Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Summary
Introduction
The pressure to reduce broiler feeding costs is
constant, since it represents approximately 70% of
the total production cost. To obtain better precision
in the formulation of broiler diets, it is necessary
to know the exact composition and energy value
of each ingredient, as well as their limitations.
Several studies have been carried out to update the
nutritional values of feedstuffs traditionally utilized
in the formulation of diets for poultry, and also to
determine the nutritional value of new feedstuffs
and byproducts, which make the composition tables
more complete and accurate. In addition to enabling
the development and qualification of technicians,
graduate students, and professors/scientists, the
XXIV
weight
=
Weight
variation,
in
grams.
2
Values
expressed
in
grams.
Nery
et
al.
(2006)
concentrate or soy
Area: Nutrition and Feed Technologies August 07
XXIV
Use of glutamine in
vegetable diets for broiler
chickens
The addition of Glutamine
(GLN) or a product containing
Glutamine and Glutamic Acid
(GLN-GLU) in diets for piglets
immediately post-weaning is
very common in Brazil, and
in many other Latin American
countries. In an excellent review
by Watford et al. (2011), the
authors concluded that even
though these amino acids are
classified as non-essential, there
is scientific evidence that GLN can
promote benefits not only during
hyper-catabolic phases, but also
improving growth performance of
healthy mammals.
The utilization of GLN or GLNGLU in broiler diets has been
scantly studied, although there
are scientific justifications to
evaluate the use of these amino
acids in diets during the first days
of age. Lora (2006) evaluated the
effect of different inclusion levels
(0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1%) of
a commercial product containing
GLN-GLU in corn-soybean meal
diets, with broiler chickens from 1
to 44 days of age. Weight gain,
carcass weight, breast weight and
bird uniformity improved linearly
Table 3 - Weight gain, carcass weight, breast with bone weight and
uniformity of broiler chickens at 44 days of age fed diets containing
different gln-glu levels.
GLN-GLU
level (%)
Weight
Gain (g)
Carcass
Weight(g)
Breast w/
Bone (g)
Uniformity
1%
0.00 %
2789
2235
748
67
0.25%
2803
2201
769
78
0.50 %
2861
2264
770
80
0.75 %
2887
2316
785
76
1.00 %
2879
2294
771
82
ANOVA
L = (P<0.08)
L = (P<0.06)
CV %
4.62
4.83
L = (P<0.05) L = (P<0.007)
3.31
11.61
Bird uniformity
acquires economic
Table 2 - Effect of early posthatch feeding in the transport tray on performance, heart i m p o r t a n c e
and bursa of broiler chickens.
during slaughter
Treatment
7 days
35 days
house processing,
Gain, g Heart, %LW Bursa,%LW
Gain, g Conversion making it possible
to maximize the
Fast
123.2 b
0.79 b
0.13 b
2025 b
1.562 b
use of machines,
Early Posthatch Diet 130.2 a
0.82 a
0.15 a
2073 a
1.537 a
reducing carcass
1 - 5 g / chick of Pre-housing diet ground in the transport box Brito (2007) Personal communication. and parts outliers,
and improving the
appearance of the
final market products. In an experiment developed
at Federal University of Viosa, as part of the
Doctorate Thesis of Valdir Ribeiro Jr. (in progress),
four dietary inclusion levels (0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6%)
of GLN or GLN-GLU were evaluated with broiler
Age = 21 days
Level
(%)
GLN
GLN-GLU
X Level
GLN
0.0
74.8
72.8
73.8
73.5
72.5
73.0
0.2
79.7
76.8
78.3
81.3
72.9
77.1
0.4
83.3
79.9
81.6
76.2
80.3
78.2
0.6
82.1
78.7
80.3
79.5
75.8
77.6
X Source
80.0
77.0
78.5
77.6
75.4
76.5
ANOVA
Interaction (ns)
L(0.01)
GLN-GLU X Level
Interaction (ns)
L(0.05)
XXIV
chickens in the period of 1 to 9 and 1 to 21 days
of age. Weight gain was not affected by the dietary
levels of the amino acids; however, feed conversion
and uniformity improved linearly (P<0.05) in the
two studied periods (Table 5).
Table 5 - Equations to estimate the metabolizable
energy of feedstuffs for birds.
Vegetable feedstuffs
MEpoultry = 4.31 CPd + 9.29 Fd + 4.14 NFEd
Animal origin-feedstuffs and fat
MEpoultry = 4.31 CPd + 9.29 Fd
Composition of feedstuffs:
metabolizable energy
XXIV
Composition of feedstuffs:
amino acids
Available
phosphorus
equivalency of phytases
There is an increased demand for inorganic
phosphorus (P) by agricultural and livestock systems,
and production is expected to peak around 2030.
Phosphorus is the most expensive mineral in poultry
diets, and has been the subject of many studies,
because of the environmental impact caused by the
excretion of non-digested P.
XXIV
Table 8 - Available phosphorus equivalency from 3-phytase obtained with prediction equations of weight
gain and bone ash for broiler chickens1 (Rodrigues et al., 2012).
Parameter
Linear Equations
FTU/kg of diet
Wt Gain
0.0758
0.1300 0.1843
Bone Ash
XAvail.P(%)=0.04745+0.00009897* Phyt3
0.0969
0.1464 0.1959
0.0864
0.1382 0.1901
500
Mean
1000
1500
0.0511
0.0835 0.1366
Bone Ash
0.0721
0.1098 0.1636
Mean
0.0616
0.0967 0.1501
Overall Mean
0.0740
0.1175 0.1701
1 - Data used for the equations: Avail.P. = 23 experiments, n=116; Phyt3= 23 experiments, n=113.
Linear Equations
FTU/kg of diet
500
1000
1500
Wt Gain
0.1316
0.1978
0.2640
Bone Ash
0.1125
0.1620
0.2114
0.1220
0.1799
0.2377
Wt Gain
0.1316
0.2390
Bone Ash
0.1189
0.1677
Mean
0.0827
0.1252
0.2034
Overall Mean
0.1024
0.1526
0.2206
Mean
Non Linear Equations
1 - Data used for the equations: Avail.P= 17 experiments, n=103; Phyt6= 22 experiments, n=95
XXIV
Females
Dig. Lys = 0.07 W0.75 + (14.42 + 2.859 W - 0.292 W2) G; R2 = 0.79
In which: W = Average Weight, kg; G: Daily Gain, kg.
Available phosphorus (g/day)
Males and Females
8 21 days: Avail.P/day = 0.026 W0.75 + 5.2 G
22 56 days: Avail.P /day = 0.026 W0.75 + 5.5 G
Total Ca: Available P Ratio Recommended: 2.13
Requirements of lysine
and available phosphorus
21
0.886
74.7
115.2
1.295
1.124
0.412
0.358
0.750
28
1.464
91.3
158.6
1.698
1.071
0.537
0.338
0.724
35
2.131
98.8
192.3
1.963
1.021
0.589
0.306
0.656
42
2.833
97.7
209.0
2.040
0.976
0.590
0.282
0.605
XXIV
Table 12 - Effect of dig. Lysine on feed conversion, lysine deposition and breast filet
yield of broiler males from 10 to 21 and 22 to 35 days.
Experiment 10 21 days
Experiment 22 35 days
Dig Lys
(%)
Feed
Conv
Lys Deposition
(g / day)
Dig. Lys
(%)
Feed
Conv
Breast Filet
Yield (%)
1.06
1.48
0.58
0.92
1.77
23.8
1.12
1.47
0.54
0.98
1.72
24.2
1.16
1.43*
0.60
1.04
1.69*
24.0
1.24
1.46
0.59
1.10
1.73
24.5
1.30
1.44
0.63*
1.16
1.72
25.6*
LL
1.16
1.30
1.04
1.16
Regression
Requirement
Regression
Requirement
L = Linear Effect (P<0.05); Q = Quadratic Effect (P<0.05). Rostagno et al. (2007). * Best
Value.
concentration
of
the amino acid that
produces
maximum
weight gain chosen
as the requirement.
H o w e v e r ,
recommended dietary
amino acid levels
may vary according
to performance and
carcass
parameters.
In
general,
lysine
requirement hierarchy,
as
mentioned
by
Leclercq (1998), would
follow the following
order: weight gain
< breast fillet <
feed conversion <
abdominal fat.
The modern broiler has high capacity of growth
and protein deposition (especially of breast meat),
and the amino acid requirements can be higher
to maximize lean meat yield than to optimize feed
conversion.
In order to study the effect of dietary digestible
lysine level, while maintaining a constant amino acid
to lysine ratio, on broiler performance (10 21
and 22 35 days), lysine deposition (10 - 21 days)
and breast filet yield (22 35 days), Rostagno et
al (2007) carried out two experiments with Cobb
broilers. Table 13 shows the experimental results,
demonstrating that male birds linearly increased
lysine body deposition (Lys. requirement 10 21
days = 1.30%), whereas the requirement for feed
conversion was 1.16%. During the 22 - 35 days
phase, the recommended level of digestible lysine
was 1.04% for feed conversion, and 1.16% for
breast filet yield. These results indicate a 12%
increase in lysine requirement for lean gain
compared to the recommended digestible lysine
for optimal feed conversion rate (Table 13).
Similar results have recently been obtained
at Federal University of Viosa by Pessoa (2012),
who conducted two experiments, as part of
his Doctorate Thesis (In progress), to evaluate
different Methionine + Digestible Cystine/
Digestible Lysine ratios on performance and
breast filet yield of male Cobb broiler chickens.
The main conclusion, based on results shown in
Table 14, is that in order to improve breast yield,
the Methionine + Cystine level must be higher than
for optimum feed conversion.
XXIV
Table 13 - Effect of Met + Cys dig. / Lys Dig. Ratios on performance and breast
filet yield of broilers from 1 to 10 and 11 to 21 days of age.
Experiment 1 10 days
M+C/Lys
Ratio (%)
Weight
Gain (g)
Experiment 11 21 days
Weight
Gain (g)
Feed
Conv
Filet Yield
(%)
65
194.2
1.48
10.3
515.2
1.50
15.0
68
204.9
1.47
10.3
515.6
1.51
15.2
71
210.6*
1.42*
10.8
512.2
1.49
15.4
74
209.4
1.42
10.7
516.3
1.49
16.1
77
210.1
1.42
11.3*
527.5
1.47
16.2
80
204.9
1.43
11.1
529.6*
1.46*
16.3*
Regression
L = Linear Effect (P<0.05); Q = Quadratic Effect (P<0.05). Pessoa (2012).* Best Value.
Table 14 - Performance of male broiler chickens (average vs high) and digestible lysine requirement1.
Phase, Weight Gain, Intake
days
g
g/day g/day
High Performance
Lysine
%2
Phase,
days
Weight,
g
Gain,
g/day
Intake
g/day
Lysine
%2
0-7
184
20.3
23.1
1.250
0-7
179
19.6
24.8
1.25
7-21
788
43.1
65.0
1.097
7-21
886
50.5
75.7
1.106
21-37
2024
77.3
138.9
1.037
21-35
2131
88.9
158.9
1.047
37-49
3040
86.0
192.6
0.928
37-44
3040
99.2
205.4
0.996
1 - Data obtained from Brazilian Tables of 2005 and 2011 (Rostagno et al., 2011). 2 - The ME levels of the diets for the
average and high performance broilers were the same: Pre-starter, 2975; Starter, 3050; Grower, 3150; and Finisher, 3200
kcal/kg
Adjustment of nutritional
requirements andfeeding
cost of broilers
In the model presented
in the Brazilian Tables of
2011(Rostagno et al., 2011), the
nutritional requirements must
be calculated according to the
animal performance. Utilizing
this model, the nutritional level
of the diet for an averageperformance broiler must be
lower than the requirement for
a high-performance broiler. To
illustrate this methodology, data
on the performance of male
broilers published in the Brazilian
Tables of 2005 and 2011 (Table
15) were utilized; the nutritional
requirements of the chickens
Average
Performance
High
Performance
Difference
(High-Average)
3040
3040
--
49
44
-5
Gain, g/day
62.0
69.1
+7.1
Feed Intake, g
5606
5306
-300
56.5
55.6
-0,8
Final weight, g
Age, days
AvailP Intake, g
17.7
17.4
-0.3
ME Intake, kcal
17652
16670
-982
2.15
2.09
-0.06
Average Performance
XXIV
Final considerations
References
BATAL, A.B. and PARSONS, C.M. (2004) Utilization of
various carbohydrates sources as affected by age in
the chick. Poultry Science 83:1140-1147.
BATTERHAM, E.S. (1990) Prediction of the dietary energy
value of diets and raw materials for pigs, in: WISEMAN,
J. & COLE, D.J.A. (Eds) Feedstuff Evaluation, pp. 267281 (London, Butterworths).
10
XXIV
11