Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Global Issue Management identifies, assesses and resolves patient safety concerns
by guiding the relevant corporate functions through an effective Issue Management
process. An Issue is:
With the above background, can you give a brief analysis of the below news stories
(either one):
Evaluation criteria:
-
The candidate here is required to understand the news story and assess how
important or significant it is for the brands/companies mentioned in the
article
Is the news story likely to have an impact on the brand image (positive,
negative, neutral). If yes then we would like to understand how the candidate
is approaching the evaluation and analysis of the news story. It need not be
an exhaustive analysis but we want to understand the approach taken or the
candidates thought process in evaluation
How strong or accurate are the observations made from the data
Structure and flow of the content and thoughts in the slide
Any analysis or insights drawn
Accuracy of language
Formatting of the slides (given the time, this will not be a major criteria for
evaluation)
The Mirena IUD is a type of birth control implant that is designed to be inserted
into the uterus where it can theoretically remain in place for up to five years,
preventing pregnancy by a combination of methods. However, Mirena lawsuits
like this one allege that the Bayer IUD can cause serious side effects like uterine
perforation and IUD migration, where the device punches through the walls of
the uterus and moves around inside of the body.
Plaintiff Marla O. filed a Mirena lawsuit against Bayer in October, alleging that
the IUD caused her serious pain and suffering. According to the lawsuit, the then
23-year old had the Mirena IUD implanted at her doctors office in California.
Follow-up appointments allegedly indicated no sign of Mirena complications until
the plaintiff went in to have the device removed.
The lawsuit claims it took the physician three separate attempts to remove the
IUD. In the course of these attempts, it was revealed that the Mirena IUD had
perforated Marlas uterus and migrated out of its original position.
In IUD migration, the device works its way through the walls of the uterus and
moves around within the body, potentially wrecking havoc. In this case, the
plaintiff required two surgeries to remove the IUD, which did include some
surgical complications.
This plaintiff is not alone in her Mirena lawsuit. Bayer currently faces hundreds of
Mirena lawsuits over similar IUD migration allegations. The U.S. legal system has
organized these various Mirena lawsuits into a single coordinated legal action
called a multidistrict litigation or MDL.
MDLs help streamline the legal system by combining tens, hundreds, or even
thousands of similar legal suits into a single coordinated action. Unlike a class
action lawsuit, individual Mirena lawsuits retain a degree of autonomy, and each
case typically has their own lawyer or legal team. Individual cases often result in
a higher award for plaintiffs should a settlement be reached.
The various Mirena lawsuits, like this one, typically seek to recoup the cost of
medical care, past present and future; compensation for pain and suffering; and
legal fees associated with the process of filing the Mirena lawsuit, which is
permissible under U.S. law.
Marlas individual Mirena lawsuit is Case No. 1594, filed in the US District Court
for the Eastern District of California. The Mirena IUD MDL is In Re: Mirena IUD
Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434, in the Southern District of New York.
OR