Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 08-2056
Submitted:
June 4, 2009
Decided:
July 2, 2009
PER CURIAM:
Caleche
Cameroon,
Njweng
petitions
for
Bongo,
review
Immigration
Appeals
(Board)
immigration
judges
decision
of
native
an
and
order
adopting
denying
of
and
her
citizen
the
Board
of
of
affirming
the
applications
for
INA
authorizes
the
Attorney
General
to
confer
It defines a
because
persecution
on
of
persecution
account
of
or
race,
well-founded
religion,
fear
of
nationality,
or
threat
of
death,
torture,
or
injury
to
ones
Li
v.
Gonzales,
405
F.3d
171,
177
(4th
Cir.
2005)
see
C.F.R.
1208.13(a)
(2009),
and
can
establish
Without
regard
to
past
2
8 C.F.R. 1208.13(b)(1)
persecution,
an
alien
can
establish
ground.
Ngarurih
2004).
well-founded
v.
fear
of
Ashcroft,
determination
persecution
371
regarding
F.3d
on
protected
182,
187
(4th
Cir.
eligibility
for
asylum
or
INS v. Elias-
Administrative findings of
of
the
INA
and
any
attendant
regulations.
will
reverse
the
Board
only
if
the
evidence
This
.
to
find
the
requisite
fear
of
persecution.
Elias-
Zacarias, 502 U.S. at 483-84; see Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 325
n.14 (4th Cir. 2002).
An
immigration
determination
on
any
judge
may
inconsistency,
make
inaccuracy,
credibility
or
falsehood
claim.
evaluating
8
an
U.S.C.
asylum
1158(b)(1)(B)(iii)
applicants
(2006).
credibility,
an
do
not
directly
relate
to
3
the
applicants
claim
of
persecution
as
long
as
the
totality
of
the
circumstances
Lin v. Mukasey,
534 F.3d 162, 164 (2d Cir. 2008); see also Mitondo v. Mukasey,
523
F.3d
statute
784,
787-88
abrogates
(7th
Cir.
decisions
2008)
that
(noting
focus
that
on
the
whether
new
the
court
substantial
evidence.
applicants
testimony
reviews
A
credibility
trier
on
of
fact
credibility
who
grounds
for
rejects
must
an
offer
findings
inherently
improbable
testimony
Tewabe
v.
Gonzales, 446 F.3d 533, 538 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation
marks and citations omitted).
is
based
speculation
and
conjecture
rather
than
find
substantial
finding.
Given
evidence
that
4
supports
finding
and
the
the
adverse
lack
of
result
with
respect
to
the
denial
of
asylum
and
with
oral
we
deny
argument
the
petition
because
the
for
facts
review.
and
We
legal
PETITION DENIED