Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/jvb
Department of Psychology, University of Tulsa, 600 South College Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA
b
George Mason University, USA
Received 3 February 2003
Available online 29 November 2003
Abstract
The current study examined the impact of two work-life benets, work schedule exibility,
and dependent care assistance, on applicants intentions to pursue jobs with potential employers. The study also explored whether anticipated organizational support would mediate the relationships between these two work-life benets and job pursuit intentions. Results indicated
that although work schedule exibility, dependent care assistance, and salary were all related
to job pursuit intentions, only schedule exibility, and dependent care were related to anticipated organizational support. Findings also indicated that anticipated organizational support
fully mediated the eects of work schedule exibility and dependent care assistance on job pursuit intentions. Findings are discussed in terms of the importance of organizational support as
a mediating mechanism through which work-life benets inuence more distal outcomes, and
in terms of implications for organizational recruiting strategies.
2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Workfamily conict; Work-life benets; Recruitment; Job choice; Organizational attractiveness; Organizational support; Familyfriendly culture
1. Introduction
During the past few decades, as the number of dual career families has increased,
considerable research has examined work and family issues. Employers today
*
Corresponding author. Fax: 1-918-631-2833.
E-mail address: wendy-casper@utulsa.edu (W.J. Casper).
0001-8791/$ - see front matter 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.09.003
392
frequently implement benets to help employees balance work and family, often with
the goal of enhancing recruitment (Basch Scott, 1996). Practitioner literature has
sometimes made unsubstantiated claims about how these benets inuence the organization. For example, Roberts (1996) reported that work-life programs enhance
morale, attendance, productivity, and recruitment, although no data were provided
to support these claims. In spite of recent calls to measure the impact of work-life
programs on organizational behaviors (Kossek & Ozeki, 1998; Landauer, 1997; Vincola, 1998), this area remains under-researched. In addition, although some studies
have linked work-life benets to increased satisfaction (Thomas & Ganster, 1995),
higher organizational commitment (Kossek & Nichol, 1992), reduced turnover intentions (Grover & Crocker, 1995), and enhanced productivity (Galinsky & Stein,
1990), few have examined work-life benets and recruitment. Recruitment involves
organizational practices that inuence the number and types of individuals who
are willing to apply for job vacancies (Rynes, 1991). This study explores how
work-life benets inuence prospective employees to apply for vacancies.
1.1. Work-life benets and recruitment
Rynes (1991) discussed the need to identify recruitment strategies to deal with labor shortages and argued for benets such as on-site child care and extime as potential strategies. To date, only a few empirical studies (Bretz & Judge, 1994;
Honeycutt & Rosen, 1997; Rau & Hyland, 2002; Rothausen, Gonzalez, Clarke, &
ODell, 1998) have examined work-life benets and an organizations recruitment
strategy. Moreover, these studies reveal competing ndings concerning the extent
to which work-life benets are universally appealing (Bretz & Judge, 1994; Honeycutt & Rosen, 1997) or appeal only to workers who are most likely to benet from
them (Rau & Hyland, 2002; Rothausen et al., 1998).
Honeycutt and Rosen (1997) explored the eects of familyfriendly career paths
among a sample of MBAs, hypothesizing that those with salient family and balance
identities would be more attracted to companies oering exible career paths. Instead, they found that all participants were more attracted to organizations with exible career paths, supporting the universal appeal of work-life benets.
In contrast, Rau and Hyland (2002) explored telecommuting and extime, and
found that work-to-family conict moderated the eects of both extime and telecommuting on organizational attraction. Specically, individuals with high workto-family conict were more attracted to organizations oering extime, whereas
those with low work-to-family conict were more attracted to organizations with
telecommuting. Thus, Rau and Hylands (2002) ndings suggest that individual differences aect the appeal of these policies.
Another work-life benet that was not explored in either of these studies (Honeycutt & Rosen, 1997; Rau & Hyland, 2002) is dependent care assistance. With an estimated 8000 worksite child care centers in the United States in 1998 (Work &
Family Connection, 1998) dependent care assistance is on the rise in todays organizations. Although some studies have found that dependent care assistance enhances
employee attitudes (Kossek & Nichol, 1992), few have examined whether dependent
393
care aects recruitment outcomes. One study that did (Rothausen et al., 1998) found
that employees with current or future needs for child care believed that on-site child
care would facilitate recruiting more so than those without child care needs, suggesting that work-life benets may primarily appeal to potential users.
Finally, Bretz and Judge (1994) explored attraction to organizations oering
general work-family policies within a study examining attraction to several human
resource systems. Although ndings in general suggested that the appeal of human
resources systems is based on individual dierences, this was not supported for
workfamily policies. Counter to expectations, they found that individuals with high
workfamily conict did not nd workfamily policies more appealing.
Although not examining recruitment per se, Grover and Crocker (1995) found
that four distinct work-life policies (i.e., parental leave, child care information and
referral, extime, nancial assistance with child care) predicted organizational attachment (i.e., aective commitment, turnover intentions). Interestingly, these policies were related to greater attachment among all employees who worked for the
rm oering them, not just users, supporting the universal appeal of work-life benets. The authors suggested that work-life benets are universally appealing because
they symbolize a concern for employees and their families, thereby creating a sense
that the organization is supportive of employee needs.
Clearly, the literature lacks consensus with respect to which, if any, individual differences moderate the eect of work-life policies on recruitment outcomes, and more
research is needed to resolve conicting ndings. In addition, although Rau and Hyland (2002) examined exible work options and Rothausen et al. (1998) investigated
on-site child care, no single study has explored both exible work options and dependent care to determine whether they make unique contributions or interact in predicting job pursuit intentions. This is important because the addition of a new
work-life benet in an organization with a pre-existing work-life program may have
a dierent impact than implementing an organizations rst work-life benet. It may
be the case that implementing a rst work-life program makes an organization appear more desirable and supportive, but that additional programs do not further enhance this perception. Research is also needed to resolve discrepant ndings with
respect to whether individual dierences aect the attractiveness of work-life benets. This is important because if benets only appeal to certain individuals, they will
enhance recruitment only if such individuals comprise the applicant pool. Finally, no
research has examined the psychological mechanisms through which work-life benets exert their eects on recruitment outcomes. Given that workfamily research
has been criticized for lacking theory and ignoring mediating mechanisms (Eby, Casper, Lockwood, Bourdeaux, & Brinley, invited monograph), this type of work is
clearly warranted.
This study extends past research in several ways. First, we explore the unique and
multiplicative eects of exible work schedules and dependent care assistance. Second, we explore anticipated organizational support as a mechanism through which
job pursuit intentions may develop. Finally, we examine workfamily conict
and parental status as moderators to assess whether work-life policies are universally
appealing or only to appeal those most apt to benet from them.
394
395
To date, no research we are aware of has explored why work-life benets might
attract applicants with low workfamily conict (Bretz & Judge, 1994) and enhance
commitment of employees without families (Grover & Crocker, 1995). We believe
that perceptions of organizational support might explain these ndings if work-life
benets exert their inuence indirectly, through anticipated organizational support
as a mediator. Past research has found perceived organizational support enhances
attachment in the form of organizational commitment (Settoon, Bennett, & Liden,
1996), attendance (Eisenberger et al., 1990), and work performance (Eisenberger et
al., 1990). It follows that applicants beliefs that an organization would be supportive
may facilitate attraction to that organization. Further, Allen (2001) found that the
impact of familyfriendly benets on workfamily conict, aective commitment,
and job satisfaction was mediated by family supportive organizational perceptions.
Thus, we proposed that information about work-life benets, presented during recruitment, would facilitate anticipated organizational support. Support perceptions,
in turn, were expected to inuence intentions to pursue employment with that organization. Based on this notion and research nding that work-life benets have universal appeal (Grover & Crocker, 1995; Honeycutt & Rosen, 1997), we expected that
both work schedule exibility and dependent care would positively relate to job pursuit intentions and that this eect would be mediated through anticipated organizational support.
H3: It was hypothesized that the availability of dependent care assistance would
be positively related to job pursuit intentions.
H4: It was hypothesized that the availability of work schedule exibility would be
positively related to job pursuit intentions.
H5: It was hypothesized that the eect of dependent care assistance on job pursuit
intentions would be mediated by anticipated organizational support.
H6: It was hypothesized that the eect of work schedule exibility on job pursuit
intentions would be mediated by anticipated organizational support.
1.3. Eects of salary
Honeycutt and Rosen (1997) found that salary did not enhance organizational attraction, and suggested that salary may not inuence attraction above an adequate
pay threshold. However, research also suggests that salary inuences behaviors
more than attitudes (Aiman-Smith, Bauer, & Cable, 2001). We examined salary in
conjunction with work-life benets because: (1) benets are a form of non-cash compensation, so that moderate salary might oset high benet levels or vice versa and
(2) research has found that salary inuences job choice (Saks, Wiesner, & Summers,
1996). Because Aiman-Smith et al. (2001) found that salary predicted behaviors better than attitudes we expected that salary would positively relate to job pursuit intentions and would relate more strongly to job pursuit intentions than to anticipated
organizational support.
H7: It was hypothesized that salary would be: (a) positively related to job pursuit
intentions and (b) more strongly related to job pursuit intentions than anticipated
organizational support.
396
2. Method
2.1. Research design
This study used a 2 2 2 experimental design that manipulated work schedule exibility, dependent care assistance, and salary. With two levels of each variable, the design
yielded eight vignettes describing dierent organizations. Each participant read one vignette and responded to items assessing perceptions of the organization portrayed.
2.2. Data collection procedures
To maximize task salience, participants were required (1) to be seeking employment currently, (2) to have engaged in a job search in the past 3 months, or (3) to
397
have begun a new job in the past 3 months. Participants were recruited through
employing organizations, job search sources, and networking. Participants received
a cover letter attached to the survey which indicated that the purpose of the study
was to examine what kinds of organizations people were most interested in working
for. A total of 945 surveys were distributed through organizations including 2 hospitals, 3 consulting rms, a manufacturing rm, 2 high tech rms, 2 universities, 2
government agencies, 2 employment agencies, and a bank. Another 379 surveys were
distributed through job search sources (i.e., job fairs, internet job postings, and
placement services), and 82 surveys were distributed through networking. In total,
1406 surveys were distributed and 371 usable surveys were returned for a response
rate of 26%. Of these, 135 surveys came through a company, 201 through a job
search source, and 34 through networking. The source of data collection was not recorded for 1 survey. Analyses revealed that participants who were recruited through
dierent sources did not respond dierently to the survey questions.
2.3. Participants
Of the 371 respondents, 58.2% were female, and the average age was 34.7 years.
Most were educated with 25.6% having a college degree and 54.8% a graduate degree.
Regarding marital status, 33.2% were single, 51.5% were married, and 7.5% lived with
a partner. Most respondents (61.7%) had no children, 11.6% had 1 child, 16.7% had 2
children, and 9.1% had 3 or more children. Of those without children, 70% planned to
have children within 10 years. On average, respondents had 11.8 years of work experience, worked 41.35 h per week, and spent 22.61 h per week in family activities. Most
(78.4%) were Caucasian, 8.4% were African American, 5.1% were Asian, 5.1% were
Hispanic, and 2.4% were other races. The modal family income (41%) was $65,000
per year or more. Participant job search status was as follows: 47.5% job hunting,
42.2% in new jobs, 8.9% neither in new jobs or job hunting, and 1.1% in new jobs
and job hunting. Participant responses on the survey did not dier based on the participants job search status (i.e., whether they were job hunting or newly employed).
Participants benet history was measured by providing a list of 21 work-life benets and asking participants if they had ever worked for a company with this benet.
The percentage of participants exposed to each benet at a current or previous employer was as follows: 17% on-site child care, 11.1% sick child care, 25% dependent
care referral program, 13.2% dependent care subsidies, 50.7% extended parental
leave (beyond what is required by the Family Medical Leave Act), 83.6% part time
work schedules, 36.7% job sharing, 42.6% telecommuting, 46.6% compressed work
weeks, and 52.6% extime.
2.4. The questionnaire
A cover letter provided study information. The rst section of the survey described the organization in which work schedule exibility, dependent care assistance, and salary were manipulated. After reading this description, participants
responded to: (1) items assessing their perceptions of the organization, (2) individual
398
dierence measures, and (3) benet history and demographic questions. Most participants returned the survey via a pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope, though some
returned it via fax or email.
2.4.1. Manipulated independent variables
Each independent variable was operationalized by the manipulations described
below. The rst author developed the manipulations based on the practical literature
on familyfriendly organizations (Fortune, 2003; Working Mother Magazine, 2002)
and benets information from employers who had not been identied as family
friendly. Content validity was assessed by three experts (professors familiar with
the content domain) who reviewed stimulus materials and recommended revisions.
Manipulations were revised, again compared against the benets oered in familyfriendly and typical companies, and consensus was reached that the vignettes operationalized each independent variable.
Work schedule exibility was operationalized as follows. The standard work schedule manipulation stated This organization requires employees to work full time
hours and a standard work schedule set by the organization. The exible work
schedule manipulation stated This organization oers extime for any employees
who want it as long as they meet job requirements, and employs both full and part
time employees. Part time employees are eligible for employee benets on a prorated basis.
Dependent care assistance benets was operationalized as follows. The standard
benets manipulation stated This organization oers a traditional benets package
including health insurance, a 401k program, vacation and sick time. The enhanced
dependent care benets manipulation stated In addition to a traditional benets
package (health insurance, a 401k program, vacation, and sick time), this organization has an on-site child care center, a dependent care referral service to assist employees with dependent care needs, and an employee assistance program to assist
employees with personal and work concerns.
Salary level. Given the diversity of participant occupations and their dierent salary expectations, we did not provide a specic dollar amount for salary. We adopted
an approach similar to Honeycutt and Rosen (1997) providing a general statement
that the salary was either around or higher than the market average. The average salary manipulation stated Salaries for this position in this company are about average
compared to similar jobs in the same location and industry. The high salary manipulation stated Salaries for this position in this company are about 15% higher than
the average of salaries of similar jobs in the same location and industry.
2.4.2. Measures
The mediator, moderator, and dependent variables were measured by the scales
described in the section which follows. Unless otherwise noted, responses were provided on a ve point Likert scale from strongly agree (5) to strongly disagree (1).
Anticipated organizational support. An 8-item perceived organizational support
scale (Eisenberger, Cummings, Armeli, & Lynch, 1997) was adapted for this study.
The original scale was developed to measure employee perceptions of how much
399
3. Results
3.1. Preliminary analysis
Prior to testing the hypotheses, coecient alphas were calculated. Measures
had satisfactory reliabilities, with alpha values ranging from .75 to .91. Means,
standard deviations, and correlations were run on all variables and are presented
in Table 1.
400
Table 1
Correlations between variables included in regression analyses
Mean
1. Schedule Flex 0.44
2. Dep Care
0.54
Benets
3. Salary
0.49
4. Sex
0.42
5. Hrs Work
41.35
6. FamInc
4.74
7. Race 1
0.08
8. Race 2
0.05
9. Race 3
0.05
10. Race 4
0.02
11. MarStat 1
0.33
12. MarStat 2
0.02
13. MarStat 3
0.05
14. MarStat 4
0.01
15. MarStat 5
0.08
16. W-to-F
2.77
Conict
17. F-to-W
2.14
Conict
18. Anticipated
3.42
Org Support
19. Job Pursuit
3.95
SD
0.50
0.50
()
).04
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
()
0.50
0.49
11.80
2.48
0.28
0.22
0.22
0.15
0.47
0.14
0.22
0.07
0.26
0.84
.02
).12
.04
.00
).05
.02
).06
).07
).02
.04
.06
).07
).03
.06
).02
).01
).06
).04
.02
.02
).03
.08
.04
.09
.02
.07
).02
.06
()
).02
).09
).07
.00
.02
).01
).12
).01
).02
).13
).07
.01
.00
()
).19
).03
.12
).05
).03
).08
.02
.00
.07
.06
.06
.17
()
.31
).08
).15
.01
.00
).19
.01
.06
).04
).01
.25
()
).11
.02
).06
.02
).43
).15
).18
.01
.10
.22
()
).07
).07
).05
.12
.03
.06
).02
.03
).07
()
).05
).04
.12
).03
).05
).02
.03
.03
()
).04
).01
).03
.00
).02
).06
).01
()
).04
).02
).04
).01
.09
.06
()
).10
).16
).05
).20
).02
()
).03
).01
).04
).13
()
).02
).07
).07
()
.02
).02
()
).12
(.81)
0.68
.05
).02
.00
.22
).01
.07
).12
.14
.00
.01
.09
).09
).04
).07
).05
.53
0.71
.27
.42
.02
.03
.04
).09
.01
.00
).06
).04
.04
.10
.03
0.81
.25
.20
.23
.02
.04
).13
.05
).02
).19
).02
).06
.11
).03
.11
).05
17
18
19
(.75)
).03
).07
).09
(.90)
.02
).04
).14
.59
(.91)
Notes. Schedule Flex work schedule exibility, 0 traditional schedule, 1 exible schedule; Dep Care Benets dependent care assistance benets, 0 no dependent care assistance benets, 1 has dependent
care assistance benets; Salary, 0 average salary, 1 above average salary; Hrs Work Average number of hours worked each week, FamInc Family Income where 1 less than $24,999, 2 $25,00034,999,
3 $35,00044,999, 4 $4554,999, 5 $5564,999, 6 $6579,999, 7 $80100,000, 8 more than $100,000; Race, 1 black vs. white, 2 asian vs. white, 3 hispanic vs. white, 4 other race vs. white; MarStat Marital Status where 1 single vs. widowed, 2 separated vs. widowed, 3 divorced vs. widowed, 4 married vs. widowed, 5 living with partner vs. widowed; W-to-F Conict Work-to-Family Conict,
1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree; F-to-W Conict Family-to-Work Conict, 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree; Anticipated Org Support Anticipated organizational Support, 1 strongly disagree to
5 strongly agree; Job Pursuit Job Pursuit Intentions, 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree.
*
p < :05.
401
Table 2
Dependent care assistance benets, work schedule exibility, and salary as predictors of anticipated organizational support
Variable
Block 1
Family income
Single vs. widowed
Separated vs. widowed
Divorced vs. widowed
Married vs. widowed
Living with Partner vs. widowed
Hours in paid work
African American vs. white
Asian vs. white
Hispanic vs. white
Other race vs. white
Sex
Block 2
Dependent care assistance
Work schedule exibility
Salary
Block 3
Schedule dependent care interaction
Salary schedule interaction
Dependent care salary interaction
Block 4
Schedule dependent care salary
Block 2
Block 3
Block 4
).11
).01
.10
.01
.11
.01
.09
.00
.03
).06
).07
).04
).12
).03
.04
).03
.10
.02
.12
).01
.02
).03
).09
).08
).11
).02
.05
).01
.09
.01
.11
.00
.04
).03
).08
).09
).11
).01
.05
).01
.09
.01
.11
.00
.04
).03
).08
).09
.43
.28
.02
.63
.50
.11
.66
.54
.15
).28
).07
).09
).34
).14
).15
.09
.05
.05
R
DR2
*
p < :05.
.30
.25
.33
.03
.33
.00
402
Table 3
Dependent care assistance benets, work schedule exibility, and salary as predictors of job pursuit
intentions
Variable
Block 1
Family income
Single vs. widowed
Separated vs. widowed
Divorced vs. widowed
Married vs. widowed
Living with Partner vs. widowed
Hours in paid work
African American vs. white
Asian vs. white
Hispanic vs. white
Other race vs. white
Sex
Block 2
Dependent care assistance
Work schedule exibility
Salary
Block 3
Schedule dependent care interaction
Salary schedule interaction
Dependent care salary interaction
Block 4
Schedule dependent care salary
Block 1
Block 2
Block 3
Block 4
).29
).19
.05
).11
).06
).01
.09
.05
.02
).13
).04
).04
).23
).18
.02
).11
).04
.00
.12
.04
.02
).10
).01
).08
).23
).16
.03
).10
).05
.01
.12
.03
.02
).11
).01
).09
).23
).17
.03
).10
).05
.01
.12
.03
.02
).11
).01
).09
.21
.27
.20
.34
.38
.37
.33
.36
.35
).08
).12
).17
).04
).08
).14
).05
.08
.08
R2
DR2
*
.22
.14
.24
.02
.24
.00
p < :05.
Results revealed that both dependent care benets and work schedule exibility
were unique predictors of anticipated organizational support, conrming hypotheses
1 and 2. In addition, results revealed a signicant schedule benets interaction in
predicting anticipated organizational support. The procedures described by Aiken
and West (1991) were used to graph the interaction. The graph (see Fig. 1) revealed
that dependent care benets had a greater impact on anticipated organizational support when organizations oered traditional work schedules than when organizations
oered exible work schedules.
Results also revealed unique eects (see Table 3) of both work-life benets in predicting job pursuit, supporting hypotheses 3 and 4. Salary was also a unique predictor of job pursuit intentions, supporting hypothesis 7a. Hypothesis 7b was examined
using a t test for dependent correlations (Cohen & Cohen, 1983). Results revealed
that the relationship between salary and job pursuit intentions was stronger than
the relationship between salary and anticipated organizational support, t (368)
4.52, p < :05, supporting hypothesis 7b.
403
Fig. 1. Interaction of work schedule exibility and dependent care assistance benets in predicting anticipated organizational support.
404
Table 4
Analyses exploring the mediating eects of anticipated organizational support (AOS) on the relationship
between dependent care assistance and job pursuit intentions
Predictor
Analysis 1
Dependent care
Analysis 2
Dependent care
Analysis 3
AOS
Dependent care
Dependent variable
R2
AOS
.15
.39
.04
.20
.33
.58
).02
Regression weight
Table 5
Analyses exploring the mediating eects of anticipated organizational support (AOS) on the relationship
between work schedule exibility and job pursuit intentions
Predictor
Analysis 1
Schedule Flexibility
Analysis 2
Schedule Flexibility
Analysis 3
AOS
Schedule Flexibility
Dependent variable
R2
Regression weight
AOS
.07
.27
.06
.24
.34
.55
.08
p < :01.
4. Discussion
This study extends past research in several ways. First, we nd unique and interaction eects of two distinct work-life policies, work schedule exibility and dependent care assistance. Second, we nd that the eects of both work-life policies on job
pursuit intentions are fully mediated by anticipated organizational support, suggesting a potential psychological mechanism through which these benets inuence job
pursuit intentions. Finally, we contribute to a discrepant literature with respect to
whether work-life benets are universally appealing or appeal only to those who
need them, with our ndings supporting universal appeal.
4.1. Unique eects of distinct work-life benets
The current study nds that both schedule exibility and dependent care assistance contribute uniquely to predicting anticipated organizational support and job
pursuit intentions. This suggests that organizations that expand existing work-life
programs may further enhance their desirability by portraying their organization
as even more supportive. However, there was also an interaction such that the eects
Work
Schedule
Flexibility
.27*
Anticipated
Organizational
Support
.55*
405
JobPursuit
Intentions
.08
Dependent
Care
Assistance
.39*
Anticipated
Organizational
Support
.58*
JobPursuit
Intentions
-.02
Fig. 2. Mediating eects of anticipated organizational support for the relationships between work-life
benets (work schedule exibility and dependent care assistance benets) and job pursuit intention. Notes.
Regression weights on Fig. 2 are standardized; solid lines represent signicant links; dotted lines represent
non-signicant links.
of oering dependent care were stronger for organizations oering traditional work
schedules than for those with exible schedules. This could suggest greater opportunities for organizations to enhance their desirability to applicants when beginning a
new work-life program.
4.2. Anticipated organizational support
This research also nds that anticipated organizational support fully mediates the
relationship of both work-life benets with job pursuit intentions, suggesting that
perceptions of support may be a psychological mechanism through which these benets inuence behavioral intentions. Given that many study participants were childless, it is not surprising that the inuence of dependent care was fully mediated by
support perceptions. However, because exible schedules could facilitate managing
work and any non-work activity, it is somewhat surprising that this benet did
not directly impact pursuit intentions over and above support perceptions. Nonetheless, the mediating eects of anticipated organizational support may explain why individuals who are unlikely to use work-life policies are still more inclined to pursue
jobs with organizations that oer them.
Findings from this study also contribute to growing literature on the antecedents
and consequences of perceived organizational support (Eisenberger et al., 1990, 1997;
Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002). Research has demonstrated the importance of this
perception given its relationship with outcomes such as job performance and with-
406
drawal behaviors (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002). Organizational support theory posits that positive organizational conditions facilitate perceived organizational support
when they are perceived as discretionary and empirical work supports a link between
supportive conditions (e.g., organizational rewards) and perceived organizational
support (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002). Given that work-life benets are likely to
be perceived as discretionary, the relationship found between work-life benets and
anticipated organizational support is consistent with organizational support theory.
The mediating eects of anticipated organizational support are also consistent
with Grover and Crockers (1995) suggestion that work-life benets are universally
appealing because they create a perception that an organization is supportive. Organizations that are perceived as supportive may be desirable because applicants expect
that they would be treated well as an employee. This perception may generalize beyond support for non-work needs such that people expect supportive workplaces will
provide adequate resources, treat them fairly, recognize good work, value cordial interpersonal interactions, and encourage fair and understanding supervision. That is,
employees that do not need support for non-work issues may believe that organizations that support non-work needs would be supportive in other important ways. This
more generalized expectation of support may explain past ndings that work-life
policies have universal appeal (Grover & Crocker, 1995; Honeycutt & Rosen, 1997).
One practical implication to consider is that if people choose an organization because of support expectations and these expectations are not met post-employment,
this may lead to a perceived violation of the psychological contract, the belief [that]
individuals hold about promises made, accepted and relied on between themselves
and [their organization] (Rousseau, 1995, p. 9). The work-life literature includes
discussions of organizations where work-life policies are provided but the organizational culture does not support their use (Finkel, Olswang, & She, 1994; Perlow,
1995). Thus, although these benets may aid recruitment because they foster expectations that employers are supportive, if applicants join a culture that does not support benet use, violation of the psychological contract may result, leading to
negative attitudes and behaviors (Rousseau, 1995). Moreover, the realistic job preview literature suggests that providing information about both positive and negative
aspects of a job during recruiting is important to retention (Premack & Wanous,
1985). Accordingly, organizations oering work-life benets to enhance recruiting
should ensure their cultures are actually supportive of benet use to avoid perceived
violations of the psychological contract post-employment.
Finally, with respect to universal versus specic appeal of work-life benets, our
study supports universal appeal. Specically, neither parental status nor workfamily conict moderated the eects of work-life benets on anticipated organizational
support or job pursuit intentions. Consistent with Grover and Crocker (1995), our
study found that all individuals perceived employers oering work-life benets as
more supportive and desirable. This nding has encouraging implications for organizations utilizing work-life benets to enhance recruitment by suggesting that these
benets may enhance recruitment for diverse applicants. Taken together with ndings that work-life benets facilitated anticipated organizational support, this suggests that the universal appeal of these benets may be due to support perceptions.
407
408
Our study also examined only two types of work-life benets, dependent care assistance, and exible work schedules. However, other work-life policies such as parental leave and relocation assistance (Zedeck & Mosier, 1990) could also be linked
to job pursuit intentions in future research. Researchers have also discussed policies
such as benets for same-sex domestic partners (Spielman & Winfeld, 1996). Because
domestic partner benets may be more controversial than other types of work-life
policies, future research might examine if such policies are less likely to be universally
desirable than benets such as extime or dependent care. These studies might shed
light on the issue of whether certain work-life benets may have universal appeal and
others may appeal only to those most likely to benet.
In addition to linking work-life benets into recruitment outcomes, research is
also needed to examine whether these benets inuence other organizational behaviors such as absenteeism, retention, productivity and organizational citizenship behaviors. Recent reviews of the literature have noted that additional studies of
workfamily policies are needed, and that the link between workfamily issues
and all types of organizational behaviors has been under-researched (Eby et al., invited monograph). Because such studies provide evidence that work-life policies
and workfamily issues relate to outcomes that matter to organizations, they may
be eective in driving organizational change by increasing the growth of work-life
initiatives.
A nal limitation involves the focus on the individual level of analysis. This research examined the impact of work-life policies on an individuals decision to pursue
employment in order to investigate the mediating psychological processes that drive
such decisions. Although these ndings may inform recruitment policies, research is
also needed at the organizational level. Findings of enhanced recruitment in organizations oering work-life benets would provide convergent validity for the usefulness of work-life benets to such eorts.
Despite limitations, this research contributes to the literature by supporting the
notion that organizations oering exible schedules and dependent care assistance
may be more desirable to a diverse array of applicants. Further, anticipated organizational support is identied as a mechanism by which this perception may develop.
Future research will aid in assessing if these ndings generalize to even more diverse
settings.
Acknowledgments
Portions of this research were presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology conference in 2000 in New Orleans, LA and 2001 in San Diego,
CA. This paper is based on the rst authors doctoral dissertation completed at
George Mason University under the supervision of the second author as chair.
The authors would like to thank Jose Cortina and Julie Mahler for serving on this
dissertation committee, Traci Sitzmann for her help with data analysis, and Chris
Bordeaux and Brian Meahan for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this
paper.
409
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T. N., & Cable, D. N. (2001). Are you attracted. Do you intend to pursue? A
recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business & Psychology, 16(2), 219237.
Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414435.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). AMOS users guide version 3.6. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 51(6), 11731182.
Basch Scott, M. (1996). Work-life programs encompass broad range benets of oerings. Employee Benet
Plan Review, 3, 26.
Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). The role of human resource systems in job applicant decision
processes. Journal of Management, 20(3), 531551.
Carlson, D. (1999). Personality and role variables as predictors of three forms of workfamily conict.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 236253.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for eld studies.
Boston, MA: Houghton Miin Company.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons:
New York.
Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bourdeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (invited monograph). A Twentyyear retrospective on work and family research in IO/OB: A review of the literature. Journal of
Vocational Behavior.
Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support,
discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812820.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee
diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 5159.
Finkel, S. K., Olswang, S., & She, N. (1994). Childbirth, tenure and promotion for women faculty. Review
of Higher Education, 17, 259270.
Fortune (2003, January 20). The 100 best companies to work for in America.
Friedman, D. E., & Galinsky, E. (1992). Work and family issues: A legitimate business concern. In S.
Zedeck (Ed.), Work, Families, and Organizations (pp. 168207). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Galinsky, E., & Morris, A. (1991). Employers and child care. Paper presented at the symposium on day care
for children sponsored by Johnson and Johnson, Inc. Institute for Pediatric Service, Washington, DC.
Galinsky, E., & Stein, P. J. (1990). The impact of human resource policies on employees: Balancing work
family life. Journal of Family Issues, 11(4), 368383.
Go, S. J., Mount, M. K., & Jamison, R. L. (1990). Employer supported child care, workfamily conict,
and absenteeism: A eld study. Personnel Psychology, 43(4), 793809.
Greenberger, E., Goldberg, W. A., Hamill, S., ONeil, R., & Payne, C. K. (1989). Contributions of a
supportive work environment to parents well-being and orientation to work. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 17(6), 755783.
Grover, S. L., & Crocker, K. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The
impact of familyfriendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents.
Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 271288.
Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elron, E. (1994). Expatriate managers and the psychological contract.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 617626.
Honeycutt, T. L., & Rosen, B. (1997). Family friendly human resource policies, salary levels, and salient
identity as predictors of organizational attraction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 271290.
410
Kossek, E. E., & Nichol, V. (1992). The eects of on-site child care on employee attitudes and
performance. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 485509.
Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work-family conict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship:
A review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 83(2), 139149.
Landauer, J. (1997). Bottom-line benets of work-life programs. HR Focus, 74, 3.
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of workfamily
conict and familywork conict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400410.
Perlow, L. A. (1995). Putting the work back into work/family. Group and Organization Management, 20,
227239.
Premack, S. L., & Wanous, J. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 70(4), 706719.
Rau, B. L., & Hyland, M. M. (2002). Role conict and exible work arrangements: The eects on
applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 111136.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698714.
Roberts, S. (1996). Employers see value in work-family benets. Business Insurance, 30, 3.
Rothausen, T. J., Gonzalez, J. A., Clarke, N. E., & ODell, L. L. (1998). Familyfriendly backlashfact or
ction. The case of organizations on-site child care centers. Personnel Psychology, 51, 685706.
Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten
agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research
directions. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational
psychology (Vol. 2, (2nd ed., pp. 399444). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.
Saks, A. M., Wiesner, W. H., & Summers, R. J. (1996). Eects of job previews and compensation policy on
organizational attractiveness and job choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(1), 6885.
Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived
organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 81(3), 219227.
Spielman, S., & Winfeld, L. (1996). Domestic partner benets: A bottom line discussion. In A. L. Ellis &
E. D. Riggle (Eds.), Sexual identity on the job: Issues and services. Haworth Press Inc.
Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on workfamily
conict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 615.
Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When workfamily benets are not enough:
The inuence of workfamily culture on benet utilization, organizational attachment, and work
family conict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392415.
Vincola, A. (1998). New strategies for measuring work-life initiatives. Benets and Compensation Solutions,
1618.
Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (in press). Considering the role of personality in the work
family experience: Relationships of the big ve to workfamily conict and facilitation. Journal of
Vocational Behavior.
Work and Family Connection (1998, February 1998). Burud study estimates number of worksite child
care centers, now 8,000, will grow 10% per year. Workfamily newsbrief, pp. 12.
Working Mother Magazine (2002, October). 100 best companies for working mothers.
Zedeck, S., & Mosier, K. L. (1990). Work in the family and employing organization. American
Psychologist, 45(2), 240251.