Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Table of Contents
1.1
1.2
1.3
a.
b.
Environmental protection.................................................................................. 5
c.
d.
e.
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
a.
b.
Lack of discrimination....................................................................................... 8
c.
d.
2.2
2.3
2.4 Assess the potential conflicts which may arise between the needs and
expectations of different stakeholders..................................................................11
3.1
a.
3.2
3.3
3.4
References................................................................................................................ 16
The ISO 26000 provides direction on how businesses and organizations can
function in a socially accountable manner. This indicates performance in an
ethical and clear manner that subsidizes to the health and safety of society.
b. Environmental protection
There are many rules and regulation regarding health and safety of human
being and animals in CSR. Occupational injuries and illness are related to
health, but they are also matters of business. Since they stalk from
workplace and work is a business actions. Economic perception on workrelated safety and health incorporates both reasons and penalties. Hence
there are special remarks on health and safety legislation in regulatory
framework of corporate social responsibilities.
d. Human rights legislation
countries and avoid funds to invest in host country as CSR activities. This
creates an issue both political and economical for the host country. Similarly
fair trade gives equal importance to economic, social, political and
environmental responsibilities. It depicts an importance of fair trade in all
developing countries CSR for various products. Businesses have no
acceptance of many global agreements because of their difference in
interests. Thus economically and politically it create issue for corporate
social responsibilities.
2.1
CSR is not only beneficial for the business but has also some benefits for the
employees as well. Following are few benefits for employees
7
Those companies where CSR is necessary give a fine working condition for
employees because they will take care of employees. Employers will always
provide such a condition for the work where employees do not suffer much
because it can create hurdle for the organization by violating international
framework of Corporate Social Responsibility.
b. Lack of discrimination
2.2
2.3
CSR policies are made in such a manner that has positive impact on business
performance. Employees will get their remunerations and salaries on time
and they will show commitment to their work and as a result the sales will
improve. The growth of the business will increase. Organizations will have
more profits due to increase in sales. Companies using corporate social
responsibility will decrease the conflict of interest between stakeholders
because the suppliers will have to increase its supply and the other
stakeholders will be in touch with the business. Those companies which are
related with CSR are having competitive edge in the industry because
without any promotion they will be in the mind of everyone.
2.4
Assess the potential conflicts which may arise between the needs
and expectations of different stakeholders
12
14
15
References
McWilliams, A. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility. Wiley Encyclopedia of
Management.
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social
responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of
Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105. Chicago
Lin, C. H., Yang, H. L., & Liou, D. Y. (2009). The impact of corporate social
responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan.Technology in
Society, 31(1), 56-63.
16
Palmatier, R. W., Gopalakrishna, S., & Houston, M. B. (2006). Returns on business-tobusiness relationship marketing investments: Strategies for leveraging profits. Marketing
Science, 25(5), 477-493.
Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level
measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247-261.
Spence, L. J. (2007). CSR and small business in a European policy context: the five C s
of CSR and small business research agenda 2007. Business and society review, 112(4),
533-552.
Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be
socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying
behavior. Journal of Consumer affairs, 35(1), 45-72.
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability:
Between agency and communion. Journal of business ethics,44(2-3), 95-105.
Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility?.Corporate
Governance: The international journal of business in society, 1(2), 16-22.
Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian companies report environmental news
objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully
by the Environmental Protection Authority.Accounting, auditing & accountability
journal, 9(2), 50-67.
Lee, K. H., & Shin, D. (2010). Consumers responses to CSR activities: The linkage
between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations Review, 36(2),
193-195.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral
management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons,34(4), 39-48.
17
Moon, J., Slager, R., Anastasiadis, S., Brunn, C., Hardi, P., & Knudsen, J. S. (2012).
Analysis of national and EU policies supporting CSR and impact.
18