Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Clause 1(a) seeks to amend the wording of sub-definition (f) under acceptable
identification which deals currently reads:
a photocopy of the applicable certificate or document referred to in
paragraphs (a) to (e)
to read
a clear, legible and certified copy of the applicable certificate or document
referred to in paragraphs (a) to (e).
Clause 1(b) deletes the word agency and its definition.
Clause 1(c) inserts a further definition of Authority after the term authorised
officer as follows:
Authority means the Road Traffic Infringement Authority, established in terms
of section 3.
It is suggested that you should not be too concerned what the RTIA is called,
etc. since this will not affect you personally.
Clause 1(d) seeks to insert a new definition entitled electronic service below the
definition disqualification period and reads as follows:
electronic service means
(a) communication by means of data messages, including data attached to,
incorporated in or logically associated with, other data that may be
electronically retrieved;
(b) e-mail messages between the Authority and an addressee in an electronic
communication format; or
(c) text messaging by the Authority to the recipients cellular telephone;
It is suggested that you consider this proposed definition very carefully since
its practical application will most certainly have an effect on you. Almost every
process defined in the AARTO Act is entirely reliant on the service of
documents, however the presumption in Section 30(2) of the Act
Page 3
Page 3 of the AARTO Amendment Bill, 2015 contemplates further definitions
amendments and then goes on to list clauses 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Clause 1 deals with Section 4 of the AARTO Act which is titled Objects and
functions of agency.
Clause 2(a) seeks to delete paragraph (e) under subsection (2) which currently
reads:
(e) issuing a warrant in terms of section 21 against an infringer who has failed to
comply with an enforcement order;
Clause 2(b) and (c) seeks to amend the wording of subsection (3) which will be
affected by the deletion of paragraph (c) which currently reads:
executing a warrant in terms of section 21 against an infringer who has failed
to comply with an enforcement order.
Clause 3 deals with Section 13 of the AARTO Act which is entitled Financing of
agency and inserts an additional revenue source for the Authority by inserting
paragraph (dA) which is proposed to read:
Clause 4 deals with Section 15 of the AARTO Act which relates to the banking
account of the RTIA and seeks to amend its wording from:
The agency may, with the approval of the Director-General, open and
maintain one or more accounts with a bank registered finally as a bank in
terms of the Banks Act, 1990 (Act No. 94 of 1990), in which must be
deposited the money received by the agency and from which payments by it
or on its behalf may be made.
to read:
The Authority may, with the approval of the Board, open and maintain one or
more accounts with a bank registered as a bank in terms of the Banks Act,
1990 (Act No. 94 of 1990), in which must be deposited money received by the
Authority and money received from issuing authorities, driving licence testing
centres and registering authorities, and from which payments by [the Authority
or on its behalf may be made.
Clause 5(a) through (c) deals with Section 19B of the AARTO Act which relates to
payments and removes subsections (a) and (b) of subsection (1) which currently
read:
If an infringer makes an insufficient payment to the agency in terms of
this Act in respect of a fine or the cheque used for payment is
dishonoured, a notice as prescribed must be served on the infringer,
informing him or her
(a)
that the full amount owed, including the prescribed fee for
the notice, must be paid within 32 days of service of the
notice; and
(b)
Page 4
Page 4 of the AARTO Amendment Bill, 2015 contains clauses 6 through 9.
Clause 6 deals with Section 20(3) of the AARTO Act which is applicable to the
enforcement order and the amendment of the wording of subsection (3) to delete
the further subsections (a) and (b) which currently reads:
An enforcement order must
(a)
state that the infringer on whom it is served may, not later than 32
days after the date of service of the order, pay the penalty,
representations fee and the fees of the courtesy letter, if any, and
the prescribed fee of the enforcement order to the agency at the
specified place and in the specified manner, and that the
prescribed demerit points will be recorded in the national
contraventions register; and
(b)
and in the specified manner, and that the prescribed demerit points will be
recorded in the National Road Traffic Offences Register.
Clause 7 deals with Section 21 of the AARTO Act which contemplates a warrant.
This warrant should not be confused with a criminal warrant of arrest since it referred
to a civil warrant of execution.
This amendment repeals Section 21 of the AARTO Act and therefore removes the
possibility of a civil warrant of execution for the seizure of your goods should you not
pay an AARTO infringement notice.
Clause 8 deals with Section 22 of the AARTO Act, which is entitled Trial. It is
important to note that this section does not contemplate a criminal trial for offences
defined as a criminal offence in Schedule 3 of the AARTO Regulations. In fact, the
issuing of criminal summonses for offences is not contemplated anywhere in the
AARTO Act.
Section 22(1) of the AARTO Act currently reads:
If
(a)
(ii)
the
issuing
authority
who
must
cancel
the
infringement notice; or
(b)
and the issuing authority must issue a summons in terms of the Criminal
Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977)
and replaces it with:
If an infringer elects to be tried in court
(i)under section 17 (1) ( f ) (iv), the issuing authority must cancel the
infringement notice; or
(ii)
and the issuing authority must issue a summons in terms of the Criminal
Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977).
Clause 9 deals with Section 30 of the AARTO Act which is entitled Service of
documents.
Clause 9(a) proposes to amend the current wording of subsection (1) from:
Any document required to be served on an infringer in terms of this Act, must
be served on the infringer personally or sent by registered mail to his or her
last known address
to read as follows:
Any document required to be served on an infringer in terms of this Act, must be
served on the infringer as prescribed including by postage or electronic service.
It is suggested that this amendment will have a direct impact upon you and
therefore, you should consider what is being proposed very carefully and
consider making your own submission on it.
Clause 9(b) proposes to amend the current wording of subsection (2) from:
A document which is sent by registered mail in terms of subsection (1), is
regarded to have been served on the infringer on the tenth day after the date
which is stamped upon the receipt issued by the post office which accepted
It is suggested that that this amendment will also have a direct impact upon
you and therefore, you should consider what is being proposed very carefully
and consider making your own submission on it.
Page 5
Page 5 of the AARTO Amendment Bill, 2015 contains clauses 10 through 13.
Clause 10 deals with the amendment of Section 32 of the AARTO Act which is
entitled Apportionment of penalties. It proposes to amend subsections (1) and (2)
and inserts two further subsections (2) and (3).
Subsection (1) currently reads:
Any penalty received by the agency in terms of this Act must be paid over
monthly, after deduction of an amount equal to the discount contemplated in
section 17 (1) (d), to the issuing authority under whose authority the
infringement notice was issued, and if it was not issued under the authority of
such authority, to the issuing authority within whose area of jurisdiction the
infringement was committed.
and is proposed to be amended to read:
Any penalty received by the Authority in terms of this Act must, as prescribed, be
paid over to the issuing authority that issued the infringement notice, after
deduction of an amount equal to the discount contemplated in section 17(1)(d).
It is suggested that who gets what portion of the penalty (fine) paid by an
infringer is not of much interest to the ordinary person.
It is again suggested that who gets what portion of the penalty (fine) paid by
an infringer is not of much interest to the ordinary person.
This proposed insertion has obviously arisen out of the noncompliance of the
Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD) with the current
Section 30(1) of the AARTO Act by posting documents by ordinary domestic
mail as opposed to serving by registered mail which occurred from 1 April
2010 to 21 December 2012 (30 months).
This violation of the prescripts of the Act was only halted due to the complaint
that JPSA brought to the Public Protector in June 2011, which in turn resulted
in mounting political pressure from opposition parties in Parliament. In
December 2014, the Public Protector found the City of Johannesburg and the
JMPD to have engaged in maladministration.
What you need to consider about this provision is the fact that the Authority
(RTIA) is NOT the sole point of payment available to alleged infringers.
Issuing authorities may and often do receive direct payment.
You also need to consider whether you regard the RTIA withholding payment
to the issuing authority until such time as it complies with the Act (and then
paying them over to them) is sufficient sanction to deter unlawful practices by
issuing authorities.
Clause 12 deals with the proposed substitution of certain words and expressions
and changes the name of the Road Traffic Infringement Agency to the Road Traffic
Infringement Authority, as well as changing the name of the National
Contraventions Register to National Road Traffic Offences Register.