Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Email: saadchakkor@gmail.com
El Ahmadi Cheikh, Mostafa Baghouri, Abderrahmane Hajraoui
University of Abdelmalek Essadi, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Physics,
Team: Communication and Detection Systems, Tetouan, Morocco
Email: {elahmadi13, baghouri.mostafa}@gmail.com, ad_hajraoui@hotmail.com
Abstract The metrology field has been progressed with the
appearance of the wireless intelligent sensor systems providing
more capabilities such as signal processing, remote multisensing fusion etc. This kind of devices is rapidly making their
way into medical and industrial monitoring, collision avoidance,
traffic control, automotive and others applications. However,
numerous design challenges for wireless intelligent sensors
systems are imposed to overcome the physical limitations in
data traffic, such as system noise, real time communication,
signal attenuation, response dynamics, power consumption, and
effective conversion rates etc, especially for applications
requiring specific performances. This paper analyzes the
performance metrics of the mentioned sensing devices systems
which stands for superior measurement, more accuracy and
reliability. Study findings prescribe researchers, developers/
engineers and users to realizing an optimal sensing motes
design strategy that offers operational advantages which can
offer cost-effective solutions for an application.
Index Terms Wireless communications, Performance metrics,
Energy, Protocols, Intelligent sensors, Applications
Range
Reliability
Bandwidth
conformity (standards)
Security
Cost
Energy consumption
Speed and transmission type (synchronous,
asynchronous)
Network architecture (topology)
Environnement (noise, obstacles, weather,
hypsometry)
I. INTRODUCTION
Wireless technologies have made significant progress
in recent years, allowing many applications in addition to
traditional voice communications and the transmission of
high-speed data with sophisticated mobile devices and
smart objects. In fact, they also changed the field of
metrology especially the sensor networks and the smart
sensors. The establishment of an intelligent sensor system
requires the insertion of wireless communication which
has changed the world of telecommunications. It can be
used in many situations where mobility is essential and
the wires are not practical. Today, the emergence of radio
frequency wireless technologies suggests that the
expensive wiring can be reduced or eliminated. Various
technologies have emerged providing communication
differently. This difference lies in the quality of service
and in some constraints related on the application and it
environment. The main constraints to be overcome in
choosing a wireless technology revolve around the
following conditions [1], [2]:
Copyright 2014 MECS
Event detection
Tracking
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Bluetooth
UWB
ZigBee
Wi-Fi
Piconet
Piconet
Star
BSS
Scatternet
P2P
236
Basic Cell
Extension of the
Basic Cell
Max number of Cell
Nodes
Cluster
tree,
Mesh
>
65000
Tbit
Tprop
2007
Cell
System
1600
1000
Tbit + Tprop
10
Transmission Time (s)
N data
N ovhd
Ttx = N data +
N maxPld
Novhd
Single
Cell
10
NmaxPld
GPRS
Single
Cell
PTMP,
PTCM,
Mesh
B. Transmission Time
Ndata
ESS
Wi-Max
(1)
10
10
Bleutooth
UWB
ZigBee
Wi-Fi
Wi-Max
GSM/GPRS
-2
10
-4
10
2000
4000
6000
8000
Data Payload Size (Bytes)
10000
Bluetooth
UWB
ZigBee
Wi-Fi
Wi-Max
GPRS
Max data
rate (Mbit/s)
0.72
110
0.25
54
70
0.168
Bit time
( s)
1.39
0.009
4
0.0185
0.0143
5.95
Max data
payload (bytes)
339 (DH5)
2044
102
2312
2700
1500*
Pt
Pr
Gt
Coding
efficiency+ (%)
94.41
97.94
76.52
97.18
98.54
80.86
Pr
= GtGr
Pt
4 D
Max overhead
(bytes)
158/8
42
31
58
40
52*
(2)
Gr
D
1
4
Pr
Pt G t G r
(3)
-4
16
x 10
k=512 Bytes
k=1024 Bytes
14
Energy (J)
12
10
8
6
4
2
20
40
60
Range (m)
80
100
D. Energy consumption
The energy consumption for intelligent sensor involves
three steps: acquisition, communication, computation and
data aggregation. This consumption in the acquisition
operation depends on the nature of the application [3].
Data traffic, particularly in the transmission, consumes
more energy than the other operations. It also depends on
the distance between the transmitter and receiver [4], [5].
According to the radio energy model, [6], [38-44] the
transmission power of a k bit message to a distance d is
given by:
ETX ( k , d ) =
k . fs .d 2 + k.EElec
4
k. amp .d + k .EElec
d0 =
EElec
fs, amp
d < d0
d d0
fs
amp
d dc
4 Lhr ht
(7)
Value
50 nJ/bit
10 pJ/bit/m2
0.0013 pJ/bit/m4
(6)
(5)
fs
d < dc
amp
2 2
PG
t t Gr ht hr
d4
dc =
L
ht
hr
d
(4)
electronic energy
amplification energy
Parameters
EElec
Pr ( d ) =
( 4 d )
Parameters
L
Gt=Gr
ht=hr
Protocols
Bluetooth
UWB
ZigBee
Wi-Fi
Wi-Max
GSM/GPRS
Value
1
1
1.5 m
-2
10
-4
Power (Watt)
10
-6
10
-8
10
-10
10
-12
10
10
20
30
40
50
60
Range (m)
70
80
90
100
Fig. 5. The received power depending on the signal range with fixed
message size
VDD
ITX
IRX
(volt)
(mA)
(mA)
BlueCore2
1.8
57
47
0.72
UWB
XS110
3.3
~227
~227
114
ZigBee
CC2430
3.0
24.7
27
0.25
Wi-Fi
CX53111
3.3
219
215
54
Wi-Max
AT86
RF535A
3.3
320
200
70
GPRS
SIM300
350*
230*
0.164*
Protocols
Bluetooth
Chipset
(Mb/s)
NErr
NTXBits
100
Eb /N0 (dB)
7,8
12,7
13,3
13,8
14,3
14,8
15,7
17,6
22,6
B.E.R
10-6
10-6
10-6
10-6
10-6
10-6
10-6
10-6
10-6
However, because of their sensitivity to noise and nonlinearities, the modulations 4PAM and 8DPSK remain
little used compared to other modulations. Concerning
the QAM modulation, it uses more efficiently the
transmitted energy when the number of bits per symbol
increases. As for the frequency hopping FSK
modulations, the increase of the symbols will enable
reduction of the BER but also increase the spectral
occupancy. The main fault of these FSK modulations is
their low spectral efficiency. On the other side, the
GMSK modulation has been developed in order to
increase the spectral efficiency [50]. It has a satisfactory
performance in terms of BER and noise resistance [9],
[35-41]. Furthermore, the lower bit error probability is
obtained to the detriment of the number of users. It can be
helpful to investigate the relationship between the
transmission quality and the number of served users.
G. Data coding efficiency
The coding efficiency can be calculated from the
following formula:
N data
Pcdeff = 100
(9)
N data
N data +
N ovhd
N maxPld
80
60
Bleutooth
UWB
ZigBee
Wi-Fi
Wi-Max
GSM/GPRS
40
20
0
0
10
10
10
10
Data Payload Size (Bytes)
10
be
L
(10)
J.
be=0.01
be=0.005
be=0.0001
-1
10
-2
10
-3
10
50
100
Packet Length (Bytes)
150
I.
Energy index
number of retransmissions
packet overhead
transceiver energy
collision, idle and overhearing energy
em =200 nJ
ec =100 nJ
0.01
400
300
200
100
be=0.01
be=0.005
be=0.0001
0.008
Energy Index (nJ)
m
Tframe
Tbackoff
500
Throughput (Kbits/s)
10
20
40
60
Backoff Time (ms)
80
100
0.006
0.002
E switch = C
(14)
Vdd
(13)
N
f
(15)
3.025
x 10
3.025
3.025
3.025
3.025
3.025
100
200
300
Number of instruction cycles
400
500
V.
300
CONCLUSION
250.0
Range(m)
Data rate(Kbps)
Tx Power(mW)
Rx Power(mW)
MCU Power(mW)
VI.
250.0
300.0
250.0
250
200
100.0
100.0
100.0
150
56.4
12.0
52.2
38.0
18.0
35.0
59.1
30.0
42.0
16.5
42.0
29.0
50
38.4
100
mica2dot
micaz
telos
tmote sky
REFERENCES
[1] Jean-Paul M., G. Linmartz's, Wireless Communication,
The Interactive Multimedia CD-ROM, Baltzer Science
Publishers, Amsterdam, Vol. 1 (1996), No.1
[2] Helen Fornazier et al., Wireless Communication : Wi-Fi,
Bluetooth, IEEE 802.15.4, DASH7, ROSE 2012
ELECINF344 / ELECINF381, Tlcom ParisTech, web
site : http://rose.eu.org/2012/category/admin
[3] Lehsaini Mohamed, Diffusion et couverture bases sur le
clustering dans les rseaux de capteurs : application la
domotique , Thse de Doctorat, Universit de FrancheComt Besanon, U.F.R Sciences et Techniques, cole
Doctorale SPIM, Juillet 2009
[4] Trevor Pering et al., CoolSpots: Reducing the Power
Consumption of Wireless Mobile Devices with Multiple
Radio
Interfaces,
ACM
1-59593-195-3/06/0006,
MobiSys'06, June 1922, 2006, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Travis Collins et al., A Green Approach to a MultiProtocol Wireless Communications Network, Major
Qualifying Project to obtain the Degree in Bachelor of
Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty
of Worcester Polytechnic Institute, University of Limerick
2011, http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects
[6] Wendi B. Heinzelman et al., An Application-Specific
Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor
Networks, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 1, NO. 4, OCTOBER 2002
[7] Baghouri Mostafa, Chakkor Saad, Hajraoui Abderrahmane,
Fuzzy logic approach to improving Stable Election
Protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor
networks, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information
Technology, Vol. 53 No.3, July 2013
[8] El Ahmadi Cheikh, Chakkor Saad et al, New Approach to
Improving Lifetime in Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor
Networks Based on Clustering Energy Efficiency
Algorithm, Journal of Theoretical and Applied
Information Technology, Vol. 61 No.2, March 2014
[9] Crepin Nsiala Nzeza, RCEPTEUR ADAPTATIF
MULTI-STANDARDS POUR LES SIGNAUX A
TALEMENT DE SPECTRE EN CONTEXTE NON
COOPRATIF , thse de Doctorat, UNIVERSIT de
Bretagne Occidentale, Juillet 2006
[10] Guillaume Terrasson, CONTRIBUTION A LA
CONCEPTION DEMETTEUR- RECEPTEUR POUR
MICROCAPTEURS AUTONOMES, thse de Doctorat,
UNIVERSIT BORDEAUX 1, Novembre 2008
[11] Creed Huddleston, Intelligent Sensor Design Using the
Microchip dsPIC (Embedded Technology), Newnes 2007
[12] Elmostafa Ziani, CONCEPTION ET REALISATION
DUN INSTRUMENT ULTRASONORE INTELLIGENT
DEDIE A LA MESURE DE DEBITS DECOULEMENT
A SURFACE LIBRE, Thse de doctorat en cotutelle,
Universit Abdelmalek Essadi, Facult des sciences et
techniques de Tanger, Universit de paris 13 Villetaneuse,
Institut universitaire de technologie de Saint- denis 2005
[13] Fei Hu, Qi Hao, Intelligent Sensor Networks: The
Integration of Sensor Networks, Signal Processing and
Machine Learning, CRC Press 2012
[14] Jin-Shyan Lee et al., A Comparative Study of Wireless
Protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi, The 33rd
Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics
Society (IECON), Taipei, Taiwan, November 5-8, 2007
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]