Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
5. Principles are moderately linked with the example problem and the
application is average. Has shown average to good understanding of the
SWOT analysis, marketing mix and marketing strategies that have been
identified in the paper. Limitations of the analysis not cited.
Average analysis for example market situation has been discussed in generic
way which is not correct.
On p. 6 opportunities have been discussed in generic way which is should be
company specific.
6. Inadequate analysis is evident and the application lacks clarity, e.g. in
product on p 4, instead of cost description, product features or variants
should have been described. Has shown average understanding of the
SWOT analysis, marketing mix and marketing strategies that have been
identified in the paper. Limitations of the analysis not cited. However, the
justification for selection of marketing strategies and competitors for the
company should have been included.
The depth coverage of problem is good. The student presents the background of
the example averagely and the business organisation with relevant details and
information. The weaknesses and opportunities have been identified against the
backdrop of the marketing mix of the organization in discussion.
1. Shown good understanding of the problem issue and have used sufficient
organisation specific knowledge to prove that. The weaknesses and
opportunities have been clearly identified against the backdrop of the
marketing mix of the organization in discussion as well as the
communication mix and objectives included in the promotion element.
Good work! Keep it going. Pls provide justification as well as cite limitations of
analysis in criteria 2.
Correct referencing and citation would enhance the quality and score.
Pls pay attention to criteria 4 and 5 requirement. Assignment needs to present
information specific to the context to improve the depth coverage of problem.
Correct citation would enhance the quality and score.
Also including academic references will improve the quality of discussion.
Good work! Keep it going. Correct referencing and citation as well as use of subheadings would enhance the quality and score.
Including academic references in discussion will improve the quality of discussion
as well as correct referencing and citation would enhance the quality and score.
Pls pay attention to criteria 4 and 5 requirement. Also justification needs to be
provided as per the question requirement. Good work! Keep it going. Correct
referencing and discussing all elements of assignment appropriately would
enhance the quality and score.
Correct referencing and discussing all elements of assignment appropriately with
more academic references would enhance the quality and score.
Author may require a bit of assistance however with the citations. Initials may
be skipped, only surname and year should suffice, Page numbers are ideally
required to be given only where direct quotations have been used. The