Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Dr.G.Sidhartha Kiran
Computer as a Teacher
The computer can never replace a teacher. It merely
complements a teacher's role. However, in some areas of
interaction, it may be better than a human teacher. e.g.,
1. It never gets bored or irritated
2. It never makes mistakes on its own
3. It permits individual attention
4. It permits the learner to decide his own pace of learning.
5. A well created lesson uses multi-media to enrich and enhance
learning.
c)Laboratory mode
d) Case-simulation mode
e) Consultant Mode
f) Manager of Educational Process
b) Tutorial mode:
In this mode, a module (lesson)consists of presentation of the
content in a structured way,task-prescription to elicit learner's
response, and instant feedback and reinforcement to the
learner.
c) Laboratory mode:
The computer could be programmed to simulate a variety of
biological processes to supplement or do away with laboratory
experiments.
The learner explores various options and learns by inference.
d) Case-simulation mode:
A variety of diagnostic and therapeutic problems of the
patient management type could be effectively computerised.
This has proved quite useful in learning problem-solving, the
highest cognitive domain.
Simulated Patient Management Problems (SPMP) is one of
the most useful areas of CAL in medical education.
e) Consultant Mode:
It is one of the frontier areas now.
Knowledge based "Expert" program-mes have been devised using
artificial intelligence.
Advantages of CAL
CAL applications are of particular value for highly visual content, such
as demonstrations of surgical procedures and technical skills.
While print-based learning materials are mainly limited to text and
image based information, CAL can additionally utilize multimedia
capabilities.
CAL can be designed to incorporate not only text images but also
video to enhance student learning.
Disadvantages of CAL
The development of hightech computerassisted learning
programmes is labour intensive, requiring appropriate hardware,
backup and frequent upgrading.
Debate
Currently, there is debate as to the effectiveness of CAL as a
teaching modality.
There are several studies that have compared the use of
CAL to other methods of education.
Many of these studies show that there is no significant
difference in knowledge and skill retention between those
taught didactically or by seminar when compared to those
taught by computer teaching modules.
some studies suggesting that other forms of teaching (e.g.
didactic lecture) are still superior.
References
1. Gunderman R. Information Overload. J Am Coll Radiol 2006. 3(7): 495-7.
2. Fall L, Berman N, Smith S, et al. Multi-institutional development and utilization of a computer-assisted learning program for the pediatric
clerkship: the CLIPP project. Acad Med 2005. 80(9): 847-55.
3. Sklar B. Introduction to online CME. Fam Pract Manag 2003. 10(3): 59-60.
4. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ 2001. 322(7277): 40-4.
5. Gordon J, Oriol N, and Cooper J. Bringing good teaching cases "to life": a simulator-based medical education service. Acad Med 2004. 79(1):
23-7.
6. Knowles M. Self directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. 1975, New York: Association Press.
7. Brandt M and Davies E. Visual-spatial ability, learning modality and surgical knot tying. Can J Surg 2006. 49(6): 412-6.
8. Carr M, Reznick R, and Brown D. Comparison of computer-assisted instruction and seminar instruction to acquire psychomotor and
cognitive
knowledge of epistaxis management. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999. 121(4): 430-4.
9. Rogers D, Regehr G, Yeh K, and Howdieshell T. Computer-assisted learning versus a lecture and feedback seminar for teaching a basic
surgical technical skill. Am J Surg 1998. 175(6): 508-10.
10. Association of American Medical Colleges. MedEd Portal. 2007; Available at: www.aamc.org/mededportal (accessed August 21, 2007)