Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 11-5020
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:11-cr-00037-DCN-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
April 2, 2012
PER CURIAM:
Raynard
intent
to
D.
Williams
distribute
crack
pled
guilty
cocaine,
to
21
possession
U.S.C.
with
841(a)(1)
Williams
has
filed
brief
pursuant
Anders
to
v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that she has found no
meritorious
grounds
for
appeal,
but
questioning
whether
the
guilty
reasonable.
plea
and
whether
the
sentence
imposed
was
We affirm.
and
the
rights
he
was
giving
up
by
pleading
guilty.
Cir. 1991).
Id. at 11920.
We
applying
States,
review
an
abuse
552
U.S.
Williams
of
38,
sentence
discretion
51
standard.
(2007).
2
for
This
reasonableness,
Gall
review
v.
United
requires
consideration
of
both
the
procedural
court
properly
Id.
calculated
and
substantive
advisory
Guidelines
4950; see United States v. Lynn, 592 F.3d 572, 57576 (4th Cir.
2010).
If
substantive
totality
there
is
no
reasonableness
of
the
procedural
of
the
circumstances
to
error,
sentence,
see
we
review
the
examin[ing]
the
whether
the
sentencing
United
the
sentence
is
within
the
presumption of reasonableness.
Guidelines
range,
we
apply
the
sentence
reasonable.
presumption
is
Moreover,
of
both
procedurally
Williams
reasonableness
we
has
failed
accord
his
and
to
substantively
overcome
the
within-Guidelines
sentence.
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record
in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal.
3
This
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED