Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Food Engineering, Universidad del Bio-Bio, Casilla 447, Chilln, Chile
Department of Chemical Engineering and Environment, Universidad Tcnica Federico Santa Mara, Casilla 110-V, Valparaso, Chile
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Available online 29 March 2011
Keywords:
Osmotic dehydration
Ohmic heating
Electric eld
Vacuum impregnation
Microstructure
Microbiology
Strawberries
a b s t r a c t
The combined effect of osmotic dehydration/ohmic heating (ODOH) and vacuum impregnation/ohmic
heating (VIOH) on physicochemical and quality parameters of strawberry (aw, color, rmness and microstructure), as well as on microbial stability of storage samples at 5 and 10 C, was analyzed. Treatments
were carried out with a 65% (w/w) sucrose solution at 30 C, and ohmic heating at 9.2, 13, and 17 V/cm electric eld strengths, corresponding to applied voltages of 70, 100, and 130 V. Dehydrated samples showed
that water loss was greater in ODOH treatments at 17 V/cm. The greatest solute gain, least rmness loss
and least color loss were obtained in the VIOH treatment at 13 V/cm. The shelf-life of strawberries treated
with VIOH at 13 V/cm and stored at 5 C was extended from 12 d (control samples) to 25 d. Furthermore,
the VIOH treatment at 13 V/cm was the best processing condition for dehydrating strawberries.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Traditional processing methods used for conservation seriously
effects sensorial and nutritive values of fresh fruit. Osmotic dehydration (OD) treatment at mild temperatures preserves fresh-like
characteristics of fruits and can be used to obtain several strawberry products. OD preserves attributes, such as color, rmness
and avor, and it reduces water activity, providing high moisture
products (aw = 0.920.97) with extended shelf-life (Wiley, 1994).
Color and texture are important quality parameters in foods because consumers have increased their requirements for attractive
colors and different textures (Anzalda-Morales, 1994).
Vacuum impregnation (VI) allows an increase in the rate of
water-related weight loss and solid gain, and it introduces controlled quantities of a solution into the porous structure of fruits
and vegetables (Barat et al., 2002; Moreno et al., 2004; Deng and
Zhao, 2008). Pulsed vacuum osmotic dehydration (PVOD) has been
described as the application of subatmospheric pressure for a short
time at the beginning of the process followed by a longer OD stage
at atmospheric pressure. PVOD allows an exchange of internal gas
and liquid with an external solution through a hydrodynamic
mechanism (HDM) (Fito and Chiralt, 1997).
Mass transfer during OD occurs through semipermeable cell
membranes. The dominant resistance in the mass transfer in the
biological materials changes from partial to total permeability
311
DM w
t
o w
M t X t M o0 X w
0
Mo0
DMst
o s
M t X t Mo0 X s0
o
M0
where Mot and Moo represent the sample weight at times t and 0,
respectively; and Xwt, Xst, Xwo and Xso are the water (w) and soluble
solid (s) mass fractions in a sample at times t and 0, respectively.
The skin color of the strawberries was evaluated with a Minolta
Chroma Meter CR-200 (Minolta Corp., Osaka, Japan). The instrument was calibrated with a standard white plate (L = 97.59;
a = 0.07; and b = 1.59). The CIE Lab coordinates used D65 illuminant. A glass Petri dish containing a sample was placed above a
white plate, and the L, a and b values were recorded. The measurements were made in triplicate and in three different places
on each sample, and the mean values were reported. Color differences with regard to the initial fresh samples were obtained using
the following equation:
1=2
312
Table 1
Composition parameters reached by the fresh and processed samples at 30 C (Processing time = 3 h). OD: osmotic dehydration at atmospheric pressure, VI: vacuum
impregnation, OH: ohmic heating (ODOH and VIOH) with different electric eld intensity (V/cm).
Treatments
Xw
Xs
DMw
DM s
aw
Fresh
OD
ODOH 9.2 V/cm
ODOH 13 V/cm
ODOH 17 V/cm
VI
VIOH 9.2 V/cm
VIOH 13 V/cm
VIOH 17 V/cm
0.896 0.026a
0.820 0.013b
0.779 0.016c
0.754 0.017c,d
0.722 0.011e
0.776 0.013c
0.782 0.011c
0.769 0.010c,d
0.768 0.013c,d
0.076 0.015a
0.149 0.005b,c
0.135 0.003b
0.148 0.005b,c
0.161 0.002c,d
0.156 0.004c
0.163 0.001d
0.210 0.001e
0.204 0.002e
0.347 0.016a
0.369 0.015a
0.434 0.019c,d
0.449 0.012d
0.403 0.011b
-0.401 0.014b
0.423 0.010c
0.420 0.019c
0.048 0.017a
0.046 0.008a
0.055 0.016a,b
0.079 0.013b,c
0.062 0.011b
0.074 0.012b,c
0.089 0.015c
0.084 0.005c
0.993 0.002a
0.989 0.001b
0.989 0.002b
0.987 0.004b,c
0.983 0.003c
0.985 0.002b,c
0.988 0.003b,c
0.984 0.003b,c
0.983 0.001c
a,b,c,d
When there are signicant differences at 5.0%, homogeneous groups in each variable, according to a LSD test, they are identied by the same superscript letter.
Table 2
Firmness and color evaluation in the fresh samples and at the end of each treatment at 30 C (Processing time = 3 h).
Treatments
Firmness1 [N]
Color2
L
Fresh
OD
OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
OD-OH 13 V/cm
OD-OH 17 V/cm
VI
VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
VI-OH 13 V/cm
VI-OH 17 V/cm
a,b,c,d
1
2
8.05 0.79
5.73 0.40c,d
5.27 0.69c
4.80 0.56b
3.20 0.41a
6.31 0.47d,e
7.26 0.78e
6.29 0.26de
5.18 0.45bc
a
a
33.36 1.14
35.15 2.42b
35.35 2.45b
39.50 1.97c
37.97 2.15c
32.72 1.71a
34.66 2.19a,b
35.37 2.29b
37.84 2.13c
b
b
25.47 1.21
28.49 2.03b,c
30.07 2.58c
28.40 1.81c
28.17 1.45c
23.23 1.37a
23.67 1.62a
25.77 1.25b
22.68 1.77a
DE
b
14.91 1.07
14.53 1.72b
15.20 1.73b,c
17.47 1.20c
15.58 1.19b,c
11.40 1.52a
12.47 1.59a
13.73 1.34a,b
14.77 1.38b
0.00 0.00
0.53 0.11b
0.26 0.13a
0.51 0.11b
0.82 0.12c
0.98 0.09c,d
1.12 0.13d
1.36 0.12e
1.62 0.16f
When there are signicant differences at 5.0%, homogeneous groups in each variable, according to a LSD test, they are identied by same superscript.
Values represent the mean and standard deviation of 10 analyses.
Values represent the mean and standard deviation of 9 analyses.
313
served in the VI-treated samples when compared to the fresh samples. In the samples treated with OD and OD-OH, however, small
differences were observed among L, a, and b values of different
samples. The greater total color difference with respect to fresh
fruit was obtained by VI treatments. These lower values were associated with transparency gained due to air loss, which is an effect
that is produced by the total or partial substitution of the air present in the pores by the impregnation solution (Moreno et al., 2004).
Nevertheless, the total color difference was close to one in all cases,
which implies almost non-perceptible changes. The a and b values decreased in the VI and VIOH treatments and increased in
the OD and ODOH treatments when compared to the fresh
strawberries. The greater total color differences with respect to
Fig. 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of parenchyma tissue from fresh and treated strawberries with a 65% (w/w) sucrose solution at 30 C. (a) Fresh
control, (b) OD, (c) ODOH 17 V/cm and (d) VIOH 17 V/cm.
Fig. 2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of parenchyma tissue from fresh and treated strawberries with a 65% (w/w) sucrose solution at 30 C. (a) Fresh
control, (b) OD, (c) ODOH 17 V/cm and (d) VIOH 17 V/cm.
314
the control (OD and VI) was obtained with the ODOH and VIOH
treatments at 17 V/cm, which was caused by the increase of electric current intensity resulting in the seeds darkening and ultimately causing them to burn. When the total change of color
was evaluated with the DE parameter, small changes were associated with the OD treatments, and the greatest changes were associated with the VI treatments. Therefore, the main differences were
due to loss of clarity in accordance with the transparency gain.
The maximal force values obtained from the mechanical test
indicated that the osmotic treatments resulted in decreased rmness (Table 2). The greatest difference in rmness was observed
in samples treated at atmospheric pressure (OD) combined with
OH (ODOH). The OD treatments showed a lower force decreasing
especially in ODOH treatments at 17 V/cm. The VI and VIOH
(9.2 V/cm and 13 V/cm eld strengths) treatments did not cause
a signicant difference in rmness when compared to fresh fruit.
The application of the vacuum induces a greater rmness by
replacing the osmotic solution in pores due to air loss, thus, obtaining a more compact and less deformed tissue than that produced at
atmospheric pressure (Moreno et al., 2004). Moreover, it has been
reported that when a treatment for aw reduction is applied,
changes of texture in vegetal tissue are more dependent on phys-
8
Control (OD)
OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
OD-OH 13 V/cm
OD-OH 17 V/cm
Ec. pred. Control OD
Ec. pred. OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
Ec. pred. OD-OH 13 V/cm
Ec. pred. OD-OH 17 V/cm
6
5
Control (VI)
VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
VI-OH 13 V/cm
VI-OH 17 V/cm
Ec. pred. Control VI
Ec. pred VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
Ec. pred VI-OH 13 V/cm
Ec. pred VI-OH 17 V/cm
4
3
2
1
6
5
4
3
2
1
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
10
15
Storage (days)
25
30
35
40
4550
Storage (days)
Control (OD)
OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
OD-OH 13 V/cm
OD-OH 17 V/cm
Ec. pred. Control OD
Ec. pred. OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
Ec. pred. OD-OH 13 V/cm
Ec. pred. OD-OH 17 V/cm
6
5
Control (VI)
VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
VI-OH 13 V/cm
VI-OH 17 V/cm
Ec. pred. Control VI
Ec. pred VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
Ec. pred VI-OH 13 V/cm
Ec. pred VI-OH 17 V/cm
20
4
3
2
1
6
5
4
3
2
1
10
15
20
25
30
Storage (days)
35
40
45
50
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Storage (days)
Fig. 3. Growth counts for molds and yeasts in treated strawberries and stored at 5 C (a and b) and 10 C (c and d). OD: osmotic dehydration at atmospheric pressure, VI:
vacuum impregnation, OH: ohmic heating (ODOH and VIOH). Data were tted by re-parameterized version of the modied Gompertz equation.
315
6
5
Control (OD)
OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
OD-OH 13 V/cm
OD-OH 17 V/cm
Ec. pred. Control OD
Ec. pred. OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
Ec. pred. OD-OH 13 V/cm
Ec. pred. OD-OH 17 V/cm
4
3
7
6
5
4
3
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Control (VI)
VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
VI-OH 13 V/cm
VI-OH 17 V/cm
Ec. pred. Control VI
Ec. pred VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
Ec. pred VI-OH 13 V/cm
Ec. pred VI-OH 17 V/cm
50
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Storage (days)
Storage (days)
8
8
5
4
Control (OD)
OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
OD-OH 13 V/cm
OD-OH 17 V/cm
Ec. pred. Control OD
Ec. pred. OD-OH 9.2 V/cm
Ec. pred. OD-OH 13 V/cm
Ec. pred. OD-OH 17 V/cm
3
2
1
0
6
5
4
Control (VI)
VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
VI-OH 13 V/cm
VI-OH 17 V/cm
Ec. pred. Control VI
Ec. pred VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
Ec. pred VI-OH 13 V/cm
Ec. pred VI-OH 17 V/cm
3
2
1
0
10
15
20
25
30
Storage (days)
35
40
45
50
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Storage (days)
Fig. 4. Growth counts for aerobic mesophiles in treated strawberries and stored at 5 C (a and b) and 10 C (c and d). OD: osmotic dehydration at atmospheric pressure, VI:
vacuum impregnation, OH: ohmic heating (ODOH and VIOH). Data were tted by re-parameterized version of the modied Gompertz equation.
316
Table 3
Effect of the combined treatments at 30 C on the shelf life of osmotically dehydrated
strawberries stored at 5 C and 10 C. OD: osmotic dehydration at atmospheric
pressure, VI: vacuum impregnation, OH: ohmic heating (OD-OH and VI-OH) with
different electric eld intensity (V/cm).
Treatments
Storage
Temperature
(C)
OD (control 1)
ODOH 9.2 V/cm
ODOH 13 V/cm
ODOH 17 V/cm
VI (control 2)
VIOH 9.2 V/cm
VIOH 13 V/cm
VIOH 17 V/cm
OD (control 1)
ODOH 9.2 V/cm
ODOH 13 V/cm
ODOH 17 V/cm
VI (control 2)
VI-OH 9.2 V/cm
VIOH 13 V/cm
VIOH 17 V/cm
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Molds and
yeasts
SL (days)
Aerobic
mesophiles
SL (days)
12.89 1.28
16.27 1.70
18.76 1.87
21.65 1.79
15.05 2.69
21.37 3.00
25.15 2.38
26.31 3.85
8.99 1.08
10.12 1.39
11.38 1.61
12.59 0.79
11.29 1.19
11.69 1.60
11.83 0.97
12.80 0.48
>3 weeks
>3 weeks
>3 weeks
>3 weeks
>3 weeks
>3 weeks
>3 weeks
>3 weeks
5.50 048
6.98 0.64
9.34 0.53
10.05 1.49
5.79 0.69
8.47 0.44
9.59 0.75
11.86 1.20
References
Aguilera, J.M., Lillford, P., 2000. Microstructural and Imaging Analyses. In: Fito, P.,
Ortega-Rodriguez, E., Barbosa-Cnovas, G. (Eds.), Food Engineering 2000.
Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 2338.
Allali, H., Marchal, L., Vorobied, E., 2010. Effects of vacuum and ohmic heating with
citric acid on the behavior of osmotic dehydration and structural changes of
apple fruit. Biosystems Eng. 106 (1), 613.
Alzamora, S.M., Salvatori, D., Tapia, M.S., Lpez-Malo, A., Welti-Chanes, J., Fito, P.,
2005. Novel functional foods from vegetable matrices impregnated with
biologically active compounds. J. Food Eng. 67, 205214.
Anzalda-Morales, A. (1994). La evaluacin sensorial de los alimentos en la teora y
la prctica, in: Acribia S.A., Zaragoza, Spain, (Eds.). pp. 11-15, 24-40
[AOAC] Association of Ofcial Analytical Chemists,, 2000. Moisture in fruits. An
adaptation of method 934.06. In: Ofcial methods of analysis of Association of
Ofcial Analytical Chemists International 16th ed.. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Barat, J.M., Talens, P., Barrera, C., Chiralt, A., Fito, P., 2002. Pineapple Candying at Mild
Temperature by Applying Vacuum Impregnation. J. Food Sci. 67 (8), 30463052.
Briones, L., Reyes, J.E., Tabilo-Munizaga, G., Prez-Won, M., 2010. Microbial shelf-life
extension of chilled Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and abalone (Haliotis
rufescens) by high hydrostatic pressure treatment. Food Control 21, 15301535.
Castello, M.L., Igual, M., Fito, P.J., Chiralt, A., 2009. Inuence of osmotic dehydration
on texture, respiration and microbial stability of apple slices (var Granny
Smith). J. Food Eng. 91, 19.
Castello, M.L., Fito, P.J., Chiralt, A., 2010. Changes in respiration rate and physical
properties of strawberries due to osmotic dehydration and storage. J. of Food
Eng. 97, 6471.
Deng, Y., Zhao, Y., 2008. Effects of pulsed-vacuum and ultrasound on the
osmodehydration kinetics and microstructure of apples (Fuji). J. Food Eng. 85,
8493.
Fito, P., 1994. Modeling of vacuum osmotic dehydration of food. J. Food Eng. 22,
313328.
Fito, P., Chiralt, A., 1997. Osmotic dehydration: an approach to the modeling of solid
food-liquid operations. In: Fito, P., Ortega, E., Barbosa-Cnovas, G. (Eds.), Food
Engineering 2000. Chapman & Hall, New York pp, pp. 231252.
Fito, P., Chiralt, A., Barat, J.M., Martnez-Monz, J., 2000. Vacuum impregnation fruit
processing. In: Lozano, J.E., Aon, C.A., Parada, A.E., Barbosa-Canovas, G.V. (Eds.),
Trends in Food Engineering. Technomic Pub. Co., Inc., PA, Lancaster, pp. 149
164.
Fito, P., Chiralt, A., Betoret, N., Gras, M., Chfer, M., Martnez-Monz, J., Andrs, A.,
Vidal, D., 2001. Vacuum impregnation and osmotic dehydration in matrix
engineering: application in functional fresh food development. J. Food Eng. 49,
75183.
Glen, G.M., Poovaiah, B.W., 1990. Calcium-mediated post-harvest changes in
texture and cell wall structure and composition in golden delicious apple. J.
Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115, 962.
Kemp, M.R., Fryer, P.J., 2007. Enhancement of diffusion through foods using
alternating electric elds. Innov. Food Sci. Emerging Technol. 8, 143153.
Kulshrestha, S.A., Sastry, S., 2006. Low-frequency dielectric changes in cellular food
material from ohmic heating: effect of end point temperature. Innovative Food
Sci. Emerging Technol. 7, 257262.
Lombard, G.E., Olivera, J.C., Fito, P., Andres, A., 2008. Osmotic dehydration of
pineapple as a pre-treatment for further drying. J. Food Eng. 85, 277284.
Martnez-Monz, J., Martnez-Navarrete, N., Chiralt, A., Fito, P., 2001. Osmotic
dehydration & vacuum impregnation. In: Chiralt, P., Barat, A., Spiess, J.M.,
Behsnilian, W.E.L., Fito, D. (Eds.), Applications in Food Industries Food
Preservation Technology Series. CRC Press, Technomic Publishing Co., PA,
Lancaster, pp. 6178.
Minsal 2008. Chilean Food Sanitary Regulations. Dto. N 977/96 (D. of 13.05.97),
Republic of Chile, Health Minister, actualized 2008.
Moreno, J., Chiralt, A., Escriche, I., Serra, J.A., 2000. Effect of blanching/osmotic
dehydration combined methods on quality and stability of minimally processed
strawberries. Food Res. Int. 33, 609616.
Moreno, J., Bugueo, G., Velasco, V., Petzold, G., Tabilo-Munizaga, G., 2004. Osmotic
Dehydration and Vacuum Impregnation on Physicochemical Properties of
Chilean Papaya (Carica candamarcensis). J. Food Sci. 69 (3), 102106.
Quiles, A., Hernando, I., Prez-Munuera, I., Llorca, E., Larrea, V., Lluch, M.A., 2004.
The effect of calcium and cellular permeabilization on the structure of the
parenchyma of osmotic dehydrated (Granny Smith) apple. J. Sci. Food Agric. 84,
17651770.
Rastogi, N., Angerbach, A., Knorr, D., 2000. Evaluation of mass transfer mechanisms
during osmotic treatment of plant materials. J. Food Sci. 65 (6), : 10161019.
Simpson, R., Jimnez, M., Carevic, E., Grancelli, R., 2007. Aceleracin de la
Deshidratacin Osmtica de Frambuesas (Rubus idaeus) por medio de
Calentamiento hmico. ALAN 57 (2), : 192195.
Salengke, S., Sastry, S.K., 2007. Experimental investigation of ohmic heating of solidliquid mixtures under worst-case heating scenarios. J. Food Eng., 83: 324326.
Sarang, S., Sastry, S., Knipe, L., 2008. Electrical conductivity of fruit and meat during
ohmic heating. J. Food Eng., 87: 351356.
Wiley, C.R., 1994. Minimally processed refrigerated fruits & vegetables. In: BarbosaCnovas, G.V., Welti-Chanes, J. (Eds.), In Food Preservation by Moisture Control
Fundamentals and Applications. Isopow Pract II. Technomic Pub. Co., PA,
Lancaster, pp. 66127.
Zell, M., Lyng, J.G., Cronin, D.A., Morgan, D.J., 2009. Ohmic cooking of whole beef
muscle Optimization of meat preparation. Meat Sci. 81, 693698.