Input-Costs, Capacities, Demands

Demand Region Production and Transportation Cost per 1.000.000 units

Supply Region
N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
Africa
Demand

N. America
81
117
102
115
142
12

S. America

Europe

92
77
105
125
100
8

Asia
101
108
95
90
103
14

Africa
130
98
119
59
105
16

115
100
111
74
71
7

Decision Variables
Supply Region
N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
Africa
Constraints
Supply Region
N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
Africa
Unmet Demand

Demand Region - Production Allocation 1.000 units

N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
Africa
0
0
0
0
12
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
16
0
0
10
0

0
0
0
0
7

Excess Capacity
0
0
0
0
3
N. America
S. America
Europe
0
0

Objective Function
Cost =

23751

Asia
0

Africa
0

Fixed
Low
Fixed
High
Cost ($)
Capacity Cost ($)
Capacity
6000
10
9000
20
4500
10
6750
20
6500
10
9750
20
4100
10
6150
20
4000
10
6000
20

Plants
(1=open)

Plants
(1=open)
0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
1
1

Sources/
Markets
Buffalo
Sources Memphis
St. Louis
Atlanta
Boston
Markets Jacksonville
Philadelphia
New York

Facility Location
X=
Y=
Cost=
Cost=

681.3
882.0

1265235.39212

$/Ton Mile
Tons
Fn
Dn
0.90
0.95
0.85
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50

Xn
500
300
700
225
150
250
175
300

Coordinates
Yn
dn
700
1200
250
600
225
825
600
500
1050
1200
800
300
925
975
1000
1080

319
515
460
391
487
594
261
375

Inputs-Costs, Capacities, Demand (or TelecomOptic)

Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Demand

Demand City Production and Transportation Cost per 1000 Units

Atlanta
Boston
Chicago Denver
Omaha
Portland
1675
400
685
1630
1160
2800
1460
1940
970
100
495
1200
1925
2400
1425
500
950
800
380
1355
543
1045
665
2321
922
1646
700
508
311
1797
10
8
14
6
7
11

Decision Variables
Demand City-Production Allocation (1000
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago Denver
Baltimore
0
8
2
Cheyenne
0
0
0
Salt Lake
0
0
0
Memphis
10
0
12
Wichita
0
0
0
Constraints
Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita

Units)
Omaha
0
6
0
0
0

Portland
0
7
0
0
0

0
11
0
0
0

Excess Capacity
8
0
0
0
0
Atlanta

Unmet Demand
Objective Function
Cost=

Boston
0

47401

Chicago
0

Denver
0

Omaha
0

Portland
0

Fixed Cost ($)

Capacity

7650
3500
5000
4100
2200

Plants
(1=open)
1
1
0
1
0

18
24
27
22
31

Tujuan:

Ingin mengtahui apakah kedua perusahaan

TelcomOne
Kapasitas
71000
Demand
32000
HighOptic
Kapasitas
71000
Demand
32000

ah kedua perusahaan akan digabung (dimerger) atau dijalankan sendiri-sndiri (diliat dari Production Cost, Inv

Production Cost, Inventory, Transportation cost) dan ingin tau mau buka pabrik dmana saja

Inputs-Costs, Capacities, Demand (or TelecomOptic)

Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Demand

Demand City Production and Transportation Cost per 1000 Units

Atlanta
Boston
Chicago Denver
Omaha
Portland
1675
400
685
1630
1160
2800
1460
1940
970
100
495
1200
1925
2400
1425
500
950
800
380
1355
543
1045
665
2321
922
1646
700
508
311
1797
10
8
14
6
7
11

Decision Variables
Demand City-Production Allocation (1000
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago Denver
Baltimore
0
8
2
Cheyenne
0
0
0
Salt Lake
0
0
0
Memphis
10
0
12
Wichita
0
0
0
Constraints
Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita

Units)
Omaha
0
6
0
0
0

Portland
0
7
0
0
0

0
11
0
0
0

Excess Capacity
8
0
0
0
0
Atlanta

Unmet Demand

Kalo Digabung

Boston
0

Objective Function
Cost=
47401

Chicago
0

Denver
0

Omaha
0

Portland
0

Kalo Sendiri - Sendiri

Fixed Cost ($)

Capacity

7650
3500
5000
4100
2200

18
24
27
22
31

Atlanta
0
0
0
3800
0

Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita

Total

Plants
(1=open)

Supply City
1
1
0
1
0

Fixed Cost ($)

Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Total
Objective Function
Cost=

7650
3500
5000
4100
2200
22450

54601

Kesimpulan:
Karena cost jika digabung lebih kecil daripada

alo Sendiri - Sendiri

Boston
3200
0
0
0
0
Total

Chicago
1370
0
0
6516
0

Denver
0
600
0
0
0

Omaha
Portland
0
0
3465
13200
0
0
0
0
0
0
32151

g lebih kecil daripada sendiri sendiri (47401 < 54601), jadi mending digabung ajah .. Kay??

ah .. Kay??