This drainage structure was designed to accomodate the following stringent design constraints. A. 100 year water surface in the proposed RWCD Floodway. B. Provide outlet for proposed 72" RCP carrying 3002 cfs. The tailwater from the RWCD Floodway was taken into account in the backwater computations. The box size itself was influenced by the need to service the proposed 72" RCP. The design could have reflected a shallower depth with a subsequent widening of the box width, but this would have rendered the proposed 72" RCP ineffective. Several computations were performed to determine a realistic flow for the 72" RCP. It was determined that the 72" RCP could carry only about 220 cfs if the hydraulic gradeline was limited to the height of the edge of the pavement.
2.
THE 10' TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL:
Like the 8' X 6 ' box culvert, the channel was influenced by the need to accomodate a 100 year tailwater in the RWCD Channel. The design flow for this channel is 500 cfs, 300 cfs crossing Apache Boulevard and 200 cfs entering the channel from the south side of Apache Boulevard. The channel was sized to minimize the tailwater for the 8' X 6 ' R.C.B.C. while providing an adequate bottom width to allow access for maintenance within an existing 30' easement. The 200 cfs entering the trapezoidal channel from the south side of Apache Boulevard will outlet to the channel via a rip-rap transition apron with a 4 . 7 to 1 slope. This apron should be traversable by truck for maintenance access.
3.
SPILLWAY DESIGN: At the intersection of Apache Boulevard and Higley Road, design requirements dictated terminating 730 cfs into the channel. This was accomplished by rep1acing about 342' of the existing curb and sidewalk with ribbon curb and sidewalk and sloping the ground from the gutter down to the channel at a 3% slope. Computations show that a depth of about 0 . 5 5 5 is required to convey the design flow of 730 cfs. None of the 730 cfs will inundate Apache Boulevard.
SUMMARY OF HYDRAULIC DESIGN
ADOT MCFCD Page 2
4. HIGLEY ROAD 72" RCP:
This design size was established by the size of the 72" RCP proposed by the City of Mesa. The City design presently terminates north of Apache Boulevard and this segment would continue from that terminal point across the intersection, to the downstream RWCD wingwall of the box culverts. However, because of present ground level at the downstream end of the culverts we suggest that this section of the 72" RCP crossing the ApacheHigley intersection be bulkheaded until final joining with the Higley Road 72" RCP. 5.
APACHE-HIGLEY BOX CULVERT:
At this crossing of the RWCD channel, the Soil Conservation Service provided this firm with the following parameters: A. Design flow of 1900 cfs. B. Intersection alignment. C. 5 - 10' X 7' R.C.B.C. These parameters were central to the overall site layout. Inlet and outlet structures were designed to minimize expansion and contraction losses while meeting the channel inverts as set in the channel design.
N09n IiE'fH A k A A k l ~ ; t k A ~ A A_--___ A A A A ; C . ;-t A f . t k ; i . t- f-A -; t- ~-l -A A_A j- t A_.A--_._ A A A ._-; C A_._ t_ _;_t_A. _._t. _l. _A k _______ fAAA;CAAA;iA~,il~t~;f;i,if;i~~~~~.;r,t~~~k~k.if~~~~~A~j,~;t~~~~~~~~~i;t.if;ir~.fAA~~~~~;f
---------
.0003;'2
.f
.---
-.-.
- --- ----
--.
0.00
i0780.00
0.01
40.939
--Tm?---40.370
3.59
2.901
0.00
.OC0190
- -
- .---- -
. .
. --.
--.
.-..
.3.3037+3
.- .
--
..
.9QO35s . .. -. -
6-08 -.-.
4?,3:.4 -.
-- -__
63- -6-. 4-..--
.-
4-1 . 4 7-3.
-.
____
19D0.0 .
.--
2.69 -- . . -
O.il2
..
41.585
- -
..-
.----
-.
m-7 z;'br;.c.1 m-?Iz~.,
- -
.-
4.25"
--- - - .
-__
-_..
--
0.00 -.
-..-.
--
3-.-53
- 9
4.555
--.--
--- ---Z.$Q
----
.-- -
--
90.QrJ __.-
3.:(! .
.. .
-.
..
- .. - . .. .,.,>:-;
-.:-;-" . -
90.00
3.30
0.00
qc.00
3.0C:
9,OC)
- w e e - . -.'
- ,
5-39
C.
---
.---
--- 3. . 5 3 '
-.
.------
2.338 ._...-..--
--
--- ..__- . -- --+"%p-----
Gr G + - - . 9 - ; , * .
2 7zc
C.il.3
--
r$-rJ---7~,m-.-Q
___-.--L?O.OC
9.50
2 . Y "
-**--t./i+ -------
_-
-.-0009'27-- -0-R" g - .--.--.
"
^ 7 ,-,
Y .
-3-30
4 . :.a2 --.-'------
---.-
0 . Y .
-.-...---_.-
oe ---- . . - - . - - - - . - .
--.. -
4%436--
-.---
...-----.-
Z.Q,2
41.253
-ex-
---
--- -- . -
/37+03,85
0.90
9-22
----
3.00
8?.00
-------.-
-.
s-
G R E I N E R E N G INEESi ING
W A T E R S U R F A C E P R S F I L E PkOGRAH VERSION 03.01
INPUT F I L E : P A Z I l f i . D A T
PAGE
m m m
!L!
"c.r,
It:
TRIAL NO -. 1 I
'2
... , I
Afrfr"5 -HAC+t.-t%eWWAA?
my !.
.:
m:.
-.
A r t 100 Y E A R
01-2s-86 STRiIC)N
"I
- _ _ _
.--
--
---
--
-~- -
!. CEAD - - -.VE
VEi.
fl
W.5.
.-. . 1CI,
.bII
I , L-..
t-
__---
.r l t ~ - : :
INC;E.;tT
-- - -_
11..b/.
E?+ts:zy
HCTi
f2
P~f C ~ ; I T ~ ~ A L ELEi: 1:E .=' 1 ?;
--
ZL
EASE,'
:,C
Ai:E.7:'5
C. r3 r c 7 782 E: j r ~ ERZ.EL. ELEV uL EzA !:I K g E YEP -----..-.--. ---- ----..--. - . ---- .---__ .----. .-. LIELEE SO SF AL'E HF N O R ? DE.Ci."( Z3 i i ~ A A l ~ ~ A ~ A t ~ A ~ ~ A i ; h ; t A A A ~ A A A f c ~ A A A , t ? t ~ ; i A ~ ; t A ~ A A A ~ A I t A A A l A ~ ~ ~ ~ t f c A ? t ~ ~ A ~ ~ A ; C ~ ; ~ A A ; i A ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ k i r . j , A A i r A r C IC't ; ~ ; i r j , ~
A ,
..- ----
A* Pl?ELIk!IHARY G E A D E FCR M O D . NC. 3 ------------
'
. I
---
fie3E5X'34fTtHt ?Ef - k t T E R ? t + ? T M 3-
-.
DATE : 25-3AK-S6 -
U A T E R S U R E A C E P R O F I L E L IS? ING 13:
