Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
V.
Respondent
Sheriff of Los Angeles County represented by Aaron Mitchell Fontana
Lawrence Beach Allen &Choi PC
100 West Broadway Suite 1200
Glendale, CA 91210
818−545−1925
Fax: 818−545−1937
Email: afontana@lbaclaw.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Respondent
Judge David P Yaffe represented by Kevin M McCormick
Hon. David P. Jaffe Benton Orr Duval &Buckingham
39 North California Street
P O Box 1178
Ventura, CA 93002−1178
805−648−5111
Email: kmccormick@bentonorr.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Respondent
Superior Court of California, County represented by Kevin M McCormick
of Los Angeles (See above for address)
Superior Couirt of Califoria, County of LEAD ATTORNEY
Los Angeles ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Intervenor Defendant
Del Rey Shores Joint Venture represented by Joshua Lee Rosen
Joshua L Rosen Law Offices
5905 Sherbourne Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90056
310−649−0063
Case: 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW As of: 03/25/2010 03:48 AM PDT 2 of 7
Fax: 310−410−7227
Email: jrosenlaw@ca.rr.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Intervenor Defendant
Del Rey Shores Joint Venture North represented by Joshua Lee Rosen
(See above for address)
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
(Entered: 07/06/2009)
07/01/2009 34 PETITION for Certificate of Appealability to USDC by petitioner Richard I. Fine;
Filed as Notice of Appeal to 9th CCA from district court judgment, 31 filed
06/29/2009. cc: Richard I. Fine; Attorney General. (car) Modified on 7/6/2009
(car). (Entered: 07/06/2009)
07/09/2009 35 REQUEST Under FRCP Rules 60(b)(2), (4) and (6) to Recuse Magistrate Judge
Woehrle for Bias for Failure to Disclose That She Was a Criminal Defense
Attorney Prior to Becoming a Magistrate Judge, and is Subject to Malpractice
Claims if She Rules that It is a Denial of Due Process for L.A. Superior Court
Judges to Take Payments From L.A. County When She Did Not Raise Such Issue
on Behalf of Her Own Clients When They Were Prosecuted by the L.A. County
District Attorney filed by petitioner Richard I. Fine. (pcl) (Entered: 07/10/2009)
07/09/2009 36 REQUEST UNDER FRCP Rules 60(b)(2),(4) and (6) to Recuse Judge Walter for
Bias for Failure to Disclose That He Was a Criminal Defense Attorney Prior to
Becoming a Judge, and is subject to Malpractice Claims If He Rules That It Is A
Denial of Due Process for L.A. Superior Court Judges to Take Payments from L.A.
County When He Did Not Raise Such Issue Of Behalf of His Own Clients When
They Were Prosecuted by the L.A. County District Attorney filed by petitioner
Richard I. Fine. (pcl) (Entered: 07/10/2009)
07/09/2009 37 STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD − EX PARTE APPLICATION Under FRCP
Rule 60(b)(6) to Release Petitioner From Jail Pending Decision From Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals filed by petitioner Richard I. Fine.(pcl) Modified on 7/21/2009
(dt). (Entered: 07/10/2009)
07/10/2009 38 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 09−56073, 9th
CCA regarding Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 as to petitioner Richard
I. Fine. (lra) (Entered: 07/13/2009)
07/13/2009 39 REFERRAL OF MOTION to Disqualify Judge/Magistrate Judge has been filed.
Pursuant to GO 08.05 and Local Rule 72−5 REQUEST for Recusal of Judge
Walter 36 is referred to Judge George H. King for determination. (rn) (Entered:
07/13/2009)
07/13/2009 40 REFERRAL OF MOTION to Disqualify Judge/Magistrate Judge has been filed.
Pursuant to GO 08.05 and Local Rule 72−5 REQUEST for Recusal of Magistrate
Judge Carla Woehrle 35 is referred to Judge George H. King for determination.
(rn) (Entered: 07/13/2009)
07/15/2009 43 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE In Support Of Recusals Of Magistrate Judge
Whoehrle And Judge Walter filed by petitioner Richard I. Fine. (pcl) (Entered:
07/20/2009)
07/16/2009 41 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge George H. King: Proceedings: Order Re:
Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Judge Woehrle 35 . Petitioner has raised no
sufficient basis for disqualifying Judge Woehrle under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a).
Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion is hereby DENIED. (mg) (Entered: 07/17/2009)
07/16/2009 42 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge George H. King: Proceedings: Order Re:
Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Judge Walter 36 . Petitioner has raised no
sufficient basis for disqualifying Judge Walter under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a).
Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion is hereby DENIED. (mg) (Entered: 07/17/2009)
07/17/2009 44 Order by Judge John F. Walter The Certificate of Appealability is DENIED for the
following reason(s): There has been no substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 . (lr) Modified on
7/21/2009 (lr). (Entered: 07/21/2009)
07/21/2009 45 CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA re Petition for Certificate of
Appealability 34 filed by Richard I. Fine ; Court of Appeals Case Number:
09−56073; Transcripts: None Requested. (lr) (Entered: 07/21/2009)
07/21/2009 46 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle: the documents listed below were
improperly filed for the following reasons: Application does not state claim
amounting to claim for relief from judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P, Rul 60(b)(6).
Case: 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW As of: 03/25/2010 03:48 AM PDT 6 of 7
Petitioner could move for release under Fed.R.App.P.Rule 23(b), in either district
court or appeals court, but has not stated claim under Rule 23(b) so as to justify
construing this application as a Rule 23(b) motion.; therefore, the following
document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the
Court: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for to Release Petition From Jail
Pending Discion From 9CCA 37 . (dt) (Entered: 07/21/2009)
07/21/2009 47 (DUPLICATE) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle: striking 37 Ex Parte
Application for Order (dt) (Entered: 07/21/2009)
07/21/2009 48 Order by Judge John F. Walter DENYING Request for Certificate of
Appealability. (se) (Entered: 07/23/2009)
08/12/2009 49 APPEAL FEE PAID: re Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 as to Petitioner
Richard I. Fine; Receipt Number: 121320, Paid in the amount of $455. (lr)
(Entered: 08/12/2009)
08/26/2009 50 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 filed by
Richard I. Fine, CCA # 09−56073. Appellant's motion for reconsideration of this
court's order denying his request for immediate release pending appeal is denied.
Order received in this district on 8/26/09. (lr) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
09/03/2009 51 Request that the entire Record be sent to Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals re Petition
for Certificate of Appealability, 34 . (dmap) (Entered: 09/04/2009)
09/15/2009 52 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 filed by
Richard I. Fine, CCA # 09−56073. Appellant's second motion for immediate
release is denied. No further motions for immediate relese pending appeal shall be
filed or entertained. No motions for reconsideration, modification, or clarification
of this order shall be filed or entertained. The opening brief has been filed; the
answering brief is due October 9, 2009; and the optional reply brief is due within
14 days after service of the answering brief. Order received in this district on
9/15/09. (lr) (Entered: 09/16/2009)
12/09/2009 53 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 filed by
Richard I. Fine, CCA # 09−56073. Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration of
Denial of Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandate is DENIED. Order received in
this district on 12/09/09. (lr) (Entered: 12/09/2009)
12/11/2009 54 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 filed by
Richard I. Fine, CCA # 09−56073. Dr. Daniel Gottlieb's motion for amicus curiae
status and submission of an amicus curiae brief is DENIED. Order received in this
district on 12/11/09. (lr) (Entered: 12/11/2009)
12/15/2009 55 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 filed by
Richard I. Fine, CCA # 09−56073. Appellant's Motion to Reconsider Clerk's
Denial of Requests for Judicial Notice is DENIED. As to the request for judicial
notice of California Government Code 68220 − 68222, however, we note that the
request is denied only because is unncessary to request judicial notice of a statue.
The panel will consult the parties' cited legal authorities in its consideration of this
appeal. Order received in this district on 12/15/09. (lr) (Entered: 12/16/2009)
12/24/2009 56 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 filed by
Richard I. Fine, CCA # 09−56073. Appellant's Request for Judicial Notice of
Monterey County Judges' Public Statements is DENIED. Order received in this
district on 12/24/09. (lr) (Entered: 12/30/2009)
02/10/2010 57 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 filed by
Richard I. Fine, CCA # 09−56073. The order received in this district on 2/10/2010.
The petitions for rehearing en banc are denied. No further motions shall be
entertained in this appeal. (lra) (Entered: 02/10/2010)
02/12/2010 58 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 filed by
Richard I. Fine, CCA # 09−56073. Order received in this district on 2/12/10.
Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Judges and to Void the Memorandum Disposition
and Other Orders is DENIED. (cbr) (Entered: 02/16/2010)
Case: 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW As of: 03/25/2010 03:48 AM PDT 7 of 7
02/18/2010 59 MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability 34 , CCA
# 09−56073. The Decision of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Mandate received
in this district on 2/18/2010. (lr) (Entered: 02/23/2010)