Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
org/sceaStudyofCivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA)Volume3,2014
UsingSEPSasANovelModifierforBitumen
NazaninMoshtagh1,FarhadZafari2,MohammadRahi3,HosseinNazockdast4
PolymerEngineeringDepartment,AmirkabirUniversityofTechnology,Tehran,Iran
1,2
HeadofResearchandDevelopmentDepartment,PasargadCompany,Tehran,Iran
AssociatedProfessor,PolymerEngineeringDepartment,AmirkabirUniversityofTechnology,Tehran,Iran
nazanin.moshtaq@gmail.com;2farhad_zafari@yahoo.com;3mohamadrahi@yahoo.com;4nazdast@aut.ac.ir
Abstract
Theuniqueproperties(highflexibility,hightraction,sealing
abilities, heat resistant) of Kratons such as SEPS and their
considerable effects on improving the original bitumen
properties, encouraged using these additives as effective
modifiers.Inthisstudy,softbaseasphalthasbeenmodified
byadditionofdifferentamountsofSEPSandtherheological
propertiesandhotstoragestabilityofthePolymerModified
Bitumens(PMBs)havebeenstudied,severaltestshavebeen
conductedtodeterminetheresultedeffects,suchasclassical
tests and rheological analaysis. The results of classic tests
showedthataddingSEPSreducedpenetration,temperature
susceptibility, and ductility and increased the softening
point and elastic recovery. Rheological properties of
modified specimens were investigated with DSR in
temperature sweep and frequency sweep and creep tests
before and after aging in RTFO. The results indicated that
the rheology of the modified binders is largely dependent
on the polymer content At low polymer content, the
modified binders showed dispersed polymer particles in a
continuous bitumen matrix. At a sufficiently high polymer
contents, a continuous polymer phase was observed.
Regardless of the nature of the two phases, the storage
stability of the modified binders decreased as polymer
content increased. Polymer modification improved bitumen
rheologicalpropertiessuchastheincreasedelasticresponses
athightemperaturesandthereducedcreepstiffness.Inthis
study the FTIR test was employed to investigate the
chemical bonding changes of neat and polymer modified
asphalt and the results proved the strong interaction
between polymer and bitumen due to creation of new
chemicalbonds.
Keywords
SEPS;PolymerModifiedBitumen;Rheology;Aging;FTIR
Introduction
Intherecentdecadesasphaltsarewidelyemployedin
several applications, but the most important one is
related to the paving industry. Unfortunately, high
temperature rutting and low temperature cracking of
asphalt cement or coating layer due to severe
temperaturesusceptibilitylimitsitsfurtherapplication.
Therefore, the improvements of functional properties
70
StudyofCivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA)Volume3,2014www.seipub.org/scea
AgingProcedures
Allbitumensampleswereagedbyrollingthinfilm
oven test (RTFOT) (ASTM D method 287285) in
ordertosimulatetheplanthotmixingprocess.
2)
StorageStability
Thehotstoragestabilitytestconsistsofkeepingthe
PMB in a test tube stored in a vertical position at
180 oCfor721handthentakingsamplesfromthe
top and bottom part was done. The difference of
TR&B between the two samples indicates what
proportionoftheSEPSisseparatedandmigratesto
the lower or upper layers of the tube, due to its
density difference in comparison with asphalt and
the complex modulus of top and bottom parts
shows how they are different in terms of
rheologicalproperties.
ClassicalTests
All of the asphalt binder samples were analyzed
through the following classical methods: Penetration
(ASTM method D5), Ring and Ball Softening Point
(ASTM method D36 and Elastic Recovery using a
Ductilometer (ASTM method 608497) and Rotational
Viscosity(ASTMmethodD4402).Theelasticrecovery
test evaluates the ability of the binder to stretch and
recoverelastically.
DynamicRheologicalCharacterization
Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) MCR101 from
Austria Anton Paar Company was used in this study
forgenerating the dynamic data for the bitumen. The
parametersfortheDSRareinthefollowingTABLES1
and 2. The repeated shear creep test with a loading
and recovery period was conducted on bitumen by
DSR. The creep tests were done under 2 fixed shear
stressesof100and3200Pawithtotally100(s)loading
timeand100(s)recoverytimeat50oC.
TABLE1PARAMETERSFORFREQUENCYSWEEP
Temperature(C)
Da(mm)
10,20
8
30,40,50,60
25
aDiameteroftheplate
bGapbetweentheplates
cSweepfrequency
Hb(mm)
2
1
Frec.(rad/s)
0.11000
0.11000
TABLE2PARAMETERSFORTEMPERATURESWEEPTEST
Temperature(C)
D(mm)
h(mm)
Fre.(rad/s)
Strain(%)
Temperaturerisingrate
30oCto90oC
25
2
10rad/s
1%
2oc/min
Sample
Elastic
Softeningpoint Penetration Ductility
oC
(mm)
(cm) recovery(%)
neatbitumen
43.3
108
160
bitumen+2%
SEPS
46.5
76
52
15
bitumen+4%
SEPS
78.3
56
47.6
100
bitumen+6%
SEPS
87.9
45
47
100
71
www.seipub.org/sceaStudyofCivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA)Volume3,2014
RotationalViscosity(mPa.s)
1.00E+05
basebitumen
2%SEPS
1.00E+04
4%SEPS
6%SEPS
1.00E+03
1.00E+02
1.00E+01
1.00E+00
80
100
120
140
160
Temperature(C)
180
200
FIG.1ROTATIONALVISCOSITYVS.TEMPERATURE
TemperatureoC
Top
44.3
Bottom
44.3
TtopTbottom
0
47.4
47.6
0.2
77.4
76.9
0.5
82.7
73.9
8.8
72
basebitumen
0.6
2%SEPS
0.5
4%SEPS
0.4
6%SEPS
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.1 0
0.2
20
40
60
80
100
0.3
0.4
Temperature [C]
FIG.2THEISOCHRONALPLOTOFSEPARATIONINDEX(Is)
FORBINDERSAT10RAD/S.
RheologicalProperties
TABLE4STORAGESTABILITYOFBINDERS
Samples
Neatbitumen
Bitumen+2%
SEPS
Bitumen+4%
SEPS
Bitumen+6%
SEPS
astheseparationindex,Is.DSRresultsobtainedat10
rad/sareplottedinFIG.2.
Is at10rad/s[1]
StudyofCivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA)Volume3,2014www.seipub.org/scea
Complexmodulus[Pa]
Phaseangle[]
2%SEPS
90
4%SEPSaged
80
6%SEPSaged
70
basebitumenaged
60
50
40
1.00E+09
30
1.00E+08
20
1.00E+07
10
1.00E+06
1.00E+00
1.00E+02
basebitumenaged
1.00E+05
1.00E+04
1.00E+06
1.00E+08
Complexmodulus[Pa]
1.00E+04
2%SEPSaged
FIG.4THEBLACKDIAGRAMOFRTFOAGEDSAMPLESAT30
1.00E+03
4%SEPSaged
1.00E+02
6%SEPSaged
1.00E+01
1.00E+00
0.0001
0.01
100
AngularFrequency[1/s]
10000
1.E+06
basebitumenunaged
1.E+05
2%SEPSunaged
4%SEPSunaged
1.E+04
6%SEPSunaged
1.E+03
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
30
40
50
60
70
Temperature[C]
80
90
FIG.5(A)COMPLEXMODULUSOFUNAGEDSAMPLES
1.E+06
1.E+05
Storagemodulus[Pa]
Complexmodulus[Pa]
FIG.3THEMASTERCURVEOFRTFOAGEDSAMPLESAT30
1.E+04
basebitumenunaged
1.E+03
2%SEPSunaed
1.E+02
4%SEPSunaged
6%SEPSunaged
1.E+01
1.E+00
1.E01
20
40
60
Temperature [C]
80
100
FIG.5(B)STORAGEMODULUSOFUNAGEDSAMPLES
73
www.seipub.org/sceaStudyofCivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA)Volume3,2014
1.E+06
StorageModulus [Pa]
2%SEPSunaged
100
basebitumenaged
2%SEPSaged
4%SEPSaged
6%SEPSaged
1.E+05
basebitumenunaged
Tan(delta)[1]
modifiedbinders.Thesechangesaremainlyduetothe
oxidative hardening of the bitumen. FIG. 6(a), (b), (c)
plotted complex modulus (G*), Storage modulus (G)
anddampingfactorTanvs.temperaturerespectively
forRTFOagedsamples.
1.E+04
4%SEPSunaged
1.E+03
6%SEPSunaged
1.E+02
10
1.E+01
1.E+00
1
40
60
Temperature[C]
80
100
1.E01
FIG.5(C)DAMPINGFACTOROFUNAGEDSAMPLES
74
30
40
50
60
70
Temperature [C]
80
90
FIG.6(A)STORAGEMODULUSFORRTFOAGEDSAMPLES
1.E+06
1.E+05
ComplexModulus [Pa]
20
1.E+04
1.E+03
basebitumenaged
2%SEPSaged
4%SEPSaged
6%SEPSaged
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Temperature [C]
FIG.6(B)COMPLEXMODULUSFORRTFOAGEDSAMPLES
1000
basebitumenaged
DampingFactor [1]
2%SEPSaged
4%SEPSaged
100
6%SEPSaged
10
1
30
40
50
60
70
Temperature [C]
80
90
FIG.6(c)DAMPINGFACTORFORRTFOAGEDSAMPLES
EffectoftemperatureonG*/sinisshowninFIG.7for
both aged and unaged samples. The Superpave
parameter G*/sin was specified as the stiffness
indicator for evaluating the rutting resistance of both
unmodifiedandpolymermodifiedbinders.Ruttingis
definedastheprogressiveaccumulationofpermanent
deformation of each layer of the pavement structure
under repetitive loading. Obtained results indicate
that for unaged and aged specimens this parameter
considerablyincreasedbyincreasingtheSEPScontent.
StudyofCivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA)Volume3,2014www.seipub.org/scea
35
basebitumenaged
30
2%SEPSaged
25
4%SEPSaged
Strain [1]
6%SEPSaged
20
1.E+06
15
1.E+05
|G*|/sin(delta)[Pa]
10
1.E+04
5
1.E+03
0
basebitumenunaged
1.E+02
2%SEPSunaged
4%SEPSunaged
1.E+01
50
6%SEPSunaged
20
40
60
Temperature[C]
80
100
(a)
1.E+06
|G*|/sin(delta)[Pa]
1.E+05
1.E+04
1.E+03
1.E+02
basebitumenaged
2%SEPSaged
4%SEPS
6%SEPSaged
1.E+01
1.E+00
30
40
50
60
70
Temperature [C]
80
90
(b)
FIG.7RUTTINGFACTORFORUNAGED(A)ANDRTFOAGED
(B)SAMPLES
80
basebitumenunaged
70
2%SEPSunaged
60
4%SEPSunaged
50
6%SEPSunaged
40
30
20
10
0
0
50
150
200
(b)
1.E+00
0
100
Time [s]
100
(a)
150
200
FIG.8THERESULTSOFCREEPTESTOFBITUMENBINDERSAT
AT50OCFOR(A)UNAGEDAND(B)AGEDSAMPLES
75
www.seipub.org/sceaStudyofCivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA)Volume3,2014
FIG.9THEFTIROFBITUMENBINDERS
Conclusion
In comparison with the neat bitumen, SEPS modified
binders demonstrate more resistance to aging and
better properties after RTFO aging, from FTIR results
the creationof new chemical bonds between polymer
andbitumenwasproved.
REFERENCES
Tamimi,A.A,Zubaidy,I.A.H.A,Upadhye,A.Ali,L.(2014).
EuropeanPolymerJournal42(2006)446457.
CivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA),Vo.3,pp.4147.
AcademicPublishers;1999.
modifiers.ConstrBuildMater2005;21(2):32837
WongWG,HanH,HeG,WangK,LuW.Ruttingresponse
binders,J.Assoc.AsphaltPavingTechnologists63(1994)
ofhotmixasphalttogeneralizeddynamicshearmoduli
414449.
ofasphaltbinder.ConstrBuildMater2004;18:399408.
76
WangL,ChangCQ,XingYM(2010).Creepcharacteristicsof
StudyofCivilEngineeringandArchitecture(SCEA)Volume3,2014www.seipub.org/scea
Fuel77(1998)961972.[18]X.Lu,U.Isacsson,J.Ekblad,
Rheological properties of SEBS, EVA and EBA polymer
modifiedbitumens,Mater.Struct.32(1999)131139.
77