Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/optcom
Abstract
Automation of ber-to-optic alignment is critical to the development of cost eective ber-optic component manufacturing technologies. Key to the alignment automation is the angular alignment automation, which is now unavailable. But angular misalignments are unavoidable in practical ber-optic aligning process. This work evaluates the
eects of pitch, yaw, and roll angular misalignments for a butt coupling scheme involving the optical coupling between
a single-mode ber and a laser diode. It is demonstrated that the coupling eciency and misalignment tolerance are
more sensitive to tilt, i.e., pitch and yaw angular misalignments than lateral ones. It is further demonstrated that the
time for locating the optimal coupling position using conventional hillclimbing automation searching algorithm is a
strong function of angular misalignments. 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: Optical coupling; Alignment tolerance; Optoelectronics packaging automation; Angular misalignments
1. Introduction
Automation of ber-to-optic alignment is critical to the development of cost eective ber-optic
component manufacturing technologies. However,
angular alignment automation is currently unavailable, or restricted to relatively constrained
packaging and xturing situations, while angular
misalignment is unavoidable in practical aligning process [1]. Thus, it is of great importance to
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-949-824-5362; fax: +1-949824-2541.
E-mail address: fgshi@uci.edu (F.G. Shi).
identify and evaluate the possible angular misalignment eects in ber-optic coupling and alignment process.
This work, presenting a detailed analysis of the
consequences of initial angular misalignments between a single-mode ber (SMF) and a laser diode
butt coupling, is organized as follows. First, the
coupling eciency and overall optic-ber alignment tolerance for laser-SMF butt coupling are
investigated in the presence of pitch, yaw, and roll
angular misalignments. Then, the eects of angular misalignment on the ber-optic automation
alignment process are presented using hillclimbing
algorithm, which is often the current industrial
standard choice for ber-optic alignment automation.
174
2. Fiber-optic coupling
A general laser-to-SMF butt coupling scheme
as shown in Fig. 1 is chosen for present study.
Here the eld of a SMF is taken to be symmetric,
and can be described by a Gaussian beam with
beam waist radius of -0f . The laser diode eld is
taken to be elliptical, and has Gaussian distributions in both vertical and horizontal directions
with unequal beam waist radii of -0x and -0y . The
elliptical beam then diverges to the right. At a
plane with the waist spacing, the beam is described
by its waist size -0 -0x and -0y or -0f and distance z of the z plane of interest from the waist. If
-0 and z are known, radius R and waist - can be
found from [2],
2
R z1 K-20 =2Z
1
2 1=2
- -0 1 2Z=K-0
where
gx gx
z gd gh gd;h
x x x
y y y
gy gy
z gd gh gd;h
gx
z
2
2
1=-2f 1=-2x
-f -x
2
K =4 1=Rx
gd exp
2
6
4
8
>
<
>
:
1=Rf
2
1=2
2dx2
39
>
=
1=-2x -2f 1=-2x 1=-2f K 2 =4 1=-2x R2f 1=-2f R2x
7
5
2
2
>
;
1=-2x 1=-2f K 2 =4 1=Rx 1=Rf
Z
X
Fig. 1. Schematic butt coupling in the presence of misalignment. Here -0x , -0y and -0f are the beam waist of the laser diode in X and Y
direction and the ber; z is the distance to a plane of interest from the waist; d is oset; and h is the tilt angle away from Z-axis.
gh exp
8
>
<
>
:
K 2 h2 =2
2
6
4
175
1=-2x
1=-2x 1=-2f
2
1=-2f K 2 =4 1=Rx
39
>
=
7
5
2 >
;
1=Rf
8
gd;h exp
2
8
>
<
>
:
K 2 hdx
2
2
1=
1=x
f
6
4
2
1=-2x 1=-2f K 2 =4 1=Rx
39
>
=
7
5
2 >
;
1=Rf
9
176
eciency. However, the pitch and yaw misalignment eects on the coupling eciency are signicant as evident from Fig. 4. The coupling eciency
in the absence of angular misalignment as presented in Fig. 4(a) is compared to the coupling
eciency in the presence of both pitch and yaw
misalignments of 10, i.e. Fig. 4(b). It is evident
from a comparison of the results presented in Fig.
2(a) and (b) that the contour is compressed by
pitch and yaw angular misalignments under the
same conditions. This indicates that the coupling
eciency and the tolerance are reduced signicantly by the misaligned angles.
For laser diodes with relatively larger aspect
ratios, the angular misalignment eect becomes
even more signicant, due to the increased mode
mismatch between the laser diode and the SMF. A
comparison of the angular misalignment eect on
optimal coupling eciency for a laser with dierent aspect ratios, of 1, 2 and 4, are presented in
Fig. 5. Fig. 5(a) presents the coupling eciency in
the presence of pitch angular misalignments. It is
clear from Fig. 5(a) that the coupling eciency can
be signicantly reduced for a few degree pitch
misalignment. Fig. 5(b) indicates the similar con-
Fig. 4. 2D coupling contours with and without angular misalignments. (a) 2D contour without angular misalignment; (b)
2D contour with pitch misalignment of 10.
177
178
Fig. 7. 2D coupling contour with and without roll misalignments. (a) 2D contour without angular misalignments; (b) 2D
coupling contour with roll misalignments.
179
steps are 1.8 times more than the condition without roll misalignment for this simulation.
3.3. Alignment with preexisting pitch and yaw
misalignments
Similarly, assuming the aspect ratio of laser
diode is 2.5, the aligning processes are simulated
by above 2D hillclimbing algorithm for preexisting
pitch and yaw misalignments. The results show
4. Conclusion
The angular misalignment eects on both coupling eciency and automated alignment process
have been identied and presented in details. The
analysis shows that roll misalignment has no eect
on optimal coupling eciency and tolerance.
However, both pitch and yaw misalignments can
decrease the overall coupling eciency signicantly; in the meantime, limit the overall tolerance
180
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful for the encouragement given by Drs. J. Guo and J. Jeong.
References
[1] S.R. Kidd, C. Buckberry, Photon. Spectra 35 (2001) 122124.
[2] W.B. Joyce, B.C. DeLoach, Appl. Opt. 23 (1984) 4187
4196.
[3] L.A. Wang, C.D. Su, J. Lightwave Technol. 14 (1996) 2757
2762.
[4] S. Gangopadhyay, S.N. Sarkar, Opt. Commun. 146 (1998)
104108.
[5] D.H. Ackley, A Connectionist Machine for Genetic Hillclimbing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1987.