Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Rocky Mountain
ASHRAE
2013 Tech
Conference
April 19, 2013
by:
Silvertip
HIGH ALTITUDE
HVAC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Goals
NOT
Overview
A Few Examples
Thought Process
Why
(In the words of...)
Understand, rather
than......
Cookbook
Substitute for
engineering
Altitude Effects
Baseball
Home run distance
Basketball
Doug Moe Era
Football
Similarities???
Relation to air
density
Gravity???
Function of oxygen
content
Heat Rejection
Mitigating Factors
Humidity
Equipment
counteracts using:
Heat transfer
Temperature
Equipment design
basis
Pressure
Combustion
equipment
Boilers, furnaces,
generators, engines,
gas absorption
Condensers, chillers
Motors, electrical
and electronic
equipment
High Altitude HVAC Design
RM ASHRAE 2013 Tech Conf
Pumps
Evaporative coolers,
Cooling towers
Balancing, VAV box
April 19, 2013
Michael D. Haughey, P.E., CEM, HBDP
Airflow Calculations
(Sensible Only)
cfm = (Btu / hr) / (CP * p * 60 * DT)
Let CP * p * 60 = FCFM = CFM
transfer factor
cfm = (Btu / hr) / (FCFM * DT)
Airflow Calculations
(Sensible Only)
OR
cfm * FCFM * DT = Btu / hr
Look up FCFM in tables
THEN
Check on Psych Chart
Reference
page 1
10
11
12
13
14
15
Fan selection
Use computer selection at altitude,
OR
16
Reference
page 7
17
Altitude
Correction
factors
Temperature
Correction
factors
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Reference
Page 3
25
Altitude
Correction
factors
26
27
Reference
Page 5
28
29
30
10
Reference
page 39
Motor
Rating
limits
31
32
33
11
Reference
Page 36
Altitude
Correction
factors
34
35
Combustion Equipment
Gravity, packaged
equipment, AGA:
de-rate by 4% /
1,000 ft. (volume of
combustion air flue
gas increases about
4%/1,000 ft.)
Typically de-rate
when above 2,000 ft.
elevation
High Altitude HVAC Design
RM ASHRAE 2013 Tech Conf
36
12
37
38
39
13
Pumps
Three concerns:
NPSH
Cavitation
Motor cooling / rating
NPSH: less
barometric pressure
on open systems, 6
ft. less at 5000 ft.
altitude
Cavitation: less
barometric pressure
on open systems
April 19, 2013
Michael D. Haughey, P.E., CEM, HBDP
40
Reference
Page 41
NPSH
Formula
41
42
14
Reference
page 47
NPSH
Formula
43
44
Evaporative Coolers
Significant
Parameters
Mass Velocity
Air Density
Heat Transfer
Coefficient,
turbulence at
boundary layer
Water Vapor
Pressure
High Altitude HVAC Design
RM ASHRAE 2013 Tech Conf
45
15
Reference
Page 73
Humidification
Effectiveness
Formula
46
47
Cooling Towers
Some controversy
Dont derate but increase fan motor HP
Dont derate
Dont derate and reduce fan motor HP
Add capacity at higher altitude
48
16
Cooling Towers
For some (or most typical, higher WB)
operating conditions, increased water
partial pressure at higher altitudes may
have a greater effect in increasing
capacity than reduced density does in
reducing capacity
Cold air operation economizers: less
capacity.
High Altitude HVAC Design
RM ASHRAE 2013 Tech Conf
49
Cooling Towers
Data hard to find, normally included in
selection software
Some info at CTI.org/tech_papers
50
Reference
Page 74
One
Method
51
17
52
Per one
manufacturers
representative, 1/2%
per 1000 ft. for 65F
EWB and 1.25%
per 1000 ft. for 78F
EWB.
53
Lower density
overpowers the added
capacity from increased
vapor pressure at
higher altitude
54
18
Summary
Use Mfg data where
available, BUT
check it to be sure
reasonable
Consider
density
Heat transfer
Motor cooling
Vapor pressure
Mass flow
High Altitude HVAC Design
RM ASHRAE 2013 Tech Conf
Be aware of
counteracting
factors
Use altitude psych
charts
Be sure of the
altitude for data
Use absolute
barometric pres.
April 19, 2013
Michael D. Haughey, P.E., CEM, HBDP
55
The End
56
Questions?
57
19
Supplemental Handouts
58
20