered
impermissible
factor
when
imposing
revocation
sentence
is
United States
these requirements.
As Blevins correctly notes, 18 U.S.C. 3583(e) (2006)
mandates
that
district
court
consider
majority
of
the
18
are
U.S.C.
the
need
3583(e).
for
the
Omitted
sentence
from
to
3583(e),
reflect
the
just
Accordingly,
punishment.
district
18
court
may
U.S.C.
not
3553(a)(2)(A).
impose
revocation
Crudup,
direction
that
at
revocation
the
court
should
account,
to
limited
degree,
the
seriousness
of
the
does
the
not
district
indicate
courts
a
explanation
plainly
3
improper
of
Blevins
reliance
on
3553(a)(2)(A).
the
comment
consideration
of
was
made
Blevins
in
reference
repeated
to
attempts
the
to
courts
evade
his
Blevins
sentence.
Thus,
we
find
no
violation
of
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED