Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
On
Published by:
AMT The Association For Manufacturing Technology
7901 West Park Drive, McLean, VA 22102
Printed in the United States of America
Copyright 2006 AMT The Association for Manufacturing
Technology all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of the publisher.
ii
Preface
1
Introduction . 1
1.1
What is cryogenic machining? 2
1.2
Early history of cryogenic machining (1950 1975) . 3
23
25
28
30
31
32
34
35
37
38
41
42
10
11
Cryogenic grinding
11.1
Cryogenic cooling effects in grinding 55
11.2
Cryogenic grinding of steels and stainless steels .. 56
iii
11.3
11.4
12
13
66
68
70
71
73
76
References . 77
iv
Preface
The present report tries to document the increasing use of cryogenic cooling in the
various fields of machining. The document is based on an extensive literature review
of published work and patents, as well as information obtained on commerciallylaunched products and processes. Despite the authors best efforts, some of the
information contained in this document might be outdated or incorrect. While the
author has tried to include all well-known research in the area of cryogenic
machining, a significant portion of the reviewed information still comes from our own
research at Air Products and Chemicals over the last decade. While there are a
number of ongoing activities by several research groups throughout the world, the
area of cryogenic machining is still an emerging area and less mature than some of
the fields that has been covered in previous AMT Technology Assessment reports.
The author would like to thank his colleague Zbigniew Zurecki for his help in putting
this report together. The author would also like to acknowledge the help provided by
Prof. I.S. Jawahir in literature search. Finally, the author would like to express his
appreciation to AMT for the opportunity to put this work together and hopes that the
manufacturing community finds the work to be useful.
Ranajit Ghosh
Allentown, PA
January 25, 2006
1. Introduction
In recent years, as low-cost manufacturing has driven down unit part costs,
manufacturers are striving harder to improve productivity and maintain part quality.
Continuing improvements in productivity through better cutting tools, machine tools
and processes have resulted in significant increases in cutting speeds.
An
unintended consequence of improving productivity gains is the significant increase in
heat, generated in the cutting process. Management of this increased heat and the
resulting high temperature it produces is critical in formulating a stable, optimized
machining process with improved tool life and part quality.
While innovations in the areas of tool/work/machine interaction and material
treatment processes have enhanced productivity and part quality, the same is not
true for cooling and temperature management of the machining process. This is due
to the fact that the conventional coolants, such as air, oils, or aqueous emulsions,
whether in flood or mist form, have a limited potential to meaningfully impact the
extremely high temperatures produced during the modern machining processes. The
heat transfer coefficient of conventional coolants is still less than that of water and
consequently, the convective heat transfer process is not efficient enough to counter
the accelerated thermal wear of the tool.
Cryogenic fluids have been used in industrial quenching and cold treating
applications for quite some time, but their application in the machining industry as
coolants is relatively new. However, the history of cryogenic machining research
traces back more than 50 years. One of the earliest known applications of cryogenic
machining involved the application of liquid carbon dioxide in machining in the early
1950s. Use of liquid nitrogen as a coolant in machining was first documented in the
mid-1960s. However, issues related to economical machining with cryogenic fluids,
variable material behavior at cryogenic temperatures and lack of efficient delivery
systems prevented industrial adoption and caused the level of research to drop off
significantly in the seventies and early eighties. Since then, the need for more
efficient machining of difficult-to-machine materials, as well as the desire to
eliminate the use of oil or water-based cutting fluids has prompted renewed interest
from several research groups and industries. This interest has also spawned the
development of other cryogenic material removal processes, which are highlighted in
the latter part of this review.
2.
2.1
2.1.1
2.2.1
300
W o rk M a te ria l: A 2 (6 2 H R c)
O p e ra tio n : O D T u rn in g / C o n tin u o u s C u ts
T o o l: C N G A 4 3 2 (A l 2 O 3 ce ra m ic)
d o c: 0 .0 1 5 in . (0 .3 8 m m ) f = 0 .0 0 9 in . (0 .2 3 m m ) U = 7 0 0 S FM (2 1 3 m /m in .)
C o o la n t: L IN , D R Y , H ig h P re ssu re Flo o d (H P F), Lo w P re ssu re Flo o d (L P F)
250
L IN
DRY
200
HPF
LPF
150
100
50
C ircle d d o ts in d ica te o n se t o f to o l fa ilu re
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
C u t T im e (s e c .)
Figure 2.2.1: Feed force comparison between LIN, Dry and Flood cooling
300
W ork Material: A2 (62 HRc)
Operation: Increasing feed (0.004" - 0.020") @ 1 sec. interval
Tool: CNGA 432 (Al2O 3 ceramic)
doc: 0.015" (0.38 mm) U = 600 SFM (183 m/min.)
Coolant: LIN, DRY, High Pressure Flood, Low Pressure Flood
250
Actual Feed
0.012
LIN
200
0.016
DRY
HPF
150
0.008
LPF
100
0.004
50
Cirlced dots indicate onset of tool failure
0
0
10
12
14
Figure 2.2.2: Feed force comparison under variable load for LIN, Dry and Flood cooling
2.2.2
2.2.3
Performance evaluation of
carbide cutting tool inserts
cryogenically
treated
Abstract
The researchers investigated the effects of various cold treatments on tungsten
carbide cutting tools and compared the metallurgical properties and cutting
performance. The six treatment conditions were: (a) as received (b) quenching
treatment (c) cryogenic quenching (d) cryogenic quenching followed by tempering
(e) cold treatment and (f) cold treatment followed by tempering. The researchers
did not observe any significant differences in hardness between the six samples.
However, abrasion wear and chipping resistance were significantly better with the
treated tools (c, d, e and f) at all cutting speeds. No observable difference in tool
performance was recorded between cold treatment at -80C and cryogenic treatment
at -196C.
Microstructure analysis showed distinct differences between the samples, especially
the amount and distribution of -phase carbides. The researchers attributed the
increase in wear resistance of the treated tools to the presence of these -phase
carbides. Relatively low change in fracture toughness of the treated tools was
ascribed to the fineness and even distribution of the phase.
Key research issues for this program
Cryogenic treatment of cutting tools
Reference
Seah K. H. W., Rahman M. and Yong K. H., Performance evaluation of cryogenically
treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts, Proceedings of Institute of Mechanical
Engineers, vol. 217(B), 2003, pp. 29-43.
2.2.4
2.2.5
fiberboard
with
10
2.2.6
11
2.3.1
12
3.
3.1
3.1.1
13
3.1.2
14
3.1.3
temperatures
in
15
3.2.1
The conductive heat transfer process through the cutting tool was also shown to be
dependent on the temperature difference between the surface and bulk temperature.
The researchers explained that with cryogenic cooling, the bulk of the tool is at
cryogenic temperature, which results in a steep temperature gradient between the
hot cutting zone and the insert subsurface. This not only results in an efficient heat
removal process, but also generates significant compressive residual stresses within
the bulk of the tool, increasing its fracture toughness.
Key research issues for this program
Cryogenic machining of ferrous, nonferrous and composites
Effects of cryogenic cooling on surface properties
Efficient cryogenic delivery systems
Cryogenic milling and drilling
Reference
Zurecki Z. and Harriott G., Development of industrial systems for cost effective
machining of metals using an environmentally friendly liquid nitrogen coolant,
Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Conference, Long Beach, CA, June 1998.
16
3.2.2
17
3.2.3
18
4.
4.1
4.1.1
19
4.1.2
solid
20
4.1.3
21
4.2.1
22
5.
5.1
Machining of steels
5.1.1
23
5.1.2
24
5.2.1
Abstract
The researchers studied the effects of cryogenic cooling on the machinability of
austenitic stainless steels. Comparison tests were carried out between oil emulsion
and liquid nitrogen cooling with both high speed and carbide tools. Results show a
10 20% reduction in cutting forces with LIN cooling at all speeds and an increase in
the cutting speed with both carbide and HSS tools. LIN-cooled machining was shown
to improve the surface finish with HSS tools, while an opposing effect was observed
with carbide tools.
Key research issues for this program
Cryogenic machining of stainless steels
Reference
Mitelea I. and Popovici G., Cutting forces and surface roughness in cryogenic
machining of austenitic stainless steels, Utensil, vol. 15, 1993, pp. 31-35.
25
5.2.2
26
5.2.3
27
5.3.1
28
5.3.2
29
5.4.1
30
6.
6.1
6.1.1
31
6.2.1
Cryogenic machining
composites
of
tungsten
carbide/cobalt
32
Reference
Ghosh R., Zurecki Z. and Frey J. H., Cryogenic machining with brittle tools and
effects on tool life, Proceedings of ASME IMECE2003-42232, Nov. 2003.
0.5 mm
PCD layer
Carbide
holder
Overheated
braze
Flank wear
(abrasion)
Figure 6.2.2: Worn tool, showing heat built-up in the braze layer
Figure 6.2.3: Comparison of PCD rake surfaces, showing smearing with flood
33
6.3.1
34
6.4.1
35
Figure 6.4.1: Subsurface hardness changes between LIN and flood cooling
Figure 6.4.2: Tool life comparison between LIN and flood cooling
36
7.
7.1
7.1.1
37
7.2.1
38
7.2.2
39
7.2.3
40
7.3.1
41
7.4.1
42
8.
8.1
8.1.1
43
8.1.2
44
8.2.1
45
9.
9.1
9.1.1
46
0.35
BNC200 / DRY
ZC4 / LIN
BNC200 / FLOOD
0.25
0.2
12
16
20
24
28
32
# of interruptions ('000s)
0.9
0.8
Material: 52100 Steel Slot: 3/16" wide single slot
DOC: 0.007" Feed: 0.005" Speed: 900 SFM
Insert: CNGA 432 (PCBN) Coolant: DRY
0.6
0.7
0.5
62 HRc
TL: 0.2 min.
0.4
0.3
0.8
Nose Wear (m m )
0.7
N ose Wear (m m )
0.3
56 HRc
TL: 3.13 min.
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.5
0.4
56 HRc
TL: 14.82 min.
62 HRc
TL: 3.55 min.
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
10
12
14
47
16
10.
10.1
10.1.1
48
10.1.2
49
10.2.1
50
10.3.1
51
10.3.2
52
10.3.3
Nanocrystalline
cryomilling
NiCrAlY
powder
synthesis
by
53
10.3.4
54
11.
Cryogenic Grinding
11.1
11.1.1
55
11.2.1
56
11.2.2
57
11.3.1
58
11.3.2
59
11.4.1
60
12.
12.1
12.1.1
61
62
12.1.2
Reference
Kudashov D. V., Baum H., Martin U., Heilmaier M. and Oettel H., Microstructure and
room temperature hardening of ultra-fine-grained oxide-dispersion strengthened
copper prepared by cryomilling, Materials Science and Engineering, vol. A 387389,
2004, pp. 768771.
63
12.2.1
Reference
Ghosh R., Cryogenic Machining of Functionally Critical Hardened Steel and Powder
Metal Components, 1st Annual Manufacturing Technology Summit (SME), Aug 2004,
Dearborn, MI.
64
60 minutes
30 minutes
Sn = 22.6 ksi
Sn = 50.9 ksi
0.025
0.020
PCBN/FLOOD sample
PCBN/DRY sample
0.015
Al2O3/LIN sample
0.010
Sample Preparation
Depth of Cut: 0.020" Feed: 0.003"
Coolant: DRY, FLOOD, LIN
0.005
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Figure 12.2.2: Comparison of wear track width between LIN, flood and dry samples
65
13.
13.1
ICEJET machining
13.1.1
66
13.1.2
In initial tests, productivity was much lower than AWJ machining, mainly due to
clogging of ice particles and the low cutting ability of ice, compared to abrasive
particles. However, a significantly narrower kerf was generated with IJ machining of
stainless steels, compared to AWJ machining.
The researchers attribute this
phenomenon to the prevention of steam formation in the icejet, resulting in a
reduction of the jet diameter. Similar kerf width reductions were also reported in
cutting of Ti, Al and Cu. With IJ, depth of penetration in drilling was significantly
higher, compared to waterjet machining, in all materials tested.
Key research issues for this program
Icejet machining
Reference
Geskin E., Shishkin D. and Babets K., Investigation of Icejet machining,
Proceedings of 1999 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference, Long
Beach, California, January 1999.
67
13.2.1
68
13.2.2
69
13.3.1
70
13.4.1
71
13.4.2
72
13.5.1
73
13.5.2
74
13.5.3
75
13.6.1
76
REFERENCES
Australia
13.5.3 Nguyen T. and Zhang L. C., An assessment of the applicability of cold air
and oil mist in surface grinding, Journal of Material Processing Technology, vol. 140,
2003, pp. 224-230.
13.1.1 Shanmugam D. K., Chen F. L. and Morsi Y., Analysis of Ice Particles Using
Visualisation Techniques, Symposium on Engineering Plasticity and its Applications,
Sydney, December, 2002.
China
13.5.1 Gao H., Wang J. X. and Lan X. H., Development of CBN wheel with cold gas
inner cooling, Key Engineering Materials, vol. 202-203, 2001, pp. 215-218.
5.3.2
Li J., Yuan Z. and Zhou M., Cryogenic ultra-precision machining of ferrous
metals with natural diamond tools, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol.
25(1), 1989, pp. 69-72.
8.1.1
Zhao Q., Chen M., Liang Y. and Dong S., Wear of diamond cutting tool in
ultra-precision single point turning, Mocaxue Xuebao (Tribology) [China], vol. 22,
2003, pp. 321-327.
2.2.6
Zhao Z. and Hong S. Y., Cryogenic properties of some cutting tool
materials, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 1(5), 1992, pp.
705-714.
11.3.1 Zhu B., Zhang F. H. and Niu H., Grinding titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) by
cryogenic cooling, Key Engineering Materials, vol. 202-203, 2001, pp. 309-314.
Germany
4.1.3
Hbner W., Gradt T., Schneider T. and Borner H., Tribological behavior of
materials at cryogenic temperatures, Wear, vol. 216, 1998, pp. 150-159.
12.1.2 Kudashov D. V., Baum H., Martin U., Heilmaier M. and Oettel H.,
Microstructure and room temperature hardening of ultra-fine-grained oxidedispersion strengthened copper prepared by cryomilling, Materials Science and
Engineering, vol. A 387389, 2004, pp. 768771.
11.3.2 Teicher U., Ghosh A., Chattopadhyay A. B. and Kunanz K., On the
grindability of titanium alloy by brazed type mono-layered superabrasive grinding
wheels, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2006 [to be
published].
11.4.1 Wilczek M., Bertling J. and Hintemann D., Optimized technologies for
cryogenic grinding, International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 74S, 2004, pp.
S425S434.
77
India
10.2.1 Chattopadhyay A. B., Bose A. and Chattopadhyay A. K., Improvement in
grinding steels by cryogenic cooling, Precision Engineering, vol. 7(2), 1985, pp. 9398.
3.1.1
Dhar N. R., Paul S. and Chattopadhyay A. B., Role of Cryogenic Cooling on
Cutting Temperature in Turning Steel, Journal of Manufacturing Science and
Engineering (ASME), vol. 124, 2002, pp. 146-154.
3.2.3
Paul S. and Chattopadhyay A. B., Determination and control of grinding
zone temperature under cryogenic cooling, International Journal of Machine Tools
and Manufacture, vol. 36(4), 1996, pp. 491-501.
5.1.2
Paul S. Dhar N. R. and Chattopadhyay A. B., Beneficial effects of cryogenic
cooling over dry and wet machining on tool wear and surface finish in turning of AISI
1060 steel, Journal of Material Processing Technology, vol. 116, 2001, pp. 44-48.
11.1.1 Paul S. and Chattopadhyay A. B., A study of effects of cryo-cooling in
grinding, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 35(1), 1995, pp.
109-117.
7.2.1
Venugopal K. A., Tawade R., Prashanth P. G. and Chattopadhyay A. B.,
Turning of titanium alloy with TiB2-coated carbides under cryogenic cooling,
Proceedings of Institute of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 217(B), 2003, pp. 1697-1707.
Japan
13.4.2 Kitajima K., Miyazaki K., Minamino S. and Akamatsu T., End milling
characteristics using cold air and dry ice flow, Technology Reports of Kansai
University (Japan), vol. 43, 2001, pp. 1-9.
13.5.2 Yokogawa M., Yokogawa K. and Honma H., Study of environmentally
conscious CBN cooling-air grinding technology, Japan Society of Precision
Engineering, vol. 31(3), 1997, pp. 187-192.
Malaysia
7.2.3
Venkatesh V. C., Brevern P., Izman S. and Vichare P., Cryogenic machining
of Ti-alloys, International Conference on Machining Science and Technology
(ICOMAST), Melaka, Malaysia, August 2006 (to be published).
78
New Zealand
10.2.1 Bhattacharya D. and Horrigan D. P. W., A study of hole drilling in Kevlar
composites, Composites Science and Technology, vol. 58, 1998, pp. 267-283.
8.2.1
Bhattacharya D., Allen M. N. and Mander S. J., Cryogenic machining of
Kevlar composites, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 8(6), 1993, pp.
631-651.
Romania
5.2.1
Mitelea I. and Popovici G., Cutting forces and surface roughness in
cryogenic machining of austenitic stainless steels, Utensil, vol. 15, 1993, pp. 31-35.
5.2.3
Mitelea I., Cryogenic cutting of austenitic steels A method of improving
tool life, Bulletin du Cercle d'Etudes des Metaux., vol. 15(20), 1990, pp. 1-11.
5.1.1
Petru B., Horatiu I. and Iosif T., Optimization of the technological
parameters in cryogenic turning, Gepgyartastechnologia (Hungary), vol. 32(11),
1992, pp. 489-494.
Singapore
13.4.1 Rahman M., Kumar A. S., Ul-Salam M. and Ling M. S., Effect of chilled air
on machining performance in end milling, International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, vol. 21, 2003, pp. 787-795.
2.2.3
Seah K. H. W., Rahman M. and Yong K. H., Performance evaluation of
cryogenically treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts, Proceedings of Institute
of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 217(B), 2003, pp. 29-43.
South Korea
10.3.4 Choi J. H., Moon K. I., Kim J. K., Oh Y. M., Suh J. H. and Kim S. J.,
Consolidation behavior of nanocrystalline Al-5at%Ti alloys synthesized by cryogenic
milling, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 315, 2001, pp. 178-186.
Spain
10.3.3 Picas J. A., Forn A., Ajdelsztajn L. and Schoenung J., Nanocrystalline
NiCrAlY powder synthesis by mechanical cryomilling, Powder Technology, vol. 148,
2004, pp. 20-23.
79
Taiwan
8.1.2
Lin C. B., Hung Y. W., Liu W. C. and Kang S. W., Machining and fluidity of
356Al/SiC(p) composites, Journal of Material Processing Technology, vol. 110, 2001,
pp. 152-159.
Tunisia
11.2.2 Fredj N. B., Sidhom, H. and Braham C., Ground surface improvement of
the austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 using cryogenic cooling, Surface and Coatings
Technology, 2006 [to be published].
Ukraine
4.1.1
Ostrovskaya Ye. L., Strelnitskij V. E., Kuleba V. I. and Gamulya G. D.,
Friction and wear behavior of hard and superhard coatings at cryogenic
temperatures, Tribology International, vol. 34, 2001, pp. 255-263.
4.1.2
Yukhno T. P., Vvedensky Yu. V. and Sentyurikhina L. N., Low temperature
investigations on frictional behavior and wear resistance of solid lubricant coatings,
Tribology International, vol. 34, 2001, pp. 293-298.
United States
13.3.2 Christopher J. D., The influence of high pressure cryogenic coolant on tool
life and productivity in turning, SME Advanced Machining Technology Conference,
MR90-249, Chicago, Illinois, 1990.
3.1.2
Dillon O. W., De Angelis R. J., Lu W. Y., Gunasekara J. S. and Deno J. A.,
The effects of temperature on the machining of metals, Journal of Material Shaping
Technology, vol. 8(1), 1990, pp. 23-29.
5.3.1 Evans C., Cryogenic diamond turning of stainless steel, Annals of the CIRP,
vol. 40(1), 1991, pp. 571-575.
2.2.4
Gallagher A. H., Agosti C. D. and Roth J. T., Effect of cryogenic treatments
on tungsten carbide tool life: micro-structural analysis, Transactions of NAMRI/SME,
vol. 33, 2005, pp. 153-160.
13.1.2 Geskin E., Shishkin D. and Babets K., Investigation of Icejet machining,
Proceedings of 1999 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference, Long
Beach, California, January 1999.
9.1.1 Ghosh R., Interrupted hard turning with cryogenically cooled ceramic tools,
Transactions of NAMRI/SME, vol. 33, 2005, pp. 161-169.
6.1.1 and 7.4.1 Ghosh R., How cryogenic machining offers greater ceramic tool
performance, IMTS Manufacturing Conference, Sept. 2004.
80
12.2.1 Ghosh R., Cryogenic Machining of Functionally Critical Hardened Steel and
Powder Metal Components, 1st Annual Manufacturing Technology Summit (SME),
Aug 2004, Dearborn, MI.
2.2.1 and 6.2.1 Ghosh R., Zurecki Z. and Frey J. H., Cryogenic machining with
brittle tools and effects on tool life, Proceedings of ASME IMECE2003-42232, Nov.
2003.
2.3.1 and 13.6.1 Hashish M. and Dunsky C. M., The formation of cryogenic and
abrasive cryogenic jets, Proc. 14th Intl. Conf. On Jetting Technology, BHR group,
Brugge, Belgium, 1998, pp. 329-343.
7.2.2
Hong S. Y., Markus I. and Jeong W., New cooling approach and tool life
improvement in cryogenic machining of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V, International
Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 41, 2001, pp. 2245-2260.
3.1.3
Hong S. Y. and Ding Y., Cooling approaches and cutting temperatures in
cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V, International Journal of Machine Tools and
Manufacture, vol. 41, 2001, pp. 1417-1437.
4.2.1
Hong S. Y., Ding Y. and Jeong W., Friction and cutting forces in cryogenic
machining of Ti-6Al-4V, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol.
41, 2001, pp. 2271-2285.
5.2.2
Hong S. Y. and Broomer M., Economical and ecological cryogenic
machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel, Clean Products and Processes, vol.
2, 2000, pp. 157-166.
5.4.1
Hong S. Y., Ding Y. and Ekkens R. G., Improving low carbon steel chip
breakability by cryogenic chip cooling, International Journal of Machine Tools and
Manufacture, vol. 39, 1999, pp. 1065-1085.
10.1.1 Hong S.Y., Qu X. and Lee A., Economical cryogenic milling for
environmentally safe manufacturing, Transactions of NAMRI/SME, May 19-22, 1998,
MR98-177.
2.2.2
Kim D. and Ramulu M., Cryogenically treated carbide tool performance in
drilling thermoplastic composites, Transactions of NAMRI/SME, vol. 32, 2004, pp.
79-85.
10.3.1 Lau M. L., Jiang H. G., Perez R. J., Juarez-Islas J. and Lavernia E. J.,
Synthesis of nanocrystalline M50 steel powders by cryomilling, NanoStructured
Materials, vol. 7(8), 1996, pp. 847-856.
2.1.1
Marquardt E. D., Le J. P. and Radebaugh R., Cryogenic material properties
database, 11th International Cryocooler Conference, June 20 22, 2000.
10.1.2 Shih A. J., Lewis M. A. and Strenkowski J. S., End milling of elastomers
fixture design and tool effectiveness for material removal, Journal of Manufacturing
Science and Engineering (ASME), vol. 126, 2004, pp. 115-126.
81
2.2.5
Stewart H. A., Cryogenic treatment of tungsten carbide reduces tool wear
when machining medium density fiberboard, Forest Products Journal, vol. 54(2),
2004, pp. 53-56.
13.2.1 Stratta J., Schneider R., Adrian N., Weber R. and Donahue B., Alternatives
to open burning/open detonation of energetic materials, USACERL Technical Report,
98/104, August, 1998.
7.1.1
Wang Z. Y., Rajurkar K. P., Fan J., Lei S., Shin Y. C. and Petrescu G.,
Hybrid machining of Inconel 718, International Journal of Machine Tools and
Manufacture, vol. 43(13), 2003, pp. 1391-1396.
3.2.2
Wang Z. Y. and Petrescu G., Stress analyses of CBN insert in hybrid
machining of RBSN ceramic, International Journal of Machining Science and
Technology, vol. 8, 2004, pp. 1-19.
7.3.1
Wang Z. Y., Rajurkar K. P. and Petrescu, G., Cryogenic machining of
tantalum, Journal of Manufacturing Processes (SME), vol. 4(2), 2002, pp. 122-127.
6.3.1
Wang Z. Y., Rajurkar K. P. and Murugappan M., Cryogenic PCBN turning of
ceramic (Si3N4), Wear, vol. 195, 1996, pp. 1-6.
10.3.2 Zhou F., Witkin D., Nutt S. R. and Lavernia E. J., Formation of
nanostructure in Al produced by low energy ball milling at cryogenic temperature,
Materials Science and Engineering, vol. A 375377, 2004, pp. 917-921.
12.2.1 Zurecki Z., Ghosh R. and Frey J. H., Investigation of white layers formed in
conventional and cryogenic hard turning of steels, Proceedings of ASME IMECE200342313, Nov. 2003.
6.4.1
Zurecki Z. Ghosh R. and Frey J. H., Finish turning of hardened powder
metallurgy steel using cryogenic cooling, International Conference on Powder
Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, Las Vegas, NV, June 2003.
3.2.1
Zurecki Z. and Harriott G., Development of industrial systems for cost
effective machining of metals using an environmentally friendly liquid nitrogen
coolant, Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Conference, Long Beach, CA, June
1998.
82