Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 99-4384
COUNSEL
Roger T. Smith, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T.
Calloway, United States Attorney, Jerry W. Miller, Assistant United
States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Ellancer Allen McGrady was originally sentenced to a term of life
imprisonment following a jury trial and convictions for conspiracy to
possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, as well as
various related counts. He appealed his sentence and we remanded for
resentencing on the issue of whether McGrady possessed a firearm
and therefore was subject to an enhancement pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual 2D1.1(b)(1) (1998). On remand, the district court held a second sentencing hearing and again applied the
enhancement. McGrady appeals, contending that the district court
erred in applying the enhancement. McGrady also attempts to challenge his sentence, arguing that the findings the court made regarding
drug quantity and possession of a weapon should have been presented
to a jury, relying upon Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.
First, even if the Apprendi issues McGrady wishes to raise were
before the court, his claims are without merit. As to drug quantity, his
indictment specified an amount of cocaine and crack cocaine sufficient to expose McGrady to a life sentence. The indictment was read
to the jury during jury instructions. Therefore, there is no error under
Apprendi. United States v. Richardson, 233 F.3d 223, 231 (4th Cir.
2000), petition for cert. filed, Mar. 19, 2001 (No. 00-9234). It also
was not error to make a determination that McGrady possessed a firearm for sentencing purposes. Sentencing enhancements that do not
increase the statutory maximum do not violate the principles of
Apprendi. United States v. Kinter, 235 F.3d 192, 200-01 (4th Cir.
2001), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 69 U.S.L.W. 3618 (U.S. Mar. 19,
2001) (No. 00-8591).
Section 2D1.1(b)(1) of the Sentencing Guidelines calls for the
imposition of a two-level enhancement "[i]f a dangerous weapon
(including a firearm) was possessed. The enhancement should be
applied if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that
the weapon was connected with the offense." USSG 2D1.1, comment. (n.3). In order to avoid application of the adjustment, the defendant must show that the connection between the drug offense and the