Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DOI 10.1617/s11527-014-0268-9
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 9 August 2013 / Accepted: 7 February 2014 / Published online: 19 February 2014
RILEM 2014
Abstract The environmental impact from the production of cement has prompted research into the
development of concretes using 100 % replacement
materials activated by alkali solutions. This paper
reports the assessment of a number of key durability
parameters for geopolymer concrete made from fly ash
activated with sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide.
Properties investigated have included workability,
compressive strength, water sorptivity, carbonation,
chloride diffusion and rapid chloride permeability.
Microstructure studies have been conducted using
T. K. Molyneaux
e-mail: tom.molyneaux@rmit.edu.au
I. Patnaikuni
e-mail: indu.patnaikuni@rmit.edu.au
1 Introduction
A. Wardhono
e-mail: arie.wardhono@rmit.edu.au
A. A. Adam
Department of Civil Engineering, Tadulako University,
Palu, Indonesia
e-mail: adam.arham@gmail.com
A. Wardhono
Department of Civil Engineering, State University of
Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
722
Percentage
SiO2
49.45
Al2O3
29.61
Fe2O3
CaO
10.72
3.47
MgO
1.3
K2O
0.54
Na2O
0.31
TiO2
1.76
P2O5
0.53
Mn2O3
0.17
SO3
0.27
LOI
1.45
723
Aggregate (kg)
Activator (kg)
Sand
(7 mm)
(10 mm)
Na2SiO3 (liquid)
NaOH (10 M)
w/b
G7.5-0.75
1,050
1,728
763
1,528
198
209
88
0.34
G7.5-1.00
1,030
1,728
763
1,528
262
165
84
0.32
G7.5-1.25
1,016
1,728
763
1,528
324
123
79
0.32
724
Fig. 1 Schematic of
accelerated carbonation
chamber
The microstructure was observed using SEM imaging employing both secondary and backscatter electron
detectors. To prepare the samples for SEM analysis the
specimens were cut using a diamond saw to a size of
24 mm in height and 510 mm in diameter. The
samples were subsequently gold coated for imaging.
Samples were mounted on the SEM sample stage with
conductive, double-sided carbon tape. A total of 3
samples were investigated for each mix.
725
2.5
2.0
7 days
28 days
90 days
G7.5-0.75
39.1 3.5
44.4 3.4
46.1 2.1
G7.5-1.00
51.3 5.2
53.3 2.6
53.6 5.5
G7.5-1.25
52.5 4.6
56.9 3.3
57.3 2.0
i (mm3/mm2)
Mix
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0
10
1/2
15
20
1/2
(min )
Sorptivity parameters
56 days
Si (mm/min1/2)
90 days
R
Si (mm/min1/2)
G7.5-0.75
0.101
0.996
0.101
0.997
G7.5-1
0.078
0.996
0.075
0.998
G7.5-1.25
0.071
0.997
0.066
0.998
726
Cs (%)
Da 9 10-11 m2/s
G7.5-0.75
0.16
3.1
G7.5-1
0.17
3.1
G7.5-1.25
0.14
3.7
The geopolymer specimens display a similar diffusion coefficient for all activator moduli. The diffusion
coefficients of the FA geopolymer concretes are
comparable with those for OP and blended cement
concretes, indeed being in the lower range of values
reported in the literature [13, 17]. This data would
indicate a high level of resistance to chloride ingress
for geopolymer concretes. However, one factor that
should be taken into account when considering long
term performance is that OP and to a greater extent
blended cement concretes show a reduction in the
chloride diffusion coefficient with time. This is
represented as the maturity factor, m [13]. This
improved performance is attributed to on going
hydration of the concrete with time. For geopolymer
concrete, which is produced by heat curing, little if any
further reaction will take place, illustrated by a
minimal increase in compressive strength with time
when compared to OP and blended cement concretes
cured at ambient temperatures. Hence, it may be
expected that little improvement in the diffusion
coefficient will occur over time when compared with
OP and blended cement concretes. This would mean
that the chloride diffusion coefficient after 20 years
would be similar to that observed in these tests. Thus at
20 years the diffusion coefficients for geopolymer
concretes may be higher than those for OP and blended
cement concretes.
RCPT were undertaken on the geopolymer specimens. However, rapid heating of the specimens was
observed, Table 6, with all specimens reaching 60 C
before the conclusion of the test. The flow of electric
current through a conductor generates heat which will
in turn increase the mobility of the ions that carry the
current, which will itself raise the total current flow
producing more heat in a cyclic process. Given the
rapid rises in temperature observed it can no longer be
assumed that Ohms law (V = IR) applies, which is
the basic principle of the RCPT method. Hence the
RCPT is assessed as not giving data which can be used
Solution temperature C
Duration (Min)
Initial
Final
G7.5-0.75
26.1
60
60
G7.5-1
25.1
60
200
G7.5-1.25
22.4
60
270
727
Fly
ash
(kg)
Fine
sand
(kg)
Activator (kg)
Na2SiO3
(liquid)
NaOH
(15 M)
G7.5-0.75
0.523
1.440
0.128
0.101
G7.5-1.0
0.522
1.431
0.124
0.133
0.064
G7.5-1.25
0.521
1.438
0.167
0.046
0.108
Added
water
(kg)
0.082
G15-1
0.505
1.388
0.193
0.148
0.046
G15-1.25
0.500
1.376
0.255
0.117
0.033
G15-1.5
0.496
1.364
0.316
0.087
0.020
pH
0 days
3 days
7 days
28 days
G7.5-0.75
11.86
11.88
11.01
10.88
G7.5-1.0
11.94
11.91
11.35
10.46
G7.5-1.25
11.73
11.71
11.39
10.73
G15-1
11.96
11.97
11.50
11.05
G15-1.25
11.99
11.88
11.50
11.00
G15-1.5
11.97
11.98
11.77
11.23
728
4 Conclusions
There is a significant increase in strength from the
MS = 0.75 to the MS = 1.0 and 1.25 concrete which
is attributed to an increase in the dissolution of the FA
grains and a resultant increase in the reaction rate.
Minimal variation in strength is observed between the
MS = 1.0 and 1.25 concretes and little increase in
strength is observed for any of the geopolymer
concretes with time, which is attributed to the heat
curing.
The geopolymer concretes display a non-linearity
in the sorptivity data in the initial stages compared to
OP and blended cement concretes. This non linearity
is hypothesized as being due to an increased bleeding
in geopolymer concretes giving a cement rich surface
layer allowing higher initial absorption. The sorptivity
values of the geopolymer concretes are comparable to
729
References
1. AASHTO (2005a) Standard method of test for resistance of
concrete to chloride ion penetration, T259. American
Association of State Highway Transport Officials, Washington DC
730
2. AASHTO (2005b) Standard method of test for rapid
determination of the chloride permeability of concrete
T277. American Association of State Highway Transport
Officials, Washington DC
3. Adam AA, Patnaikuni I, Law DW, Molyneaux TCK (2007)
Strength of mortar containing activated slag and fly ash. In:
Proceedings of the 23rd biennial conference of the Concrete
Institute of Australia. Adelaide, Australia, pp 353358
4. AS (1998) Supplementary cementitious materials for use
with portland and blended cementfly ash. AS 3582.11998, Standards Australia
5. AS (2000) Methods for sampling and testing aggregates
particle density and water absorption of fine aggregate. AS
1141.5-2000, Standards Australia
6. AS (1993) Methods of testing concreteSampling of fresh
concrete. AS 1012.1-1993, Standards Australia
7. ASTM (2004) Standard test method for measurement of rate
of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes.
ASTM C1585-04. ASTM, West Conshohocken
8. ASTM (2004) Standard test method for electrical indication
of concretes ability to resist chloride ion penetration.
C1202-10, ASTM, West Conshohocken
9. Bakharev T, Sanjayan JG, Cheng Y-B (1999) Alkali activation of Australian slag cements. Cem Concr Res 29(1):
113120
10. Bakharev T (2005) Geopolymeric materials prepared using
class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem Concr
Res 35(6):12241232
11. Bakharev T (2005) Resistance of geopolymer materials to
acid attack. Cem Concr Res 32(3):658670
12. Bakharev T (2005) Durability of geopolymer materials in
sodium and magnesium sulphate solutions. Cem Concr Res
35(6):12331246
13. Bamforth P, Pocock D (2000) Design for durability of
reinforced concrete exposed to chlorides. Workshop on
structures with a service life of 100 years or more, 6th
international conference on deterioration and repair of
reinforced concrete in the Arabian Gulf, Bahrain
14. Barbosa VFF, MacKenzie KJD, Thaumaturgo C (2000)
Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate
polymers. Int J Inorg Mater 2(4):309317
15. Bernal SA, Provis JL, Brice DG, Kilcullen A, Duxon D, van
Deventer JSJ (2012) Accelerated carbonation testing of
alkali-activated binders significantly underestimates service
life: the role of pore solution chemistry. Cem Concr Res
42(10):13171326
16. Broomfield JP (2007) Corrosion of steel in concrete, 2nd
edn. Taylor and Francis, London and New York
17. Cairns JJ, Law D W (2003) Prediction of the ultimate state
of degradation of reinforced concrete structures. In: Proceedings of the integrated lifetime engineering of buildings
and civil infrastructures, Kuopio, Finland
18. Crank J (1975) The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn.
Clarendon Press, Oxford
19. Davidovits J (1994) Properties of geopolymer cements. In:
Proceedings of the first international conference on alkaline
cements and concretes. Kiev State Technical University,
Kiev, Ukraine, pp 131149
20. Davidovits J (2005) Geopolymer chemistry and sustainable
development. The poly(sialate) trminology: a very useful
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
731
47.
48.
49.
50.