Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
org
Published in IET Renewable Power Generation
Received on 22nd May 2012
Revised on 9th October 2012
Accepted on 31st October 2012
doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2012.0130
ISSN 1752-1416
The National Grid TransCo., St. Catherines Lodge, Wokingham, RG41 5BN, UK
School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, London, UK
3
Southeast University, Nanjing, Peoples Republic of China
E-mail: ddwenjuan@gmail.com
2
Abstract: This study proposes a power angle control strategy of grid-connected doubly fed induction generators (DFIGs) to
improve the transient performance during grid fault ride-through (FRT). The proposed power angle control can efciently
restrict the rotor-side current under a limited converter rating, support the terminal voltage of DFIGs and hence improve
system stability during the fault period. In this study, the power angle of DFIGs in a multi-machine power system is dened
rstly and then the relation between the dened power angle and rotor-side current surge and terminal voltage dip of DFIGs
are analysed, respectively. Based on the analysis, control of DFIG power angle is implemented expediently on the existing
ux magnitude and angle control (FMAC) scheme of DFIGs as an improved FMAC scheme. In this study, two test examples
are presented to demonstrate and validate the effectiveness of improved FMAC with power angle control and to compare it
with the conventional PQdq control and FMAC. Simulation results show that it can signicantly enhance the FRT capability
of grid-connected DFIGs.
Introduction
www.ietdl.org
DFIGs being signicantly enhanced. Moreover, transient
stability margin of power systems is also increased because
of the support of grid voltage by proposed control.
(1)
(2)
(3)
ig | 2
dddfig 2
d|E
Lrr
2
ig | +
vs s +
|E
=
vs Lm
dt
dt
(4)
ig0 |, where subscript
At steady-state, |V re0 | = s Lrr / Lm |E
0 denotes the steady-state value. However, in transient state,
|V re | might become much larger than |V re0 | mainly because
of the sudden change of dg caused by its transient
characteristic, since s is usually constrained to a range
between 0.2 and 0.2, and variation of dg is usually
ig | as |E
ig | is normally
much greater than that of |E
controlled by the control scheme of RSC either directly or
indirectly.
19
www.ietdl.org
(5)
V V
V f
f
b
+
= I s
jxe2
jxg
ig
V s + jxI s = E
1/ xe1
x
1
1 +
xe1
1/ xe1 + 1/ xe2 + 1/ xg
1/ xe2
x
ig +
V b
V s = E
xe1 1/x + 1/x + 1/ x
e1
e2
(6)
Equation (6) can be expressed briey by
ig + bV b
V s = aE
(7)
where
1/
x
x
a = 1/1 +
1 e1
xe1
1/ xe1 + 1/ xe2 + 1/ xg
1/
x
x
e2
/
b=
xe1 1/x + 1/x + 1/ x
e1
e2
g
1/ x
1 + x 1 e1
xe1
1/ x
+ 1/ x
+ 1/ x
e1
e2
www.ietdl.org
In (xy) coordinate, V b = 1, (7) becomes
vsx + jvsy = aeigx + b + jaeigy
(8)
(9)
21
www.ietdl.org
4
4.1
Case study
Case study 1
|V s | = |V 2 | =
ig |2 + b2 |V 3 |2 + 2ab|E
ig ||V 3 | cos ddfig b
a 2 |E
= 0.8044 p.u.
(11)
where
a = 0.6785, b = 0.1072,
ig | = 1.0674 p.u. (t = 150 ms),
|E
2
2
ig | cos ddfig + bv3x + a|E
ig | sin ddfig + bv3y
a|E
2
2
ig | sin ddfig + b|V 3 | sin b
ig | cos ddfig + b|V 3 | cos b + a|E
=
a|E
(10)
2
2
2
2
= a |E ig | + b |V 3 | + 2ab|Eig ||V 3 | cos ddfig b
22
www.ietdl.org
23
www.ietdl.org
Case study 2
Fig. 8 Conguration of a real power system in eastern China: 500 kv (thick full line), 220 kv (thin full line)
24
www.ietdl.org
Fig. 9 DFIG response with PQdq, FMAC, improved FMAC and PSS
a Comparison of power angle of 10th DFIG (s = 0.2)
b Comparison of magnitude of rotor-side current of the10th DFIG (s = 0.2)
c Comparison of magnitude of terminal voltage of the 10th DFIG (s = 0.2)
Conclusions
References
www.ietdl.org
2 Datta, R., Ranganathan, V.T.: Variable-speed wind power generation
using doubly fed wound rotor induction machine a comparison
with alternative schems, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2002, 17, (3),
pp. 414421
3 Qiao, W., Venayagamoorthy, G.K., Harley, R.G.: Real-time
implementation of a STATCOM on a wind farm equipped with
doubly fed induction generators, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2009, 45,
(1), pp. 98107
4 Morren, J., de Hann, S.W.H.: Ride through of wind turbines with
doubly-fed induction generator during a voltage dip, IEEE Trans.
Energy Convers., 2005, 20, (2), pp. 435441
5 Seman, S., Niiranen, J., Arkkio, A.: Ride-through analysis of doubly
fed induction wind-power generator under unsymmetrical network
disturbance, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2006, 21, (4), pp. 17821789
6 Rahimi, M., Parniani, M.: Efcient control scheme of wind turbines
with doubly fed induction generators for low-voltage ride-through
capability enhancement, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2010, 4, (3),
pp. 242252
7 Hu, S., Lin, X.C., Kang, Y., Zo, X.D.: An improved low-voltage
ride-through control strategy of doubly fed induction generator
during grid faults, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2011, 26, (12),
pp. 36533665
8 Guo, W.Y., Xiao, L.Y., Dai, S.T.: Enhancing low-voltage ride-through
capability and smoothing output power of DFIG with a superconducting
fault-current limiter-magnetic energy storage system, IEEE Trans.
Energy Convers., 2012, 27, (2), pp. 277295
9 Abbey, C., Joos, G.: Effect of low voltage ride through (LVRT)
characteristic on voltage stability. Proc. IEEE PES General Meeting
2005, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 2005, pp. 19011907
10 Yang, L.H., Xu, Z., Ostergaard, J., Dong, Z.Y., Wong, K.P.: Advanced
control strategy of DFIG wind turbines for power system fault ride
through, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, (2), pp. 713722
11 Xiang, D., Ran, L., Tavner, P.J., Yang, S.: Control of a doubly fed
induction generator in a wind turbine during grid fault ride-through,
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2006, 21, (3), pp. 652662
12 Petersson, A., Harnefors, L., Thiringer, T.: Evaluation of current control
methods for wind turbines using doubly-fed induction machines, IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., 2005, 20, (1), pp. 227235
13 Marques, G.D., Sousa, D.M.: Understanding the doubly fed induction
generator during voltage dips, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2012,
27, (2), pp. 421431
14 Mendes, V.F., Sousa, C.V., Silva, S.R., Rabelo, B.C., Hofmann, W.:
Modeling and ride-through control of doubly fed induction generators
during symmetrical voltage sags, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.,
2011, 26, (4), pp. 11611171
15 Xu, H.L., Hu, J.B., He, Y.K.: Integrated modeling and enhanced control
of DFIG under unbalanced and distorted grid voltage conditions, IEEE
Trans. Energy Convers., 2012, 27, (3), pp. 725736
16 Costa, J.P., Pinheiro, H., Degner, T., Arnold, G.: Robust controller for
DFIGs of grid-connected wind turbines, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
2011, 58, (9), pp. 40234038
17 Anaya-lara O., Jenkins, N.: Fault current contribution of DFIG wind
turbines. IEE Conf. on Reliability of Transmission and Distribution
Networks, London, February 2005
18 Zhao, S., Tseng, K.J., Choi, S.S., Nguyen, T.D., Yao, D.L.: Advanced
control of series voltage compensation to enhance wind turbine ride
through, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2012, 27, (2), pp. 763772
19 Ibrahim, A.O., Nguyen, T.H., Lee, D.C., Kim, S.C.: A fault
ride-through technique of DFIG wind turbine systems using dynamic
voltage restorers, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2011, 26, (3), pp.
871882
20 Abdel-Baqi, O., Nasiri, A.: Series voltage compensation for DFIG wind
turbine low-voltage ride-through solution, IEEE Trans. Energy
Convers., 2011, 26, (1), pp. 272280
21 Flannery, P., Venkataramanan, G.: A fault tolerant doubly fed induction
generator wind turbine using a parallel grid side rectier and series
grid side converter, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2008, 23, (3),
pp. 11261135
22 Lopez, J., Sanchis, P., Roboam, X., Marroyo, L.: Dynamic behavior of
the doubly fed induction generator during three-phase voltage dips,
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2007, 22, (3), pp. 709717
23 Lopez, J., Gubia, E., Olea, E., Ruiz, J., Marroyo, L.: Ride through of
wind turbine with doubly fed induction generator under symmetrical
voltage dips, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2009, 56, (10), pp. 42464254
24 Anaya-lara, O., Hughes, F.M.: Rotor ux magnitude and angle control
strategy for doubly fed induction generators, Wind Energy, 2006, 9,
pp. 479495
25 Hughes, F.M., Anaya-lara, O., Jenkins, N.: Control of DFIG-based
wind generation for power network support, IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., 2005, 20, (4), pp. 19581966
26
Appendix
PG2 = 0.9,
Q6 = 0
|V 1 | = |V 2 | = 1
The rest nodes are PQ nodes, with all the injected active and
reactive power equal to 0.
2. DFIG super-synchronous operating condition (s = 0.1):
Slack node: V 3 = 1/0W
PV node: PG1 = 0.55,
PQ node: P6 = 1.0,
PG2 = 0.95,
Q6 = 0
|V 1 | = |V 2 | = 1
The rest nodes are PQ nodes, with all the injected active and
reactive power equal to 0.
7.2
1 + 0.024s 1 + 0.035s
1 + 0.004s 1 + 0.05s
kip = 0.05
kim = 0.01,
1 + 0.4s
1 + 2s
kiv = 0.5
kia = 0.01,
1 + 0.4s
1 + 2s
www.ietdl.org
Compensator loop: gps (s) = 3
Limiter loop: upss max = 0.5,
1
1 + 0.49 s
2
27