Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TAX ?
and
playing.
Two
claimed
helps
funds
involving
something
that
form
of
sumptuary
which
are
regarded
socially
many
from
initiatives
sin
taxes
relevant
to
in
develop
WHY
DO
GOVERNMENT
SUPPORTS
SINFUL
TAX ?
that
the
tobacco
and
their medication.
The ethical, clinical and fiscal
Proponents
consumption
argue
of
illustration,
anaesthesiologists
Mayo
clinic
Dr.
Michael
high-satisfactory
which
recommend,
WHY
DO
SOME
OPPOSITION
CRITICS
increasing
that
tax
for
people
proponents
illustration
who
smoke'
tax
in
nature
and
that
the
terrible humans
pay a higher
evaluate
estimated
wellbeing
disadvantages.
annual
wellbeing
estimated
wellbeing
that
lifestyles
used
input
parameters
on
data
from
the
Behaviours
Netherlands.
economic
activities
Discouraging Harmful
but
certain
hazardous
behaviours.
For
than
few
wellbeing
issues
negative
wellness
impacts
of
states
like
California
are
alcohol,
ammunition
tobacco,
in
fiscal
firearms
year
and
2009."
Effectiveness
Even as discouraging dangerous habits is
ordinarily mentioned as one of the most
targets of sin taxes, it is doubtful whether
Economic Activity
Sin taxes can potentially
outcomes in diminished monetary
or
not sin taxes are certainly robust at
discouraging unsafe conduct. In line with
as
basic
specifications
so
'Sinful tax'
for alcohol
Texas taxes various types of alcohol
(mixed beverages, liquor, beer, wine, and
malt liquor). Alcohol taxes generated
$784.1 million in fiscal 2008. The tax on
mixed beverages is 14 percent of gross
receipts. The state shares revenue from the
tax with the cities and counties, which each
receive 10.7143 percent of tax collections
in
their
jurisdiction.
The
state
last
pay
the
tax.
'Sinful tax'
for Tobacco
third
reduction
in
school
property taxes.
Before that, the state last
raised the tax in 1990.
Texas tax rate is now the
17th highest among the
states.
In
cigarette
2008,
tax
the
generated
tax.
currently
Congress
is
considering
'Sinful tax'
for Junk
Foods
Obesity
is
problem,
tax
on
Recent
data
analyzed
by
'Sinful tax'
for Gambling
Taxing sin that is legal and legalizing sin to
tax it are altogether different things. Thus,
expanding
gambling
in
Texas
is
because
of
its
social
consequences.
Gambling has high social costs. One recent
estimate of the social costs of gambling,
such as increased crime, lost work time,
bankruptcies and financial hardships faced
by the families of gambling addicts,
concludes that casino gambling causes up
to $289 in social costs for every $46 of
economic benefit. Gambling can cause
addictive and destructive behaviour much
like alcohol and drugs.
However,
about
10
percent
of
the
among
lower-income
from
the
Texas
Lottery