Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Titration Lab
Report
GRADE 10 CHEMISTRY
AIM
To find out if there is a clear correlation between the acidity and the energy (kcal)
of the chosen beverages.
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
WHAT IS TITRATION?
Titration is a method used to find the concentration of an unknown solution by
using a solution of known concentration. The known solution is known as the
titrant and the unknown solution is known as the analyte. If we are able to find
out the volume of the titrant added to the analyte, we can use that to find the
concentration of the analyte.
(http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/lab/techniques/titration/what.html)
CONTENTS OF BEVERAGES
COCA COLA (COCOCOLA.JP)
SPRITE(COCOCOLA.JP)
CC LEMON (COCOCOLA.JP)
ORANGINA (COCOCOLA.JP)
(COCOCOLA.JP)
Beverage
Acids in it
Coca Cola
Sprite
Orangina
CC Lemon
Ginger Ale
The acids and sugars in these beverages can also cause digestive problems and
make people more likely to get health issues. Our mouth lining, esophagus and
throat are very sensitive to the acids found in these drinks and so is our stomach.
If sodas are drank on a regular basis, the acids in them decrease the secretion of
hydrochloric acid in our stomach. This can, overall, affect the digestion process
in our stomach. However, this also means that pathogens that are usually stopped
by the hydrochloric acid in our stomach are now free to move to our intestines
and cause health issues. (sfgate.com)
HYPOTHESIS
I think that there will be no correlation between the acidity of the drink and its
sweetness. After doing research, I found out that the acidity in the drinks is not
affected by the amount of sugar in it. It is affected by how much acid is inserted,
its concentration and the type of acid. For example, hydrochloric acid wont be
used in drinks, as it is really powerful. (sfgate.com)
VARIABLES
Independant Variable
Dependant Variable
Controlled Variables
Orangina)
(50mL)
The volume of the soft
drops)
The concentration of
NaOH (0.1M)
MATERIALS/ EQUIPMENT
Apparatus
Chemical
Burette (50mL)
Conical Flask (100mL)
Beaker (100mL)
Measuring Cylinder (25mL)
Burette Stand and Clamp
Funnel
METHOD
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. RESULTS
RAW DATA
Table 1. Showing the Results Acquired through the Experiment
Beverage
Trial 1 (mL)
Trial 2 (mL)
Trial 3 (mL)
Trial 4 (mL)
Sprite
21.6
17.3
15.3
15.5
Orangina
18.7
20.2
18.6
19.2
CC Lemon
18.4
18.5
17.9
16.6
Ginger Ale
17.9
19.8
17.8
18.2
Coca Cola
17.5
15.2
17.9
15.6
Beverage
Energy (kcal)
Sprite
41
Orangina
43
CC Lemon
44
Ginger Ale
35
Coca Cola
45
PROCESSED DATA
Table 3. Showing the Averages of the All the Trials Conducted for each Beverage
Beverage
Trial 1 (mL)
Trial 2 (mL)
Trial 3 (mL)
Trial 4 (mL)
Average (mL)
Sprite
21.6 (not
counted in
average since it
is really
different to
others)
17.3
15.3
15.5
16.0
Orangina
18.7
20.2
18.6
19.2
19.2
CC Lemon
18.4
18.5
17.9
16.6
17.9
Ginger Ale
17.9
19.8
17.8
18.2
18.4
Coca Cola
17.5
15.2
17.9
15.6
16.6
sCalculations:
Sprite: (17.3+15.3+15.5)/3 = 16.0 (3 s.f.) (21.6, from Trial 1, is disregarded as it is really
different from the other trials.)
Orangina: (18.7+20.2+18.6+19.2)/4 = 19.2 (3 s.f.)
CC Lemon: (18.4+18.5+17.9+16.6)/4 =17.9 (3 s.f.)
Ginger Ale: (17.9+19.8+17.8+18.2)/4 = 18.4 (3 s.f.)
Coca Cola: (17.5+15.2+17.9+15.6)/4 = 16.6 (3 s.f.)
Table 4. Showing the Acidity of the Different Beverages
Beverage
Acidity
Sprite
0.064
Orangina
0.077
CC Lemon
0.072
Ginger Ale
0.074
Coca Cola
0.066
Calculations:
Example (for Sprite)
Ar of NaOH = 40g
1M of NaOH = 40g
Therefore, 0.1M of NaOH = 4g in 1000ml (dm3)
of water
4/1000 = 0.004
Average of all the trials of Sprite = 16.0mL
16.0 x 0.004 = 0.064
Therefore, 0.064g of NaOH is in the drink.
Table 5. Comparing the Acidity and the Energy of the Different Drinks
Beverage
Acidity
Energy (kcal)
Sprite
0.064
41
Orangina
0.077
43
CC Lemon
0.072
44
Ginger Ale
0.074
35
Coca Cola
0.066
45
GRAPHS
Graph 1. Graph Showing the Acidity (g of NaOH) of the Chosen Beverages
CONCLUSION
From the data I collected with my group, I am able to conclude that there is no direct
relation between the acidity of the beverage and its energy. This is also what I had
predicted in my hypothesis. If we compare Graph 1 and Graph 2, we can deduce that
there is no connection, pattern or trend between the acidity and the energy. For example,
Coca Cola has low acidity, however it has the highest energy. But, Orangina has high
acidity and energy. Therefore, there is no trend that can be seen here.
I think that my results make sense. All of these drinks have different quantities of acids,
different types of acids and different types of sugars added to them. This is why there is
no simple, visible trend. However, if we did a experiment on drinks that use the same
type of acid and sugar, I think that we would have gotten a trend. But, in this case, since
we have many different types of drinks, I think that it is natural that we dont see a
pattern. So, I think my experiment, itself, was successful, however, my aim wasnt
constructed correctly. I should have measured drinks with the same types of acids and
etc.
EVALUATION
Limitation
Improvements
(usdavis.edu)
titrating.
properly titrated.
pipette.
Extensions:
10
Do the same experiment with drinks that use the same type of acid
Do the same experiment with drinks that use the same type of sugars
Measure the sugar level instead of the energy
DISCUSSION
ASSUMING THE RATIO OF THE ACID AND THE BASE IS 1M TO 1M
While doing this experiment and processing data, a lot of assumptions were made. The
first thing I assumed was that the ration between NaOH and the acid in the drink is 1M to
1M. However, this was not the case. The concentration of the acid and the NaOH was
different, but we had to assume that they 1M to 1M, in order to do the calculations. This
made the processed data inaccurate. If we had found a way to calculate the results,
without assuming that the ration was 1M to 1M, I think that it would have been possible
to find a trend in the data.
11
REFERENCES
12
13