Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Introduction
Successful development of Human Resources (HR) quality is expected to become the motor of
economic progress and welfare of Indonesian society. The human resource development become the
national education goals as stated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No 20 of 2003 that the
national education serves to develop the ability and character development and a dignified civilization
in order to educate the nation, aimed at developing students' potentials in order to become a man of
faith and fear of God Almighty, noble, healthy, knowledgeable, capable, creative, independent, and
become citizens of a democratic and accountable. The goal is to develop briefly competent human
resources to be able to contribute in a business that drives the economy.
361
2. Theroretical Study
2.1. The Effectiveness of Fieldwork Practice
The effectiveness of the implementation of student field work practice is the effectiveness of the
individual that is part of the effectiveness of the organization. Thus, the effectiveness of the
Organization include the effectiveness of individual and group effectiveness. Gibson, Ivancevich,
Donnelly and suggests that effectiveness can be identified through two approaches, namely: approach
according to the objectives and approach according to systems theory. Approach according to the
objectives is to formulate and measure effectiveness through the achievement of the objectives that
have been set up with the cooperation efforts, whereas systems theory approach places emphasis on the
importance of adapting to the demands of the external assessment criteria as effectiveness. Then
Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly and suggested that in the perspective of effectiveness, individual
performance is the effectiveness of the individual because of the effectiveness of the Organization
include the effectiveness of individual and group effectiveness. With respect to the performance of
individuals as part of the effectiveness of the organization. Mullins explains some of the factors that
influence the effectiveness of the Organization, the individual factor, organizational factors, and
environmental factors. Organizational effectiveness model of Mullins made in image as in Figure 1.
below.
362
Size
Age
Cohesion
Goals
Relationship
Leader
Task
Leadership
History
Size
Values
Personal situation
Other activities
Need
Hierarchy
Expected results
Level of aspiration
Reward
Time and place
Job
Personality
Aptitude
Experience
Training
Age
Motivation to work
Group
relations
Objectives
Unions
Type of
people
Ability
The Individuals
The effectiveness
of the organization
Economy
Competition
Resources
Capacity
Physical environment
Admin structure
Control System
Reward System
Power Structure
Type of people
System and
structures
Condition of plant
Type of technology
Raw materials
Rate of exchange
Based on Figure 1. The aforesaid interpretation can be argued that competence, motivation and
role as part of the individual factors: leadership, group relationships, systems and structures as part of
the organizational factors and the economic environment, physical environment, and environmental
technology as part of the factor environment affects the effectiveness of the organization. Mullins
explanation about the factors that affect performance in line with the Castetter explanation who argued
that individual factors, organizational factors, and environmental factors affect the performance.
2.2. Organizational Culture
Culture is a system of values, beliefs and unique norms that is owned jointly by members of the
organisation and its culture can be an important cause for effectiveness. Robbins defines organizational
culture (organizational culture) as a system of shared meaning is shared by members of the
organization that distinguishes the Organization to another. Further, Robbins stated that a system of
shared meaning is shaped by its citizens, which at once became the criterion with other organizations.
The definition of the system with a set of key characters from the Organization's values ("a system of
shared meaning held by members that distinguishes the organization from other organizations. This
system of shared meaning is, on closer examination, a set of key characteristics that the characteristics
that the organization values ").
Gibson argued that the culture has the meaning and for the purposes of this study, culture is
defined as a system of shared values and beliefs that result in behavioral norms. Organizational culture
is the common perception that lived by the members of the Organization as a system of values that
subsequently received together. In carving out the effectiveness of an organization's culture is one of
the dominant variable variable, in addition to the strategy, the environment and technology. Robbins
says that the Organization has a personality as well as individuals, we call the personality as the
organizational culture.
Organizational culture also was defined as a system of understanding received together. Its
main characteristic is the initiative, individual, tolerance of risk, the direction (direction), integration,
management, control, support identity, reward system, tolerant of conflict and communication pattern.
According to Hofstade, culture is defined as "the collective programming of the mind or mental
colective \ program. Mental programming contained on three levels: (1) universal level of mental
programming, namely the operational human biological systems including behaviour that are universal,
such as smile, the cry is happening everywhere throughout history, (2) the colective level of mental
363
365
3. Research Methods
This research includes research of ex Post Facto because this research was conducted to examine the
events that have happened and then it did to the back to find out the cause factors. It is supported with
the Sugiyono explanation that the ex Post Facto research is conducted to examine the events that have
happened and then according to the back to find out the factors that lead to the onset of the incident.
According to the research instrument used to trawl data was the question form, then this so-called
research method of the survey. This research is also called exploratory research because it aims to find
out the influence of the exogenous variable to the endogenous variable using the path analysis. This is
in accordance with Sitepu statement that research aimed to determine the influence of a variable
against the influence of other variables, either direct or indirect influence can be used that path analysis
is Exploratory.
e3
e2
1 2)
Study Satisfaction (X
Organizational
Behavior (X1)
e3
The Effectiveness
of Field Work
(X5)
Achievement
Motivation (X4)
e5
e4
366
r13 = 31
r14 = 41
r15 = 51 + 52 r21 + 53r13 + 54r14
r25 = 51r12+ 52 + 53r23 + 54r24
r35 = 51r13+ 52 r23 + 53 + 54r34
r45 = 51r14+ 52r24 + 53r34 + 54
By using the computer application SPSS for Windows version 21 obtained a summary of the
results of correlation analysis and path analysis between exogenous variables as endogenous variables
in Table 1 below.
Table 1:
Results of Correlation Analysis and Path Analysis Summary between exogenous variables to
endogenous variables, and its significance.
Hypothesis
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Correlation
Coefficient*
r12= 0.427
r13= 0.398
r14= 0.592
r15= 0.617
r25= 0.710
r35= 0.669
r45= 0.796
Path
Coefficient*
0.423
0.398
0.952
0.172
0.323
0.282
0.329
Tsum
Signification
6.474
5.954
10.080
3.947
7.411
6.690
6.506
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Description
Imply Path
Imply Path
Imply Path
Imply Path
Imply Path
Imply Path
Imply Path
All significant path coefficient has sig smaller than 0.05. Thus, all are imply paths.
Furthermore, to see the connection between the correlation coefficient, the direct/indirect path.
Suprious and Unanalysis can be obtained from the equation substructure path diagram above, the
obtained result, as shown in Table 2 below.
Tabel 2:
A summary of the correlation, path linkages direct and Indirect Pathways, Suprious, Unanalysis
between the Exogenous variable with the Endogenous variable
Hypothesis Number
Correlation Coefficient
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
r12=0.427
r13=0.398
r14=0.592
r15=0.617
r25=0.710
r35=0.669
r45=0.769
Path Coefficion
Direct
Indirect
0.427
0.398
0592
0.172
0.445
0.323
0.282
0.329
367
Non Path
Suprious
Unanalysis
0.0734
0.0685
0.1018
0.3136
0.319
0.3378
p51 = 0.172
r15 = 0.617
X2
p52 = 0.323
p21 = 0.427
r12 = 0.427
X1
p31 = 0.398
r13 = 0.398
e2
X3
p53 = 0.282
r35 = 0.669
X5
p54 = 0.329
p41 = 0.592
r14 = 0.592
r25 = 0.710
e3
r45 = 0.769
e5
X4
Description:
X1
=
Working Behavior
X2
=
Study Satisfaction
X3
=
Creative Behavior
X4
=
Achievement Motivation
X5
=
The Effectiveness of Field Work Implementation
e2, e3, e4, and e5 = Residues Variable
368
Summary of Direct Impact Proportional organizational culture (X1), the satisfaction of learning
(X2), Creative Behavior (X3), Achievement Motivation (X4)
Variable
In accordance with the structure of the above relationships, The direct effect relative to the X2
X1 is 0.427, further by using a formula developed by the disproportionate influence of Al-Rasjid
calculated directly proportional effect = 0.427 x 0.427 = 0182. Thus the power of organizational
culture (X1) which directly determines changes to the satisfaction of learning (X2) is 0182 = 18.2%,
while the rest of 1-0182 = 0818 = 81.8% is determined by other factors outside the organization's
culture (X1) with a path coefficient px2e1 = Subsequently, based on calculations made a summary of
the effect of direct and indirect influence of organizational culture (X1), the satisfaction of learning
(X2), Creative Behavior (X3), Achievement Motivation (X4) positive and significant direct effect on
the effectiveness of the implementation of job training (X5) as in Table 4 below.
Table 4:
Variable
X1
X2
X3
X4
Total
Summary of Effects of Direct and Indirect Influence Proportional organizational culture (X1), the
satisfaction of learning (X2), Creative Behavior (X3), Achievement Motivation (X4) on the
effectiveness of the implementation of job training (X5)
Direct against X5
0.0296
0.1043
0.0795
0.108
Influence
Indirect against X5 through
X2
X3
X4
0.0237
0.0193
0.0335
Non Path
Total
Effect
0.1061
0.1043
0.0795
0.108
0.3979
0.0237
0.0193
0.0335
0.0765
0.101
0.0899
0.1109
0.302
Based on Table 4 above can be seen that the direct influence of organizational culture (X1) on
the Effectiveness of Field Work Practice (X5) of 0.0296. The indirect effect of Organizational Culture
(X1) of the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Field Work Practice (X5) via Satisfaction Study
(X2) is 0.0237. The indirect effect of Organizational Culture (X1) of the Effectiveness of the
Implementation of Field Work Practice (X5) through Creative Behavior (X3) of 0.0193. The indirect
effect of Organizational Culture (X1) of the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Field Work
Practice (X5) with Achievement Motivation (X4) of 0.0335. Thus, the total direct and indirect
influence of organizational culture (X1) of the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Field Work
Practice (X5) of 0.1061. Thus, the power of organizational culture (X1) that directly and indirectly
define the changes Effectiveness of Field Work Practice (X5) amounted to 10.61%.
369
X2
0.182
0.1043
X1
0.158
X3
0.35
0.0795
X5
0.108
X4
Discussion
In accordance with the theoretical model of the variables as well as referring to the provision in the
Fedhazurs provisions exogenous variables on endogenous variables in a path diagram. Organizational
culture can be calculated variables (X1), the satisfaction of learning (X2), Creative Behavior (X3),
Achievement Motivation (X4) positive and significant direct effect on the effectiveness of the
implementation of job training (X5).
Data Effectiveness of Field Work Practice shows that the distribution of scores Effectiveness of
Field Work Practice 93 (48.95%) is below the average grade interval or less category and 93 (51.05%)
which is above the average grade interval. Based on these data, the Effectiveness of Practice Field
Work generally spread around the average. the tendency of the rate of Variable Effectiveness of Field
Work Practice (X5) is likely to be less. Thus it can be argued that the Effectiveness of Field Work
Practice (X5), on average at less category. In more detail lacking stated that category reached 63.16%,
while the category quite reached 36.84%.
Work Culture (X1) positive direct effect on Satisfaction Study (X2). Ho testing criteria is
rejected, if the calculated significance value <0.05 or accept Ho if the calculated significance value>
0.05. It is shown that = 0.427 and t = 5.179 with a significance value <0.05. Thus, Ho is rejected and
Ha accepted, so that it can be concluded that the work culture (X1) positive direct effect on Satisfaction
Study (X2).
On the hypothesis put forward Satisfaction Study (X2) a positive direct effect on the
Effectiveness of Field Work Practice (X5). Ho testing criteria is rejected, if the calculated significance
value <0.05 or accept Ho if the calculated significance value> 0.05. It is shown that = 0.323 and t =
7,411 with significance value <0.05. Thus, Ho is rejected and Ha accepted, so that it can be concluded
that the Satisfaction Study (X2) a positive direct effect on the Effectiveness of Field Work Practice
(X5).
In the proposed hypothesis Creative Behavior (X3) positive direct effect on the Effectiveness of
Field Work Practice (X5). Ho testing criteria is rejected, if the calculated significance value <0.05 or
accept Ho if the calculated significance value> 0.05. It is shown that = 0.282 and t = 6.69 with a
significance value <0.05. Thus, Ho is rejected and Ha accepted, so that it can be concluded that the
Creative Behavior (X3) positive direct effect on the Effectiveness of Field Work Practice (X5).
On the hypothesis put forward Achievement Motivation (X4) positive direct effect on the
Effectiveness of Field Work Practice (X5). Ho testing criteria is rejected, if the calculated significance
370
5. Conclusion
Based on the results of data analysis and research results in the previous section conclusion taken as
follows:
1. Organizational culture positive and significant direct impact on customer satisfaction study. In
other words, the better the organizational culture the better the learning satisfaction anyway.
2. Organizational culture positive direct and significant effect on the behavior of the creative. In
other words, the better the organizational culture the better the Creative Behavior anyway.
3. Organizational culture positive and significant direct effect on the motivation of overachievers. In
other words, the better the organizational culture is getting higher the motivation of
overachievers.
4. Organizational culture positive and significant direct impact on the effectiveness of the
implementation of the practice of field work. In other words, the better the organizational culture
increasingly higher the effectiveness of the implementation of the practice of field work.
5. The direct positive effect of learning Satisfaction and significantly to the effectiveness of the
implementation of the practice of field work. In other words, the higher the satisfaction of
learning the higher the effectiveness of the implementation of the practice of field works.
6. Creative firsthand the positive impact Behavior and significantly to the effectiveness of the
implementation of the practice of field work. In other words, the higher the creative Behavior
increasingly higher the effectiveness of the implementation of the practice of field works.
7. Motivation a direct positive and influential achievers significantly to the effectiveness of the
implementation of the practice of field work. In other words, the higher the achievement
motivation the higher effectiveness of the implementation of the field works.
6. Implication
Based on the conclusions of the study, can be made some effort in improving the effectiveness of the
implementation of the practice of field work through the organizational behavior theory, especially the
theory of organizational culture, learning, conduct creative satisfaction, motivated achievers. Thus,
based on the conclusions of research there are some implications that can be addressed, namely, the
implications of research, theoretical implications, and policy implications.
1. Research Implication
Based on the research results obtained that the effectiveness of the implementation of the practice of
field works, are expected to contribute to the development of the theory of organizational behavior, in
particular the theory of organizational culture, learning, conduct creative satisfaction, motivation and
effectiveness of implementation, an accomplished practical field work. So it is expected to give an
answer to the problem of the effectiveness of the implementation of the practice of fieldwork, so
referable to enhance the effectiveness of the implementation of the practice of field work students of
higher education of tourism in the city of Medan.
2. Theoretical Implication
Increasing the effectiveness of the implementation of job training can theoretically be done by
increasing the satisfaction of learning, creative behavior and achievement motivation. By seeking
371
3. Policy Implication
The effectiveness of the implementation of job training students an individual effectiveness that is part
of organizational effectiveness, organizational effectiveness include the effectiveness of individual and
group effectiveness. In the study the effectiveness always emphasized to the organization's ability to
adapt to the changing environment or through the process and succeed, is the main characteristic of
effective organization. If so, then the effectiveness of an organization can be seen also, how the
organization or institution that responds to the demands of society who want the speed and accuracy in
carrying out the public service or in other words, organizations or institutions that are required to be
more oriented to the demands of users of public services.
7. Sugesstion
Based on the research conclusions put forward some suggestions as follows:
1. For the lecturer in Improving ability should:
a. Really understand the theory study on the main principles and characteristics of effective
implementation of job training.
b. Involving all faculty to always discuss and interact positively, starting from the problems
associated with the effectiveness of the implementation of job training and cultural organization
made on campus.
2. The results of the analysis of the data generated in this study can be used as a reference in an effort
to improve the performance of lecturers especially in the same situation and the same situation
against the background of this research.
3. Leaders are expected to continue to improve theoretical and practical abilities in management and
thus can implement and organizational culture on campus made effective.
Bibliography
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Anderson, I.E. 1979. Public Policy Making. New York: Holt, Rinehart arid Wins
Ahmadi, Psikologi Sosial, Rineka Cipta Jakarta, 1999
Atkinson, R, L., Atkinson,RC, 1997, Pengantar Psikilogi 1 Judul asli Introduction to Psycology
eighth edition., Jakarta, Penerbit Erlangga
Bimo Walgito, 2002, Pengantar Psikologi Umum, Yogyakarta, Andi Offset 2
Bateman, Thomas S. and Scott A. Snell, Management: Leading & Collaborating in a
Competitive World. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007.
Bootzin, Richard R., Gordon H. Bower, Robert B. Zajonc, Elizabeth Hall. Psychology Today.
New York: Random House, 1986.
Brown, Mark Graham, Darcy E. Hitchcock, and Marsha L. Willard. Why TQM Fails and That
to Do About It. New York: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1994.
Buhler, Patricia M. Alpha Teach Yourself Management Skills in 24 Hours. US of America:
Alpha A Pearson Education Company, 2001.
Bromley, Daniel W. 1989. Economic Interest and Intitutions, The Conceptual Foundation of
Public Policy. New York : Basic Blackwell, Inc
372
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
Campbel, 1986, The Road to Creativity and get off your dead end. Disadur oleh
Mangunharjana,Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Chaplin, JP. (1999), Kamus Lengkap Psikologi (Terjemahan dari Dr.Kartini Kartono), Jakarta;
PT.Raja Grafindo Persada
Ching Chung Li. 1975. Path Analysis a Primer. USA : The Boxwood Press.
Cohen, Jacob. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioural Sciences. New York :
Academic Press.
Coralie, Bryant. Louise G. White. 1989. Managing Development In Third World (Manajemen
Pembangunan Untuk Negara Berkembang). -Diterjemahkan oleh Rusyanto. Jakarta : LP3ES.
Dahl, Robert A. 1977. Modern Political Analysis. New Delhi : Prentice - Hall India.
Duncan, W. Jack. 1981. Organizational Behavior IT Edition. Boston : Houghton Muffin Coy.
Dunn, William N. 1981. Public Policy Analysis, New Jersey; Prentice - Hall, Inc. Dye, Thomas
R. 1978. Understanding Public Policy, New Jersey ;Prentice - Hall, Inc.
Easton, D. 1965. A System Analysis Political Life. New York : Welley.
Elliasen, A. Kjell and lan Koliman. 1993. Managing Public Organization. London; SAGE
Publikation.
1996. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Cetakan I. Bandung; CV. Ramadhan.
1997. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan Pemerintahan; Pendekatan Budaya, Moral dan
Etika. Cetakan I Jakarta; PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Eulau, H and Prewitt, K. 1973. Labyrinths of 'Democracy; Indiana Polis; Boobs - Merril.
Falhstrom, Hans. 1986. Penelitian Kerja dan Prodktivitas, Diterjemahkan oleh J.L. Wetik.
Jakarta; Erlangga.
Feinstein, Andrew Hale and David Vondrasek, A Study Of Relationships Between Job
Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment Among Restaurant Employees. Journal of
Managerial Issues, 30 March 2003
Fremonte, Kast/ James E. Rosenzweig. 1986. Organisasi dan Manajemen. Diterjemahkan oleh
Mohammad Yasin. Jakarta; Bina Aksara.
Gabriel. 1993. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Diterjemahkan oleh Alumuddin Tawu. Jakarta;
UI Press.
Gibson, James L. Ivancevich, and Donnely. 1994. Organization. Diterjemahkan oleh Djoerban
Wahid. Jakarta; Erlangga.
Gomez, Meija, Luis R David, Robert L Cardy. 1995. Managing Human Resources. New York;
Prentice Hall.
Gordon, I.J. Lewis and K. Young. 1997. Respectives on Policy Analysis. Public Administration
Bulletin, Vol 25.
Gore, Al. 1995. Commonsense Goverment Working Better With Less Cost. New York; Random
House.
Graham, G. 1985. The World of Bussiness. USA : Addison Wesley Pub. Comp.
Grindle, M.(ed).1980. Politics and Policy Implementation in The Third World. Princeston
University Press.
Guilford, JP, 1965. Intellectual Factors in Produktif Thinking. Dalam Ascher dan Bish.
Productive Thinking in Education. Washington DC : The Nasional Education Association and
The Carniegie Cooperation of New York.
Handayaningrat, Suwarno. 1995. Administrasi Pemerintahan dalam Pembangunan Nasional
Cetakan II. Jakarta; PT. Gunung Agung.
Henry, N. 1975. Public Administrtion and Public Affairs, New Jersey; Prentice Hall, Inc.
Hersey, Paul. Ken Blanchard. 1980. Management of Organization. New Delhi; Prentice Hall of
India.
Heckhausen, 1967, The Anatomy of Achievement Motivation, New York; Akademic Press
Edisi Kelima. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi Nomor 1 / Volume HI April
373
[70]
[71]
[72]
[73]
[74]
[75]
[76]
[77]
[78]
[79]
[80]
[81]
[82]
[83]
[84]
[85]
[86]
[87]
[88]
375
376