Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I.
INTRODUCTION
A. Modeling cMUTs
Fig. 1 is a two port equivalent circuit model shown by the
Khuri-Yakub research group at Stanford University to assist in
designing a cMUT for a particular application. The derivations
of the following equations are given in Hunt [3], Ladabaum [4],
and Mason [7]. Note that Zs is the electrical impedance of the
384
rm k 1 k 2 ( jk 2 J 0 (k 1 rm ) I 1 ( jk 2 rm ) + k 1 J 1 ( k 1 rm ) I 0 ( jk 2 rm ) )
Z m = j t m
2
2
rm k 1 k 2 ( jk 2 J 0 (k 1 rm ) I 1 ( jk 2 rm ) + k 1 J 1 ( k 1 rm ) I 0 ( jk 2 rm ) ) j 2 k 1 + k 2 (J 1 (k 1 rm ) I 1 ( jk 2 rm ) )
1:n
Zs
ZmA
d=
ZaA
C0
(1)
(7)
Figure 1. Two-port equivalent circuit for a cMUT. The port on the left is the
electric port (connected to the system) and the port on the right is the acoustic
port (placed on the body).
Zs
C0 =
0 m A
0tm + mta
(2)
C0
n=
VDC 0 2m A
( 0 t m + m t a )2
(3)
k1 =
d 2 + 4 c 2 d
2c
k2 = j
d 2 + 4c2 + d
2c
c=
(Y0 + T ) t m2
12 1 2
ZaA/n2
(4)
(5)
(6)
385
METHODS
Figure 3. cMUT array with flexible interconnect circuit.
A. Fabrication of cMUTs
Fabrication methods for cMUTs are described in detail in
the literature and briefly below for reference. Results from
both surface and bulk micro-machined cMUTs are shown in
this paper, but it is not the intent of the author to make a
comparison between the two methods. At this point, both
processes seem viable and should be investigated further. A
cMUT generally consists of a silicon substrate with a
membrane, typically silicon or silicon nitride, over a vacuum
gap. In the case of surface micro-machined cMUTs, sacrificial
oxide layer and nitride membrane are first applied to the
substrate wafer. Next, etch holes are opened in the wafer in the
desired locations by e-beam lithography. The sacrificial oxide
is then etched away and the holes are plugged. Metal and
passivation can then be applied to the top surface of the wafer
and patterned as desired. [4]
Figure 4. Assembled cMUT probe showing the ergonomic handle, cable, and
system connector.
386
Figure 5. Acoustic testing setup showing the water tank, 5-axis positioning
system, and cMUT array with biasing electronics.
III.
RESULTS
387
Figure 8. Short-axis view of the carotid artery and thyroid gland from a PZT
array (left) and a cMUT array (right).
Figure 9. Long-axis view of the carotid artery from a PZT array (left) and a
cMUT array (right).
Mean
2dB
388
Mean
2dB
Figure 12. Bandwidth variation across a bulk micromachined cMUT array
operated in conventional mode.
389
REFERENCES
[1]
DISCUSSION
Figure 16.
Short-axis view of the carotid artery and thyroid gland from a PZT array (left) and a
bulk micromachined cMUT array operated in collapse mode. (right).
390