0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
52 Ansichten2 Seiten
Rodolfo L. Lauredo, owner of a demolished house in Taytay, Rizal, believes the demolition was unjust, unlawful, and inhumane. The demolition violated provisions of the Urban Development Housing Act that require at least 30 days notice and consultations with affected communities. No notice was given to residents before demolition, and no consultations occurred regarding resettlement. Additionally, required signatures from agencies like HUDCC and PCUP were missing from demolition orders. Lauredo requests PHP 200,000 from the Mayor to compensate for financial, emotional, and moral damages caused by the unlawful demolition.
Rodolfo L. Lauredo, owner of a demolished house in Taytay, Rizal, believes the demolition was unjust, unlawful, and inhumane. The demolition violated provisions of the Urban Development Housing Act that require at least 30 days notice and consultations with affected communities. No notice was given to residents before demolition, and no consultations occurred regarding resettlement. Additionally, required signatures from agencies like HUDCC and PCUP were missing from demolition orders. Lauredo requests PHP 200,000 from the Mayor to compensate for financial, emotional, and moral damages caused by the unlawful demolition.
Rodolfo L. Lauredo, owner of a demolished house in Taytay, Rizal, believes the demolition was unjust, unlawful, and inhumane. The demolition violated provisions of the Urban Development Housing Act that require at least 30 days notice and consultations with affected communities. No notice was given to residents before demolition, and no consultations occurred regarding resettlement. Additionally, required signatures from agencies like HUDCC and PCUP were missing from demolition orders. Lauredo requests PHP 200,000 from the Mayor to compensate for financial, emotional, and moral damages caused by the unlawful demolition.
Mayor, Municipality of Taytay Rizal Taytay Municipal Hall, Don Hilario Cruz Street Taytay, Rizal, 1920
I, Rodolfo L. Lauredo, the owner of the said house demolished in
Highway 2000, Taytay, Rizal last June 2015. I, along with the other members of the community, believe that the demolishment that took place was unjust, unlawful, and inhumane. This belief is derived from the law itself. According the R. A. 7279, otherwise known as the Urban Development Housing Act of 1992 Art. VII Sec. 28, the following items shall be mandatory in the execution of eviction or demolition orders involving underprivileged or homeless citizens. (1) Notice upon the effected persons or entities at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of eviction of demolition; (2) Adequate consultations on the matter of settlement with the duly designated representatives of the families to be resettled and the affected communities in the areas where they are to be relocated. These provisions explicitly stated in the law have been violated by the citys demolishment team, thus, rendering the demolition that occurred, unjust, unlawful, and inhume. No notice of demolition was received by any of the residents of the said community. The order was only given to the community the day the demolition team of the city arrived to the said area despite the fact of it being released already last April 2014. There was in no way that the residents of the affected community were informed of the upcoming demolition. No consultations on the matter of settlements took place with the representatives of the families being affected, thus explicitly violating the provision above.
The eviction order released by the Tanggapan ng Punong
Bayan of Taytay Rizal , which was signed by the Municipal Administrator, Grace Dei G. De Leon, for Municipal Mayor, Hon. Janet De Leon Mercado, did also not contain the signatures of the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) Representative, Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor's (PCUP) Representative, Municipal Local Government Operations Officer (MGLOO) Representative, and the Liga ng Barangay President, despite the fact of them being signatories to this order.
With these arguments being stated, we then ask the Municipal
Mayor to pay for the damages incurred by the damaged party the amount of PHP Two Hundred Thousand Pesos (P200,000). The unfortunate and unlawful event that took place in the community has brought financial, emotional, and moral damages to the member, and I believe that it is just for the person/s responsible of this act to compensate for it.