Incorporeal God of Gita - Shiv Shankar Bholenath or the soul of corporeal Sri Krishna

alias Dada Lekhraj?

There is no doubt that the Geeta, which has been guiding the Indians since the last two
and a half thousand years is a gem among all the scriptures. No other scripture has as
many commentaries by scholars, academics, religious minds and others as the Geeta.
This proves few things. First, this scripture is very unique. Second, different kinds of
clarifications on the Geeta given by human beings have never satisfied all the human
beings. Someone said, "Kai jaaney kavi, ya kai jaaney ravi". It is only the poet or the
Sun of Knowledge who can give the right clarification of a poem. Any other clarification
given by human beings will always remain incomplete.

It is commonly known that the Narrator of the Geeta was Shri Krishna, who gave the
discourse of the Geeta to Arjuna sitting in his chariot in the battlefield of Kurukshetra.
However, if we look from a spiritual and historical point of view, all the questions such as
who, when, to whom and where the Geeta was narrated are disputable. The story of the
Geeta and Satyanarayana prove that God reveals himself through the form of an
ordinary, old and experienced human being. It has been written in Geeta:

Avjaanaanti maam moodha manurshee tanumashritam I

Param bhaavamjaananto mam bhootmaheshwaram II (Gita 9/11)

Further it has been written in Geeta that God is ajanma (eternal), abhokta (one who does
not enjyoy any pleasures) and avyakta (imperceptible).

Ajo S pi sannvyayatma bhootanamishraro S pi san I

Prakriti swamdhishthaay sambhavamyatmamaayayaa II (Gita 4/6)

Yo maamjamanaadim cha veti lokmaheshwaram I

Asam-moodhah sa martyeshu sarvapapaih pramuchyatey II

In the Shrimad Bhagwatgita that aadi-anadi purush (eternal being) was praised: tamev
chadhyam purusham prapdhye yatah pravrittih prasoota puraani I the Geeta 15/4, i.e., I
bow to that aadi-anaadi purush, who first created this world-like tree. That eternal being
(aadi purush) is saying about himself: ‘Ahamadirhi devanam maharshinaam cha
sarvashah’ the Geeta 10/2, i.e., I myself am the beginning of all the deities and sages. It
was him who spread that famous principle of karmayoga (remembering God while
performing actions) in the ancient times, due to which India received the name of
karmabhoomi (the land where God performs actions); as per the Jaina tradition, ‘nishtha
pura prokta mayanagh… karmayogen yoginaam’ the Geeta 3/3.

It should be recalled that the knowledge of the Geeta was not narrtaed by Shri Krishna,
but by that aadi-anaadi purush (eternal being) to the householder Arjuna in order to
teach him the dharm of household (grihastha-dharma) and easy raja yoga. This was
proved by some famous historians. Selected excerpts are mentioned below without going
into the details, as the topic is already well described in the literature.
Hopkins said, “The present Krishna-dominated form (of the Geeta) was earlier a Vishnu-
dominated poem and prior to that it was a non-communal writing” Religions of India
(1608) page 386 (Radhakrishnan Geeta, Page 17). Farkuhar has written in Religious
Literature of India (1620) page 12-14, “This (Geeta) is an ancient prose Upnishad, which
was probably written after Shwetashwataropanishad and which has been moulded into
the present form after the death of Christ to support the Krishnaism by some poet.” As
per Garvey, “The Bhagwatgita was earlier a scripture related to sankhya-yoga, in which
the methods of worship of Krishna Vasudev was included and it was adjusted as per the
Vedic traditions by considering Krishna to be a form of Vishnu in the 3rd century B.C.
Holtzman considers the Geeta to be a later Vishnu-dominated form of a Sarveshwarwadi
poem. Keith also believes that originally the Geeta was a Shwetashwatar form of
Upanishad, but later it was moulded in the form of Krishna worship. (An extract from the
introduction to Radhakrishnan ‘Geeta’, page 17)

Shri Krishna was born from the womb of a mother. He enjoyed all the pleasures of life
and received knowledge from Guru Sandipani. He was mostly depicted as a child. That is
why the entire world doesn’t accept him as a father. Secondly, it is famous in
mythological stories that Shri Krishna narrated the Geeta only to one Arjuna while sitting
in his chariot. It was said to happened in the Copper Age (Dwapar Yug). On the other
hand, it is also famous that it was Sage Vyaas who wrote the scripture Mahabharata,
which became popular in public in Sanskrit. From the historical point of view these facts
are disputable.

Actually, the Geeta is the highest among all the scriptures (sarva shastra shiromani), but
it is narrated in the Confluence Age of the 5000-year world drama consisting of four
ages, i.e. during the confluence of the Iron Age and the Golden Age, which is recurring
now. Had the Geeta been narrated in the Copper Age, why should it lead to the
establishment of the sinful Iron Age? God’s incarnation in the world of human creation
should have resulted in the establishment of the Golden Age and not the most sinful Iron
Age. Apart from this, the Geeta is narrated in the Confluence Age, when all the religions,
the religious fathers and the their followers are present in their last birth. That is why it
was said in the Geeta, “Renounce all the religions and find shelter in me, the shelter of
the Supreme Soul.”

Sarvadharmanparityajya Mamekam Sharanam Vraj.

Aham twa sarvapapebhyo mokshayami maa shuchah. (Geeta 18/66)

Let’s try to see these things from the point of view of a Hindu. If the Geeta was narrated
in the Copper Age, this shloka should not have been written in it. Religions like Muslim
Dharm, Sikhism and others were not present at that time yet. Moreover, the Geeta
contains common teachings. Common teachings are narrated in a living and commonly
understood language. They are not narrated in languages artificially created for
exclusivism and difficult to understand. With no doubts Sanskrit is a language like this.
History proves that Sanskrit was never a language of common public. Why should God,
the Father of All, whose aim is to make the true knowledge widely accessible, use a very
complex language like Sanskrit? The Gita is narrated once a cycle in its Confluence Age in
Hindi, a language which has a simple grammar, simple writing system and is not difficult
to be mastered. Apart from this, the Geeta was not narrated by Shri Krishna, who had an
attractive name and form and who undergoes the cycle of life and death, but by the
incorporeal God Shiva, who is ajanma (beyond physical births), abhokta (beyond
experience), who incarnates at the end of the Iron Age and through an ordinary human
body (Prajapita Brahma) narrates the Geeta not just to one Arjuna, but to many others
who like Arjuna live in household. It is written in the Geeta, “O Arjuna, you do not know
your births (i.e. past lives). I tell you the story of your past lives.”

Bahooni mein vyateetani janmaani tav charjun.

Taanyaham ved sarvaani na twa vettha parantap. (Geeta 4/5)

How can Krishna, who is a human soul and passes through the cycle of life and death,
can give the inheritance of the true mukti (liberation) and jeevanmukti (living a liberated
life), and narrate the story of many births to other human souls? It is the Supreme Soul
Shiva who is beyond the cycle who comes to the human world and narrates the story of
many births. That story is also known as the Geeta or the Amarkatha (The Story of
Immortality).

The above view about the Geeta is completely different from the common view. It is the
point of view of Adhyatmik Ishwariya Vishwavidyalaya based in Kampila, Uttar Pradesh.
The True Gita is God’s knowledge called Murli (the Flute of Knowledge) and narrated in
the Confluence Age through a human chariot, meanings through a body of an ordinary
man. This knowledge recorded in the spiritual register of human souls is recollected and
written in an adulterated form in Sanskrit, in the second part of the cycle that is from the
Copper Age. The Brahma Kuamaris Organisation believes that the incorporeal Shiva is
the God mentioned in the Geeta, however they spread the name and form of Dada
Lekhraj, meaning the soul of Krishna as the corporeal form of God. It is known that Dada
Lekhraj died in 1969 because of a heart attack. How can he be called the Father of the
entire world, i.e. Prajapita Brahma? In the Murlis narrated by the incorporeal Supreme
Soul Shiva about the Geeta and its narrator, He said the following points:

This is a new knowledge for the new world. The Narrator is only one. Krishna does not
narrate this knowledge. Krishna is not called the one who purifies the impure ones. The
who purifies the impure ones is only One – the Supreme Father Supreme Soul, who is
beyond the cycle of rebirths. The name of Krishna, who passes through 84 births, was
added in the Geeta. (Murli dated 28.10.87)

Now, who gave birth to the Geeta? This is a topic [to be discussed]. Since it is said
‘jayanti’ (the birthday of the Geeta), the Geeta was certainly born, wasn’t it? Since it is
said ‘Shrimat Bhagwat Geeta Jayant’i, there must also be someone who gave birth to the
Geeta, mustn’t he? Everyone says ‘Shri Krishna Bhagwaanuvach’ (God Shri Krishna
speaks), then Shri Krishna is first and next is the Geeta. Now, the creator of the Geeta is
certainly needed. But Shri Krishna was a small child. He cannot narrate the Geeta. It will
have to be proved who gives birth to the Geeta. This is a deep issue. Whatever dispute is
there in India, it is only because of this point. Krishna is born through the mother’s
womb. He is a prince of the Golden Age. (Murli dated 24.11.88)
Shri Krishna cannot be called Vrikshapati (the Lord of the World Tree). The Supreme
Father Supreme Soul is the seed-creator of the human world. Krishna cannot be called
the creator. He is always a human being having divine virtues. (Murli dated 22.2.98)

Krishna is not the father of everyone. (Murli dated 30.9.98)

Krishna cannot be called the father of all the souls. The father of the souls, i.e. the
Supreme Father Supreme Soul says, “Remember no one else, but me.”

In the picture of the Trimurti Shiva published by the Brahma Kumaris organization Dada
Lekhraj’s photo was shown as Brahma, however the Brahma Kumaris can’t explain which
among the human souls after the death of Dada Lekhraj in 1969 play the roles of
Shankar and Vishnu. That is why in place of Shankar and Vishnu, the pictures ofhe path
of worship (bhaktimarg) were shown. On the basis of the Murlis and Avyakta Vanis
narrated in Mt. Abu, Adhyatmik Ishwariya Vishvavidyalaya accepts that after 1969 the
incorporeal Supreme Soul Shiva is narrating the true knowledge of the Geeta and
teaching easy raja yoga to all the human souls through his permanent corporeal human
chariot called Shiva-Shankar Bholenath, through which all the human souls can be
transformed from human beings in the state of degradation into perfect beings that is
deities. The proofs for this are contained in various Murlis that were narrated through
Dada Lekhraj, which the administrators of the Brahma Kumaris Organization don’t want
to reveal being afraid of losing their status.

The Brahma Kumari Organization and AIVV accept that the soul of Dada Lekhraj will be
born in the coming Golden Age as Krishna. However, advertising Dada Lekhraj as the
medium of Shiva the Narrator of the Geeta by the Brahma Kumaris Organization is
denying the knowledge narrated in those very murlis narrated through the body of Dada
Lekhraj himself. Dada Lekhraj was a temporary chariot of Shiva since 1951 till 1969, the
period during which he gave motherly love to the Brahma Kumar and Kumaris. Before
1947 and after 1969, the responsibility for God’s task is carried by the soul of his
partner. He is his partner in spiritual and physical sense and it is him who plays the role
of the corporeal chariot of the incorporeal Shiva, i.e. Mahadev Shiva-Shankar, and will
play the role of Satya Narayan in the near future. One of his disobedient students at the
time of the beginning of the Rudra Gyan Yagya recollects him like this:

God Shiva certainly narrated the knowledge of the Geeta, i.e the Murlis through Dada
Lekhraj, but he is revealing the deep secrets of those Murlis through his permanent
human chariot.

As a result of ignorance in the path of devotion the Hindus assumed that it was not
Shiva-Shankar Bholenath, but the good-looking Shri Krishna was the Narrator of the
Geeta. Similarly in the Confluence Age during the shooting, the Brahma Kumari
Organization assumed that it is not Shiva through his chariot Shankar, but the good-
looking Dada Lekhraj, i.e. the soul of Krishna is the Narrator of the Geeta. They even
added the name of Dada Lekhraj (Pitashri) before the name Shivbaba in the Murlis of
Knowledge published by them. This is the main mistake because of which in the path of
worship in the world drama cycle from Copper Age onwards, the name of Shri Krishna
was added in the Sanskrit Geeta and he instead of Shiv-Shankar was considered as its
creator. The qualities of God described in the Geeta, such as avyakta, ajanma, abhokta
and others apply only to Shiva-Shankar both in a limited and unlimited sense. They do
not to Shri Krishna.

The Father says, ‘I am the God of the Geeta’. It was Shivbaba who created Mother
Geeta. Krishna was born [from her]. Along with him Radha and others came. The
Brahmins are first. Father says, ‘Who is that fool who has removed my name? Then, I
myself have to come and reveal that it is me, the Supreme Soul Shiva, who is the God
mentioned in the Geeta. I have created the Geeta. The child Krishna was born from the
Geeta. You have then added the name of the child instead of the Father. This is the
biggest mistake. – (Murli dated 13.12.88)

The child Krishna was born from Rudra (another name of Shiv-Shankar). The name of
the child has been added instead of the father in it (i.e. in the Geeta). (Murli dated
29.3.88)

The Geeta is the mother and father. The Geeta is called mother. No other scripture is
called ‘mother’. Its name is ‘Mother Geeta’. All right, who created it/her? First, a man
adopts a woman, doesn’t he? – (Murli dated 28.9.88)

Everything is based on adding corrections in the Geeta. Because of adding corrections in

the Geeta the personality of God disappeared. (Murli dated 9.3.88)

Bharat receives the cream through the God of the Shrimat Bhagwat Geeta. The Shrimat
Bhagwat Geeta has also been added corrections to the extent that it has been reduced to
the level of water after milk; [it happened because of] inserting the name of Shri Krishna
instead of the [name of the] Ocean of Knowledge, the one who purifies the impure, the
incorporeal Supreme Father Supreme Soul. (Murli dated 31.10.78)

The Geeta is the mother and father of all the scriptures. It is not true that it is only the
mother and father of only the scriptures of India. No! It is the mother and father of all
the biggest scriptures that are present in the world. (Murli dated 5.2.83)

That one is the creator of heaven. He helps everyone. Krishna himself is a creation. He is
the first class flower of the garden. (Murli dated 5.2.83)

Adding the name of Krishna in the Geeta is a mistake that leads to degradation of India,
and brought about condemnation of the Geeta. Although the Geeta is the mother of all
the scriptures, it is not accepted by the majority of followers of the other religions. That
is the reason why scholars clarified the Geeta in various ways. On the basis of the Geeta
Shankaracharya proved the soul and the Supreme Soul were one and the same
(advaita), whereas Madhvacharya proved the soul and Supreme Soul to be different
entities (dwaita). In the Geeta sexual desires were described as the biggest enemy of
man. People of the world do not accept this fact, because it is also known from the
scriptures that the so-called creator of the Geeta, i.e., Shri Krishna had 8 wives and
16,108 female friend (gopika). If Mahadev Shiva-Shankar’s name had appeared in the
Geeta as the Narrator, the world would have accepted the point about sexual desire
being the greatest enemy, because Shankar is described in the scriptures as the one who
had only one wife and who burnt sexual desire to ashes.

The human mind at the end of the Iron Age is tired and distracted; that is why with a
great difficulty it recognises the one who is called the Truth. Memorials of this are
contained in the Satya Narayan Katha (Story about the True Narayan) that describes that
when God appeared as an ordinary old man, no one could recognize him. Daksh
Prajapati seeing Shankar in his ordinary form didn’t recognise him and insulted him.

The fact that the Geeta is called ‘mother’ is not an empty metaphor. In the divine
knowledge communicated by Shivbaba it was clarified that the Geeta is not only a symbol
of knowledge or a non-living scripture, but it is also a living human soul that along with
the Father of the World (Prajapita) is playing the role of the World Mother (Jagdamba).
Both are sustaining the Brahmin family in the present Confluence Age. Scriptures
contain memorials of them. They are described as Aadi Dev- Aadi Devi by the Hindus, as
Aadam-Havva by the Muslims, as Adam-Eve by the Christians and as Aadinath-
Aadinathini by the Jains.

The world will accept the Gita as the verses of God the Father of All, if instead of the
child, Shri Krishna, the true living Father is introduced to people.

When did God narrate the Geeta? Certainly all the religions must be present [at that
time]. Actually, the Geeta is the main scripture for all the religions. People of all the
religions must accept it. […] The Father has come to bring about the true salvation of
people belonging to all the religions through the Geeta. The Geeta has been narrated by
the Father. This issue has been complicated by inserting the name of the child instead of
Father. (Murli dated 21.2.93)

Study and translation

Adhyatmik Ishwariya Vishwa Vidyalaya
House No. 351/352, Block A, Phase-I,
Vijayvihar, Near Sector-5 of Rohini,
Delhi-10085. Ph. No.011-27044227, 27044152.