10 views

Uploaded by K Guru Prasad

optimal dg

- Micro-hydro
- Optimal Placement Sizing of Distributed Generation Dg to Minimize Active Power Loss Using Particle Swarm Optimization Pso
- Optimal location and sizing of DG units to improve the voltage stability in the distribution system using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Time Varying Acceleration Coefficients
- OPTIMAL DG PLACEMENT FOR MINIMUM REAL POWER
- Economic Load Dispatch Using Bacterial Foraging Technique
- Multiple DG Placement For Voltage Profile Improvement And Loss Reduction Using IA And PSO Methods
- POWER SYSTENM ANALYSIS & FAULT Lecture_18.ppt
- processes-05-00034
- Network Lifespan Maximization For Wireless Sensor Networks Using Nature-Inspired Elephant Based Swarm Optimization
- Particle Swarm Optimization
- Overview of Algorithms for Swarm Intelligence.pdf
- Coordinated Scheduling of Residential Distributed Energy Resources to Optimize Smart Home Energy Services
- reworld20160102-dl
- OptimizationDistributedGeneration_GASA
- Lambert 2018
- Habib Ahmed
- Panta Lucic ED
- A QP Approach and CONOPT-GAMS for Optimization
- Integración Del Work Index en La Plani.
- Optimal Coordination of Overcurrent Relays in Distribution Systems With Distributed Generators Ba

You are on page 1of 12

http://www.researchgate.net/publication/271373002

of Distributed Generation with

Particle Swarm Optimization

Algorithm for Loss Reduction

ARTICLE JANUARY 2015

DOWNLOADS

VIEWS

603

92

2 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:

Tarek Bouktir

Ferhat Abbas University of S

79 PUBLICATIONS 333 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Retrieved on: 09 July 2015

Optimization Algorithm for Loss Reduction

K. Ras Guerriche * and T. Bouktir**

*Department of Electrical Engineering, Setif1 University, Email: kguerriche@gmail.com

** Department of Electrical Engineering, Setif1 University, Email:

tarek.bouktir@esrgroups.org

Abstract an optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation units in distribution

system is usually done for the purpose of loss reduction and voltage profile improvement.

Research work included by this paper focuses on using an optimization methodology for

identifying proper location and size of DG units. Solutions particle swarm optimization

algorithm for DG units placement and sizing has been developed in terms of parameter

selection, to obtain the maximum loss reduction and voltage profile improvement. The

performance of this proposed methodology is tested on IEEE 33-Bus distribution system.

Results show the efficiency and robustness of the proposed PSO algorithm to finding the very

near optimal location and sizing of the DG units for enhancing the loadability of radial

distribution system.

Keywords Particle swarm optimization (PSO), Optimal size, Optimal location, Distributed

generation (DG), Active power losses.

I.

INTRODUCTION

The need to provide acceptable power quality and reliability will create a very favorable

climate for the penetration of renewable and nonrenewable distributed generation resources

around the world. As a result of this penetration of DG resources at the distribution level,

distribution system are no longer passive supplying loads, but are active with power flows and

voltages determined by the generation and loads. A number of steps should be followed

concerning, one of this steps is the best use of existing distribution network through the

optimal allocation and sizing of the DG resources.

In order to achieve the desired performance in DG resources and minimizing power loss,

improve the voltage profile, increase reliability and improving the power quality parameters of

the electric grid, suitable placement and size need to provide for this DG units.

There are two methods for sitting and sizing of DG in the distribution network. The first

method is traditional based such as optimal power flow (OPF), sensitive factor and repetitive

load flows (reload flow). In the second method, the artificial intelligent (AI) is used to apply

with DG placement and sizing like Ant Colony Algorithm (ACO), Genetic Algorithm (GA),

Tabu Search (TS), Differential Evolution (DE) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). A lot

of papers and studies have been carried out in the recent years to present methodologies in the

general topic of DG units placement and sizing [1- 6]. A particle swarm optimization (PSO)

algorithm was introduced to determine the optimum size and location of a single DG unit to

minimize the real power losses of the system in [7]. In [8], a novel optimization approach that

employs an Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm to find the optimum DG size, power

factor, and location in order to minimize the total system real power loss. A genetic algorithm

(GA)-based technique along with optimal power ow (OPF) calculations were used to

determine the optimum size and location of DG units installed to the system in order to

minimize the cost of active and reactive power generation is used in [9]. In [10], an analytical

method to determine the optimum locationsize pair of a DG unit was proposed in order to

minimize only the line losses of the power system. In [11], a combined PSO and GA

algorithm was used to nd the optimal location of a xed number of DG units with speci c

59

total capacity such that the real power loss of the system is minimized and the operational

constraints of the system are satis ed. [12] Present a genetic algorithm (GA) approach for the

location and sizing of DG in three different loading conditions which were peak load, medium

load and low load. In [13], A novel optimization approach that employs an Artificial Bee

Colony (ABC) algorithm to find the optimum DG size, power factor, and location in order to

minimize the total system real power loss. In [14], a sensitivity analysis of power losses in

terms of DG size, location and operating point has been performed to nd the optimal size and

location of DG units. [15], a PSO algorithm was used to place multiple DG units with nonunity power factor but the objective was to minimize only the real power loss of the system.

Pavlos, S in [16]. Present a review serves as a guide to aid researchers and power system

engineers on the available DG placement models and methodologies.

In this paper a particle swarm optimization algorithm is presented, to solve DG units optimal

placement and sizing problem in the radial distribution system. Firstly a brief review about

distributed generation technology. Section II explains the proposed approach. A problem

formulation in Section III. The results and discussion are presented in Section IV. And finally

the conclusion is given in Section V.

Definition of Distributed Generation (DG):

As known, distributed generation signify the electric power generation within distributed

network to meet the rapid energy demand of consumers. However, There is many terms and

definitions used for explain DG and thats create a various perspectives:

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) de nes distributed generation as

generation from a few kilo-watts up to 50 MW [17].

International Energy Agency (IEA) de nes distributed generation as generating

plant serving a customer on-sit or providing support to a distribution network,

connected to the grid at distributed level voltages [18].

The International Conference on large High Voltage Electric Systems (CIGRE)

de nes DG as smaller than 50-100 MW [17].

Although there are variations in de nitions, however, the concept is almost same. DG can be

treated as small scale power generation to mitigate the consumer energy demand. Distributed

Generation can come from a variety of sources and technology. Here, we will consider the

Distributed Generation as an Electric power source connected directly to the distribution

system.

II.

One of the most recent metaheuristic algorithms is the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is a

population based stochastic optimization technology [19,20] by Dr. Eberhart and Dr. Kennedy

in 1995, inspired by social behavior of bird flocking and fish schooling. It is used for

optimization of continuous nonlinear functions [21, 22].

PSO is a swarm intelligence algorithm, inspired by the social dynamics and an emergent

behavior that arises in socially organized colonies. PSO algorithm exploits a population of

individuals to probe promising regions of the search space. In this context, the population is

called swarm and the individuals are called particles or agents.

In conventional PSO, particles change their positions (states) with time. Let 'u' and 'v' denote a

particle coordinates (position) and its corresponding flight speed (velocity) in a search space

respectively. The position vector ui and the velocity vector vi of the i th particle in the ndimensional search space can be represented as

Optimal Allocation and Sizing of Distributed Generation with Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Loss Reduction

60

ui

(ui1 , ui 2 ,.....,uin )

And

vi

(vi1 , vi 2 ,......,vin )

respectively.

The best previous position of the i the particle is recorded and represented as

Pbest

(ui1pbest , uipbest

,....., uinpbest ) .

2

The index of the best particle among all the particles in the group is represented by :

Gbest

The modified velocity and position of each particle can be calculated as per following

formulas [23]:

vi( k

1)

vi( k )

Pr evious Velocity

Cognitive Component

c2 r2 (Gbest

(k )

ui(k ) )

(01)

Social Component

ui( k

1)

ui( k ) vi( k

1)

(02)

: is the inertia weight factor.

c1 and c2 : are the acceleration coefficients.

rl and r2:are two random numbers within the range [0,1].

vi(k ) , ui(k ) : are the velocity and the current position of particle i in the search space at

iteration k, respectively.

In general, the inertia weight provides a balance between global and local explorations

(control the influence of the previous history of the velocities on the current one). It is set

according to the following equation:

max

max

min,

max

min

kmax

(03)

k: current iteration number.

61

The constants c1 and c2 pull each particle toward Pbest positions (cognitive component of

velocity) and Gbest positions (social component of velocity).

The position is updated with respect to (02).

Time Varying Acceleration Coefficients

The time-varying inertia weight (TVIW) can locate a good solution at a significantly faster

rate but its ability to fine tune the optimum solution is weak, due to the lack of diversity at the

end of the search. It has been observed by most researchers that in PSO, problem-based tuning

of parameters is a key factor to find the optimal solution accurately and efficiently [24, 25]. In

TVAC, this is achieved by changing the acceleration coefficients and with time in such a

manner that the cognitive component is reduced while the social component is increased as the

search proceeds. TVAC-PSO is successfully implemented for economic load dispatch (ELD)

problem in [26].

vi( k

1)

(k ) (k )

i

c1( k )

(k )

2

(c1i c1 f )

(c2 f

c2i )

k

kmax

k

kmax

(04)

c1i

(05)

c2i

Where:

c ii and c if are initial and final values of the ith acceleration coefficient respectively.

(k )

III.

PROBLEM FORMULATION

The objective of this work is to minimize the active power loss in the radial distribution

system as well as to improve the voltage profile of the system by solving the distributed

generator placement and sizing problem. The complexity of this problem lead the researchers

to introduce simple assumptions such as [27]:

The section load is balanced and uniformly distributed, and the load current is constant.

The power factor of the section load is 1.0.

The candidates of DG installation position for every feeder section are given.

The capacity of distributed generator must be selected from given capacity

candidates (discrete values).

One DG can be allocated for one candidate position.

The maximum number of installable DGs is given.

The total installation capacity of DGs is given.

Optimal Allocation and Sizing of Distributed Generation with Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Loss Reduction

62

The upper and lower limits of node voltages.

The capacities of conductors.

The objective function of our problem is to minimize the total active power loss and according

to the previous assumptions the formulation of problem can be listed as fellow [28]:

Ri Ii2

(06)

Subject to:

(07)

Ii

(08)

Ii max

In which:

Ii : is the current of the ith branch.

I i max : is the maximum current of the ith branch.

IV.

To check the validity of the proposed PSO algorithm, the IEEE 33-Bus (Fig.1) radial

distribution feeder system was considered in different cases. This network has a voltage of

12.66kV, load size of 3.715MW and 2.300 MVar and consists of 32 line and 33 buses. The

size of the distributed generation used will vary automatically between the ranges of 0% to

30% of the total load until it reaches the optimal values; the DG voltage is 12.66 kV. That will

be able to show the effects of the optimal placement and sizing of DGs units on the network

parameters (voltage profile, active power losses). Therefore, with the application of the

proposed approach (PSO) we calculate and compare the result with those obtained via other

methods.

Furthermore, we analyzed two scenarios, Scenario I and scenario II. For the first scenario we

have three cases to studying. Case I (the reference case) is when the system without distributed

generation unit, Case II is to determine the optimal size and location for a single DG unit and

the Case III for two DG units simultaneously. Scenario II on the other hand, represents the

situation where two load levels are applied the light load (50% from the full load) and heavy

load (150% from the full load). The results of the feeder system due to above mentioned

scenarios are shown below:

The voltage profile before and after DG installation is shown in Fig.2. The lowest voltage

occurred in the Bus 18 in the case I and II with the amount of 0.91 p.u and 0.97 p.u, for the

case III the lowest voltage is in Bus 25 with the value of 0.98 p.u. Noticed an important

improvement of voltage profile in case II and III compared to the reference case.

63

Table.1. shows the most appropriate location and size and corresponding real power for the

scenario I, The results show that a significant real power loss reduction and voltage profile

improvement after the installation of DG units in the system. Noticed that the installation of

DG units can improve the system loadability.

Initial Power losses (kW)

Optimal DG Location

Optimal DG size (MW)

Case I

202.66

Minimum Voltage (p.u)

0.91

(Bus 18)

Case II

202.66

06

2.43

Case III

202.66

13 , 30

0.82 , 1.16

69.52%

85.77%

0.97

(Bus 18)

0.98

(Bus 25)

Optimal Allocation and Sizing of Distributed Generation with Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Loss Reduction

64

Fig. 2

To evaluate and prove the effectiveness of the proposed PSO Algorithm we compare the

results obtained by this technique using the IEEE 33-BUS system with those obtained in

[29],[30]. The table.2 shows the DG units optimal location, sizing and the total power losses

of the system.

TABLE II.RESULTS AND COMPARISON

Case II

Case III

Approach

Proposed PSO

[29]

Proposed PSO

[30]

Optimal DG location

13 , 30

6,8

2.43

2.28

0.82 , 1.16

1.72, 0.84

61.77

63.26

28.83

55.67

The table.2 reveals that the proposed PSO algorithm could gain better results compared to

[29],[30] approaches in real power loss reduction so the voltage profile improvement too, by

reducing the real power losses from 202.6 kW to 61.77 kW and 28.83kW.

TABLE III SUMMARY OF SCENARIO II RESULTS FOR SINGLE DG UNIT

Light Load

Normal Load

Heavy Load

46.8

202.66

497.12

Optimal DG location

1.22

2.43

3.69

14.96

61.77

142.78

Further study to the proposed PSO when the system is under different loads levels. The light

load (50% from the full load) and heavy load (150% from the full load) in order to see how the

DGs Units can react with the load variation. Moreover the optimum size and location of DGs

units for the voltage profile improvement and active power reduction using the proposed

approach in the different load levels are illustrated below:

65

Light Load

Normal Load

Heavy Load

46.8

202.66

497.12

Optimal DG location

13 , 30

13 , 30

13 , 30

0.41 , 0.56

0.82 , 1.16

1.25 , 1.69

7.03

28.83

65.36

From Tables.3 and 4, for the different levels loads the DGs size is change simultaneously

with the load levels (preserve the same place of the DG units).

Moreover the voltage profile of feeder system due to different load levels are varying in

matching to the load levels as illustrated in Figure.3 and 4.

66

V.

CONCLUSION

A particle swarm optimization approach is proposed in this paper to solve the DGs units

allocation and sizing problem. Comparing the proposed approach to other optimization

algorithms, showed an improved performance and better results. The proposed PSO was

applied to the IEEE 33-Bus system radial distribution system. Based on the results the

proposed algorithm has the capability to provide the optimal placements and sizes for the DGs

units. Moreover, the results illustrate the efficiency of this approach for the voltage profile

improvement and power losses reduction.

In order to better evaluate the robustness of this approach we should be tested in larger

distribution systems.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The author thanks Prof. Tarek Bouktir and all members of his SMART GRID team.

REFERENCES

[1] H. Hedayati, S. A. Nabaviniaki and A. Akbarimajd, A Method for Placement of DG

Units in Distribution Networks, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 23, No. 3,

July 2008, pp.1620-1628.

[2] Lalitha, M.P., Reddy, V.C.V., Usha, V.: Optimal DG placement for minimum real

power loss in radial distribution systems using PSO, J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol.,

2010, 13, (2), pp. 107116.

[3] Gandomkar, M., Vakilian, M., Ehsan, M.: A combination of genetic algorithm and

simulated annealing for optimal distributed DG allocation in distributed networks.

Proc. IEEE Electrical and Computer Engineering Canadian Conf., 2005, pp. 645648.

[4] H. Yoshida, K. Kawata and Y. Fukuyama, A Particle Swarm Optimization for Reactive

Power and Voltage Control Considering Voltage Security Assessment, IEEE

Transactions on Power System, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2000, pp.1232-1239.

[5] Zhu, D., Broadwater, R.P., Tam, K., Seguin, R., Asgeirsson, H.: Impact of DG

placement on reliability and ef ciency with time-varying loads, IEEE Trans. Power

Syst., 2006, 21, (1), pp. 419427.

[6] Keane, A., OMalley, M.: Optimal distributed generation plant mix with novel loss

adjustment factors. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2006.

[7] Y. A. Katsigiannis and P. S. Georgilakis, Optimal Sizing of Small Isolated Hybrid

Power Systems Using Tabu Search, Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced

Materials, Vol. 10, No. 5, May 2008, pp. 1241-1245.

[8] T. Niknam, S. I. Taheri, J. Aghaei, S. Tabatabaei, M. Nayeripour, A modified honey

bee mating optimization algorithm for multiobjective placement of renewable energy

resources, Applied Energy, vol. 88, pp. 48174830, 2011.

[9] Mardaneh, M., Gharehpetian, G.B.: Siting and sizing of DG units using GA and OPF

based technique. IEEE Region 10 Conf., 2004, vol. 3, pp. 331334.

[10] Gozel, T., Hocaoglu, M.H.: An analytical method for the sizing and siting of

distributed generators in radial systems, Int. J. Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2009, 79, pp.

912918.

[11] Safari, A., Jahani, R., Shayanfar, H.A., Olamaei, J.: Optimal DG allocation in

distribution network, Int. J. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2010, 4, (8), pp. 550553

67

[12] D. Singh, D. Singh, and K. S. Verma, GA based energy loss minimization approach for

optimal sizing and placement of distributed generation, International Journal of

Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems vol. 12, pp. 147-156 2008.

[13] F. S. Abu-Mouti, M. E. El-Hawary, Optimal Distributed Generation Allocation and

Sizing in Distribution Systems via Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm, IEEE Trans. on

Power Delivery, vol. 26, 2011.

[14] Kashem, M.A., Le, D.T., Negnevitsky, M., Ledwich, G.: Distributed generation for

minimization of power losses in distribution systems. IEEE Power Engineering Society

General Meeting, 2006.

[15] AlHajri, M.: Sizing and placement of distributed generation in electrical distribution

systems using conventional and heuristic optimization methods. Ph.D. thesis,

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 2009.

[16] P. S. Georgilakis, S. Member, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, Optimal Distributed

Generation Placement in Power Distribution Networks : Models, Methods, and Future

Research, IEEE Transactions, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3420-3428, August 2013.

[17] T. Ackermann, G. Andersson, and L. Sder, Distributed generation: a de nition,

Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 195-204, 2001.

[18] IEA publication, distributed generation in liberalized electricity market, 2002. (page19).

[Online].

Available:

http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2000/distributed2002.pdf

[19] M. A. Abido, Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization Electrical power

and energy systems 24(2002)563- 571- 1985.

[20] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, A Particle Swarm Optimization Proceedings of IEEE

International conference on Neural Networks, vol.IV, pp.1942- 1948, Perth, Australia,

1995.

[21] Ioan Cristian TRELEA, Lessaim de particule vu comme un systme dynamique :

convergence et choix des paramtres , Sminaire Loptimisation par essaim de

particules, Paris, 2003.

[22] Maurice Clerc et Patrick Siarry, Une nouvelle mtaheuristique pour loptimisation

difficile : la mthode des essaims particulaires , Sminaire Loptimisation par essaim

de particules, Paris, 2003.

[23] Salhi A, Bouktir T, Naimi D. Economic dispatch resolution using adaptive acceleration

coefficients based PSO considering generator constraints. Proceedings of the first IEEE

International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies

CoDIT13, Hammamet, Tunisia, 2013.

[24] Niknam T, Mojarrad H D, Meymand H Z. Non-smooth economic dispatch

computation by fuzzy and self-adaptive particle swarm optimization. Applied Soft

Computing, 2011, 11(2): 2805-2817.

[25] Safari A, Shayeghi H. Iteration particle swarm optimization procedure for economic

load dispatch with generator constraints. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011,

38(5): 60436048.

[26] Kumarasamy K, Raghavan R. Particle swarm optimization algorithm for voltage

stability improvement using multiple STATCOM. Proceedings of International

Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical Engineering and Energy Management

(ICETEEEM), Chennai, India, 2012, 235242.

Optimal Allocation and Sizing of Distributed Generation with Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Loss Reduction

68

[27] Nara, K, Hayashi, Y, Ikeda, K and Ashizawa, T, Application of tabu search to optimal

placement of distributed generators, IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting,

2001, Volume: 2, PP.918 923.

[28] M. R. Aghaebrahimi, M. Amiri An Immune-Based Optimization Method for

Distributed Generation Placement in Order to Optimize Voltage Profile, IEEE

International Conference on Sustainable Power Generation and Supply, Nanjing, 978-14244-4934-7, 2009.

[29] B. Hanumantha Rao and S. Sivanagaraju,Optimum allocation and sizing of distributed

generations based on Clonal Selection Algorithm for loss reduction and technical

benefit of energy savings, International conference on Advances in Power Conversion

and Energy Technologies (APCET), pp. 1-5, 2-4 August 2012.

[30] T. N. Shukla, S. P. Singh, V. Srinivasarao and K. B. Naik, Optimal sizing of

distributed generation placed on radial distribution systems, Electric Power

Components and Systems, vol. 38, pp. 260-274, 2010.

69

- Micro-hydroUploaded byPalintinad
- Optimal Placement Sizing of Distributed Generation Dg to Minimize Active Power Loss Using Particle Swarm Optimization PsoUploaded byIJSTR Research Publication
- Optimal location and sizing of DG units to improve the voltage stability in the distribution system using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Time Varying Acceleration CoefficientsUploaded byGRD Journals
- OPTIMAL DG PLACEMENT FOR MINIMUM REAL POWERUploaded byMohammad R Z Shahriary
- Economic Load Dispatch Using Bacterial Foraging TechniqueUploaded byVijay Rohilla
- Multiple DG Placement For Voltage Profile Improvement And Loss Reduction Using IA And PSO MethodsUploaded byAnonymous vQrJlEN
- POWER SYSTENM ANALYSIS & FAULT Lecture_18.pptUploaded byAV Shrinivas
- processes-05-00034Uploaded byEastman Sianipar
- Network Lifespan Maximization For Wireless Sensor Networks Using Nature-Inspired Elephant Based Swarm OptimizationUploaded byInternational Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR)
- Particle Swarm OptimizationUploaded byChristopher Herring
- Overview of Algorithms for Swarm Intelligence.pdfUploaded bymenguemengue
- Coordinated Scheduling of Residential Distributed Energy Resources to Optimize Smart Home Energy ServicesUploaded byIoana Gafton
- reworld20160102-dlUploaded bytorinomg
- OptimizationDistributedGeneration_GASAUploaded byred_champion
- Lambert 2018Uploaded byJamsranjav Enkhbayar
- Habib AhmedUploaded byHabib Ahmed
- Panta Lucic EDUploaded byTATATAHER
- A QP Approach and CONOPT-GAMS for OptimizationUploaded byLucas Souza
- Integración Del Work Index en La Plani.Uploaded byFrancisco Javier Zepeda Iribarren
- Optimal Coordination of Overcurrent Relays in Distribution Systems With Distributed Generators BaUploaded byVictor HuGo
- b 04302018024Uploaded byInternational Journal of computational Engineering research (IJCER)
- QuantMinerUploaded bykafrar
- Optimisation (Repaired)Uploaded byPushpa Rajah Rajaguru
- The Optimal Portfolio Based on the Bat Algorithm ResearchUploaded byinventionjournals
- 83114-204479-1-PBUploaded byمحمود السيسى
- MBDEUploaded byHicham Qasmi
- 07_LO525_Lot Sizing Procedures.docUploaded byvviini
- niniki-grafi-1.docxUploaded bylakserk
- IITA.2009.132.pdfUploaded byJannatun Amira Al Aqilah

- EPE_9busUploaded byHemang Patel
- 09 Chapter 4Uploaded byNmg Kumar
- MSW A4 FormatUploaded byricardus25
- Optimal Allocation of DG Units for Power Loss Reduction and Voltage Profile Improvement of Distribution Networks Using PSO AlgorithmUploaded byK Guru Prasad
- 139 OptimalUploaded byK Guru Prasad
- A Novel Binary Particle Swarm OptimizationUploaded byAhmad Safaee

- Ober Meyer CaseUploaded byTampan Badai
- WBT, BBT, GBT.docxUploaded bySri Venigandla
- ATM Case Study Code-javaUploaded byRithika Mohan
- Subcontratação de MM – NF-e (138)Uploaded byceduardo_68594
- Angularjs SuccinctlyUploaded byAndre Richardson
- Load Runner VUGen User GuideUploaded byphileanyc
- Sequential Logic (pdfUploaded bypraveen_banthi
- Coding Unit Plan LT Tracking Hex 1Uploaded byLisa Bejarano
- s41044-016-0016-yUploaded byMaz Har Ul
- Highline Excel 2016 Class 20 Clean Transform & Import Excel Workbook Data With Power QueryUploaded byene
- 1. Data Preparation.docxUploaded byAldo Addoodle
- Executive Position Description- Vice President Human Resources - ConvergeOneUploaded byLisa Curtin
- List of open-source health softwareUploaded byGFBMGFBLKNGMDSBGFNFHNFHNMHD
- Telive DocUploaded bykaraVelika
- Benchmarking SRD IoT OperatorUploaded byyosiamanurun
- R05420307-COMPUTERGRAPHICSUploaded byvanamgoutham
- Connectionist PsycholinguiticsUploaded byAlton Melvar Madrid Dapanas
- ECRS_UserManual.docUploaded byShefat Phiri
- AD QuestionsUploaded byAmogh Desai
- Data Summary Review ChecklistUploaded byBen Jennings
- 4 IPasolink Ethernet Functions 1-LibreUploaded byÉdipo Lisboa
- Hero MotoCorpUploaded byKumar Somil
- Master DPR plan.xlsxUploaded byMANISH
- 1.SAP BASIS Material Keylabs1Uploaded byDevender5194
- Honors Advanced Calculus and Linear Algebra p2Uploaded bymarchelo_chelo
- Excel TipsUploaded byapi-3722405
- peronnin_etal_ECCV10.pdfUploaded byAbdulkadirSengür
- Manual Workcenter 3315Uploaded byemanuel_schon
- Human Resource ManagementUploaded bysksingh.rose196711
- CCNA1 Chap7 Practice Test QuestionsUploaded byPhoenix Rock