GM 10067

General Motors
Global Part Submission Procedure for Iterative Matching

Index
PART SUBMISSION PROCEDURE
Page
1
MATCHING BODY-IN-WHITE (BIW) PARTS

SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS FOR MATCHING PART SUBMISSION
PART DIMENSIONAL SUBMISSION CRITERIA
DOCUMENTATION FOR MATCHING
WHITE LIGHT SCANNED (WLS) MEASUREMENT DATA REQUIREMENTS: (GM Stamping)
3D SCANNED MEASUREMENT DATA REQUIREMENTS: (GM Outsourced Stamping)
REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADMAPS
REQUIREMENTS FOR PART MARK-UP
2
3
3
4
5
6
7
MATCHING GENERAL ASSEMBLY (GA) PARTS

PART DIMENSIONAL SUBMISSION CRITERIA
DOCUMENTATION FOR MATCHING
REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADMAPS
8
8
9
10
MATCHING BIW AND GA PARTS

MATCHING BUILD PART SUFFIXES
MATCHING BUILD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
SHIPPING LABELS AND IDENTIFICATION TAGS
REVISION HISTORY
11
11
12
12
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT B
ATTACHMENT C
ATTACHMENT D
ATTACHMENT E
ATTACHMENT F
ATTACHMENT G
ATTACHMENT H
ATTACHMENT I
ATTACHMENT J
ATTACHMENT K
ATTACHMENT L1
ATTACHMENT L2
SUPPLIER WARRANT FOR BIW

MATCHING PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
DATUMS TO PRINT CLARIFICATION
CAPABILITY STUDY
DATUM ROADMAP
CMM ONE-PIECE DIMENSIONAL ROADMAP
CMM ONE-PIECE DIMENSIONAL DATA
SUPPLIER WARRANT FOR GA
PANEL MARK-UP EXAMPLE
MARKING OF DATUMS AND OUT-OF-SPEC POINTS FOR WLS PARTS
EXAMPLE OF 3D SCAN MEASUREMENT PRESENTATION
MATCHING BUILD TAGS
BIW PART TAGGING GUIDELINES FOR PRE-SALEABLE MATERIAL
13
14
15
16
17-20
21
22
23
24-31
32
32-34
35
36-41
i
General Motors (GM)

Global Part Submission Procedure for Iterative Matching
PART SUBMISSION PROCEDURE
PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to describe the dimensional, statistical, and part submission
requirements of the Matching Process.
For critical parts, this procedure will describe how to complete a dimensional part mark-up,
associated roadmap, tags, labels, warrants, and other documentation required for parts
submitted to the Matching Builds. This includes parts submitted to a fixture [Exterior Total
Assembly Check Fixture (ETAC), Interior Total Assembly Check Fixture (ITAC)], GA parts
installed to a Matching BIW w/closures, and body parts submitted for the Iterative Match BIW
Build.
BENEFITS
Verifies parts meet dimensional requirements
Verifies parts meet Free State check of datums on check fixtures
Ensures that parts are produced in a controlled process supporting the nominal build
philosophy.
Provides a consistent method to prepare and ship parts to the Matching Build site
SCOPE
All Body-In-White (BIW), General Assembly (GA) - Exterior, Interior and Electrical Matching
Production Parts and Assemblies must meet the requirements of this Procedure. The Tier 1
Supplier is responsible for satisfying these requirements for detail components and assemblies
coming into the assembly plants.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Matching Team:
To provide the part supplier with a review, prior to the Matching Event, of the requirements
within this procedure for part dimensional requirement, part mark-up, roadmap creation, and
completion of all other Matching required documentation.
To evaluate submitted parts in various builds and provide feedback to the part supplier(s).
Feedback to the part supplier will be provided via oral and written communication during
Iterative Matching Build reviews.
Part Supplier: (BIW, GA)

For all parts/assemblies, follow the flow path outlined in Matching Process Flow Diagram for
Component Parts and Assemblies (Attachment B). It is the responsibility of the submission
source to analyze data and verify that dimensional submission requirements are met prior to
submitting parts. For parts not conforming to these requirements the supplier must submit a
corrective action plan.
Conducts the capability study from which the dimensional parts are obtained.
Mark-up the one vehicle set of parts from the capability study that are closest to nominal using
the production checking fixture/gage. Submit the marked - up part as the Matching Part.
Completes and submits documentation as described in the Documentation section (pgs 3, 8)

of this procedure. Exceptions to requirements are to be noted on the GM Supplier Warrant of
Matching Build Material (Attachment A) for BIW parts. GA Suppliers are to follow the PreProduction Part Quality Process (PPQP) and use the PPQP-1 Quality Warrant (Attachment
H).
Revision Date: 03/16/09

Printed document is uncontrolled Controlled version available
within the Global Matching Process website: http://me.body.gm.com/dimensional/gmatch/
Page 1 of 41
PART SUBMISSION PROCEDURE (contd)

SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS FOR MATCHING PART SUBMISSION
1. The goal is to build a Nominal Body and Every part is a Matching part.
2. All parts/assemblies must be made from production tooling and assembly processes. Any exceptions to this
require approval from the Matching Team.
3. Drive part dimensions to nominal. If marked - up part is not at nominal, communicate where it is off nominal. The
supplier must possess knowledge of the quality level of the part. The supplier must submit (per this GM #10067
procedure) the data, roadmaps, and process capability studies in order for the build team to assess the quality
level of the part and help resolve build issues.
4. Provide production parts at the initial submission date and continue to improve the part (drive part to nominal) to
resolve build issues.
5. Work closely with the Iterative Matching Team led by the Vehicle Dimensional Quality Manager (VDQM) or BIW
Quality Lead to resolve part/build issues. Non-conforming parts must be communicated to the Matching
Team along with a corrective action plan.
6. Provide improved parts (when part issues are identified & communicated) in a timely manner, per the Iterative Part
Submission process.
7. Work to the latest part GD&T (datums & tolerances). Parts should be measured using the datum strategy
communicated in the Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T). All critical points are to be driven to
nominal.
8. Work closely with the Matching Team to improve part quality. Provide a part which will ultimately result in a high
quality BIW and a finished vehicle with world-class fit and finish.
9. The supplier will be required to participate in the Iterative Matching Build Events at the build sites per the Matching
Build Plan/Schedule. The Body Quality Lead maintains the Body Matching Schedule. The Build Event Engineer
maintains the GA Matching Schedule.
In Summary:
a. Every part is a Matching part
b. The goal of the Iterative Matching process is to build a Nominal Body
c. Your production tools have to be done by start of Iterative Matching
d. Be ready to ship Production-Tooled Parts by start of Iterative Matching
e. Drive your part (s) to nominal
f. Know your issues with the part (s)
g. Know the Iterative Matching Team and its Leader
h. Work with the Team to resolve part/build issues
i. Be there with the Team to resolve part/build issues
j. Be ready to provide data as needed

Page 2 of 41
MATCHING BIW PARTS

PART DIMENSIONAL SUBMISSION CRITERIA:
1. All parts/assemblies must be made from production tooling and assembly processes. Any exceptions to this
require approval from the Matching Team.
2.
The parts/assemblies must be measured using the production checking systems, following the GD&T.
Measurement point data is required on 5 parts (3 parts for GM Stamping) for Matching. The supplier should
possess information on capability studies, using CMM, White Light Scanning, etc. Submit this dimensional data
in a single file, per Matching Team direction, according to the provided program distribution list (to include the
Dimensional Program Manager - DPM and Body Quality Lead - QL). Data submissions shall be coordinated
with the program Material Required Dates (MRD) and must be received on or before the MRD.
3.
For Carryover (C/O) and Modified C/O parts/assemblies (from the first shipment only), a 1-piece dimensional
part mark-up showing any point out-of-specification and the datum locations must be submitted upon request.
The out-of-specification points and datum locations must be shown on the Roadmap as well. Capability data
may be requested from specific suppliers that have achieved steady state approval (PPAP). The marked - up
panel must be the top or end part in the shipping container for easy identification. See Attachment J for
example of part mark-up for a C/O or C/O modified part.
4.
If the part has received full PPAP, it does not need to be marked. However, current data for PPAPd parts must
be furnished in place of capability studies. At the request of the Matching Team, PPAP parts may be required to
be marked-up. Additional information may be communicated as required for issue resolution.
5.
All datums must be to print. Refer to Attachment C for the Free State Datum Check requirements.
6.
Dimensional conformance requirements parts and assemblies must meet the following guidelines:
Minimum Requirement:
80 % of measurement points for parts/assemblies
must be within the GD&T/Control Drawings
specifications.
NOTE: In those instances where a part is non-conforming, the issue must be elevated to the BIW Quality Lead and
VDQM, without delay , along with a corrective action plan. The Program Management Team will establish regular reviews
to assess the part improvement progress per the GMNA Part Assessment Review (PAR) process.
7.
With subsequent Iterative material submissions, the expectation is that the part will improve dimensionally from
the initial submission requirement of 80%. The goal is to drive the part to nominal. This applies to parts that
meet the minimum requirements and are in the continuous improvement phase, as well as any non-conforming
parts that are in the corrective action phase.
DOCUMENTATION FOR ITERATIVE MATCHING:

1. The source must supply a completed GM Supplier Warrant of Matching Build Material (BIW) (Attachment A) for
each part shipped, including explanations of any warrant requirement deficiencies. A Capability Study for Parts
Submission worksheet (Attachment D) is required to document the statistical information taken from the
capability study of the dimensional parts.
2.
The source is to complete one Roadmap for each part number submitted. A roadmap is a graphical display of
the dimensional part identifying values read and the part location of checks. These readings may be recorded on
a copy of the OP, which will become a roadmap see Gage Operating Procedure Roadmap example
(Attachments E1 thru E4). If White Light Scanning capabilities are available, hard copies of Roadmaps, OnePiece Dimensional and One-Piece Dimensional Graphic are not required. When a Coordinate Measurement
Machine (CMM) is used to measure the part, a CMM One-Piece Dimensional Graphic is required, see example
(Attachment F), along with the CMM Data as seen in example (Attachment G). If other measurement
equipment is being used, e.g. WLS, have available information equivalent to Attachments G. CMM checked parts
also require some portions of the aforementioned copy of the Operating Procedure to be utilized, for purposes of
road mapping the balance of required checks (i.e. holes). For a description of how to complete a roadmap, refer
to the Requirements For Roadmaps section (pg. 6) within this procedure.

Page 3 of 41
WHITE LIGHT SCANNED (WLS) MEASUREMENT DATA REQUIREMENTS: (GM Stamping and TDO only)
1. Part must be in the approved checking fixture position. There may be exceptions to this based on unique panel
designs. These exceptions must be reviewed/approved by the BIW Quality Lead and the VDQM.
2. Each part must be scanned while constrained per the GD&T. Free State Checks are required for all panels. All data
will be posted on the TcAE Manufacturing database and forwarded to the Matching Team by the Die Execution
Manager (DEM).
3. Clamp locations identified by feature labels and any deviations from the GD&T will be reviewed by the Matching
Team. Datums must be marked on the part to support datum coordination in the production weld tools. Part name and
number must be marked on the part. See Attachments I1-I8
4. Cloud data should be processed in CogniTens software; output into the latest approved format.
5. Core View format with the following requirements:
a) Capable of viewing deviation contour plots of different view/zoom and scalable legend.
b) Capable of viewing section cuts in every 50mm in X, Y, and Z directions.
c) Capable of viewing pre-defined points provided with a measurement data set.
d) Upload Core View to TcAE build teams.
6. 3 pc Capability studies saved to Core View reports, PMP points labeled on the outputs.
7. 3 pc Capability Study to be sent with the Core View file. The Part Approval Review (PAR) report may be used in place
of the Capability Study
Special Note: In case of Non-CogniTens scan post-processing software, (example Attachment K) the data submitted
must have comparable capabilities in terms of:
a) Clamp locations indicated in picture files
b) Deviation contour plots
c) Section cut of every 50mm
d) Capability Study
8. Body-in-White warrant (Attachment A) need not be completed.
9. Part Number and Run Date must be written on all parts with permanent pen or paint pen (not on weld surface or Class
A surface). See Attachment J.
10. Part and Shipping tags (Attachment L1 and/or L2) must be completely filled out.
11. Out-of-spec areas must be marked - up on one representative part per shipment. See Attachment I1 to I8.
12. Roadmap, One-piece Dimensional Graphic, and One-piece Dimensional Data are not required.
13. Data for Die Engineering Integration parts is available thru server at:
http://teamgm.gm.com/quickplace/dei_planning/Main.nsf

Page 4 of 41
3D SCANNED MEASUREMENT DATA REQUIREMENTS: (GM Outsourced Stamping)

1. Part must be in the approved checking fixture position. There may be exceptions to this based on unique panel
designs. These exceptions must be reviewed and approved by the BIW Quality Lead and VDQM.
2. Each part must be scanned while constrained per the GD&T. Free State Checks are required for all panels. All data
must be posted on the TcAE Manufacturing database and forwarded to the Matching Team (see Note below).
3. Clamp locations identified by feature labels, and any deviations from the GD&T will be reviewed by the Matching
Team. Datums must be marked on the part to support datum coordination in the production weld tools. Part name and
number must be marked on the part. See Attachments I1-I8.
4. Cloud data should be processed in CogniTens or Polyworks software; output into the latest approved format.
5. CogniTens Core View or Polyworks IMView format must have the following requirements:
a) Capable of viewing deviation contour plots of different view/zoom and scalable legend.
b) Capable of viewing section cuts in every 50mm in X, Y, and Z directions.
c) Capable of viewing pre-defined points provided with a measurement data set.
d) Upload to TcAE Manufacturing as a specified dataset.
6. 5 pc Capability Study saved to CoreView or IMView reports, PMP points labeled on the outputs.
7. 5 pc Capability Study to be sent with the CoreView or Polyworks file.
Special Note: In case of Non-CogniTens or Polyworks scan post-processing software, the data submitted must have
comparable capabilities in terms of:
a) Clamp locations indicated in picture files
b) Deviation contour plots
c) Section cut of every 50mm
d) Capability Study
e) Cloud data in ASCII format or Polygons in STL (Stereo Lithography) format
8. Part Number and Run Date must be written on all parts with permanent pen or paint pen (not on weld surface or Class
A surface). See Attachment J.
9. Part and Shipping tags (Attachment L1) must be completely filled out.
10. Out-of-spec areas must be marked-up on one representative part per shipment. See Attachment I1 to I8.
11. Roadmap, One-piece Dimensional Graphic, and One-piece Dimensional Data are not required.
12. Body-in-White warrant (Attachment A) shall be completed.
Note: Outside suppliers, who dont have access to a server, must generate a CD with data and graphic information.
Outside suppliers must include all required and readable documentation with their data submission. The CD must be
given to the Die Execution Manager (DEM) who will have it loaded into the TcAE Manufacturing database and
forwarded to the Matching Team.

Page 5 of 41
REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADMAPS:

Note: For all points checked, only mark out-of-specification points on the part. Indicate the vehicle position and
directional deviation from nominal of the checks that were out-of-specification using the following abbreviations: HI/LO,
INB/OTB and FWD/AFT
1. Copies of the checking fixture/gage OP/GD&T (available from the Measurement System Engineer), may be used as
Roadmaps for graphically indicating location of part checks performed, along with inspection results. Roadmaps
may be completed while marking up the part itself as described in the Requirements for Part Mark-up section of this
procedure, or may be created afterwards utilizing the marked-up parts as a guide.
2. Operating Procedures typically consist of one or more pages containing a graphic of the part and part checking
requirements including: part loading instructions, datum scheme, clamping sequence, PMP locations, and hole check
requirements. If a part is marked - up with out-of-spec points, this same data is to be documented on the OP/GD&T
Roadmap.
3. The roadmap must have the datum location and clamping sequence recorded as shown in the checking fixture
OP/Instructions (Attachment E1). Any checking fixture auxiliary datum not called out on the checking fixture OP or
the GD&T, yet used in checking the part, must also be documented onto the roadmap. These auxiliary datums must
be approved by the Matching Team / Vehicle Dimensional Quality Manager (VDQM).
4. For BIW parts, record the results of the Free State Datum Checks (FSDC) onto the roadmap at the datum locations,
utilizing the following note: FSDC______ mm, see Attachment E1. If the Free State check fails, Matching Team
approval is required prior to part submission. This approval should come from the Matching Build Engineers signature
on the GM Supplier BIW Warrant of Matching Build (MB) Material (Attachment A).
5. Holes and slots, see table below:
RoadmapRequirementsHoles&Slots(thatareshownontheGD&T)
TypeofCheck
CheckResults
RoadmapNotation
OK
Mark"OK"foreachholeandslotpresent
Sightcheck
NotOK
Runanewpartandreinspect

OK
Mark"OK"foreachholeandslot
AttributeSize(Go/NoGo)
Markas"NotOK",measureforsizeandrecord
NotOK
valuetothenearest0.1mm
OK
AttributeLocation(Plug)
NotOK
Markas"NotOK",measureforlocationand
recordvaluetothenearest0.1mm
6. Obtain actual measurements for all measurement points (which include, but are not limited to, KPC, PMP, and PQC
points) taken from the capability study for this part. Record them next to the corresponding checkpoint location on the
one-piece dimensional roadmap. Include direction of check and deviation to nominal (even if in-tolerance). For an
example of this portion of the roadmap, see Attachment F. If other measurement equipment is being used, e.g.,
WLS, have appropriate information available (Attachment K).
7. Readings that are out-of-specification for variable surface (flush) measurements that were taken on the periphery of
the part, per the checking routine, must be recorded onto the roadmap. Use a dot with a line symbol to indicate where
the exact measurements were out-of-specification on the part, see Attachment E2. Surface features not contained in
the periphery check (example: surfaces on the interior of the part), must be evaluated against the checking fixture
features, e.g. swing templates.
8. Readings that are out-of-specification for variable trim (gap) measurements that were taken on the periphery of the
part, per the checking routine, must be recorded onto the roadmap. Use an arrow symbol to indicate where the exact
measurements were out-of-specification on the part, see Attachment E2.
Note For Non-GM supplied Body parts, the Warrant must accompany the parts in the part-shipping container.
All other documentation, including roadmaps, dimensional data, etc. must be provided by the supplier with each
submission to the Matching Team.
Page 6 of 41

directional deviation from nominal of the checks that were out-of-specification, again using the following abbreviations:
HI/LO, INB/OTB and FWD/AFT
Body Parts:
Prerequisites to marking up a dimensional part:
Checking fixture has passed a Gage R study, 1X10., one operator, one part checked ten times.
Parts numbered to correlate with the Capability study.
Current GD&T and Operating Procedure sheets.
Source has reviewed the requirements within this procedure.
1. From the capability study parts, choose one part closest to the design nominal dimensional values, perform a
complete dimensional measurement and ship to the BIW Matching Build. Additional parts may be requested, if
required.
2. Perform sight-checks for any holes, slots, cutouts, etc., as called for by the OP Instructions. If a hole is missing, a new
part is required.
3. Write on each part in black or yellow permanent or paint pen: part name, part number, engineering change level,
material thickness, run date, MRD , and the parts identifying sequence number from the capability study.
4. Load and clamp the parts onto the checking fixture according to the OP/GD&T Instructions.
5. Location, size and corresponding clamping sequence for all of the checking fixture datums should be drawn on the
part in yellow/black. Also label each datums corresponding GD&T call-out in yellow/black.
6. Record on part any GD&T specified holes and slots that are out-of-tolerance. Holes without GD&T requirements do
not require data unless otherwise specified by the Matching Team.
7. Conduct a Free State Datum Check (FSDC) of BIW parts. Use the part material thickness criteria specified within the
Datums to Print Clarification Free State Check of Datums On Checking Fixture, (Attachment C). Record the FSDC
results onto the part in yellow/black utilizing the following note: FSDC______ mm. If the Free State Check fails,
Matching Team approval is required prior to part submission.
8. Measure specified GD&T holes, slots, cutouts etc., for size in two directions, using calipers or other appropriate
measuring device. All holes that are out-of-specification for size must be marked on the part in white permanent or
paint pen. Denote the actual hole size measured and record to the nearest 0.1mm for each direction. Perform all hole
Go/NoGo checks and plug checks specified by the OP.
the part, per the checking routine, must be recorded on the part in red. Use a dot with attached line symbol to
indicate where the exact measurements were out-of-specification on the part, see example (Attachment E2). Surface
features not contained in the periphery check (example: surfaces on the interior of the part), must be evaluated
against the checking fixture features, e.g. swing templates.
part, per the checking routine, must be recorded on the part in yellow. Use a yellow arrow symbol to indicate where
the exact measurements were taken on the part, see example (Attachment E2).

Page 7 of 41
MATCHING GA PARTS
PART DIMENSIONAL SUBMISSION CRITERIA:
All parts must be made from production tooling and assembly processes. Exceptions to the requirements below for GA
parts are to be noted on the PPQP-1 Quality Warrant (Attachment H) and approved by the VDQM and BIW Quality Lead.
1. The parts must be measured using the production checking system per the GD&T. Measurement point data is
required on 5 parts for Matching submission.
2. All datums must be to print. Refer to the GD&T drawings for the Free State Datum Check requirements.
3. If multiple Tools / Cavities are required to meet the production volumes, the Master Tool / Cavity must be designated
by the component supplier. All parts supplied to the Matching Activities (Current program and any future programs)
must be supplied from the Master Tool and Cavity. The supplier is responsible for ensuring that parts out of the other
tools also meet the requirements of this procedure.
4. Dimensional conformance requirements parts and assemblies must meet the following guidelines:
Build event
KPCs/PQCs/Critical
Measurement Points
One piece full dimensional check
GA Matching 1
(ETAC and ITAC builds)
80% of points must be within

specifications
All other points must be within 150% of

specification.
(Example: If tolerance is +/- 1.0mm,
point must be within +/- 1.5mm.)
GA Matching 2
(Body Build and TAC Builds)
100 % must be within specification

(PPAP Status RequirementPPV MRD)
Must be within specification

(PPAP Status RequirementPPV MRD)
DOCUMENTATION FOR ITERATIVE MATCHING:

1. The source must supply a PPQP-1 Quality Warrant (GA) (Attachment H) for each part shipped, including
explanations of any warrant requirement deficiencies. A Capability Study for Parts Submission worksheet
(Attachment D) is always required for documenting the applicable statistical information taken from the capability
study of the dimensional parts.
2.
The source is to complete one Roadmap for each part submitted. A roadmap is a graphical display of the
dimensional part identifying values, and the location of checks. These readings may be recorded on a copy of the OP,
which will become a roadmap see Gage Operating Procedure Roadmap example (Attachments E1 thru E4). If
scanning capabilities are available, hard copies of Roadmaps, One-Piece Dimensional, and One-Piece Dimensional
Graphics are not required to be submitted. Electronic reports similar to Attachment K should be submitted in place of
the roadmap. For GA parts, when a Coordinated Measurement Machine (CMM) is used to measure the part, a CMM
One-Piece Dimensional Graphic is required, see example Attachment F, along with the CMM Data as seen in
example Attachment G. For a description of how to complete a roadmap, refer to the Requirements For Roadmaps
section (pg. 9) within this procedure.
3. If the part has received full PPAP approval, it does not need to be marked - up. However, current data for PPAP
approved parts must be furnished in place of capability studies. At the request of the Matching Team PPAP parts may
be required to be marked - up. These will be noted on the Purchase Orders (PO) sent to Suppliers.
Page 8 of 41
REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADMAPS:

directional deviation from nominal of the checks that were out-of-specification, using the following abbreviations: HI/LO,
INB/OTB and FWD/AFT
1. Copies of the checking fixture/gage OP/GD&T (available from the Measurement Systems Engineer), may be used as
Roadmaps for graphically indicating location of part checks performed, along with inspection results. Roadmaps
may be completed while the mark-up of the part is completed as described in the Requirements for Part Mark-up
section (pg. 10) of this procedure. If gage OPs are not available, other documents (e.g. PADs) may be used as
Roadmaps.
2. Operating Procedures typically consist of one or more pages containing a graphic of the part and part checking
requirements including: part loading instructions, datum scheme, clamping sequence, PMP locations, and hole check
requirements. Out-of -spec points must be documented on the OP/GD&T Roadmap in addition to the part mark-up.
3. The roadmap must have the datum locations and clamping sequence recorded (Attachment E1). Any checking
fixture auxiliary datum not called out on the checking fixture OP or the GD&T, yet used in checking the part, must also
be documented on the roadmap. These auxiliary datums must be approved by the Matching Team / Vehicle
Dimensional Quality Manager (VDQM) prior to the part submission.
4. Holes and slots, see table below:
RoadmapRequirementsHoles&Slots(thatareshownontheGD&T)
TypeofCheck
CheckResults
RoadmapNotation
OK
Mark"OK"foreachholeandslotpresent
Sightcheck
NotOK
Runanewpartandreinspect

OK
AttributeSize(Go/NoGo)
Markas"NotOK",measureforsizeandrecord
NotOK
valuetothenearest0.1mm
OK
AttributeLocation(Plug)
NotOK
Markas"NotOK",measureforlocationand
recordvaluetothenearest0.1mm
5. Obtain variable data for all measurement points (which include but are not limited to KPC, PMP, and PQC points)
taken from the capability study for this part and record them next to the corresponding checkpoint location on the onepiece dimensional roadmap include direction of check and deviation to nominal (even if within specification). For an
example of this portion of the one-piece dimensional roadmap, see Attachment F.
the part, per the checking routine, must be recorded onto the roadmap. Use a dot with a line symbol to indicate where
the exact measurements were out-of-specification on the part, see Attachment E2. Surface features not contained in
the periphery check (example: surfaces on the interior of the part), must be evaluated against the checking fixture
features, e.g. swing templates.
part, per the checking routine, must be recorded onto the roadmap. Use an arrow symbol to indicate where the exact
measurements were out-of-specification on the part, see Attachment E2
8. For GA parts, variable measurements will be taken at points called out by the Measurement Plan, whether they are on
the periphery or surface of the part. Points must be chosen on GA parts to be in harmony with adjacent GA parts to
properly evaluate Product Quality Checkpoint (PQC) requirements and facilitate root cause.
Note For GA Parts, the Documentation Submission Package, made up of the PPQP-1 Quality Warrant, Capability
Study, Roadmap, One-Piece Dimensional Graphic, and One-Piece Dimensional Data must be provided by the
supplier with each submission to the Matching Team.
Page 9 of 41

directional deviation from nominal of the checks that were out-of-specification, again using the following abbreviations:
HI/LO, INB/OTB and FWD/AFT
For an example of the sequential mark-up of a part see Attachments I1 thru I8.
Prerequisites to marking up a dimensional part:
Checking fixture has passed a Gage R study, 1X10., one operator, one part checked ten times.
Parts numbered to correlate with the Capability study.
Current GD&T and Operating Procedure sheets obtained
Source has reviewed the requirements within this procedure.
1. From the capability study parts, choose one part closest to the design nominal dimensional values, perform a
complete dimensional measurement and ship to the GA Matching Build. Additional parts may be requested, if
required, as listed on the Purchase Order ( PO).
2. Perform sight-checks for any holes, slots, cutouts, etc., as called for within the OP Instructions. If a hole is missing, a
new part is required.
3. Painted Exterior parts will be ordered in white color. Unpainted, molded Exterior parts may be left in their dark base
color. Interior trim parts will be ordered in light sand drift or light gray color.
4. Write on each part in black permanent or paint pen: part name, part number, engineering change level, material
thickness, run date, MRD , and the part number which corresponds with its sequential order run from the capability
study. In the case of unpainted parts left in their dark base color, yellow can be used to write part information on the
part.
5. Load and clamp the parts onto the checking fixture according to the OP/GD&T Instructions.
6. The location and size for all of the checking fixture datums and the corresponding clamping sequence of each is to be
drawn in yellow or black on the part. Also label each datums corresponding GD&T call-out in yellow or black onto the
part.
7. Record on the part any GD&T specified holes and slots that are out-of-tolerance. Holes without GD&T requirements
need not be checked.
8. Conduct a Free State Datum Check (FSDC) of parts. Use the criteria specified within the Datums to Print Clarification
Free State Check of Datums On Checking Fixture, (Attachment C). Record the FSDC results onto the part in
yellow/black utilizing the following note: FSDC______ mm. If the Free State Check fails, Matching Team approval is
required prior to part submission.
9. Measure specified GD&T holes, slots, cutouts etc., for size in two directions, using calipers or other appropriate
measuring device. All holes that are out-of-specification for size must be marked on the part in white permanent or
paint pen. Denote the actual hole size measured and record to the nearest 0.1mm for each direction. Perform all hole
Go/NoGo checks and plug checks specified by the OP.
the part, per the checking routine, must be recorded on the part in red. Use a dot with attached line symbol to
indicate where the exact measurements were out-of-specification on the part, see example (Attachment E2). Surface
features not contained in the periphery check (example: surfaces on the interior of the part), must be evaluated
against the checking fixture features, e.g. swing templates.
part, per the checking routine, must be recorded on the part in yellow. Use a yellow arrow symbol to indicate where
the exact measurements were taken on the part, see example (Attachment E2).

Page 10 of 41
MATCHING BIW & GA PARTS

MATCHING BUILD PART SUFFIXES:
Part #
DLS
PLS
None
Tooling Status
Cost/Destination
Desired DLS of prototype

tooled part
Prototype piece cost and No Marking. These are very

few parts for Matching 1 (ex: Frame)
Desired DLS of production

tooled part without PPAP
Approval.
Production piece cost + marking parts for Matching

Builds. These are the critical Matching parts.
A-Z
Desired DLS of production

tooled part without PPAP
Approval.
Production piece cost and No Marking. Parts used for

Matching Builds.
12345678
A-Z
Desire DLS part without

PPAP Approval.
Inert Inflatable Restraint Assemblies
12345678
None
None
Production tooled
Production piece cost, and marking parts per

appendix J only if requested by the Matching
Team. Parts used for Match builds or DQ&V.
12345678
A-Z
12345678
A-Z
12345678
DLS=Design Level Suffix

PLS=Part Level Suffix
DQ&V=Design Quality and Verification
PPAP=Production Part Approval Process
MATCHING BUILD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS:
Engineering Change Level: All parts submitted for the Matching Builds are expected to conform to the Engineering
Change Level identified during Part Order Reconciliation. For parts where this is not possible, the team will determine
the change level required for each build iteration. The Matching Build schedule is the driver to determine engineering
change implementation. If a later released part becomes available it must be approved by the DE and the Matching
Team for use in the build.
Prototype Parts: Use of prototype parts will not be accepted.
Part Re-Submission: If the Matching build allows, replacement parts may be used. If replacement parts are used,
they must also have a new Parts Submission Data Package.
Supplier Warrant Submission of Matching Build Material: Suppliers must complete warrants as appropriate. The
warrant guarantees that the shipped material for a given part number and engineering change level has been
produced on production tools, meets all design criteria and the submission requirements as specified in this GM
#10067 Procedure. If any of these conditions are not met, the deviation must be specified on the warrant. The
General Motors Supplier Warrants of MB Material, , can be obtained from the GM Supply Power website.
General Motors Supplier Warrant of MB Material - BIW, (Attachment A),
General Motors Supplier Warrant of MB Material GA , (Attachment H),
Note: Source is to complete, sign and date the required forms for each submission.

Page 11 of 41
SHIPPING CONTAINER LABELS AND PART IDENTIFICATION TAGS (see Attachments L1 and L2):
Shipping Label (GM form NA2838) must be placed on the shipping container. Labels should be placed on (2) sides of
container.
Part Identification Tag (GM form NA2836) must be wired to each Matching part.
The vehicle program name must appear on the lower right side of the tags as indicated.
Note: Labels and Tags may be obtained from CMS @ 734-953-3260 or online via the CMS/Supplier Portal link
under GM Links on the GM SupplyPower website.
REVISION HISTORY:
10/23/04: Removed the scribing of gridlines requirement. Removed the Matching Build 3 requirements.
01/18/05: Gage R&R was revised to Gage R.
05/13/05: Removed the Bluing requirement for Body-in-White parts. Added Matching Build Part Suffixes.
10/06/05: Removed the Math Based Requirement and added the White Light Scanning requirements.
04/20/06: Revisions were made to reflect the Iterative process.
02/23/07: Revisions were made to address the global requirements for BIW part submission criteria.
06/27/07: Revision to title to better reflect the intent of the document.
09/07/07: Updates to text throughout to indicate that submission materials are now to be kept on file by the source and
made available upon request.
10/08/07: Changed Relizon contact information to WorkflowOne.
10/15/07: Addition of new appendixes for part tagging and scan data added. Updated attachment references.
03/16/09: Procedure rewritten.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
GM - D303 [North American] Plant Procedure - Stamping Batch & Hold Process

Page 12 of 41
ATTACHMENT A
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
SUPPLIER WARRANT FOR ITERATIVE MATCHING BUILD (MB) BIW MATERIAL
This form is to be completed by the supplier and must accompany every shipment of material to General Motors Matching
Evaluation build event. Consult the Purchasing department division for specific documentation guidelines.
Failure to comply with these procedures may result in the rejection and return of the parts, requiring a resubmission.
Section 1:
PART STATUS AND SHIPPING INFORMATION
Part #:
CVER
Program/Model #:
SVER
IVER
Eng. Change Level (EWO #):
Part Name:
Qty Shipped:
Date of Manufacture:
Part Submission for MRD:
Are parts produced 100% from Production Tooling, Materials, and Processes?
on
Shipment of material, which does not meet Matching Submittal Requirements, must be approved by the Matching Build Team.
Section 2:
Required Support Documentation
Section 3:
(submit a copy with parts)
Panel Markup and Identification
(the following items must be marked on each panel submitted)
Y N
N/A
2.1 Checking fixture pass a Gage R?
Y N
N/A
3.1 Do panels meet all dimensional submittal requirements?
Y N
N/A
2.2 Do the datums pass Free State Datum Check?
Y N
N/A
3.2 Part #, Eng. Chg. Lvl (EWO #), panel # & date produced?
Y N
N/A
2.3 Capability Study ?
Y N
N/A
3.3 PMP/KPC readings & panel # match Capability Study?
Y N
N/A
2.4 PMP / KPC roadmap?
Y N
N/A
3.4 Datum location, size and sequence match GD&T?
Y N
N/A
2.5 Cap. Studies performed w/ correct # of parts?
Y N
N/A
3.5 Datums properly marked?
Y N
N/A
2.6
Is the range of the KPC/PMP data < 1.0mm?
Y N
N/A
3.6 Are attachment features CMM checked?
Y N
N/A
2.7
Do the means pass the 80% rule?
Y N
N/A
3.7 Are any out of spec points values marked from nominal
Y N
N/A
2.8
One Piece CMM Dimensional Data?
Y N
N/A
2.9
One Piece CMM Dimensional Roadmap?
Y N
N/A
3.8 Free State Datum Check results recorded on panel?
Y N
N/A
2.10 Have you attended the Part Marking training?
Y N
N/A
3.9 MB tags (NA-2836) attached to all parts?
Y N
N/A
2.11 All other dimensions in 1-pc study within + 2.0mm
Y N
N/A
3.10 MB labels (NA-2838) on all shipping containers?
Y N
N/A
3.11 Parts packaged to prevent damage during transit?
of nominal?
Y N
N/A
Y N
N/A
with vehicle direction?
2.12 Is Pp value > 1.0?

2.13 P.A.S.T. (Points Acceptable to Specified Tolerance)
Score ________ [ (Pts in Spec / Total Pts Checked) x 100 ]
Explanation of all "NO" answers or comments:
Section 4:
Supplier Identification
(
Submitter's Printed Name
Supplier's Name and Location
Signature
Title
e - mail:

Printed document is uncontrolled Controlled version is available
within the Global Matching Process website:http://me.body.gm.com/dimensional/gmatch/
Phone #
Date
page 13 of 41
ATTACHMENT B
Matching Process Flow Diagram for

Component Parts and Assemblies
Responsibility
Source
Production Tooling
complete and ready to run
Source
Run 5 parts *
* 3 parts for GM stampings
Source
Measure parts to production

checking system
GD&T
Datums to
print?
[Free State]
No
Iterative Part Improvement
Yes
Source
Analyze & document

designated check points
Source
Sumittal
q
Requirements
Met?
Submittal
Process
Source
No
Yes
Build Site
Matching Team
Mark up Matching part (closest

to Nominal) per the Matching
Part Submission Procedure
Matching Build
Evaluate Matching Build
No
Matching Team
Is Buid OK Yes
?
Review Part
Submission Data
Document Issues
Evaluation
Source
Yes
Matching Team
Initial Part Evaluation Acceptable

Printed document is uncontrolled - Controlled version is available
page 14 of 41
ATTACHMENT C
DATUMS TO PRINT CLARIFICATION
FREE STATE CHECK OF DATUMS ON CHECKING FIXTURE
For Sheet Metal Parts **
Part or assembly:
1. Must be observed on minimum of three (3) datums before clamping
2. May be clamped on three (3) datums to evaluate non-contact of part or assembly to other datums.
3. Should conform to the following free state specifications (see sketches below), if free state checks are
not specified on the released GD&T drawings.
a. Part or assembly with material thickness > than 1.0 mm must set on all datums within 1.0 mm.
PART
PART
PART
CLAMP
CLAMP
CLAMP
A
A
DATUM
LOCATOR
DATUM
LOCATOR
EXAMPLE OF OFF-ANGLE
Part Thickness
1.0 mm or less
> 1.0 mm
EXAMPLE OF EXCESSIVE OPEN
DATUM
LOCATOR
EXAMPLE OF OFF-ANGLE
AND EXCESSIVE OPEN
Dimension A
2.0 mm or less
1.0 mm or less
4. Part or assembly not setting on all datums should be able to be moved to the datums with minimum
finger pressure.
5. Exceptions to these specifications must be approved by the Matching Team.
6. Must meet free state specifications (stated above) without rework to approve parts.
** For General Assembly (GA) parts,
reference the GD&T Drawing for the Free State Datum
Check Requirements.

Printed document is uncontrolled Controlled version is available
page 15 of 41
ATTACHMENT D
CAPABILITY STUDY FOR MATCHING BUILD PARTS SUBMITTAL

Points on
roadmap
Parts
10
11
12
13
14
1
2
3
4
5
NOMINAL
TOLERANCE
MEAN
RANGE
SIGMA
3 SIGMA
4 SIGMA
USL
LSL
Pp

Printed document is uncontrolled - Controlled version is available
page 16 of 41
15
MB #1
Attachment E1

page 17 of 41
MB #1
Attachment E2

page 18 of 41
MB #1
Attachment E3

page 19 of 41
MB #1
Attachment E4

page 20 of 41
ATTACHMENT F
CMM ONE-PIECE DIMENSIONAL ROADMAP

(Example for non-White Light Scanned parts)
Not required for White

Light scanned parts

within the Global Matching Process website http://me.body.gm.com/dimensional/gmatch/
page 21 of 41
ATTACHMENT G
CMM ONE-PIECE DIMENSIONAL DATA

(for non-White Light Scanned parts)
TIME=14:14:24
DATE=4/8/07
PART NUMBER
REV NUMBER
SER NUMBER
STATS COUNT
: 10420597 T9912
:
: lay-out #1
:0
Not required for White Light Scanned parts
DIM D4= LOCATION OF CIRCLE CIR-B1

AX
NOMINAL
+TOL
X
-3316 . 360
0 . 000
Y
809 . 870
0 . 200
Z
1127 . 540
0 . 000
D
11 . 600
0 . 250
T
0 . 000
0 . 100
-TOL
0 . 000
0 . 200
0 . 000
0 . 250
0 . 100
MEAS
-3316 . 361
809 . 813
1127 . 544
11 . 820
0 . 057
DEV
- 0 . 001
0 . 057
0 . 004
0 . 220
0 . 057
OUTTOL
- 0 . 001
0 . 000
0 . 004
0 . 000
0 . 000
DIM D5= LOCATION OF CIRCLE CIR-B2

NOMINAL
+TOL
AX
X
-3300 . 110
0 . 500
Y
809 . 750
0 . 500
Z
1158 . 130
0 . 500
D
11 . 600
0 . 250
T
0 . 000
0 . 500
-TOL
0 . 500
0 . 500
0 . 500
0 . 250
0 . 500
MEAS
-3300 . 108
809 . 813
1127 . 544
11 . 820
0 . 074
DEV
0 . 002
- 0 . 074
0 . 113
0 . 224
0 . 074
OUTTOL
0 . 000
0 . 000
0 . 000
0 . 000
0 . 000
DIM D6= LOCATION OF CIRCLE CIR1

AX
NOMINAL
+TOL
X
-3284 . 077
0 . 750
Y
809 . 828
0 . 750
Z
1132 . 146
0 . 750
D
25 . 000
0 . 250
T
0 . 000
0 . 750
-TOL
0 . 750
0 . 750
0 . 750
0 . 250
0 . 750
MEAS
-3384 . 226
809 . 753
1132 . 181
25 . 228
0 . 075
DEV
- 0 . 149
- 0 . 075
0 . 035
0 . 228
0 . 075
OUTTOL
0 . 000
0 . 000
0 . 000
0 . 000
0 . 000
DIM D8= LOCATION OF POINT PT1

AX
NOMINAL
+TOL
X
-3349 . 919
0 . 750
Y
804 . 908
0 . 750
Z
1055 . 275
2 . 000
T
0 . 000
2 . 000
-TOL
0 . 750
0 . 750
2 . 000
2 . 000
MEAS
-3350 . 097
809 . 348
1127 . 415
-0 . 164
DEV
- 0 . 178
0 . 440
0 . 140
- 0 . 164
OUTTOL
0 . 000
0 . 000
0 . 000
0 . 000
DIM D9= LOCATION OF POINT PT2

NOMINAL
+TOL
AX
X
-3316 . 360
0 . 000
Y
809 . 870
0 . 200
Z
1127 . 540
0 . 000
D
11 . 600
0 . 250
T
0 . 000
0 . 100
-TOL
0 . 000
0 . 200
0 . 000
0 . 250
0 . 100
MEAS
-3316 . 361
809 . 813
1127 . 544
11 . 820
0 . 057
DEV
- 0 . 001
0 . 057
0 . 004
0 . 220
0 . 057
OUTTOL
- 0 . 001
0 . 000
0 . 004
0 . 000
0 . 000

Printed document is uncontrolled - Controlled version available
page 22 of 41
Attachment H
GM PPQP-1: PRE-PRODUCTION PART QUALITY PROCESS (PPQP) WARRANT/CORRECTIVE ACTION
The PPQP SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS GUIDELINE specifies the General Motors global minimum part quality
certification requirements for Pre-Production/Prototype/Production parts that have not received full PPAP (Production Part
Approval Process) approval for use in design intent Mule and Integration Pre-Production Builds at PPO (Pre-Production
Operation) build shops.
The term Supplier shall be used to indicate the prime contractor (Tier 1 Supplier) to General Motors Corporation. Tier 1
Suppliers are responsible to apply the PPQP Supplier Requirements Guideline to subcontractors (Tier 2 Suppliers).
The PPQP-1 Part Quality Warrant document shall be printed using blue paper as per, Section1.1 PPQP-1 Part Quality
Warrant, Page #4 of the PPQP-1 Supplier Requirements Guideline, Release Date: 04 Mar 2009.
PPQP-1: GM Pre-Production Part Quality Warrant

PART INFORMATION
MY:
Program:
Part
As Ordered (provide if available)
DLS:
PLS:
ST:
As Shipped (required information)
DLS:
PLS:
ST:
Tool Type: ____________ Submission Date:
Shipment Date:
Serial Number Sthrough SWeight (Kg) of 1 part:
P.O. Number:
Part Number:
REV:
REV:
REASON FOR SHIPMENT

Correction of Discrepancy:
Additional Quantities:
Initial Submission:
Color Change Only (Dimensionally Approved Part):
Engineering Change(s):
SUBMISSION STATUS SELECT ONE
Supplier certifies that part MEETS ALL
NON-CRITICAL GM SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS: GM
PART
Approval NOT required prior to shipment.
CONFORMING
CRITICAL
PART
CONFORMING
Supplier certifies that part MEETS ALL

GM SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS: GM
Approval REQUIRED prior to first
shipment.
PDI:
PDI:
Shipment Quantity:
Matching 1:
Matching 2:
NON-CRITICAL
PART
NONCONFORMING
Supplier certifies that part DOES NOT MEET all

GM specified requirements. Corrective Action
Plan required. GM Approval REQUIRED prior
to shipment.
CRITICAL
PART
NONCONFORMING
Supplier certifies that part DOES NOT MEET all

GM specified requirements. Corrective Action
Plan required. GM Approval REQUIRED prior
to shipment.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
NOTE: Corrective Action Plan required if answer is NO to items 1-3 below
1. Does part meet dimensional requirement on the design record?
2. Does part meet functional requirements of the design record?
3. Was part produced with specified materials?
4. Have part key characteristics (KCDS) been identified?
5. Are inspection results enclosed?
6. Is the Design Record (sketch, drawing, print, GD&T, etc) enclosed?
7. Has International Material Data System (IMDS) Data been submitted?
CHECKING PROCESS USED FOR THE PART(S)
Checking Fixture
Checking Fixture Number:
Holding Fixture
White Light Scanning
Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM)
SUPPLIER INFORMATION
Supplier Name:
Street Address:
State/Province:
Quality Manager at Supplier
Name:
Email:
Phone:
No
N/A
IMDS Number:
Engineering Change:
Faro Scanning
Open Set-up
Function
Other:
Z-Code:
Duns Number:
City:
Zip/Postal Code:
Country:
Authorized Quality Engineer or Product Engineer at Supplier
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Signature:
GM Release Engineer
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Yes
GM Program Subsystem Validation Engineer

Name:
Email:
Phone:
TO BE COMPLETED BY GM PPO QUALITY FOR 1ST SHIPMENT OF CRITICAL PARTS ONLY

Approver
Print Name
Signature
PPO Quality Rep.
GM Response:
Approve

Printed document is uncontrolled Controlled version available within the
Global Matching Process website: http://me.body.gm.com/dimensional/gmatch/
Reject
Date
Page 23 of 41
Attachment I1
1. Start with a panel
chosen from the
capability
bilit study.
t d

Page 24 of 41
Attachment I2
2. In black, write:
part name, part
number run date
number,
date,
engineering change
level, material
thickness & panel
number used from
the capability
p
y study.
y
For both non-White

Light Scanned and
White Light
scanned parts
15735002
Rad Air Side Baffle RH
R 011
Run 6/7/97
.90 mm
Panel #3
MRD ___

Page 25 of 41
Attachment I3
3. Mark checking
fixture datums in
Yellow and GD&T
callouts in black.

4
A4
-c-
For both White

Light Scanned and
non-White Light
Scanned parts
1
A1
15735002
R 011
Run 6/7/97
-B .90 mm
Panel #3
MRD ___
2
A2
3
A3

Page 26 of 41
4. Mark Free State

Datum Checks next
to datums - unless
employing RGYB.
Attachment I4
4
A4
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
-C-
For non-White
non White
Light Scanned
parts
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
1
A1
15735002
R 011
Run 6/7/97
-B .90 mm
Panel #3
MRD ___
2
A2
3
A3

F.S.D.C. 0.4mm
FSDC 0
F.S.D.C.
0.0mm
0
Page 27 of 41
Attachment I5
6. Scribe crosshairs on
all GD&Td holes to
show design location.
location
Measure holes in two
directions for size and
centerline and write the
out of specification
sizes next to hole.
#7
.27 LO
4
A4
#8
.42 OTB
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
#9
.86 FWD
#3
.82 AFT
#6
.60 FWD
-C-
Not OK
1.78
OTBD
F.S.D.C. .0.0mm
1
A1
For non-White
Light Scanned
parts only
#10
.04 AFT
15735002
R 011
Run 6/7/97
-B.90 mm
OK
Panel
P l #3
0.42
MRD ___
INBD
#5
.46 AFT
#1
.36
36
HI
#5
.44 FWD
3
A3
#11
.09 FWD
#4
.52 AFT
2
A2
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
F.S.D.C. .4mm
#2
1.22 HI
#3
.68 HI
Page 28 of 41
7. Surface periphery
measurements to be
taken on even body
lines every 50 mm.
(wherever possible, or
greater frequency to
capture feature.) Out of
specification points to
be marked in black
(w/dot) on panel
indicating the vehicleposition
directional deviation to
nominal.
Attachment I6
#7
.27 LO
#8
.42 OTB
3.2 HI
4
A4
3.4
3 4 HI
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
#9
.86 FWD
#3
.82 FWD
#6
.60 FWD
-C-
Not OK
1.78
OTBD
1.6 FWD
F.S.D.C. .0.0mm
1
A1
#10
.04 AFT
For non-White
Light Scanned
parts only
15735002
R 011
Run 6/7/97
-B.90 mm
Panel #3
OK
MRD ___
0.42
INBD
#5
.46 AFT
#4
.52 AFT
2
A2
#1
.36
36
HI
#11
.09
09 FWD
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
3
A3
F.S.D.C. .4mm
#2
1.22 HI
#3
.68 HI
Page 29 of 41
8. Trim periphery
measurements to be
taken on odd body lines
every 50 mm. O
Outt off
specification points to
be marked in yellow
(w/arrow) on panel
indicating
vehicle-position
directional deviation
from nominal.
#7
.27 LO
4
A4
Attachment I7
3.2 HI
FSDC 0
F.S.D.C.
0.0mm
0mm
#8
.42 OTB
3.4 HI
#9
.86 FWD
#4
.82 AFT
#6
.60 FWD
3.3 LO
-C-
Not OK
1 78
1.78
OTBD
1.6 FWD
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
1
A1
For non-White
Light Scanned
parts only
#10
.04 AFT
15735002
R 011
Run 6/7/97
-B.90 mm
OK
Panel #3
0 42
0.42
MRD ___
INBD
#4
.46 AFT

3
A3
#11
.09 FWD
#4
.52 AFT
2
A2
#5
.44 FWD
#1
.36
HI
2.8 INB
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
F.S.D.C. .4mm
#2
1.22 HI
#3
.68 HI
Page 30 of 41
Attachment I8
#7
.27 LO
9. Final Panel
Mark up
Mark-up
4
A4
#8
.42 OTB
3.2 HI
3.4
3 4 HI
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
#9
.86 FWD
#4
.82 AFT
For non-White
non White
Light Scanned
parts only
#6
.60 FWD
3.3
3 3 LO
Not OK
-C-
1.78
OTBD
1.6 FWD
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
1
A1
#10
.04 AFT
15735002
R 011
Run 6/7/97
-B.90 mm
Panel #3
OK
MRD ___
0.42
INBD
#4
.46 AFT

3
A3
#11
.09
09 FWD
#4
.52 AFT
2
A2
#5
.44 FWD
#1
.36
36
HI
2.8 INB
F.S.D.C. 0.0mm
F.S.D.C. .4mm
#2
1.22 HI
#3
.68 HI
Page 31 of 41
Attachment J
Marking of Datums and Out-of-Spec
P i
Points
ffor Whi
White Light
Li h Scanned
S
d parts
A1
A2
A4
A3
1.
Feature mark-ups must be based on GD&T requirements.
2.
All Datums locations must be marked on part in yellow.
3.
All out of specification features (surface, trim and flange break lines)
must be marked up showing magnitude and direction from nominal.
Deviations should be called out as Hi/Low, Inb/Otb, or as Fwd/Rwd
(See below) Use arrows for trim checks and dots for surface checks.
4.
For frequency of out of specification surface and trim points refer to

page 5 of 31
31, paragraphs 10 and 12
12.
Note:
Please use paint pens or permanent marker for all panel

mark-ups to prevent loss of information
1.8mm Low
2.2mm Low
16
1.6mm
L
Low
1.3mm Otb
1.6mm Fwd
2.0mm Low
1.8mm Fwd

Page 32 of 41
ATTACHMENT L1
MATCHING BUILD TAGS

GM2836
FROM:
PART NO. / REV LEVEL

PART NAME
MRD NUMBER and MRD DATE
RUN DATE
QUANTITY
GM MATCHING BUILD
ATTN:
GM PLANT NAME / NO.

ADDRESS:
DOCK
VEHICLE PROGRAM
GM2836
GM2838
FROM:
PART NO. / REV LEVEL
PART NAME
ENG. CHG. AND DATE
WARRANT LEVEL
QUANTITY
PACK DATE
GM MATCHING BUILD
ATTN:
GM PLANT NAME /
NO
ADDRESS:
DOCK
VEHICLE PROGRAM
GM2838

/
Page 35 of 41
Body Manufacturing Engineering - Quality
Attachment L2
BIW PART TAGGING GUIDELINES

FOR PRE-SALEABLE MATERIAL
MRD 0
MRD 1
MRD 2
MRD 3
ORANGE TAG
PURPLE TAG
YELLOW TAG
BLUE TAG
BODY SHOP
VALIDATION W/
MATCHING MATERIAL
GM 2400
BODY SHOP
VALIDATION W/
MATCHING MATERIAL
GM 2410
BODY SHOP
VALIDATION W/
MATCHING MATERIAL
GM 1413 NS
BODY SHOP
VALIDATION W/
MATCHING MATERIAL
GM 1413 NS-B
ALL MRDs (0, 1, 2 and 3) Shipping Tag Instructions

Panels shipped for Matching should (follow Matching guidelines GM10067)
Ship remaining panels in assigned container
Place color coded shipping tags (as specified above) on two sides of container
Date material was run MUST be on the color coded shipping
pp g tag
g
For multiple tool sets, identify / label the tool used to manufacture the part.
All panels within each MRD MUST be marked with the run date. The date can
either be written on part with a paint pen or stamped into the part. Exception is
panels that do not have a run stamp
p location identified
MRD 2 and MRD 3 for p
(typically outer panels), once the part has been approved by the matching team,
the run date is no longer required.
Page 36 of 41

Attachment L2
MRD 0
ORANGE TAG
MRD 1
PURPLE TAG
MRD 2
YELLOW TAG
MRD 3
BLUE TAG
Approximately
20-35 PANELS
Approximately
30 PANELS
Approximately
45 60 PANELS
45-60
Approximately
45 60 PANELS
45-60
TDO or
OUTSOURCED:
Run Date must be
written on panel
TDO or
OUTSOURCED:
Run Date must be
written on panel
METAL CENTER:
Activate and
maintain run
stamp. If panel
without run stamp
(ie - Outer Panels) Run Date written
on panel
METAL CENTER:
Activate and
maintain run stamp.
If panel without run
stamp (ie - Outer
Panels) - Run Date
written on panel
TDO or
OUTSOURCED:
If Part has not been
approved
pp
by
y
Matching Team
(VDQM/BIW QL)
Run Date must be
written on panel
TDO or
OUTSOURCED:
If Part has not been
approved
pp
by
y
Matching Team
(VDQM/BIW QL)
Run Date must be
written on panel
METAL CENTER:
Activate and
maintain run stamp.
stamp (ie - Outer
Panels) - Run Date
must be written on
panel until the part
has been approved
by the Matching
Team (
(VDQM/BIW
Q /
QL)
METAL CENTER:
Activate and
maintain run stamp.
stamp (ie -Outer
Panels) - Run Date
written on panel
until the part has
been approved by
the Matching Team
(VDQM/BIW
(
Q /
Q
QL)
)

Page 37 of 41

Attachment L2
Process Owner Responsibility:
These guidelines for shipping material apply to whatever source has the dies at the time of the material
request, TDO, Metal Center or Outside Supplier.
The TDO Quality Manager has responsibility to insure that all material shipped from TDO Facilities for
Matching
g and Pre-Saleable Builds have the p
proper
p shipping
pp g tags
g p
per these g
guidelines and with Matching
g
Instructions (GM10067).
The Program Die Execution Manager (DEM) has Responsibility to insure that all material shipped from
outside suppliers for Matching and Pre-Saleable Builds have the proper shipping tags per these guidelines
and with Matching Instructions (GM10067).
Th Stamping
The
St
i Quality
Q lit Manager
M
h responsibility,
has
ibilit after
ft die
di delivery,
d li
tto insure
i
th
thatt material
t i l shipped
hi
d ffor
Matching and Pre-Saleable Builds have the proper shipping tags per these guidelines and with Matching
Instructions (GM 10067).
The DEM or designate, is responsible to clarify any conflicting material requests between PPO and the Plan
For Every
y Part.
Material Shipments: Other than Matching Panels
The remaining panels for all MRD Shipments should be sent in their assigned containers with the designated
Color Coded Shipping Tags (2 per container).
The run date must be written on the Color Coded Shipping Tags
Tags.
The run date must be on each panel. This can be done with either a paint pen or stamped into the
panel.
Each iteration may require additional quantities as required for Matching and Body Shop Validation.
The DEM should insure that each material request specifies the appropriate MRD.
When shipping material to multiple assembly plants the matching panels should go to the lead plant unless
otherwise specified.

Page 38 of 41

Attachment L2
Matching Panels:
For each MRD, Matching material may be required. The VDQM (Vehicle Dimensional
Quality Manger and DEM (Die Execution Manager) will determine when the part is
dimensionally acceptable and Matching parts are no longer required.
Within the MRD (0,1,2,3) additional Matching panels may be requested depending upon
feedback from the Iterative Matching Team.
Matching Panels must follow existing matching guidelines (GM10067) unless otherwise
specified.
specified
Matching Panels: Material Shipping Tags

Fuchsia Tag
GM2836
GM Matching/Body Shop Build Material
Fuchsia Tag
GM2838
GM Matching/Body Shop Build Material
(Tags that say GM Functional Build Material can be used until all supplies are used up)
Tag usage for MRD 0 through MRD 3 should be as follows:

Orange Tag
GM2400
GM Body Shop Validation w/Matching Matl
MRD 0
(Tags that say Re-Verification

Re Verification Material
Material can be used until all supplies are used up)
Purple Tag
GM2410
MRD 1
(Tags that say Body Test / Tryout can be used until all supplies are used up)
Yellow Tag
GM1413NS
MRD 2
(Tags that say Non-Saleable Material can be used until all supplies are used up)
Blue Tag
GM1413NS-B
GM1413NS
B

Mat l
MRD 3
(Tags that say Non-Saleable Material can be used until all supplies are used up)
Page 39 of 41

GM Form #
GM2400
GM2410
GM1413 NS
GM1413 NS-B
GM2836
GM2838
Shipping Tag Source:

CMS
CMS
CMS
CMS
CMS
CMS
Attachment L2
Source Contact #
734-953-3260
734-953 3260
734-953-3260
734-953-3260
734-953-3260
734-953-3260
GM & Outside Suppliers should call CMS or browse the CMS catalog online via the
CMS/Supplier Portal under GM Links on the GM SupplyPower website (note: you
mustt first
fi t register
i t on SupplyPower
S
l P
in
i order
d tto access the
th site).
it )
PROCESS DEVELOPED BY:
Gerrard
G
d Ebbitt
Tina Dinan
Hari Menon
Devyani Patel

/
Stamping
St
i Quality
Q lit
Stamping Metal Centers
Stamping TDO
Body ME PPI
Page 40 of 41

Attachment L2
Requirements:
Panels shipped for Matching should follow Matching guidelines GM10067. This means:
One of the panels should have datum's marked.
Data should be posted to the TDO home page (per the PAR process). Data should be forwarded to
the contacts provided during the Matching Part Submission Procedure Training . Supplier data should
be forwarded to the contacts provided during training. For GM in-house stampings the data will be
posted to the TDO Website Home Page.
Ship remaining panels in assigned container.
Place color coded shipping tags on two sides of container. This means:
Matching
g iterative 3 p
panel submission ((use Fuchsia Tag
g - GM2836))
MRD 0 - use Orange Tag GM2400
MRD 1 - use Purple Tag GM2410
MRD 2 - use Yellow Tag GM1413NS
MRD 3 - use Blue Tag
GM1413NS-B
((Note: TDO usually
y does not run MRD 1,, 2 or 3 but mayy end up
p running
gp
partial loads based on the difficulty
y of
rd
the die and must be tagged appropriately. Die Execution Manager (DEM) is responsible for tagging 3 party
part runs and stamping must tag parts run in their facility.)
Date material was run MUST be on the color coded shipping tag.
All panels within each MRD MUST be marked with the run date. The date can either be written on
part with a paint pen or stamped into the part.
part

Page 41 of 41

GM 10067

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

GM 10067

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

General Motors

Global Part Submission Procedure for Iterative Matching

MATCHING BODY-IN-WHITE (BIW) PARTS

MATCHING GENERAL ASSEMBLY (GA) PARTS

MATCHING BIW AND GA PARTS

SUPPLIER WARRANT FOR BIW

General Motors (GM)

Verifies parts meet dimensional requirements

Verifies parts meet Free State check of datums on check fixtures

Part Supplier: (BIW, GA)

Completes and submits documentation as described in the Documentation section (pgs 3, 8)

Revision Date: 03/16/09

PART SUBMISSION PROCEDURE (contd)

Revision Date: 03/16/09

MATCHING BIW PARTS

DOCUMENTATION FOR ITERATIVE MATCHING:

Revision Date: 03/16/09

Revision Date: 03/16/09

3D SCANNED MEASUREMENT DATA REQUIREMENTS: (GM Outsourced Stamping)

Revision Date: 03/16/09

REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADMAPS:

REQUIREMENTS FOR PART MARK-UP

Revision Date: 03/16/09

One piece full dimensional check

80% of points must be within

All other points must be within 150% of

100 % must be within specification

Must be within specification

DOCUMENTATION FOR ITERATIVE MATCHING:

REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADMAPS:

REQUIREMENTS FOR PART MARK-UP

Revision Date: 03/16/09

MATCHING BIW & GA PARTS

Desired DLS of prototype

Prototype piece cost and No Marking. These are very

Desired DLS of production

Production piece cost + marking parts for Matching

Desired DLS of production

Production piece cost and No Marking. Parts used for

Desire DLS part without

Inert Inflatable Restraint Assemblies

Production piece cost, and marking parts per

DLS=Design Level Suffix

PPAP=Production Part Approval Process

MATCHING BUILD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS:

Prototype Parts: Use of prototype parts will not be accepted.

Revision Date: 03/16/09

Revision Date: 03/16/09

PART STATUS AND SHIPPING INFORMATION

Eng. Change Level (EWO #):

Part Submission for MRD:

Required Support Documentation

(submit a copy with parts)

Panel Markup and Identification

(the following items must be marked on each panel submitted)

2.1 Checking fixture pass a Gage R?

3.1 Do panels meet all dimensional submittal requirements?

2.2 Do the datums pass Free State Datum Check?

2.3 Capability Study ?

3.3 PMP/KPC readings & panel # match Capability Study?

2.4 PMP / KPC roadmap?

3.4 Datum location, size and sequence match GD&T?