Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Correlation
Statistics
I don't
make me cry understand
statistics
3
I have little
experience of
computers
1.000
.677
-.043
-.318
.233
.677
1.000
.040
-.517
-.030
-.043
.040
1.000
-.278
.233
-.318
-.517
-.278
1.000
.173
.233
-.030
.233
.173
1.000
.358
.517
.438
-.438
.640
-.359
.014
-.192
.192
.196
.224
.296
.224
-.224
-.252
-.008
.030
-.233
.640
-.034
-.178
.267
-.472
-.190
-.014
.004
.292
-.307
-.160
-.827
.558
.219
-.141
.141
.773
I don't understand
statistics
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
a. Determinant = .000
b. This matrix is not positive definite.
Correlation Matrixa,b
8
I can't sleep
for the
thought of
Eigen values
10
My friends are
better at
SPSS than I
am
I weep openly
at the mention
of Central
Tendency
11
12
.358
-.359
.224
-.008
-.178
.004
.558
.517
.014
.296
.030
.267
.292
.219
.438
-.192
.224
-.233
-.472
-.307
-.141
-.438
.192
-.224
.640
-.190
-.160
.141
.640
.196
-.252
-.034
-.014
-.827
.773
1.000
.394
-.179
-.414
.227
-.514
.558
.394
1.000
-.607
-.196
.543
-.239
.198
-.179
-.607
1.000
.454
0.000
.463
-.328
-.414
-.196
.454
1.000
.055
.302
-.028
.227
.543
0.000
.055
1.000
.230
.022
-.514
-.239
.463
.302
.230
1.000
-.673
.558
.198
-.328
-.028
.022
-.673
1.000
Table 01
Pair of Question Co-efficient
1
1&3
0.043
2
1&5
0.233
3
1&8
0.224
4
1&9
0.008
5
1&10
0.178
6
1&11
0.004
7
2&3
0.04
8
2&5
0.03
9
2&7
0.014
10
2&9
0.03
11
2&12
0.219
12
3&5
0.233
13
3&7
0.192
14
3&8
0.224
15
3&9
0.233
16
3&12
0.141
17
4&5
0.173
18
4&7
0.192
19
4&8
0.224
20
4&10
0.19
21
4&11
0.16
22
4&12
0.141
23
5&7
0.196
24
5&9
0.034
25
5&10
0.014
26
5&11
0.827
27
5&12
0.773
28
6&8
0.179
29
6&10
0.227
30
7&9
0.196
31
7&11
0.239
32
7&12
0.198
33
8&10
0
34
9&10
0.055
35
9&12
0.028
36
10&11
0.23
37
10&12
0.022
Note: 2 are higher than 0.75 and
35 are less than 0.25
Table 02
Pair of Question Qn. Dropped New Determinant
1
1&3
1
4.97E-08
2
1&3
3
1.99E-07
3
1&5
5
0
4
1&8
8
9.98E-09
5
1&9
9
4.05E-07
6
1&10
10
1.88E-05
7
1&11
11
2.98E-08
8
2&3
2
6.40E-08
9
2&7
7
1.14E-08
10
2&12
12
0
11
4&5
4
1.12E-07
12
6&8
6
5.66E-05
Note: Q05 & Q12 have highest determinant 0.0001,
but Q12 has more missing values, hence Q12 shall
be dropped.
After dropping Q12, the analysis did not report KMO
value and significance value because the sample size
is too low.
Correlation
I have never
been good at
mathematics
Computers
I can't sleep
I have never SPSS always
I have little
are useful
for the
been good at crashes when
Statistics
experience of
only for
thought of
mathematics I try to use it make me cry computers playing games Eigen values
1.000
-.438
-.318
-.278
.173
-.224
SPSS always
crashes when
I try to use it
-.438
1.000
.358
.438
.640
-.179
Statistics
make me cry
-.318
.358
1.000
-.043
.233
.224
I have little
experience of
computers
-.278
.438
-.043
1.000
.233
.224
Computers
are useful
only for
playing games
.173
.640
.233
.233
1.000
-.252
I can't sleep
for the
thought of
Eigen values
-.224
-.179
.224
.224
-.252
1.000
My friends are
better at
SPSS than I
am
.640
-.414
-.008
-.233
-.034
.454
I weep openly
at the mention
of Central
Tendency
-.190
.227
-.178
-.472
-.014
0.000
People try to
tell you that
SPSS makes
statistics
easier to
understand
-.160
-.514
.004
-.307
-.827
.463
I don't
understand
statistics
-.517
.517
.677
.040
-.030
.296
I slip into a
coma
whenever I
see an
equation
.192
.394
-.359
-.192
.196
-.607
a. Determinant = .000
b. This matrix is not positive definite.
ation Matrixa,b
People try to
tell you that
My friends are I weep openly SPSS makes
better at
at the mention
statistics
I don't
SPSS than I
of Central
easier to
understand
am
Tendency
understand
statistics
.640
-.190
-.160
-.517
I slip into a
coma
whenever I
see an
equation
.192
-.414
.227
-.514
.517
.394
-.008
-.178
.004
.677
-.359
-.233
-.472
-.307
.040
-.192
-.034
-.014
-.827
-.030
.196
.454
0.000
.463
.296
-.607
1.000
.055
.302
.030
-.196
.055
1.000
.230
.267
.543
.302
.230
1.000
.292
-.239
.030
.267
.292
1.000
.014
-.196
.543
-.239
.014
1.000
Communalities
Question
1 Statistics make me cry
Initial
1.000
Extraction
.711
1.000
.651
1.000
.914
1.000
.709
1.000
.904
1.000
.809
1.000
.911
1.000
.885
1.000
.852
1.000
.937
1.000
.953
3 games
4 values
5
6 Tendency
7
8 I don't understand statistics
9 equation
10
11
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Total
% of Variance Cumulative %
3.059
27.813
27.813
Total
% of Variance Cumulative %
3.059
27.813
27.813
2.656
24.143
51.956
2.656
24.143
51.956
2.024
18.397
70.353
2.024
18.397
70.353
1.496
13.602
83.955
1.496
13.602
83.955
.958
8.712
92.667
.554
5.035
97.702
.119
1.084
98.785
.097
.883
99.669
.028
.252
99.920
10
.009
.080
100.000
11
1.237E-17
1.124E-16
100.000
Component Matrixa
Component
1
.417
.391
.263
-.599
-.265
.741
-.182
-.258
.515
-.479
.629
-.215
.193
-.588
-.086
-.082
.737
.055
.001
.884
.154
-.771
.389
.379
-.148
.190
.798
.364
.281
.446
-.484
.646
.031
-.297
-.741
-.196
.512
.904
.313
.137
.136
6 Tendency
7
8 I don't understand statistics
I slip into a coma whenever I see an
9 equation
11
4
-.109
4 values
10
3
.695
3 games
2
.207
Table 03
Structuring of Questionnaire
Factor 1: Myths about Computers/SPSS
1 Computers are useful only for playing games
2 People try to tell you that SPSS makes statistics easier to understand
3 SPSS always crashes when I try to use it
Factor 2: Aptitude for Statistics
4 Statistics make me cry
5 I can't sleep for the thought of Eigen values
6 I don't understand statistics
7 I have never been good at mathematics
Factor 3: Aptitude for Computers/Mathematics
8 I have little experience of computers
9 I weep openly at the mention of Central Tendency
10 I slip into a coma whenever I see an equation
Factor 4: Self-esteem/Confidence
11 My friends are better at SPSS than I am