Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EXECUTIVE SUMMERY
The topic is about Dumping & Anti-Dumping, where first I have written about dumping.
The Dumping is an international price discrimination in which an exporter firm sells a
portion of its output in a foreign market at a very low price and the remaining output at a
high price in the home market. There are some objectives of dumping which discriminate the
new trade relations, surplus commodity, and many more. The dumping has some effects
which effect s the import and export of country.
There are some advantages and dis-advantages for dumping. Dumping is not one there are
some types of dumping like prededatory, persistent, sporadic. The dumping is calculated as
the price is determined by some assumptions and conditions are there. Then there is
calculation of dumping, this is calculated by the marginal cost and by the duty assessment of
dumping.
The Anti-dumping can be fined as a protective device available to the states against
vicissitudes associated with the free trade. In the recent years a large number countries have
become frequent users of anti-dumping. There are also measures of anti-dumping. The antidumping has wto measures and agreements which is important for anti-dumping. The last is
subsides of anti-dumping which is benefited for the public which is paid by the government.
INTRODUCTION
DEFINATION
definition
of
dumping
according
to
GATT
is
The sale of products for export at a price less than the normal value where normal value
means roughly the price for which those same products are sold on the home or exporting
market. The concept of dumping seems fair because it is recognized that producers may
sell their goods in different markets at different prices and that prices of a goods are
influenced by several market forces and may vary at different times. It may be a perfectly
legitimized business activity like discounts offered by airlines to students or senior
citizens etc. There may not seem anything intrinsically unethical or illegal about
dumping.
MEANING
Dumping is an international price discrimination in which an exporter firm sells a portion of its
output in a foreign market at a very low price and the remaining output at a high price in the
home market Haberler defines dumping as: The sale of goods abroad at a price which is lower
3
OVERVIEW
Economics Of Global Trade &
Finance
OBJECTIVE OF DUMPING
ETN
wpS
Tsl
dnS
op
R
aIs
uC
ym
m
d
ETN
exS
wal
TsS
or
a
eol
RIs
edC
o
as
ymo
m
o
i
o x
a
i
l
e
fl
n
t u
s
p e
r
p
n
n l
on
u i
a
u r
ed
n u
if
d
o
l u
o
t t
t
o
t
l
r
r i
d
t
EFFECTS OF DUMPING
Dumping affects both the importer and exporter countries in the following ways:
Effects on Importing Country
7
ADVANTAGES OF DUMPING
Unfairly
The main advantage of dumping is being able to sell at unfairly competitive lower price.
Generally a country will have to give the exporting businesses a huge subsidy to enable
them to sell the export below cost. The country is willing to take a loss on the product to
increase its comparable advantage in that industry
Attack
It may do this because it wants to create jobs for its residents. It often uses dumping as an
attack on the other country's industry, in the hopes of putting that country's producers out
of business, and dominating that industry.
DISADVANTAGES OF DUMPING
very expensive
The main disadvantage of dumping is that it's very expensive to maintain. It can take
years for dumping to work. Meanwhile, the cost of subsidies can add to the export
country's sovereign debt.
Trade partner
10
PS
rpe
dos
as
ode
ycny
D
u
m
p
n
g
TYPES OF DUMPING
P PS
e rp
r eo
s dr
i aa
s td
t oi
e rc
n yD
t Du
D um
u mp
m pi
p in
i ng
n
g
i
t
r
t
r
ri
t
Sporadic Dumping
It is adopted under exceptional or unforeseen circumstances when the domestic
production of the commodity is more than the target or there are unsold stocks of the
commodity even after sales. In such a situation, the producer sells the unsold stocks at a
low price in the foreign market without reducing the domestic price. This is possible only
if the foreign demand for his commodity is elastic and the producer is a monopolist in the
domestic market. His aim may be to identify his commodity in a new market or to
establish himself in a foreign market to drive out a competitor from a foreign market. In
11
Persistent Dumping
When a monopolist continuously sells a portion of his commodity at a high price in the
domestic market and the remaining output at a low price in the foreign market, it is called
persistent dumping. This is possible only if the domestic demand for that commodity is
less elastic and the foreign demand is highly elastic. When costs fall continuously along
with increasing production, the producer does not lower the price of the product more in
the domestic market because the home demand is less elastic. However, he keeps a low
price in the foreign market because the demand is highly elastic there. Thus, he earns
more profit by selling more quantity of the commodity in the foreign market. As a result,
the domestic consumers also benefit from it because the price they are required to pay is
less than in the absence of dumping.
Predatory Dumping
The predatory dumping is one in which a monopolist firm sells its commodity at a very
low price or at a loss in the foreign market in order to drive out some competitors. But
when the competition ends, it raises the price of the commodity m the foreign market.
Thus, the firm covers loss and if the demand in the foreign market is less elastic, its profit
may be more.
12
NED
Vxu
ipm
eop
nri
tn
Pg
r
i
c
e
e
o
p
g
t
x
13
t
k
i
t
14
15
In Figure
ARH = Average revenue in home market
MRH = marginal revenue in home market
ARW = MRW = Foreign market demand curve
PH = Price in home market (monopoly price)
PW = Price in world market (competitive price)
In Figure an assumption is taken that there are two markets that is domestic market (home
market) and foreign market (world market) faced by an organization. In domestic market, the
organization enjoys monopoly, whereas in foreign market, the organization faces perfect
competition. Monopolist is in equilibrium when profits are maximum that is when MR=MC.
16
17
PRICE DETERMINATION
UNDER DUMPING
Under dumping, the price is determined just like discriminating monopoly. The only difference
between the two is that under discriminating monopoly both markets are domestic while under
18
Conditions
The main aim of the monopolist is to maximize his profit. He, therefore, produces that
output at which his marginal revenue equals marginal cost. Since he sells his commodity
in the domestic market and the foreign market separately, he adjusts the quantity such
wise in each market that marginal revenues in both markets are equal.
Given the marginal cost of producing the commodity, the most profitable monopoly
output will be determined at a point where the combined marginal revenue of both the
markets equals the marginal cost. In other words, dumping profit = MRH + MRF = MC.
The elasticitys of demand must be different in the two markets. The demand should be
less elastic in the domestic market and perfectly elastic in the foreign market. As a result,
the monopolist sells his commodity at a low price in the foreign market and at a high
price in the domestic market. Thus, the price and MR are related to each other by this
equation: MR = p (=AR) (1 1/E), where e refers to the elasticity of demand.
The foreign market should be perfectly competitive and the domestic market is
monopolistic
The buyers in the domestic market cannot buy the cheap commodity from the foreign
market and bring it in the domestic market.
Explanation
19
The foreign market demand curve faced by the monopolist is the horizontal line PD F which is
also the MR curve because the foreign market is assumed to be perfectly elastic. The demand
curve in the home market with a less elastic demand for the product is the downward sloping
curve DH and its corresponding marginal revenue curve is MRH. The lateral summation of
MRH and PDF curves leads to the formation of TREDF as the combined marginal revenue curve.
In order to determine the quantity of the commodity produced by the monopolist, we take the
marginal cost curve MC. E is the equilibrium point where the MC curve equals the combined
marginal revenue curve TREDF. Thus OF output will be produced for sale in the two markets.
Since FE is the marginal cost, equilibrium in the domestic market will be established at point R
where the marginal cost FE equals the MRH curve (FE = HR).
20
21
HISTORICAL DUMPING
COUNTRY WISE
Dumping by Germany
There is general agreement that before 1914, export dumping was more widespread and more
systematically practiced in Germany than any other country. The resort to export dumping by
Germany seems to have been facilitated by the high tariffs and by the complete organization
of large scale industry into cartels or industrial selling and buying combinations. These two
factors monitored price competition in the domestic market. Cartels monitored price
competition from outside Germany and the combinations monitored the German producers
themselves. In concert, they made it possible for many of the cartels to adopt as a definite
price policy the maintenance of domestic prices at the foreign level plus the full amount of
the German import duties and the sale for exports at best prices obtainable, even if these
should be substantially below domestic prices. It is obvious that systematic and continued
dumping is not likely to arise if the dumping concern must share the higher domestic prices
with the competitors and must bear by itself the cost of the export dumping.
The cartel method in Germany provided the machinery whereby, without the loss of
individuality of the separate concerns, the benefits and burdens of export dumping could be
equitably distributed among the domestic producers. The effects of the protective tariff were
such that foreign competitors were prevented from sharing in the high domestic prices
resulting from the price fixing activities of the cartels. However, export dumping by German
industries and especially by the iron and steel trade began in the nineteenth century, long
before the establishment of cartels. Since 1914, writers have always made the charge hostile
22
23
C
c
a
n
O
D
m
n
M
r
s
INR
vsu
oap
er
mo
r
md
tp
m
g
u
t
n
h i n
rl e
ex
r
s
u
i
i
ad
d
i
li
fw
i p
b t
e
e
n
a
d p u
e u
m
f
nu
n
r
s
g
a
g
24
transactions.
Refund or reimbursement
The Agreement requires Members to collect duties on a non-discriminatory basis on imports
from all sources found to be dumped and causing injury, except with respect to sources from
which a price undertaking has been accepted. Moreover, the amount of the duty collected
may not exceed the dumping margin, although it may be a lesser amount. The Agreement
specifies two mechanisms to ensure that excessive duties are not collected. The choice of
mechanism depends on the nature of the duty collection process. If a Member allows
importation and collects an estimated anti-dumping duty, and only later calculates the
specific amount of anti-dumping duty to be paid, the Agreement requires that the final
determination of the amount must take place as soon as possible, upon request for a final
assessment. In both cases, the Agreement provides that the final decision of the authorities
25
any
refund
should
be
made
within
90 days.
New shippers
The Agreement makes provision for the assessment of anti-dumping duties on exports from
producers or exporters who were not sources of imports considered during the period of
investigation. In this circumstance, the investigating authorities are required to conduct an
expedited review to determine a specific margin of dumping attributable to the exports of
such a new shipper. While that review is in progress, the authorities may request
guarantees or withhold appraisement on imports, but may not actually collect anti-dumping
duties on those imports.
26
DEFINATION
Anti-dumping is a measure to rectify the situation arising out of the dumping of goods &
its trade distortive effects. Thus the purpose of anti-dumping duty is to rectify the trade
distortive effects of dumping & re-establish fair trade
A protectionist tariff that a domestic government imposes on foreign imports that it
believes are priced below fair market value. In the United States, anti-dumping duties are
imposed by the Department of Commerce and often exceed 100%. They come into play
when a foreign company is selling an item significantly below the price at which it is
being produced. The logic behind anti-dumping duties is to save domestic jobs, although
critics argue that this leads to higher prices for domestic consumers and reduces the
competitiveness
27
of
domestic
companies
producing
similar
goods
MEANING
Anti-dumping can be fined as a protective device available to the states against vicissitudes
associated with the free trade. In the recent years a large number countries have become
frequent users of anti-dumping. Many of the heaviest anti-dumping users are countries who
did not even have an anti- dumping statute a decade ago.
The traditional users continue to make use of these measures with more vigour by targeting
new users. Anti-Dumping duties were introduced by the developed countries to protect their
industries against the low priced imports. Developing countries supported the inclusion of the
provision relating to anti-dumping duties under GATT because they wanted to levy of antidumping duties to be under international regulation. Anti-dumping measures are not only
legal but they are also flexible in usage. Further, anti-dumping duties can be presented not
only as protection but also as an encounter against unfair competition.
If a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it normally charges on its own
home market, it is said to be dumping the product. Is this unfair competition? Opinions
differ, but many governments take action against dumping in order to defend their domestic
industries. The WTO agreement does not pass judgment. Its focus is on how governments
can or cannot react to dumping it disciplines anti-dumping actions, and it is often called
the Anti-Dumping Agreement. (This focus only on the reaction to dumping contrasts with
the approach of the Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement.)
28
TIV
oam
lrp
uio
rnf
tf
aDQE
umr
ytob
Eyta
xar
pg
oo
r
t
R
e
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
MEASURES OF ANTI-DUMPING
Tariff Duty
To stop dumping, the importing country imposes tariff on the dumped commodity
consequently, the price of the importing commodity increases and the fear of dumping
29
Import Embargo
Import embargo is an important retaliatory measure against dumping. According to this,
the imports of certain or all types of goods from the dumping country are banned.
30
ANTI-DUMPING
IN
INDIA:
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
The principle of imposition of anti-dumping duties was propounded by the Article VI of
General Agreement on Tariffs & Trade (GATT) 1994 Uruguay Round
Indian legislation in this regard is contained in Section 9A and 9B (as amended in 1995)
of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975
Further regulations are contained in the Anti-Dumping Rules [Customs Tariff
31
ANTI-DUMPING
IN
INDIA:
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Anti-dumping, anti-subsidies & countervailing measures in India are administered by the
Directorate General of Anti-dumping and Allied Duties (DGAD) functioning in the
Department of Commerce in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry and the same is
headed by the Designated Authority. The Central Government may, by notification in
the Official Gazette, appoint a person not below the rank of a Joint Secretary to the
Government of India or such other person as that Government may think fit as the
Designated Authority. In India, there is a single authority DGAD designated to initiate
necessary action for investigations and subsequent imposition of anti-dumping duties.
The Designated Authority is a quasi-judicial authority notified under the Customs Act,
1962. A senior level Joint Secretary and Director, four investigating officers and four
costing officers assist the DGAD. Besides, there is a section under the DGAD headed by
the Section-Officer to deal with the monitoring and coordination of die functioning of the
DGAD.
The Designated Authoritys function, however, is only to conduct die anti-dumping/anti
subsidy & countervailing duty investigation and make recommendation to the
Government for imposition of anti-dumping or anti subsidy measures. Such duty is
finally imposed/ levied by a Notification of the Ministry of Finance. Thus, while the
Department of Commerce recommends the Anti-dumping duty, it is the Ministry of
Finance, which levies such duty.
The law provides that an order of determination of existence, degree and effect of
dumping is appealable before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal
32
33
WTO
AND
ANTI-DUMPING
AGREEMENT
Though the WTO rules normally discourage protectionist policies, they do permit and
accommodate anti-dumping measures to provide temporary relief to domestic industry against
dumping by foreign firms. Many trade economists view anti-dumping as the most pernicious
WTO-sanctioned instrument of protection available to countries currently. The best explanation
for its existence is that developed countries have chosen not to give it up. Lately, however,
developing countries have also become frequent users of this instrument.
The WTO provisions on anti-dumping are contained in GATT Article VI and the Uruguay Round
Agreement on Anti-dumping (formally, Agreement on Implementation of Article VI). The latter
builds on the Tokyo Round Anti-dumping Agreement, which had been signed by developed
countries only. The UR Agreement revises the Tokyo Agreement in some areas while adding
precision in others.
The Agreement on Anti-dumping introduces specific provisions relating to the methodology of
establishing the existence of dumping and injury. For example, the United States and European
Community had for years compared the prices charged in Individual export transactions with the
average home market price to establish dumping. This practice biased the outcome in favor of a
positive finding. The Agreement on Anti-dumping now requires that export prices be compared
on either "average-to-average" or "transaction-to-transaction" basis. As a result, the US has
adopted the average-to-average comparisons in majority of the cases.
34
SUBSIDIES
This agreement does two things: it disciplines the use of subsidies, and it regulates the
actions countries can take to counter the effects of subsidies. It says a country can use the
WTOs dispute settlement procedure to seek the withdrawal of the subsidy or the removal of
its adverse effects. Or the country can launch its own investigation and ultimately charge
extra duty (known as countervailing duty) on subsidized imports that are found to be
hurting domestic producers.
The agreement contains a definition of subsidy. It also introduces the concept of a specific
subsidy i.e. a subsidy available only to an enterprise, industry, group of enterprises, or
group of industries in the country (or state, etc) that gives the subsidy. The disciplines set out
in the agreement only apply to specific subsidies. They can be domestic or export subsidies.
The agreement defines two categories of subsidies: prohibited and actionable. It originally
contained a third category: non-actionable subsidies. This category existed for five years,
ending on 31 December 1999, and was not extended. The agreement applies to agricultural
goods as well as industrial products, except when the subsidies are exempt under the
Agriculture Agreements peace clause, due to expire at the end of 2003.
Prohibited subsidies
Subsidies that require recipients to meet certain export targets, or to use domestic goods
instead of imported goods. They are prohibited because they are specifically designed to
distort international trade, and are therefore likely to hurt other countries trade. They can
be challenged in the WTO dispute settlement procedure where they are handled under an
accelerated timetable. If the dispute settlement procedure confirms that the subsidy is
35
Actionable subsidies
In this category the complaining country has to show that the subsidy has an adverse
effect on its interests. Otherwise the subsidy is permitted. The agreement defines three
types of damage they can cause. One countrys subsidies can hurt a domestic industry in
an importing country. They can hurt rival exporters from another country when the two
compete in third markets. And domestic subsidies in one country can hurt exporters
trying to compete in the subsidizing countrys domestic market. If the Dispute Settlement
Body rules that the subsidy does have an adverse effect, the subsidy must be withdrawn
or its adverse effect must be removed. Again, if domestic producers are hurt by imports of
subsidized products, countervailing duty can be imposed.
Some of the disciplines are similar to those of the Anti-Dumping Agreement.
Countervailing duty (the parallel of anti-dumping duty) can only be charged after the
importing country has conducted a detailed investigation similar to that required for antidumping action. There are detailed rules for deciding whether a product is being
subsidized (not always an easy calculation), criteria for determining whether imports of
subsidized products are hurting (causing injury to) domestic industry, procedures for
initiating and conducting investigations, and rules on the implementation and duration
(normally five years) of countervailing measures. The subsidized exporter can also agree
to raise its export prices as an alternative to its exports being charged countervailing duty.
36
CONCULSION
Dumping is price discrimination between two markets in which the monopolist sells a
portion of his produced product at a low price and the remaining part at a high price in
the domestic market Dumping is an international price discrimination in which an
exporter firm sells a portion of its output in a foreign market at a very low price and the
remaining output at a high price in the home market
The sale of goods abroad at a price which is lower than the selling price of the same
goods at the same time and in the same circumstances at home, taking account of
differences in transport costs
The use of anti-dumping measures as a trade protection tool has increased phenomenally
during the last decade. One significant aspect of this new trend is the increasing
involvement of developing countries. India is one such country which has emerged as a
frequent
user
of
anti-dumping
measures.
However, safeguarding competition in domestic industry is not the only purpose that antidumping laws serve and in the present situation, they are acting as barriers for free trade
and domestic producers are concerned about avoiding competition
Critics of anti-dumping duties though find it difficult to prove the fact that the imposition
of anti-dumping duties results in economic benefits to the domestic industry. The role of
the government in tackling the problem of anti-dumping should be to protect the smaller
industries rather than concentrating on the major industries. This is because; it is these
small scale industries which suffer the most as a result of imposition of anti-dumping
duties.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
WWW.SlideShare.com
WWW.Wikipidia.com
37
38