Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TLIST
Institute of Textile Materials Technology and Design, 3 Institute of Technical Physics, 1,2,3 Riga Technical University
Azenes str. 14/24, Riga, LV-1048, Latvia
1
I. INT RODUCTION
Textile materials have intrinsic properties that make them
extremely valuable: they are flexib le, light weight, strong, soft,
etc. Because of this, they are excellent objects for impart ing
additional functionalit ies.
The techniques used to functionalize text ile surface
generally are grouped into two major categories: chemical and
physical. Physical techniques are based on the use of nonchemical forces to control the deposition of functional
material on the text ile surface[1]. Ho wever, this paper
describes the physical surface functionalization technique, i.e.
magnetron sputtering and evaluation of its application to
natural textile coating.
Sputter technologies provide alternative approaches to the
functionalization of textiles using metallic, o xide, poly mer
and composite coatings to achieve various performance
properties [1]. Physical sputtering is a non-thermal vaporizat ion
process during which the surface atoms are physically ejected
fro m a solid surface. This mo mentu m t ransfer takes place
fro m an ato mic-sized energetic bo mbarding part icle which is
usually a gaseous ion, accelerated fro m plas ma[2].
Magnetron sputtering techniques are widely used to
deposit different types of coatings, including metallic,
polymer and co mposite coatings on different substrates[1]. In
magnetron sputtering equipment, parallel magnets are p laced
near the target surface which constrains the motion of
secondary electrons ejected by the bombarding ions to the
close vicinity of the target surface. The ion current is also
increased by an order of magnitude over conventional diode
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
TLIST
I = I 0 cos
Sputtering Time
Sample Groups
Fabric 1
Fabric 2
Fabric 3
Fabric 4
Fabric 5
Fabric 6
20 seconds
40 seconds
Without Pre-treatment
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
60 seconds
3
3
3
3
3
3
Total: 54
Fabric 1
Fabric 2
Fabric 3
Fabric 4
Fabric 5
Fabric 6
A
A
A
A
A
A
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Total: 54
Total: 108
TLIST
TLIST
Coating thickness, nm
90
60
30
0
20
40
60
TLIST
70%
60%
50%
0,9
40%
0,8
30%
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
angle, degrees
0,7
30
40 50
60
70
I, a.u.
I/I0
80%
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
angle, degrees
0,9
40
50 60
70
1
0,8
I, a.u.
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
angle, degrees
40
50 60
70
non-coated Fabric 3
b
Fig. 16 Processing time and Fabric 1 and 3 structure influences on light
reflection
TLIST
0,9
0,9
0,8
0,8
0,7
0,7
0,6
0,6
I, a.u.
I, a.u.
0,5
0,5
0,4
0,4
0,3
0,3
0,2
0,2
0,1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
angle, degrees
30
40
50 60
0,1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
angle, degrees
70
50 60
70
0,9
0,8
0,7
0,6
I, a.u.
30 40
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
angle, degrees
0,9
30
40
50 60
70
0,8
0,7
0,6
I, a.u.
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
angle, degrees
Fabric 2, sputtering time 40 s
0,9
0,8
0,8
0,7
0,7
0,6
0,4
0,4
0,3
0,3
0,2
30
40
50 60
70
70
0,5
0,5
0,1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
angle, degrees
60
1
0,9
0,2
40 50
0,6
30
non-coated
I, a.u.
I, a.u.
0,1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
angle, degrees
30
40
50 60
70
b
Fig. 19 Acetone solution pre-treatment and washing influences on copper
coated Fabric 2 surface light reflection (deposition time 40 s)
[3]
[4]
[5]
TLIST
[6]