Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • United States v. Lucas, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Hochgeladen von

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 Ansichten2 Seiten
    Steve Lucas appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Lucas provided no grounds for overturning the denial of his § 2255 motion.

    Originalbeschreibung:

    Filed: 2001-10-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7121

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    Steve Lucas appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Lucas provided no grounds for overturning the denial of his § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    3 Ansichten2 Seiten

    United States v. Lucas, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Hochgeladen von

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steve Lucas appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Lucas provided no grounds for overturning the denial of his § 2255 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Als PDF herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7121

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    STEVE LUCAS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
    Judge. (CR-99-233, CA-00-848-1)

    Submitted:

    October 4, 2001

    Decided:

    October 12, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Steve Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Steve Lucas seeks to appeal the district courts order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

    dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See

    United States v. Lucas, Nos. CR-99-233; CA-00-848-1 (M.D.N.C. filed


    Apr. 26, 2001; entered Apr. 27, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen