Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1. General
A Bridge is a structure providing passage over an obstacle without closing the way
beneath. The required passage may be for a road, a railway, pedestrians, a canal or a pipeline.
The obstacle to be crossed may be a river, a road, railway or a valley.
Bridges range in length from a few metre to several kilometre. They are among the
largest structures built by man. The demands on design and on materials are very high. A
bridge must be strong enough to support its own weight as well as the weight of the people
and vehicles that use it. The structure also must resist various natural occurrences, including
earthquakes, strong winds, and changes in temperature. Most bridges have a concrete, steel,
or wood framework and an asphalt or concrete road way on which people and vehicles travel.
The T-beam Bridge is by far the Most commonly adopted type in the span range of 10 to 25
M. The structure is so named because the main longitudinal girders are designed as T-beams
integral with part of the deck slab, which is cast monolithically with the girders. Simply
supported T-beam span of over 30 M are rare as the dead load then becomes too heavy.
Deck slab
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
Wearing coat
ii)
iii)
iv)
Foundations for both abutments and piers may be of the type open, well, pile, etc.
Apart from the above, river training works and the approaches to a bridge also form a part
of a bridge works.
Girder Bridge
ii)
Truss Bridge
iii)
Arch Bridge
iv)
Cantilever Bridge
v)
Suspension Bridge
vi)
Cable-stayed Bridge
vii) Movable Bridge
viii)
Slab Bridge
1.2.1Girder Bridges
There are two main types of girder bridges. In one type, called a box girder bridge, each
girder looks like a long box that lies between the piers or abutments. The top surface of the
bridge is the roadway. Box girder bridges are built of steel or concrete. In the other type of
girder bridge, the end view of each girder looks like an I or a T. Two or more girders support
the roadway. This type of bridge is called a plate girder bridge when made of steel, a
reinforced or prestressed concrete girder bridge when made of concrete, and a wood girder
bridge when made of wood.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Climatic conditions
vi.
Hydraulic data
vii.
viii.
Labour available
ix.
x.
Maintenance provisional
xi.
xii.
xiii.
Strategic consideration
xiv.
Economic consideration
xv.
Aesthetic consideration
I.
First of all the required formation level is found out. On knowing this the permissible
structural depth is established. This is done after taking into account the following
two things : ( i ) Minimum vertical clearance required taking into account the
difference between the affluxed high flood level and the soffit of the deck. ( ii )
Thickness of wearing coat required below the formation level.
II.
Considering the depth of foundations, the height of deck above the bed level and low
water level, average depth of water during construction season, the type of bridge,
span lengths, type of foundations, cross section of the deck, method of construction
and loading sequence.
III.
Trial cross sections of the deck, sizes of various elements of the substructure and
superstructure are decided upon and drawn to arrive at the preliminary general
arrangement of the bridge. Various trials lead to a structural form with optimum
placements of its load masses. Relative proportions and sizes of certain members as
well as their shapes are decided upon and drawn to a certain scale on this drawing.
The type of bearing to be used along with their locations depending the support
system is also established. The main basis of the general arrangement drawing of a
bridge structure is a quick preliminary analysis and design of the member sections.
This is essential for forming the basis of the detailed to be carried later on depending
upon the requirements of the project.
i) Analyse and design the transverse-deck-slab and its cantilever portions, unless the
superstructure is purely longitudinally reinforced solid slab with no cantilevering
portions. This is necessitated so as to decide the top flange thickness of the deck
section which is essential to work out the deck section properties for the subsequent
longitudinal design.
ii) Compute the dead load and live load bending moments at each critical section.
iii) In order to determine the maximum and minimum live load effects that a particular
longitudinal can receive, carry out the transverse load distribution for live load placed
in various lanes.
iv) This may be done by Courbon's method, Little and Morice's method, Hendry and
Jaeger methods.
v) Alternatively, use may be made to the Plane-Grid method which involves using one
of the many standard computer programs (.e.g. STAAD program). The Plan Grid
method is basically a finite element method. Though time consuming in writing the
input data, it is nevertheless very useful for the purpose of analysis. For wide and
multi-cell boxes and transverse live load distribution may be studied by the finite
element method but it is time consuming.
vi) Design against bending of critical sections, in reinforced or in prestressed concrete as
the case may be.
vii) Work out dead load and live load shear forces at each critical section in the
longitudinals of the deck and design the sections and reinforcements for effects of
torsion and shear, if required.
ii.
an orthotropic plate
iii.
loads between longitudinals has to be determined. When there are only two longitudinal
girders, the reactions on the longitudinals can be found by assuming supports of the deck slab
as unyielding. With three or more longitudinal girders, the load distribution is estimated
using any one of the above rational methods.
By using any one of the above Methods, the Maximum reactions factors for
intermediate and end longitudinal girders are obtained. The bending Moments and shears are
then computed for these critical values of reaction factors. The above three Methods make
simplifying assumptions relating to the structure and loading. These assumptions introduce
errors but Make these Methods amenable to calculators and graphs. In relative comparison to
this the grillage Method of analysis, pioneered by Lightfoot and Sawko requires lesser
simplifying assumptions.
CHAPTER 2
LOADS
The various loads to which the bridge is subjected to are
i) Dead loads
Dead Loads: Unit weight for Dead Loads has been considered by adopting unit
weights as per IRC 6:2000 (Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road
ii)
iii)
iv)
CHAPTER 3
Design of Superstructure
3. Preliminary Design Details
Clear Roadway = 7.5M
Steel Fe 415
= 2.1/3.44
Therefore, K = 0.61
M1 = 8.2 X 10-2 and M2 = 3.12 x 10-2
Total Dead Weight = 7.1 x 2.1 x 3.44 = 51.3KN
Dead Load Bending Moment along Short span
MB = W (M1 + 0.15 X M2)
One Track of the Tracked Vehicle is placed symmetrically on the panel as shown in the
figure after the dispersion through the wearing coat of 75MM thickness the dispersed
dimensions are:
u = b + 2t and v = l + 2t
where, u = short span width of the track contact area
b = width of track wheel contact area
l = length of track wheel contact area
t = thickness of wearing coat
Therefore, u = (0.85 + 2 x 0.075) = 1M
v = (3.6 + 2 x 0.075) = 3.75 M
u
B
1
2.5
2.5
3.742
= 0.4
and
V
L
3.75
3.742
=1
= 0.67
= 14.81 KN-M
Taking Continuity Factor of 0.8 and Impact Factor as 1.25
ML = 1.25 X 0.8 X 14.81
ML= 14.81 KN-M
Design Moments due to Dead Load and IRC Class AA Tracked vehicle (Live Load)
Dead Load, MB = 4.45 KN-M
ML = 2.23 KN-M
Live Load,
MB = 30.30KN-M
3.3.2 Live Load Shear Force due to IRC Class AA Tracked Vehicle
Shear Force is calculated by effective width method, considering the panel to be fixed on all
the four edges. Hence effective size of panel will be 2.1M x 3.44M. For maximum Shear
Force the load will be so placed that its spread up to slab bottom reaches up to the face of the
1.45
2.0
= 0.705M .
= 1.64
3.442
2.1
A
L ] + bw
= 350/4.94
= 70.85KN
Shear Force
x=
0.15
0.9
; y=
2
2
x=0.075 M ; y =0.45 M
u 1=0.45 M ; v 1=0.3 M
u
v
=0.5
=0.44
k=0.61, B
, L
k=0.6,
M1= 12x10-2, M2= 5.5x10-2
k=0.61,
M1= 12x10-2, M2= 5.6x10-2
k=0.707,
M1= 11.8x10-2, M2= 6.5x10-2
M1= 0.12x10-2 M2= 0.056x10-2
Multiply these by (u1+x)(v1+y) = (0.45+0.075) + (0.3+0.45)=0.4
M1= 0.12x10-2 M2= 0.056x10-2
Step 2: Find M1 and M2
2 x=2 ( 0.075 )
U= 0.15M
V 2 y ( 0.45 ) = 0.9M
u 0.15
=
=0.072
B 2.1
v
0.9
=
=0.26
L 3.442
B
2.1
=
=0.61
L 3.442
From Pigeauds Curves by interpolation
u
v
k=0.61, B =0.5 , L =0.44
k=0.6,
M1= 21x10-2, M2= 9x10-2
k=0.61,
M1= 21x10-2,
M2= 9.2x10-2
k=0.707,
M1= 22x10-2, M2= 11x10-2
-2
M1= 21x10 M2= 9.2x10-2
Multiply these by xy=0.075x0.45=0.034
M1= 0.714x10-2 M2= 0.32x10-2
Step 3: Find M1 and M2
U=2(u1+ x )=2 ( 0.45+0.075 )
U= 1.05M
V 2 y = 0.9M
u 1.05
=
=0.5
B 2.1
v
0.9
=
=0.26
L 3.442
B
2.1
=
=0.61
L 3.442
From Pigeauds Curves by interpolation
u
v
k=0.61, B =0.5 , L =0.44
k=0.6,
M1= 13x10-2,
M2= 8.6x10-2
k=0.61,
M1= 13x10-2,
M2= 8.5x10-2
-2
k=0.707,
M1= 12.6x10 , M2= 8.6x10-2
M1= 13x10-2 M2= 8.6x10-2
Multiply these by y(u1+x)=0.45(0.45+0.075)=0.24
M1= 13x10-2 , M2= 2.07x10-2
Step 4: Find M1 and M2
U 2 ( x )=2 ( 0.075 ) = 0.15M
V 2 ( v 1+ y ) =2 ( 0.3+ 0.45 ) = 1.5M
u 0.15
=
=0.072
B 2.1
v
1.5
=
=0.44
L 3.442
B
2.1
=
=0.61
L 3.442
From Pigeauds Curves by interpolation
u
v
k=0.61, B =0.5 , L =0.44
k=0.6,
M1= 16.5x10-2, M2= 5.5x10-2
k=0.61,
M1= 16.7x10-2, M2= 6.0x10-2
k=0.707,
M1= 18x10-2,
M2= 6.0x10-2
M1= 16.7x10-2 M2= 6.0x10-2
Multiply these by x(u1+y) = 0.075(0.3+0.45) =0.057
M1= 0.96x10-2 M2= 0.035x10-2
Design M1 = 0.048+0.00714-0.0312-0.0096
M1 = 0.01434 KN-M
Design M2 = 0.0224+0.0032-0.0207-0.0035
M1 = 0.0014 KN-M
W
M1+0.15 M2)
MB due to single load =
u1v1
=22KN-M
W
M1+0.15 M2)
u1v1
=5.26KN-M
Applying the effect of continuity and Impact
Final MB=22x0.8x1.25=22KN-M and ML= 5.26 x 1.25 x 0.8 =5.26KN-M
Case 2)
W
M1+0.15 M2)
MB due to single load =
u1v1
=43KN-M
W
M1+0.15 M2)
ML due to single load =
u1v1
=20.5KN-M
For larger load,
u 0.45
=
=0.22
B 2.1
v
1.5
=
=0.26
L 3.442
B
2.1
=
=0.61
L 3.442
u
v
=0.22
=0.26
k=0.61, B
, L
k=0.6,
M1= 16.0x10-2, M2= 7.0x10-2
k=0.61,
M1= 16.2x10-2, M2= 7.4x10-2
k=0.707,
M1= 18.0x10-2, M2= 10.5x10-2
M1= 16.2x10-2 M2= 7.4x10-2
W
M1+0.15 M2)
MB due to single load =
u1v1
=32.5KN-M
ML due to single load =
W
M1+0.15 M2)
u1v1
=18.5KN-M
Net Moment MB1 = 43-32.5=10.5KN-M
ML1 = 20.5-18.5 = 2KN-M
i)
Effect of wheel no.1 of both axles : wheel no1 are not centrally placed on any of the axes
hence their effect will be analysed by treating each load as eccentrically placed.
u1= 0.45M, v1=0.3M, x = 0.375M, y = 0.45M
Step1: Find M1 and M2 for u=2(u1+x) = 2(0.45+0.375) = 1.65
v = 2(v1+y) = 2(0.3+0.45) = 1.5
By Interpolation of values for k, u/B and v/L, we get
M1 = 9.0x10-2 and M2= 4.6x10-2
Multiply by (u1+x)(v1+y) = 0.62
M1= 0.056KN-M and M2 = 0.03KN-M
Step2: Find M1 and M2 for u=2(x) = 2(0.375) = 0.75
v = 2(y) = 2(0.45) = 0.9
By Interpolation of values for k=0.61, u/B=0.36 and v/L=0.26, we get
M1 = 14.3x10-2 and M2= 9x10-2
Multiply by xy = 0.17
M1= 0.024KN-M and M2 = 0.02KN-M
Step3: Find M1 and M2 for u=2(u1+x) = 2(0.45+0.375) = 1.65
v = 2(y) = 2(0.45) = 0.9
By Interpolation of values for k = 0.61, u/B = 0.8 and v/L = 0.26, we get
M1 = 14.3x10-2 and M2= 9x10-2
Multiply by xy = 0.17
M1= 0.024KN-M and M2 = 0.02KN-M
Step4: Find M1 and M2 for u=2(x) = 2(0.375) = 0.75
v = 2(v1+y) = 2(0.3+0.45) = 1.5
By Interpolation of values for k = 0.61, u/B = 0.36 and v/L = 0.44, we get
M1 = 12.5x10-2 and M2= 5.5x10-2
Multiply by x(v1+y) = 0.28
M1= 0.036KN-M and M2 = 0.015KN-M
Design MB = 0.056+0.024-0.037-0.036
= 0.008KN-M
ML = 0.03+0.02-0.026-0.015
= 0.01KN-M
2W
M1+0.15 M2)
MB2 due to single load =
u1v1
=5.28KN-M
ML2 due to single load =
2W
M1+0.15 M2)
u1v1
=6.23KN-M
ii) Effect of wheel no 3 of both axles
u1=0.45, v1= 0.3, x=0.775, y=0.45
Step1: Find M1 and M2 for u=2(u1+x) = 2(0.45+0.775) = 2.45M
v = 2(v1+y) = 2(0.3+0.45) = 1.5
By Interpolation of values for k =,0.61 u/B = 1 and v/L = 0.44, we get
M1 = 7.5x10-2 and M2= 4.0x10-2
Multiply by (u1+x)(v1+y) = 0.92
M1= 0.07KN-M and M2 = 0.0377KN-M
Step2: Find M1 and M2 for u=2(x) = 2(0.775) = 1.55
v = 2(y) = 2(0.45) = 0.9
By Interpolation of values for k =,0.61 u/B = 0.74 and v/L = 0.26, we get
M1 = 9.9x10-2 and M2= 7.1x10-2
Multiply by (xy) = 0.348
M1= 0.035KN-M and M2 = 0.025KN-M
Step3: Find M1 and M2 for u=2(u1+x) = 2(0.45+0.775) = 2.45
v = 2(y) = 2(0.45) = 0.9
By Interpolation of values for k =,0.61 u/B = 1 and v/L = 0.26, we get
M1 = 6.63x10-2 and M2= 5.3x10-2
Multiply by y(u1+x) = 0.55
M1= 0.0364KN-M and M2 = 0.63KN-M
Step4: Find M1 and M2 for u=2(x) = 2(0.775) = 1.55
v = 2(u1+y) = 2(0.45+0.45) = 1.8
By Interpolation of values for k =,0.61 u/B = 0.74 and v/L = 0.53, we get
M1 = 9.0x10-2 and M2= 4.5x10-2
Multiply by x(v1+y) = 0.58
M1= 0.053KN-M and M2 = 0.0261KN-M
Design MB = 0.07+0.035-0.0364-0.053
= 0.0156KN-M
ML = 0.0377+0.025-0.03-0.0.261
= 0.0066KN-M
MB3 due to single load =
2W
M1+0.15 M2)
u1v1
=15.36KN-M
ML3 due to single load =
2W
M1+0.15 M2)
u1v1
=8.3KN-M
Final bending Moment for case ii
MB= MB1+ MB2+ MB3
ML = ML1+ ML2+ ML3
MB = 31.14KN-M
ML = 16.53KN-M
Case 3: Loads placed as per figure:
i) Effect of wheel 2 of axle 1:
u= 0.45, v = 0.3, u/B= 0.45/2.1,
v/L=0.3/3.442 = 0.087
for k = 0.61, by interpolation M1 = 0.2
and M2 = 0.15
MB1 = 14KN-M and ML1=11.6KN-M
ii) Effect of wheel 1 of axle 1:
For larger load, u/B=0.8, v/L=0.09, k =
0.61
MB = 16.33KN-M
ML = 16KN-M
For smaller load, u/B=0.36, v/L=0.09,
k = 0.61
Fig 4.3: Position of wheel load for Class AA wheeled vehicle
MB = 11.8KN-M
ML = 10.81KN-M
Net Moments,
MB2 = (16.33-11.8) = 2.27KN-M and ML2 = (16-10.81) = 2.6KN-M
iii) Effect of wheel load 3 of axle 1:
For larger load,
u/B= 2.45/2.1= 1.2; v/L= 0.3/3.442 = 0.09
For k = 0.61, by interpolation M1 = 0.085 and M2 = 0.081
MB = ML= 33.14KN-M
For smaller load,
= 19.66KN-M
Final Bending Moments, after applying continuity and Impact factor
MB = 1.25 x 0.8 x 30 = 30.03KN-M
ML = 1.25 x 0.8 x 19.66 = 19.66 KN-M
4.2 Live Load Shear Force due to IRC Class AA Wheeled Vehicle
W 3
( 2 2 +2 )
2
RA=
20.84
( 0.24 3 2 0.24 2 +2 )
2
R A =20.24 KN
RA=
W
( 2 2 3 )
2
RB =
20.84
( 2 0.24 2+ 0.24 3 )
2
RB =1.05 KN
R A =W 2 3 +
+1
2
4
3
R A =47.1 KN
+1
2
4
RB =W R A
R A =62.547.1=15.4 KN
W 3
( 2 2 +2 )
2
RB =
62.5
( 0.43 32 0.43 2 +2 )
2
RB =53.43 KN
RA=
W
( 2 2 3 )
2
RA=
62.5
( 2 0.43 20.43 3 )
2
R A =9.1 KN
The values of effective width, reactions and shear force are tabulated below
Load (KN)
X(M)
e(M)
R A (K
RB (K
F A (K
F B (K
W1=30.52
W2=62.5
W3=62.5
0.25
0.65
0.45
0.86
1.319
1.2
e1= k x X1x{1-(0.25/2.1)} + W
N)
20.29
47.1
53.43
N)
1.05
15.4
9.1
Total
N)
23.53
35.71
44.53
103.77
N)
1.22
11.68
7.59
20.48
=0.86M
hence k=2.536
u = 0.65M; v = 0.4M
i) Effect of wheel load 1 of axle 1:
u = 0.65M; v = 0.4M; u/B=0.65/2.1= 0.31;
v/L=0.4/3.442 = 0.12
By interpolation, For k = 0.61; M1= 0.175KN-M;
M2=0.15KN-M
MB1 = 11.26KN-M and ML1= 10.05KN-M
Fig 5: Position of wheel load for Shear force for Class A vehicle
W 3
( 2 2 +2 )
2
RA=
57
( 0.524 3 2 0.524 2+2 ) = 45.54KN
2
RB =
W
( 2 2 3 )
2
RB =
W
( 2 0.524 2 0.524 3 ) = 11.5KN
2
45.45
1.315
= 51.84KN
= 36.00KN-M
= 138KN
CHAPTER 4
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB
Grade of concrete = M30
Grade of Steel = Fe415
cbc =10 N /mm 2
st =200 N /mm
, Modular ratio, M = 10
4.1 Constants:
n=
1
1
=
=0.34
st
200
1+
1+
10 10
m. cbc
j= 1
M
36 10 6
d provided=
=
=154.25 mm
Q b
1.513 1000
d provided=225 MM
d provided >d required
Provide 225MM overall depth using 40MM
d required =225408=177 MM
M
36 106
Area of steel required=
=
=890 MM 2 along M B
st jd 200 0.89 225
S v=
1000 201
890
M
2210 6
2
=
=550 MM along M L
st jd 200 0.89 225
S v =225 mm c /c
Hence provide 16MM diameter bars at 150MM c/c
Sv=
1000 113
550
S v =205 mm c /c
Hence provide 12MM diameter bars at 150MM c/c
CHAPTER 5
LONGITUDINAL GIRDER AND CROSS GIRDER DESIGN
5.1 Reaction Factor Bending Moment in Longitudinal Girders by
Courbonss
Method
x 2=(2.5)2
w
2
(0)2+(2.5)2=2(2.5)2=12.5 m
x=0
Therefore,
RA=
RA=
P
n
1+
nex
x2
4P
3 1.1 2.5
1+
3
2(2.5)2
R A =0.5536 W
and
RB = 0.3333W
w
2
x 2=(2.5)2
(0)2+(2.5)2=2(2.5)2=12.5 m
x=0
Therefore,
RA=
RA=
P
n
1+
nex
x2
4P
3 0.8 2.5
1+
3
2( 2.5)2
4P
[ 1+0.48 ]
3
4P
[ 1.48 ]
3
1.9734 P
0.9867 w
RB =
4P
[ 1+0 ]
3
RB =
4P 4 w
= =0.67 w
3 3 2
RB =0.67 w
Therefore
Impact factor
4.5
4.5
=
=0.182
6 + L 6+ 18.71
Load No.
W1
W2
Load Value
27kN
27kN
Ordinate
3.885
4.678=1.93 m
9.355
4.955
4.678=2.48 m
9.355
Moment
52.11KN-M
67KN-M
W3
W4
W5
W6
8.155
4.678=4.1 m
9.355
114kN
4m
114kN
68kN
5.055
4.678=2.53 m
9.355
68kN
2.055
4.678=1.1 m
9.355
468KN-M
456KN-M
173KN-M
75KN-M
Total1291.11KN-M
Bending Moment, BM, including Impact Factor and Reaction factor for
Outer girder =1291.11 1.182 0.9867=1506 KN M
Load No.
Load Value
W1
W2
27kN
27KN
Ordinate
2.71625
4.39=1.7 m
7.01625
3.81625
4.39=2.39 m
7.01625
Moment
46KN-M
W4
W5
W6
W7
114KN
64.53KN-M
114KN
68KN
68KN
68KN
6.19375
4.39=2.33 m
11.7
3.2
4.39=1.2m
11.7
0.19375
4.39=0.073 m
11.7
including
Impact
Factor and
501KN-M
10.5
4.39=4.0 m
11.7
Moment,
BM,
4.39 m
W3
Bending
Reaction
factor for
456KN-M
159KN-M
82KN-M
5KN-M
=1314KN-M
Total
Load No.
Load Value
Ordinate
Moment
Bending
2.05 m
W3
W4
114KN
114KN
234.00KN-M
15.17
2.05=1.9 m
16.37
BM,
217.00KN-M
68KN
W6
68KN
7.87
2.05=0.99 m
16.37
67.32 KN-M
W7
68KN
4.87
2.05=0.61 m
16.37
42.00KN-M
W8
68KN
1.87
2.05=0.24 m
16.37
including
Impact
Factor and
10.87
3.05=2.025 m
16.37
W5
Moment,
138.00KN-M
Reaction
factor for
16.40KN-M
TOTAL 715.00KN-M
Load No.
Load Value
W1
27kN
W2
27KN
Ordinate
3.395
4.67=1.782 M
8.895
4.495
4.67=2.39 M
8.895
Moment
48.20KN-M
64.00KN-M
7.695
4.67=4.04 M
8.895
W3
114KN
461KN-M
4.67 M
W4
W5
W6
114KN
68KN
68KN
533KN-M
4.595
4.67=2.2 M
9.815
1.595
4.67=0.76 M
9.815
150KN-M
52KN-M
=1308.2KN-
Total
Bending Moment, BM, including Impact Factor and Reaction factor for
Outer girder =1.182 1.821308.2=834.00 KN-M
Load Value
Ordinate
Moment
3.77 +4.67
=4.22 M
2
700KN
2954KN-M
Bending Moment, BM, including Impact Factor and Reaction factor for
Outer girder =1.10 0.5336 2954=1800.00 KN-M
Inner girder =1.10 0.3333 2954=1083
KN-M
Load No.
Load Value
700KN
Ordinate
4.4+3.56
=3.98 M
2
Moment
2786KN-M
Bending Moment, BM, including Impact Factor and Reaction factor for
Outer girder =1.10 0.5336 2786=1697.00 KN-M
Inner girder =1.10 0.3333 2786=1022 KN-M
Load Value
700KN
Ordinate
3.51+ 4.678
=4.094 M
2
Moment
2866KN-M
Bending Moment, BM, including Impact Factor and Reaction factor for
Outer girder =1.10 0.5336 2866=1746.00 KN-M
Inner girder =1.10 0.3333 2866=1051 KN-M
Load No.
Load Value
700KN
Ordinate
2.05+ 1.656
=1.853 M
2
Moment
1298KN-M
Bending Moment, BM, including Impact Factor and Reaction factor for
Outer girder =1.10 0.5336 1298=791.00 KN-M
KN-M
Fig 5.3: Class AA tracked Wheel load position for Live loaf shear force
P1=
1.675
P=0.8 P
2.1
P2=
0.425 1.725
+
=1.03 P
2.1
2.1
P3=
0.375
P=0.18 P
2.1
Reactions at end of each Longitudinal Girder due to transfer of these loads at 1.8M from left support
RA' = 0.374P
RD' = 0.347P
RB' = 0.535P
RE' = 0.495P.
RC' = 0.093P
RF' = 0.087P.
The load RD, RE, RF should be transferred to the cross girders as per Courbons Theory
W =0.347 P+ 0.495 P+ 0.087 P
W =0.929 P
R D=
R D=
P
n
1+
nex
x2
0.929 P
3 0.5877 2.5
1+
2
3
2(2.1)
C=0.464 P
R E=
R E=
P
n
1+
nex
x2
0.929 P
[ 1+ 0 ]
3
R E=0.31 P
These reactions
RD
and
RE
R A 18.71=R A 14.968
R A =0.8 RD R B=0.8 R E
R A =0.8 0.464 R D
R A =0.3712 P
RB =0.8 0.31 P
RB =0.3712 P
RA
B= RB' +
=
RB
0.3712 P+
0.535 P+
0.3712 P
0.248 P
, But P = 350KN
5.4 Shear Force Intermediate Points: Shear at other points will be found on the basis
of the same reaction coefficients as found for B.M. Thus for Class AA Tracked loading,
reaction coefficient for outer girder = 0.5536W and for inner girder = 0.3333W
1 1 1 5.755
+
700
2 2 2 9.355
1 1
+0.31 700
2 2
284 KN
1 5 5 8.09
+
700
2 8 8 11.69
1 1
+0.44 700
2 2
371 KN
1 3 3 10.432
+
700
2 4 4 14.032
1 1
+2.23 700
2 2
458 KN
ii)
cantilever portion.
Class A Loading:
0.875
1.05
47.5 0.875
+
0.925
2
DL/M run(KN)
C.G from
Moment(KN
edge of
-M)
cantilever(
Crash Barrier
( 0.5 1 1 24 )=12 KN
M)
1.5
Wearing Coat
0.525
0.924
Slab
0.775
5.80
18.00
25.00KN-M
Total
21.18KN
Design Bending Moment = 25 + 33.7 = 58.7KN-M
Design Shear Force
= 21.18 + 77 = 98.18KN
Check for depth (MB):
M
58.7 106
d provided=
=
=154.25 mm
Q b
1.513 1000
d provided=196 MM
d provided >d required
Provide 200MM overall depth using 40MM
d required =200408=152 MM
Area of steel required=
S v=
M
58.7 106
2
=
=1466 MM
st jd 200 0.89 225
1000 201
1466
S v =137 MM
Hence provide 16MM diameter bars at 100MM c/c
2.
7.05 KN / M M 2
4.
42.43
=14.15 KN /M M 2
3
KN /M
11.
10.8) = 15.12KN
Reaction,
1
R A =RB = ( 4 15.12+18.71 30.71 )
2
= 317.53KN
Bending Moment
Bending Moment at Mid Span
= (317.53 9.355 15.12(
-
3.742
)
2
[15.12(3.742+1.871)]
= 1513KN-M
Bending Moment at Quarter Span
15.12(30.71 5.613 5.613)/2
= [317.53
]
(3.74 +1.871 )
= 1271KN-M
Shear Force
Shear Force at support,
RC =317.53 KN
317.5315.12( 30.715.613 )
=131KN
317.5315.12( 30.717.02 )
=87KN
= 317.5315.1215.12( 30.71 9.355 )
=0KN
1513+1800=3313 KN M
1271+ 1746=3017 KN M
317.53+287=605 KN
131+ 279=410 KN
87+226=313 KN
173+0=173 KN
For beams, M30 concrete will be used and the Outer girder will be designed as T-beam
having a depth of rib = 1.725M
Total depth = 1.725 + 0.225 = 1.95M
Let us assume an effective depth = 1.725-0.120 = 1.605M
M
3313 106
2
A st =
=
=11467 M M
st j d 200 0.9 1605
A st =9651 M M 2 and
A st =1964 M M
Arrange these bars in 4 layers with spacing between bars equal to largest diameter bar used
i.e.32MM
Clear cover = 40MM
Height of C.G of bars from bottom of bars = (40+12+32X2)
= 148MM
d= 1725-148=1577MM <1605MM, hence ok
Depth of Neutral Axis: Flange width will be the least of the following
a. 12ds+ br = 12 x 225 + 400 = 3100MM
b. c/c spacing = 2500MM
c. Span/3 = 18.71/3 = 6236.66MM
Hence Flange width = B=2500MM
2. Let depth of Neutral axis be N lying in web
ds
n =m A st (d n)
B
ds
2
d
1577
=
=526 MM
st
200
1+
1+
10 10
m. cbc
Actual Neutral axis falls above the critical neutral axis therefore, the stress in the steel
2
reaches the Maximum value first hence st =200 N / M M
n
c= st
M (dn)
200
361
10 (1577361)
5.94 N / M M 2
Similarly,
c 1=
nD f
c
n
c 1=
361225
5.94
361
2
= 0.38 N / M M
y=
c +2 c1 Df
c+ c 1 3
y=
( )
( )
M r=3434.34 KN M<3313 KN M
Area of steel required
3017 106
Area of steel required=
=10,443 mm2
200 11467 1497.49
No. of 32MM diameter bars = 10443/305 = 12.9 13 bars
Check for local bond stress as per IRC code
Assume effective depth = 1950 - 60 = 1890MM
3
605 10
required=
0.9 1890
No. of 32 MM bars=
355.67
3.142 32
2.
173 10
Nominal Shear stress at support =
=0.25 K N /M M 2 , hence shear
400 1700
reinforcement is not necessary.
3.
313 103
=0.46 K N / M M 2 , hence provide shear
400 1700
reinforcement.
Approximate distance from support at which shear stress is 0.5 N / M M
= (9.455+7)=8.23M
Let us bend up 2 bars at a time at a spacing of 0.707a i.e. = 0.707x0.9x1605=1021.26MM
Bend 2 bars at a time, spacing = 1020MM
If 5 bars are bent up, effective distance = 5 x 1.020 = 5.1M from support
Shear taken up by 4bent bars of 32MM = 4 x 805 x 200 x Sin(45)
= 455KN
Net remaining shear at support for which shear reinforcement has to be provided
= 605-450=150KN
Spacing , S v =
Hence provide 10MM diameter at 180MM c/c at support i.e. up to 4.08M. After 4.08M only
2 bars will be effective.
3
At quarter span, remaining shear =410 10
455 10
2
182.5 kN
292.49 mm
Hence provide 2L-10MM diameter bars at 200MM c/c from 4.08M to 5.1M
Beyond 5.1M no bent up bars are available. Therefore, shear at 3/8 span
i.e.,
3
18.71=7.02=313 kN
8
170.54 mm
Therefore provide 2L 10MM diameter bars at 150MM c/c
From 7.02M to 8.02M Provide 2L 10MM diameter at 180MM c/c
For remaining distance provide 22L 10MM diameter at 300MM c/c
Summary:
Provide 10MM 2L diameter at 180MM c/c from support upto 4.08M
Provide 10MM 2L diameter at 200MM c/c from 4.08M to 5.1M
Provide 10MM 2L diameter at 180MM c/c from 5.1M to 7.02M
Provide 10MM 2L diameter at 180MM c/c from 7.02M to 8.02M
Provide 10MM 2L diameter at 180MM c/c for remaining length.
M =2596 10 6
A st =
2596 10
200 0.9 1605
8986 mm2
A st =9651 mm2
6
A st at quarter span=
2322 10
=8039 mm2
200 0.9 1605
620 103
=414
1 0.9 1665
414
=4.1
32
v at support=
v at centre=
v at
620 10
=1.24 N / MM 2 (Shear reinforcement needed)
300 1665
105 103
=0.21 N /MM 2
300 1605
3
223 103
span=
=0.46 N / MM 2 (However provide shear reinforcement)
8
300 1605
32 mm=455 KN
Sv=
Hence provide 10MM-2L bars at 180MM c/c from support up to 4 1.02=4.08 m from
support after 4.08M
At quarter span,
Sv=
300
455
=72.5 kN
2
5.9Design of cross-girder
Dead load
Cross girder are placed at 3.742M c/c
Dimension 3 1275
Weight of rib 0.3 1.275 m 24=9.18 kN /m
2
Dead weight from slab and wearing coat 7.05 kN /m
1
Dead load on each cross girder 2 2.5 1.25
2
3.125 7.05
22.1 kN
Assuming this to be uniformly distributed, dead load per meter run of girder
22.1
=8.84 kN /m
2.5
Live Load: Maximum bending Moment and shear force due to Class AATracked Loading
700 2.842
=498 KN
4
498
1.475=245 KN M
3
45.7319.61
= 26.12KN-M
Total Bending Moment = LL BM +DL BM
270+26.12=297 KN M
498
1.1=183 KN
3
Section Design:
Total depth = 1500MM, Effective Depth = 1440MM
498
=166 KN
3
A st =
297 10
=1146 MM 2
200 0.9 1440
2
Hence provide 3nos of 25MM Diameter bars, Provide A st =1473 MM
Shear Design:
Nominal Shear v =
v
bd
0.49 N / M M 2<
But
Sv=
max
214 103
300 1440
ok
N
,
= 0.34 M M 2 hence provide shear reinforcement.
278.5 200 1440
=211.28 MM
214 10 3
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION
The analysis and design of Deck slab and T-Beam of a Bridge has been carried out manually
as per IRC guidelines and the following results have been noted.
1. Live Load due to Class AA Wheeled Vehicle produces the severest effect.
2. Shear Force due to Class AA Wheeled Vehicle is very high.
3. Bending Moment in the Inner girder is lesser than the Outer girder hence lesser
reinforcement in inner girder when compared to outer girder.
4. The design of the deck slab and T- beam has been manually done keeping in view the
above results.
REFERENCES:
1) Indian Road congress, IRC: 6-2000, Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for
Road Bridges Section: II, Loads and Stresses, 4th revision.
2) Indian Road congress, IRC: 21-2000, Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for
Road Bridges Section: III, cement concrete (plain and reinforced), 3rd revision.
3) Dr. D. Johnson Victor, Essentials of Bridge Engineering, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
4) Dr. N. Krishna Raju, Design of Bridges ,Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd
5) Mr. T.R. Jagadeesh and M.A. Jayaram, Design of Bridge Structures, Prentice Hall of
India Pvt. Ltd.
6) RCC Designs(Reinforced Concrete Structures) by Dr. B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain,
Arun Kumar Jain, Tenth Edition, Laxmi Publications.