Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2
Q Cd B 2g H 2
3
Cd
3Q
2B 2g H 3 2
Q
(m3/s)
H3/2
(m3/2)
log H
log Q
Cd
139.67
7.16 x10-5
0.002
-1.854
-4.145
0.488
0.0350
5.00
x10-2
25.31
0.000395
1
0.007
-1.456
-3.403
0.681
0.0500
5.00
x10-2
15.06
6.64 x10-4
0.011
-1.301
-3.178
0.670
0.0590
5.00
x10-2
11.68
8.56 x10-4
0.014
-1.229
-3.067
0.674
0.0700
5.00
x10-2
8.89
1.12 x10-3
0.019
-1.155
-2.949
0.686
Average
:
0.640
H
(m)
Volume
(m3)
5.00x102
30
81
0.0140
Table 1
By formula:
Example one of calculation from above results:
As we know that Breath notch, B=30mm=0.03
When H=0.07m
Cd
3Q
3x(1.12x10 -3 )
2B 2g H 3 2
By graph:
Q against H3/2
log Q against log H
=0.686
Cd against H
Graph 1: Q vs H3/2
Exp 3A Graph 3 : Cd vs H
Graph 3: Cd vs H
Analysis from graph:
Cd
3Q
2B 2g H
3
32
2B 2g
Q
H3 2
=
kx
so
Q
H3 2
3
2B 2g
where k=
and
Q
slope of graph 3.1.1
H3 2
=0.0619
2
Q Cd B 2g H 2
3
2
2
3
B 2g H 3 2 logC d B 2 g log H
3
3
2
And
c=
2
B 2g
3
Graph 3
Log Q=1.711log H -0.954
2
B 2 g 0.954
3
2
c logC d
1.5 1.711
1.5
x100% 14.067%
Q Cd
2 g tan H 2
15
2
5
Cd
15Q
8 2g tan H 5 2
2
H
(m)
Volume
(m3)
Time
(sec)
Q
(m3/s)
0.020
0
5.00 x10-
119.8
8
8.34 x10-
0.024
0
5.00 x10-
1.64 x10-
0.032
0
5.00 x10-
2.81 x10-
0.035
0
5.00 x10-
4.07 x10-
0.036
0
5.00 x10-
4.28 x10-
61.12
35.64
24.54
23.39
Q2/5
H5/2
log H
log Q
Cd
0.02
3
5.657 x10-
-1.699
x10
-4.079
0.62
4
0.03
1
8.923 x10-
-3.786
0.77
6
0.03
8
1.832 x10-
-3.552
0.64
8
0.04
4
2.292 x10-
-3.390
0.75
3
0.04
5
2.459 x10-
-3.369
0.73
6
Average
:
0.70
7
Table 2
By formula:
Example one of calculation from above results:
As we know that Breath notch, B=30mm=0.03
and
When H=0.036m
90
-1.620
x10
-1.495
x10
-1.456
x10
-1.444
x10
15Q
Cd
8 2g tan H 5 2
2
15 x (4.28x10 -4 )
90
2.5
8 x 2 9.81 tan
(0.036)
2
=0.736
By graph:
Q against H5/2
log Q against log H
Cd against H
Graph 4: Q vs H5/2
f(x) = 1.76x - 0
Graph 5 : Q2/5 vs H
f(x) = 1.29x - 0
Cd
15Q
8 2g tan H 5 2
2
kx
So
8 2g tan
=
Q
H5 2
Q
H5 2
15
Where k=
And
15
8 2g tan
2
15
90
8 2 9.81 tan
2
Q
slope of graph 3.2.1
H5 2
=1.764
Q Cd
2 g tan H 2
15
2
Q2 5
Cd
2g tan
15
2
2
5
xH
y mxc
when c 0
m y x ; y Q 5 2 ; x H and m C d
2g tan
15
2
2
5
Cd
1.29 5 2 x15
0.7395
90
8 2 9.81 tan
2
Q Cd
2 g tan H 2
15
2
5
log Q log C d
8
5
2 g tan H 2 log C d
2 g tan log H
15
2
15
2 2
m=5/2
And
c=
log C d
2 g tan
15
2
From graph 6,
Log Q=2.652log H +0.456
c log C d
2 g tan 0.456
15
2
90
8
C d antilog 0.456 /
2 9.81 tan 1.2096
2
15
2.5 2.652
% error of experimental formula to theoretical formula=
2.5
x100% 6.08%
Conclusion
The smooth flow to and over the weir is essential to the determination of accurate rates off low since
the distribution of velocities on the approach flow has a definite influence on the discharge over the
weir. As the flow rate increases, the discharge coefficient becomes more accurate to the theoretical
value. When the flow rate is to low it clings to the notch and flows down it. This changes the
coefficient of discharge because now the water is not only being affected by gravity it is having to
resist viscosity and the friction of the surface of the notch. The limitations of the theory is it has to be
level so the only force on the water is gravity, there has to be a constant flow, and constant pressure.
The theory behind this experiment makes an assumption that there is a minimum height of water
above the notch and any heights below this start to deviate from theory at an increasing rate. The
relationship between the head of the weir and the discharge of the water over the weir is directly
proportional. The lower flow rates produce lower heights above the notch creating larger changes
from the theoretical equations