that would amount to pactuim commissorium. (Art 1607, NCC). SS QUASI-DELICTS. 221. Aconstructed a building for 8. Tw ‘ack of necessary repairs resulting in 4 ty-five (25) years thereafter. the building collapsed due to th of 10 tenants of the building. Who is liable? a. the’architect A, the contractor, b. the engineer J.B. (Art 2190, NCC) 222. ABC Comp. is the owner of a hospital where Doctor A is 2 visiting consultant. A conducted 27 ‘operation at the hospital of 8 woman-neighbor but let Wo (2) gauzes Inside the Ingcission of the satient resulting in infections and eventus death of the patient. Who can be sued for damages? ‘a, The patient's hei can sue the doctor alone for his negligent act. b The heirs ean sue the hospital alone & The hairs can sue the nospital and the doctor solidarity because of tie doctrine of the hosp deere nea the hospital and the doctor because the doctor is an employee, hence, they as ie % 9, an of the een ENTERS? Bagiese Nyy fut tha it The teacher is not lable because the school is not a school of arts and traces tan. 218, F.C.; Amadora v. CA, Palisoc v. Brilantes; 218, 219, 221, 2180) 224, Ala therowner of» car driven by 8. Wile on his way fo fetch A at his office the motos wari + ator socioent resuling in the death of C, a pedestrien. He was sued for lmprudence roautiog © ee cad convicted wih civilindemniy in the erount of P00,000.00. Who may be fable for the amount of damages? a. Only Bis a liable. BABB are solidarily fable if A cannot prove the diigence of a good father of a family in the selection. and supervision of 6. e. jbaldiarily liable In cas ve Nea vcause he was not & party 10 the criminal action, otherwise, he would be deprived of the right to due process. (Art. 102 & 103, RPC) 225. _ Als en owner of # horse. He asked B to take care of R while reviewing forthe Bar Exar a inet e went to & to get back the horse but as he got near the horse, he was kickes PY the examina fone resulting in is blindness. He sued B for damages, ts B fable for demeges? ‘a, Bis riotliable because ofa force majeure. B ls eat the time A vas inlure ssessl ae eptled 0 an award of damages because the ljury is seltinfcled being he owner of fis Rouse. : 30CEN Albano Bar Review Cente Ais not entitled to damages because of his owin negligence. (Ait-2183, NCC; Hisole case) 228. ABO Corp. is @ furniture manufacturirig company. One weekend, the manager and two (2) i nt. At 42:00 midnight ‘through with the work, so B, the manager went back home driving @ company car But dropped by 2 coffee shop to have michight snacks and a cup of coffee. At 1:30 a.m., he was driving the company car on his way home when a motorcycle collided with the car resulting in the death of , the motorcycle rider. At the time of the collision, a woman shouted "Papa" 2s she was surprised by the sudder collision. Who i liable for the death of C7 a, The company is liable because the manager was still performing his tasks. b. Balone is liable because at ! not performing his tasks, ¢. The company & B are solidarily liable 4d. B, butin case of insolvency, the company. (Gastilex Industrial Corp. v. Vasquez) 227. . A&B are married. They have a 10-year old son, C. X & Y, who are childless filed a petition tor ‘adoption on June 16, 2010, seeking to adopt C. It was submited for resolution on December 15, 2010. On December 31, 2010 C was playing with a neighbor D who is likewise a minor, using the airgun of C’s father. He pointed the gun to D, squeezed the trigger and killed D. The petition was ‘granted on January 10, 2011. Who may be liable? a. The parents of D can sue A & 6 for damages. b. The parents of D can sue X & Y for damages because the effects of adoption are retroactive to the date of the filing of the petition for adoption. rents of D can jages who are solidarly liable hissparents but his properties can be made to RALBANO PBA REVIEW sbi bod Seornk lo ne province of GE aS raere MDE LOGUEICOrTLA: Hence t'delivered Ea FitS- ice in Tar out the transaction hence, he sued A for damages. s A liable? 220 ‘A canbe liable for breach of contract. ‘Acar be lable for abuse of right. ‘A cannot be liable because he was exercising a right. ‘Als not lablo, but instead, XYZ Corp. is Hable for interference in contractual relationship. (An. 19, NCC) aore 228. A and B got married without the benefit of a license. During the marriage, A left B and got married to C, hence, B sued A for bigamy. In the meantime A sued B for declaration of nulity of marriage and moved for the suspension of the criminal case. May the motion be granted? a. A’s motion cannet be granted because the marriage is presumed to be valid untif nullified. ‘The motion cannot be granted as its not a prejudicial question ee innot be oh J. The motion ean ie rbctad oh the ground a prejudicial question. 230. A promised mariage to 8, a gainfuly employed gir. Before the marriage: they agread that 8 ‘would resin from the jab, hence, a week before the date set for the wedding, 6 resigned, but A did nt comply withthe. promise of marriage. 8 sued A for damages. Is A able for damages? A inotiabts bacause mere breach of promise 16 mary isnot gr dctionable wrong. b pecause there w. nde "i i fc. Aisnotlieble because Its his right to back aut for the weesing Sule tg ee 40Gran MHI Albano Gar Review Cented 4. Ais not lable because it was voluntary for Bto-resign and that she is-presumedto take care of hher own concer: (art 21, NCC) Azan erhployee of XYZ Corp.; teceiving a.selary of 40;000.00 per month died due to a hicular accident. During the trial of the case fled by his heifs, the latter failed to produce hie Income tax retums as he never filed the same with the BIR and yet, they were claiming for damages ‘due to unearned income. Is the defendant liable for compensatory damages? am a le for ar ome as th nt #ridanee to prove tne same, 'b, The defendant is lable because testimonial evidence is sufficient to prove the unearned income. ©. The defendant is fable because the law automatically provides for liability in caso of death, 4. The defendant is liable because every person who may be criminally able for a felony shall also be civilly fable. 282. Akilled B. After tral A was convicted of the crime of murder and the court imposed the penalty of reclusion perpetua. Which amount of civil indemnity may be awarded by the court? ‘a. P50,000.00 ©. P75,000. b. P3,600.00 4d, P150,000 00, the actual earnings of B. 233, In an information for murder, there is no allegation of aggravating circumstances: The Prosecutor, however presented evidence on the aggravating circumstances during the Vial, What foris the presentation of evidence of aggravating circumstances if tney were not alleged? 4. No, because it cannot suffer sleepless nights. (Filipinas Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. Ago Medical Center: LEC v. CA) 298. _X is the owner of @ domesticated dog, He left it at his compound while at work. Y, a neighbor threw stone at the dog, trying to play with it as he used to do. The dog was hit, hence, it jumped {rom the compound of X and went after Y who gol injured when he fell while rening away frem the dag. is X liable for damages? 2. Xis liable as owner/possessor of the dog, b. Xs not ible because of force majeure, ¢. Xi not liable because of Y's fault for throwing stones at the dog. d. re 1e court will, he. es contriby i ot (Ast 2183, NCC) 236. A and B entered into a contract for B to construct the house of A for P1OM. XYZ are partners engaged in the construction of houses. As they are friends of A, they. told him that they can construct his house, for only PEM and told him ta-cancel, he goniradl wi le cancelied the contract with 8. What is the right of 8? ee . B can Eue A for breach of contract. : b. Bean sue X¥Z oartnership becasice of Interference in contractual relationship, Bean sue X.¥,2 for inducing A to viclsta his contract. aGran MHI Albano Gar Review Cented 4. Ais not lable because it was voluntary for Bto-resign and that she is-presumedto take care of hher own concer: (art 21, NCC) Azan erhployee of XYZ Corp.; teceiving a.selary of 40;000.00 per month died due to a hicular accident. During the trial of the case fled by his heifs, the latter failed to produce hie Income tax retums as he never filed the same with the BIR and yet, they were claiming for damages ‘due to unearned income. Is the defendant liable for compensatory damages? am a le for ar ome as th nt #ridanee to prove tne same, 'b, The defendant is lable because testimonial evidence is sufficient to prove the unearned income. ©. The defendant is fable because the law automatically provides for liability in caso of death, 4. The defendant is liable because every person who may be criminally able for a felony shall also be civilly fable. 282. Akilled B. After tral A was convicted of the crime of murder and the court imposed the penalty of reclusion perpetua. Which amount of civil indemnity may be awarded by the court? ‘a. P50,000.00 ©. P75,000. b. P3,600.00 4d, P150,000 00, the actual earnings of B. 233, In an information for murder, there is no allegation of aggravating circumstances: The Prosecutor, however presented evidence on the aggravating circumstances during the Vial, What foris the presentation of evidence of aggravating circumstances if tney were not alleged? 4. No, because it cannot suffer sleepless nights. (Filipinas Broadcasting Network, Inc. v. Ago Medical Center: LEC v. CA) 298. _X is the owner of @ domesticated dog, He left it at his compound while at work. Y, a neighbor threw stone at the dog, trying to play with it as he used to do. The dog was hit, hence, it jumped {rom the compound of X and went after Y who gol injured when he fell while rening away frem the dag. is X liable for damages? 2. Xis liable as owner/possessor of the dog, b. Xs not ible because of force majeure, ¢. Xi not liable because of Y's fault for throwing stones at the dog. d. re 1e court will, he. es contriby i ot (Ast 2183, NCC) 236. A and B entered into a contract for B to construct the house of A for P1OM. XYZ are partners engaged in the construction of houses. As they are friends of A, they. told him that they can construct his house, for only PEM and told him ta-cancel, he goniradl wi le cancelied the contract with 8. What is the right of 8? ee . B can Eue A for breach of contract. : b. Bean sue X¥Z oartnership becasice of Interference in contractual relationship, Bean sue X.¥,2 for inducing A to viclsta his contract. aGAMBLING AND ALEATORY CONTRACTS 409. Aand 6 are married They have aot aczount in Bonk. They eigeuted » survrship agree the death of one of them, the full amount of money in thelr acount shall become the Survivor. Is the agreement valid? + 4 is ‘No, because itis a donation mertls causa which did not comply with the formalities of the la 8. No, tis 2 donation inter vives prohibited under Article 87, Family Cod 4 No, by reason of public poliey. : i 410, placed a bet of 20,000.00 that San Beda would bet, But 8 refused to pay after SBC won, Is B correct? : 4. Yes, because of the principle of mutually of contracts; 3 b. Yes, because of the principe ofiberty of contracts; . 4 Yes, because basketballs a game of sll and not of chance, {aleatory contract of gambling or betting, Art 2013, NCCD QUAS:-DEUICTS 421, Asold his car to 8, but the later failed to register the ear under his name. While’B was deiving the car, It met ‘anaceident resulting in injuries to C, Why may be lable? 3. Can hola A lable alone as he lathe registered owner ofthe car; 1b. (Ccan sue A and 8 as they are solidarily able; © Cean sue 8 alone as the execution of the document of Sale and delivery ofthe car conferred ewnership ‘upon hin con sue 8, (Perez v. Gutierrez) a 422, A constructed 2 building for 8. Twenty-five (25) years thereafter, the building collapsed due to lack of ‘necessary repairs resulting inthe death of 10 tenants ofthe bullding. Who is liable? a. the architect A the contractor: b. the en dB. : (art 2190, Nec) 413. A, bus conductor killed passenger. ts the operator clily able? 2. Yes, based on contract, but with defense of the diligence of 9 good bi Yes, based on quas-elict; © 2, but. 4. Yes, but subsiaiary in case-of insolvency of the driver. (Art 1760, 1759, NCC; -liabityis primary; Maranan v. Perer, 20 SCRA 412) wer ofa family: 414, A, a seaman with a contract for two (2} years was required to disembark due to the sale of the ves ‘Within wiiat period should he fle an action to collect his unpald wages for one (1) year? : a. Within 3 years because itis the consequence of an employer-employee relationship; . Within 10 years because there isa written contract; 4. Within 10 years because the action isbaséd on law. “15. ABCCorp ithe owner of hospital where Doctor Aa ving consutant A conducted an operatic atthe hosp of @ woman-eighbor but lft two (2) gauze Isde the Insts of the pale resting In Infections and eventual death of the patient. Who con be sued for damages? ae 2. The patient's hers can sue the doctor alone for hs negligent ect, . The heirs can sue the hospital ston e hose d. The heirs can sue the hospital and:the doctor bacause the doctor is an employee, hence, they are = solidarity Vable, fs (Professional Services, Inc. v. Agana) oe Oe 1 | meqivt2024 atest revion/ersas, 417, a1. ats, 429, 421. | meqevil20n4 latest revslon/ens ae Als a teas: of St. Jude elementary school. While the pupils were'ln clas, 8, one of the pupils £20 of another pup reslngin the Blindness of hist ye Whe abe? ‘ a. The parents of Bare liabl 'b. The school is table. 3 : ._ The teacher isnot lable because the school Is not a school of ars and trades, (rt 228, F.C; Amadora v, CA; Palisocv, Brillantes; 248, 219, 221, 2180) A ls the owner of 2 car driven by B. While on his way to fetch A at his office, the motor vehide met an ‘accident resulting in the death of C, a pedestrian. He was sued for imprudence resulting in homicide and comicted with civil indemnity in thé amount of P§00,000.00. Who may be lable for the amount of damages? . 2. Only Bis liable. 1b. A&B are solidarlyiable IA cannot prove the dl supervision of 6 4d. Acannot be liable Because he was not a party t0 the erimin the right to due process. (at 102 & 103, RPC) nce of 008 father ofa family in the selection and ‘étion; otherwise, he would be deprived of & is an owner of 2 horse. He asked 8 to take care of It while reviewing for the Bar Exams. After the ‘examination, he went to & to get back the horse but as he got near the horse, he was kicked by the horse en - [his face resulting in his blindness. He sued B for damages. Is 8 lable for damages? [es not liable because of a force majeure. & ble ime © Als not entitled to an award of damages because the Injury is selInficted being the owner‘of the house d, “Ais not entitled to damages because of his own negligence. {Art 2383, NCC; Hisole case) é ABC Corps furniture manufactur company. One weekend, the manager snd two (2) employees had an ‘overtime to finish a work upon instruction of A, the President. At 12:00 midnight they were through with the, Work, so 8, the manager went back home driving a company car but dropped by a coffee shop to have Inldight snacks and a cup of coffee. At 1:30 am, he was driving the company car on hs way home when & ‘motorcycle collided with the car resulting in the death of C the motorcycle rider. At the time ofthe ealsion, + woman shoutes "Papa" as she was surprised by the sudden calsion, Who ls lable for the death of C? a. The company is liable because the manager was stil performing his tasks. : 6 islablebeca ne ofthe oc 2 © The company & Bare solidarily lable. 4. 8, but incase of insolvency, the company (Casttex industria Corn v Vasquet) A & 6 are married, They have a 10-year old son, C. & Y, who are chiles filed a petition for adsption on June 16, 2010, seeking to adopt C. It was subrntted for cesoluton on December 35,2010. On December 33, 2010 C was playing with a neighbor 0 whois likewise a minor, slag the airgun of C's father He polated the = Gun to 0, squected the trigger and klled 0. The petition was granted on January 10, 2011, Who may be Viable? a Thea wes b. The parents of D can sue x & ¥ for damages because the effects of adoption are retroactive to the date ofthe fling of the petition for adoption. € The parents of can sue A & 8,X & ¥ for damages who are solidaly abe, ¢. The parents of © can sue C represented by his paren's but his properties can be made to answer for the damages sustained, : e (Tamayo v. cA; 2180, NCC; PO 603, Art. 26) = DAMAGES - a ‘Aang B entered Into an exclusive deslership agresment over the product of A In the province of Tarlac. XYZ Corp. ordered such product from A, hence, he delivered the some ati efice In Taras. 8 learned ebout the 4» wansaction hence, he sued A for damages. is A lable? : " ‘Acanbe liable fr breach of contract. * bean be lable for bute of at & Acannot be liable because he was exercising a ght.422, 423, 424, ars, 426. 423. 8. ie, But instead, XYZ Corp is lable for Interference in contractual relationship.“ tare 38, Nec) z A and 8 got matried without the benefit ofa lcense, Dusing the mariage, A left 8 and got martied to > enc, 8 sue & for bigamy Inthe meantime A Sued B for declaration of nulityof thelr martaye and moved » for the suspension of the criminal case, May the motion be granted?- ae 2. A’smotian cannot be granted because the marriage is presumed tobe vl '. The motion cannot be granted as tis not a prejudicial question nti nullified, : in The motion can be granted on the ground of prejudicial question. ‘A promised martiage to 8, 9 gainfully employed gir. Before the marsiage, Wey agreed that B would resign {from the job, hence, a week before the date set for the wedding, & resigned, but A did not comply with ‘bromise of marriage. B sued A for damages, ts A liable for damages? Bae 8. Aisnot liable because mere breach of promise to marry is not an actionable wrong, B Alstloble 2 & Alsnat fable because it his ight to back out from the wedding. s 9. Alsnot lable because it was voluntary for 8 to resign and that she Is presumed to take care of her own concerns. . Pepe os ‘art. 23, Nec) pee ‘A, an employee of XY2 Corp, receiving a salary of P40,000.00 per month died due to a vehlcular accident. During the trial of the case filed by his heirs, the latter fale to produce his income tax returns as he never filed the same with the BIR and yet, they were claiming for damages due to uneamed Income, Is the defendant liable? . a sndent isnot lioble for red Inco 7 the same. ‘ b._The defendants able because testimonial evidence is suficient to prove the unearned income. The defendant is liable because the law automatically provides for liability in case of death. 4. The defendants fable as itis the natural consequence of his wrongful ac. (Victory Liner v. Gamad) A, an employes of XY2 Corp, receiving a salary of P40,000.00 per ménth died due to a vehicular accident. Daring the tial of che case filed by his heirs, the latter faled to produce his income tax returns as he never {ed the same with the BIR and yet, they were claiming for damages due to unearned Income. Is the defendant liable for compensatory damat a u th ne os there wo} no documentary evidence to prove fhe some, + The defendants liable because testimonial evidence i suficient to prove the unearned income. © . The defendant is liable because the aw automatically provides for lability incase of death. @. The defendant is lable because every person who may be criminally liable for a felony shall also be ivi table. A killed 6, After trial A was convicted ofthe crime of murder and the court imposed the penalty ofredusion Perpetua. Which amount of civil indemnity may be awarded by the court? 3 0,000.00 «275,000.00 b. 3,000.00 4. P150,000.00, the actual earnings of ln an information for murder, there is no allegation of aggravating circumstances, The prosecutor, however Presentes evidence on the aggravating circumstances during the trial, What for is the presentation of evidence of aggravating circumstances if they were not alleged? g a. To prove that the accused may be liable or moral damages. Y b. To prove the guilt ofthe accused beyond reasonable doubt. « ” xe 4. He cannot do it because he can only prove what has bean alleged inthe information, 2 May a corporation be awarded moral damages incase of libel? No, because ithas ho nervous system to feel the hurt. b. No, because being a juridical person, It cannot suffer wounded feelings. © ond de 4. No, because it cannot suffer sleepless nights, i (Fillpinas Broadcasting Network, Inc v. Ago Medical Center; 18C v. CA) ; ‘8G. 2011 lates evson/ene435. A courted 8 and promised to marry her. The wedding was set on Febeuary 14, 2012 but atthe date set for. 429, Xathe unver of a domesticated dog. He lett this compound while at work. Y, a neighbor threw atone at the soe. trving to ay with ia he use todo The dog was hit hence, It umped fiom the compound of X andwent after ¥ who got ilured when he fell while running away from the dog. Is liable for damages? 43. Kis liable as owner/possessor ofthe do : yoEies . Xs notable because of force majeure, © Xie not liable because of Y's fault for throw 4. Xlsllable but the co (art, 2183, NCC) * 430. ._Aand B entered into a contract for B to construct the house of A for P1OM. XYZ are partners engaged in the ‘Construction of houses. As they are friénds of A, they told him that they can construct his house for only POM and told him to cancel the contract with B, He cancelled the contract with B. What isthe cight of 6? ‘a. Bean sue A for breach of contract. b lg c. Bean sue X.¥,2 for inducing Ato violate his contract. 4d. Bcan sue A, and XYZ partnership for breach of contract (art. 3314, Nec) 431, A had 9 4-storey building wihich was constructed by Engineer 8 and at the same time the contractor. After five years, the building developed cracks and its stairway eventually gave way and collapsed due to poor ‘quality of materials used In the construction, resulting ‘0 Injurles to some lessees. Who should the lessees - ‘sue for damages? : 2 the owner Both A and 6: i b. B.the contractor: 1d. No one because of wear and tear of the building. 432, ~ A. a tricycle driver eaming P290.00 per day died because of a vehicular accident when his tricycle collided with a bus, The heirs sued the bus company and the driver, 8. Ouring the tial the plalntifs were not, resent documentary evidence to prove his Income, Are the heirs entitled to compensatory damages? ‘The heirs are not entitled to.compensatory damages for fallure to prove the same by documentary, evidence. ‘©The heirs are not entitled to compensatory damages because the same cannot be proved by testinal evidence 44. The helts are: not entitied to conipensatory damages because such damages cannot be recoveied by mere conjecture. 433, ABC Corp. is an owner of a Medical School & Hospital. X, a commentator ofa radio station verbally attacked {he corporation hence, the latter sued him for damages. ithe school entitled to moral damages? 3 ARC Corp. is not entitled fo moral damages ecause it his no nervous system to feel the wounded feelings and besmirched reputation, denieoned: © %, the commentator can interpase the defense of truth. 2. No, because it cannot suffer sleepless nights. (Filipinas Broadcasting Network, Inc v. Ago Medical Center, ete) ‘434. A & Bare married. 8 who was then pregnant by si (6) months was on board a bus going to the office. The vehicle met an accident resulting in injuries to B and death of the fetus. They sued the bus company for damages due tothe death ofthe fetus. isthe company lable? 34GB are entitled to an award of compensatory darnages in the amount of PS0,000.00 for the death of the fetus. E ‘ he fetus, € AB Bare not enttied to any amount of damages because the fetus has yet to be born in order to dle. « d. A & Bare entitled to damages Because the fetus had Ife inside the Womb of the mother which the ‘constitution and the law protect. (Gelurv. cA) the celebration. A did not appear at the church, 8 sued A for damages for breach of promise to: merry ie alleging that all preparations have been made and there were so many people who attended thelr : See ‘meq ci.2021 latest revionVers oe : pschedule: ‘ing. She knew however that A was married but sil submitted herselfto sexual desires. ofA IsAliabe? : sele 2. Aisnotliable because mere breach of promise to marry snot an actionable wrong, Br intable because he caused slepless nights, wounded feelings to 8 by not appearing atthe church 4. Bhasto bear her own losses. (USv. Buenaventura} 5 : tee ‘456A raped ard tilled a minor git, He was convicted after tral. He cin be eld abe for exeriplary damages: ‘What isthe basis? a The basis of the award of exemplary damagesis found solely in Article 2230, NCC; BL exemplary damages can only be awarded If there Is more than one (3) aggravating circumstances: ._ The existence of aggravating ccumstances. 437, A-was one ofthe passengers of vessel of Suiicio Unes that sank resutng Inthe dant of hinreds of. ponengers including A The heirs of A fled an action for damages praying for compensatory, @eanPar. aaa aer ces The brotiers and sisters intervened and prayed fr moral damages. Are they correct? a aotravpeatners and sisters of Aare entitled to oral damages because of the mental angush Wey, suffered by reason of A's death; : Oe eerre pycinors und sisters of A are ented becouse the taw provides that moral damage ry Be Teed in the following and analogous cases, they Being colatratflatvex who are ented! to Inert Ne, ent legitimate Meera A ace ented to moral damages because ofthe iy suffered by them due to the act or omission of Sulpiclo which was the proximate cause of A's death. ° LAND REGISTRATION ‘aah, A and B are married They have been In possesion of an agricultural lan of the publi domain as erly os ‘1928, Alter theieSeath C and D, their heirs inherited the same. Can they register the land? ° No, because the land forms part ofthe public domain; a ts ‘c._ No, because of the Regalian Doctin G._ No, because prescription does not le against the State 429. A owns a parcel of land, Through the natura curent ofthe rive, there was » gradual Increase in the aren from 11,000 square meters to 33,000 square meters in a period of 8 years. Can A register the land? a. No, because itis a public land; Tne because he has not aequlreditby prescription as the State not bound by the rules on preseripton: « ng the ipa mer i: : 1d. No, because he has not possessed itfor a period of 10 years. ‘i ‘There isan accretion forrned through the natural current 440. _Alisthe owner of a parcel of land adjoining a river, filed an epplication for of the river. in 3960, his nelghbor took posséssion of the accretion, In 2013, fegistration. Will the petition prosper? see yo, because Ais the owner being the owner the land to which the acretion is attached; . No, because the accretion is» public land; ¥en » G._ ne because the Ul of A simprescriptble, he accretion being covered by the phrase “mere oles aaa.’ Als the ewer af a'pareel of fae covered Uy TCT No. 1 consisting of 20,000 square meters move of ess ‘ining the ver bark. Accretion was formed which has Been Inthe porsesin of Bln 1990, but wa. ‘iaposed of by the Director of tands to Bin 2030s che Director corret? or ven because the acéretion forms part of the alienble land of the puble dom; * 1. Yes, because of the Regalian Doctrine; 5 “e. NLbecoute it belongs to, beng the neon owner hence, satiate land, ._ Yes Because of prescription. 8 | meat. torunencevilnlens : :