Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RECONSIDERATIONS
Author(s): SALH ZBARAN and Salih zbaran
Source: Oriente Moderno, Nuova serie, Anno 25 (86), Nr. 1, THE OTTOMANS AND TRADE
(2006), pp. 173-179
Published by: Istituto per l'Oriente C. A. Nallino
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25818053 .
Accessed: 08/08/2013 17:27
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Istituto per l'Oriente C. A. Nallino is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Oriente Moderno.
http://www.jstor.org
SALH
ZBARAN
(IZMIR)
While
atMocha, Aden, Hudaydah, Luhayyah, Jizan and other landing places.3 Unfor
tunatelywe do not have any furtherstatisticaldata concerning the trade between
theOttoman provinces around theRed Sea and theworld of the Indian Ocean,
apart from the budget of Egypt which was studied and published by Stanford
Shaw in 1968, and provided some quantitative data on the customs tax revenues
1 - Halil
Inalcik, and Donald Quataert, An Economic and
nalcik, "The India trade" in Halil
Social History of theOttoman Empire, 1300-1600, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994,
I.B.
under the Ottomans, London,
p. 315-363; Suraiya Faroqhi, Pilgrims and Sultans: The Hajj
Tauris, 1994, p. 162-163; Robert Mantran, "R glements fiscaux ottomans: la province de Bassora
224-277;
XXXXVIII
du XVIe
Mehdi
Habes
to
European Expansion,
Salih
zbaran,
"The Ottoman
in
zbaran,
Bayur
SALM
'74
ZBARAN
concerning the period towards the end of the 16th century.4No cadastral survey
nor any customs registersof the province ofHabe
(i.e. of Ethiopia) have so far
been
found.
varidat
(muhasebe-i
ve ihracat-i
hizane-i
amire-i
vilayet-i
Yemen),
cov
ering the years 969/1561-62, 984/1576-77 and the years between 1004/1595
96 and 1008/1599-1600, a ruznam e (a daily registerof revenues and expendi
tures)ofYemen, dated 1005/1596-97; one mukataat (revenues) registerofYemen
covering the years 1006-1008/1597-1600; and two mukataat of the Province of
Basra: thefirstone dating from 959/1551-52 and the other 1009/1600-01.
The Province ofBasra
The revenues (mukataa and mahsul) obtained in the iskeleha of the province of
Basra (including the district of Lahsa/el-Hasa) in 959/1551-1552 were recorded
in the summary (icmal) register6reflectingsome of the data in themufassal as
shown below inTable 1.
Table 1
Iskele or bender
Shatt al-Arab
(various
Shatt al-Arab-Basra
Basra
in ak e
iskeles) 8,573
passages
Sadr-i Sevib
Revenues
547,269
1,394,799
60,000
Kuma
Katif
120,000
35,000
Tarut
52,000
Total
2,010,641
Considering that the total amount of income obtained (or supposed to have
been obtained) in thewhole province may be calculated as 6,943,021 ak e, the
customs dues or the calculated revenues
gathered from tradewere then about 35
4 - S. Shaw, The
Budget of Ottoman Egypt 1005-1006/1596-1597,
1968.
The Hague-Paris,
Mouton,
'75
garments,
wheat,
rice
and
other
cereals
were
also
taxed
at
six percent.
Sixteen ak es was taken from each kilo of indigo. Dates loaded on boats and
destined for trade fromKatif or the environs of Katif were taxed at 16 ak es per
eight baskets. Traditionally oil had never been taxed, and this old tradition
appears to have been preserved,with no tax being imposed on oil in keeping
with this custom. Linen cloth, striped stuff,muslin and flaxen fabric or any
othermaterial passing throughorwoven and sold inKatif was taxed at two ak es
per 100. Merchant ships coming fromHormuz, India or any other distant or
an
neighbouring ports and anchoring in Katif had
anchorage tax imposed of
threemuhammedis per ship: of this one muhammedi, equal to 16 ak es,which
was levied by the agents of ah-bender (a provost of the seaport)was to be main
tained, but nothing more was to be taken from the labourers. In accordance
with this ancient regulation two muhammedis were to be taken for the treasury
(miri) and one muhammedi to be taken by the agents.8
Half a century later,we have a mukataat registerfor the province of Basra9
prepared on 10 Ramazan 1009/15 March 1601 and reflecting the iskele and
bender revenues of the previous year, i.e. 1600, inwhich the figures and places
appear as follows (Table 2):
Table 2
Iskele or bender
Revenues
in ak e
2,100,000
960,000
480,000
101,000
3,641,000
Total
- See
my "Notes on theOttoman
practice of iltizam in the Arab lands in the 16th century",
in zbaran, The Ottoman Response toEuropean Expansion, p. 39-48.
8 - BOA, Tapu-tahrir, no. 282, p. 292 (See ilhan, "The Katif District (Liva)", p. 95).
9 BOA, Maliyeden M
dewer, 7541, p. 174-183.
SA H
ne
ZBARAN
The whole income of the province for thatyear appears to have been 13,179,875
ak es, so that the percentage of the commercial income stands as 36 per cent
Figures for revenues obtained in the landing places of the province of Yemen
based on an Ottoman budget ofYemen dated 7Muharrem 971/27 August 1563
for theyear 969/11 September 1561 - 30 August 1562 are given inTable 3.10
Table 3
Iskeles Revenues
inpare
104,245
47,000
Hud (!)
Salif with Kamaran
100,501
168,331
Jazan
Aden
1,555,000
Total
4,255,557
and
increased
amount
of money
in revenue
accounts.
The
following
table (Table 4) shows the revenues collected in various iskeles in the years 1004/
1595-96,12 1005/1596-9713 and 1008/1599-1600.14
10 - Topkapi
zesi Arsivi, Istanbul, Defter 314, fol. 10b-20b.
Sarayi M
11 - Topkapi
zesi Arsivi, Istanbul, Defter 314, fol. 3b-6b.
Sarayi M
12 - BOA, Maliyeden M dewer, no. 7092.
13 BOA, Maliyeden M dewer, no. 1382.
14 - BOA, Maliyeden M dewer, no. 7555 published inH.
Sahillioglu,
Yih But esi", p. 287-319.
"Yemen'in
1599-1600
Table 4
Iskeles
Years
and revenues
1004/1595-96
Aden
Lahej
Mocha
Salif and Kamaran
Hudaida
Luhaiya
and Is
in sikke*
1005*/1596-97
1008/1599-1600
14,506
13,120
7,509
11,000
62,704
3,000
53,532
17,130
(includedwith
Aden)
87,057
1,312
1,080
10,187
10,442
6,500
4,209
4,038
3,609
3,600
1,500
1,600
500
2,600
630
2,700
1,500
600
846
109,915
97,644
106,457
Ferasan
Jazan
ShihrandHad
ramawt
Ahwar (!)
Hud (!)
Total**
*A sikke, i.e., gold coin, represented41 pares at the end of the century.
**
The figures given here aremy totals rather than the amounts recorded, some
what carelessly, in thedefiers.
Conclusion
By using the figures from the above tables, it is possible to arrive at various ra
tios.
Table 5
YearTotal income
Province
Basra
959/1551-52
Yemen
968/1561-62
Yemen
984/1576
Yemen
1004/1595-96
Yemen
1005/1596-97
Yemen
1008/1599-00
6,943,021 (ak e) 35
31,730,951 (pare) 13
17,896,318 (pare) 16
Basra
1009/1600-01
13,179,875 (ak e) 36
Percentage
668,479 (sikke)19
502,328 (toto;19
400,542 (sikke)21
How, then, can we evaluate these? From these percentages, it appears that the
income for the district of Basra in themiddle of the 16th century and in the last
years of the centurywas very similar.About one thirdof the provincal revenues
seem to have been collected at customs by emins or miiltezims, as recorded in the
middle years and the last years of the 16th century.We also know from other
sources, particularly travelaccounts, official lettersand chronicles, that commer
cial trafficthrough theGulf was active in the second half of the century.At that
i78
SA H
ZBARAN
time quite a number of big ships (nzos)went toKatif, Bahrain and Basra and did
not
even
stop
as reflected
in Hormuz,
in
sources.15
Portuguese
In Yemen, on the other hand, the figures that I have given allow us to state
that the India trade in the second half of the 16th centurybrought in about 15
20 per cent of the income of the provincial budget ofOttoman Yemen, i.e. not a
large sumwhen compared with the expenditure on the huge military campaigns
imperial
We have not greatly advanced the study of the history of the southernOt
toman expansion since the days of Fernand Braudel, Magalhzes Godinho and
Cengiz Orhonlu, and furtherstudies on the 16th and 17th centuries are needed
to place theOttoman commercial presence in the southernwaters in historical
context.We need both to develop a greater
understanding of the history of the
Ottoman southern expansion, and to see Ottoman historywithin a wider per
spective.Recent debates on the early imperial expansion of the Europeans and
theAsian potential have presented theDutch in their expansionist era, for in
stance,
as
truely
rational
profit-maximizers,
whereas
the
Portuguese
were
essen
tiallymedieval seekers afterpower. Can we reject this approach, put forward for
example byNiels Steensgaard, as Sanjay Subrahmanyam and Luis Filipe Thomaz
can we
do;16 and
adopt
the latters'
on Ottoman
arguments
expansion?
they point
out
that
the trade
in Asiatic
spices
accounted
for 27
per
cent
province
was
very
small
percentage
in the balance
sheets,
and
con
sidering also that the Ottoman merchant marine beyond the limits of Basra,
Lahsa and Yemen hardly existed,18I would argue that the figures given above,
even though not
covering a longer period and or wider geographical area, allow
me to state that the limits of theOttoman economy in the Indian Ocean were
indeed
apparent.
15-Potache,
"The
commercial
relations between
Basrah
and Goa
159-161.
16 - Niels
and Luis Filipe Thomaz,
"Evolution of empire:
Steensgaard, Sanjay Subrahmanyam
the Portuguese in the Indian Ocean
during the 16th century", in J.D. Tracy (ed.), The Politi
cal Economy of
Merchant Empires, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press, 1991, p. 298-331.
M
-Ibid,
p. 328.
THE OTTOMANSAND
/X
\\
\-j
179
al-Arab
^N^AShatr
fl
\
KBasraV-'*'
V/Tarut
\ Katif\
--
/( -
\ \ Feras n o \ _/
\ Jazan
\ \
I *u,!We
J
)1amaranov>Saht
^_^C-^\
v-^
Hadramawt
joHudaida
\ 1Mocha
x
J
X'
Shihr
Aden
I_I
Map of theprovincesof Basra and Yemen