Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 15-4571
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:15-cr-00029-IMK-JSK-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Darius
Henning
appeals
his
convictions
and
63-month
firearm,
in
924(a)(2) (2012).
violation
of
18
U.S.C.
922(j)(1),
filed
pro
se
supplemental
brief
asserting
he
Henning
received
the
sentence.
court
procedural
Id. at 51.
properly
and
substantive
reasonableness
of
the
calculated
the
advisory
Sentencing
Guidelines
United States v. Lynn, 592 F.3d 572, 57576 (4th Cir. 2010).
we
find
no
substantive
procedural
error,
reasonableness,
circumstances[.]
properly
review
examin[ing]
the
the
sentence
totality
for
of
the
we
If
calculated
range
is
presumptively
against
the
18
U.S.C.
3553(a)
factors.
United
States v. Louthian, 756 F.3d 295, 306 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,
___ U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 421 (2014).
We conclude that Hennings sentence is reasonable.
The
in
the
district
courts
failure
We find no reversible
to
impose
downward
variant sentence.
variant sentence.
with
the
Guidelines,
and
the
district
court
USSG
5G1.3
(2014).
Accordingly,
3
Hennings
Guidelines
v.
Susi,
674
F.3d
278,
289
(4th
Cir.
2012),
and
we
affirm
the
district
courts
judgment.
This
We
court
the
Supreme
Court
of
review.
If
Henning
requests
the
that
United
a
States
petition
be
for
further
filed,
but
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED