Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By
Amy Kratzer
Results
Figure 1: Plants 1-4 at week 5. Left plants are part of the experimental group, where as
the right plants are part of the control group. Note the loss of pigmentation on the tips of
the plants in the experimental group.
Figure 2: Plants 1-4 at week 9. There is a distinct difference between the experimental
group (left plants) and the control group (right plants).
Figure 3: Visual of the healthy, branched roots of a corn plant. Picture is taken of plant 4.
Table 1: Weekly height of plants. Plants 1 & 2 were the experimental group (contain
fertilizer). Plants #3 & #4 were the control group (contain no fertilizer).
Height (cm)
Week
Plant #1
Plant #2
Plant #3
Plant #4
1.51
3.76
1.62
1.06
7.78
10.49
6.12
6.18
13.61
15.72
12.93
16.73
13.59
15.99
18.22
29.95
13.56
15.63
22.13
43.18
DEAD
DEAD
27.42
55.61
DEAD
DEAD
36.21
63.42
Table 2: Mass in grams and appearance of roots after removing plant from soil.
Procedure was done at the very end of experiment.
5
Plant #1
Plant #2
Plant #3
Plant #4
Mass
0.05 g
0.08 g
4.02 g
8.78 g
Roots?
None
None
Healthy
Healthy
Graph 1: Comparison of plant heights over 9 weeks. Week 5 shows to be a pivotal point
for all plants. Plants 1 & 2 begin to demise while Plants 3 & 4 continue to grow.
Discussion
The hypothesis, which stated that fertilizer would increase the growth of plants,
was not supported by this experiment.
One possible explanation for this outcome is over fertilization. The fertilizer used
in the experiment was Miracle-Gro, an inorganic fertilizer. A danger with inorganic
fertilizer is the possibility of adding too much that the reverse outcome happens. When
too much fertilizer is added to a plant, the water evaporates and the mineral salts are left
6
References