Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1: Country/Economy Profiles
Egypt 115
Key Indicators, 2015
th
/ 138
Source: International Monetary Fund; World Economic Outlook Database (April 2016)
88.4
Population (millions)
330.8
3740.2
0.92
Performance overview
Rank / 138 Score (1-7) Trend
116 / 140
115 / 138
117
3.8
Score
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.7
3.7
87
3.6
96
3.4
89
5.5
100
3.7
112
3.3
112
4.0
135
3.2
111
3.4
99
3.3
25
5.0
111
3.2
85
3.7
122
2.7
1st pillar:
Institutions
12th pillar:
Innovation
11th pillar:
Business
sophistication
2nd pillar:
Infrastructure
7
6
5
3rd pillar:
Macroeconomic
environment
4
3
2
10th pillar:
Market size
4th pillar:
Health and primary
education
9th pillar:
Technological
readiness
8th pillar:
Financial market
development
Egypt
Egypt remains stable at 115th position this year. To create growth and
employment, Egypt could build on its large market size (25th); its business
sector, which by some accounts appears more sophisticated than those of
neighboring countries (85th); and its geographical proximity to the large
European market. To do so, Egypt needs to step up its reform eorts and
address the major rigidities that plague its goods, labor, and nancial
markets, on which the country ranks 112th, 135th, and 111th, respectively.
2016-17
119 / 144
2015-16
118 / 148
2014-15
107 / 144
2.7
2013-14
Rank
134
2012-13
3.7
Edition
115
5th pillar:
Higher education
and training
7th pillar:
Labor market
eciency
6th pillar:
Goods market
eciency
Other priorities include higher education and training (112th), which is below
the performance of peer economies, particularly in terms of quality (134th);
as well as the overall security situation (133rd), which remains fragile and
imposes signicant cost for business. Support for reform eorts comes from
the recent drop in oil prices that could open up the scal space to
consolidate the public budget by reducing energy subsidies, which make up
a signicant part of the public spending.
Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey 2015
21.0
12.5
10.2
8.4
7.7
5.5
5.4
5.4
4.3
4.1
3.9
3.2
3.1
2.7
1.7
0.9
score
0
12
18
24
Note: From the list of factors, respondents to the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select the ve most problematic factors for doing business in their country and to
rank them between 1 (most problematic) and 5. The score corresponds to the responses weighted according to their rankings.
Egypt
Rank / 138
Value
87
3.6
100
124
67
84
64
47
28
122
63
81
72
97
135
124
119
114
77
84
131
83
101
3.9
3.2
3.5
2.8
4.1
4.5
4.1
2.2
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.7
2.7
2.9
3.7
3.3
3.8
4.3
3.9
3.9
4.5
96
3.4
108
107
73
58
52
41
102
82
95
3.1
3.0
2.6
4.3
4.8
590.1
3.5
111.0
7.4
134
2.7
132
121
130
117
98
-11.7
10.9
11.0
87.7
89
5.5
N/Appl.
1
38
16
1
1
91
93
134
28
P.R.
6.8
15.0
6.7
0.1
6.9
20.3
71.1
2.1
98.0
112
3.3
85
81
135
130
138
133
136
137
86.1
31.7
2.1
2.6
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.7
Trend
Rank / 138
Value
112
4.0
127
103
78
84
96
76
48
130
100
126
125
114
80
120
55
116
4.2
3.3
3.6
3.4
45.0
7
8.0
2.9
4.0
13.6
3.4
3.8
3.8
24.7
4.9
2.8
135
3.2
96
72
61
129
104
125
133
104
103
133
4.1
5.0
3.9
36.9
3.4
3.2
3.1
2.9
2.7
0.31
111
3.4
54
72
58
136
98
70
105
108
4.5
3.8
3.8
1.9
2.5
4.8
3.7
2
99
3.3
117
121
71
96
87
105
72
3.9
3.8
4.4
35.9
4.5
11.3
50.7
25
5.0
19
49
23
132
5.1
5.0
1047.9
11.2
85
3.7
64
106
32
89
72
116
105
121
34
4.5
3.8
4.3
3.2
3.7
3.0
3.2
3.8
4.2
122
2.7
135
128
133
137
72
46
74
3.1
2.6
2.4
2.4
3.2
4.3
0.8
Trend
Note: Values are on a 1-to-7 scale unless indicated otherwise. Trend lines depict evolution in values since the 2012-2013 edition (or earliest edition available). For detailed denitions,
sources, and periods, consult the interactive Country/Economy Proles and Rankings at http://gcr.weforum.org/