Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Wildcards 15
Conclusion: Renewed Normal Creates
Business Opportunities
17
Executive Summary
The global economy is finally beginning to stabilize following the Global Financial Crisis
and Great Recession. Our base case outlook for average annual real growth between 2014 and
2020 is between 3 and 4 percent.
We expect emerging economies to continue to grow by more than 4 percent (contributing
$6.5 trillion to global growth through 2020), while the growth rate of advanced economies
is forecast to exceed 2 percent (contributing $6.6 trillion through 2020) for the first time since
2010. The United States is leading the recovery among advanced markets, and we expect that
it will be a significant contributor to global growth through 2020.
However, we anticipate economic performance will diverge within both the emerging and
developed market groupings in 2014 based on key policy choices, as governments grapple
with structural reforms in the context of reduced fiscal and monetary stimulus.
We expect the next wave of global growth to come from seven key emerging markets. We
call these countries the 2020Seven, consisting of China, Chile, Malaysia, Peru, Poland,
the Philippines, and Mexico. In addition, a variety of strong-performing and high-potential
Sub-Saharan Africa markets will begin to contribute more to the global economy.
Despite this benign base case medium-term global outlook, there are several significant
risksboth economic and politicalthat could derail sustained global economic growth.
Among them are unintended consequences of tapering by the U.S. Federal Reserve, instability
in emerging markets, weakness in the eurozone, deflation in developed markets, a hard
landing in China, natural resource supply shocks, and geopolitical flare-ups.
Figure 1
Global growth will stabilize
Real annual GDP growth rate
%
Historical growth
Oxford Economics
IMF
EIU
Forecast
4
3
2
1
0
1
2
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014f 2015f 2016f 2017f 2018f 2019f 2020f
Note: Historical growth is an unweighted average of the three sources GDP data.
Sources: Oxford Economics, IMF World Economic Outlook (April 2014), IMF World Economic Outlook Update (July 2014), EIU; A.T.Kearney analysis
Economist Intelligence Unit, EIU Country Data; International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, April 2014; International
Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Update, July 2014; Oxford Economics, Global Economic Databank
Oxford Economics, Global Economic Databank, accessed on 5 August 2014
World Trade Organization, Modest Trade Growth Anticipated for 2014 and 2015 following Two-Year Slump, press release no. 721,
14 April 2014
Further complicating the global economic outlook is the fact that the drivers of global economic
growth are shifting again, as the world enters a new era after a decade of instability (see figure 2).
In The Great Bubble from 2003 to 2007, advanced economies powered global growth while
the emerging economies also grew strongly. This growth was fueled partly by a massive asset
bubble in the United States and parts of Europe, and as a result global imbalances between
creditor and indebted nations grew to unsustainable levels. The excesses and imbalances of
The Great Bubble led to the Global Financial Crisis of 20082009 and a new global growth model,
Emerging Emergence, which lasted until 2013. During this period, emerging markets decoupled
and continued to grow without support from advanced economies. Emerging markets drove the
global economy as the advanced economies shrank or stagnated. Global growth was supported
in part by unsustainable fiscal stimulus in China and elsewhere, and by the U.S. Federal Reserves
unprecedented monetary easing. As of 2014, were entering a new phase of Growth with
Divergence. Across advanced economies, growth rates are stabilizing in positive territory, while
emerging markets growth rates are slowing and converging with the advanced economies at
lower levels. Advanced economiesled by the United Stateswill again surpass emerging markets
in absolute contribution to global GDP. But in all economies, success will be tied increasingly to
structural reforms that unlock underlying growth potential. This marks a return to reality in which
country-level fundamentals and policy choices will increasingly trump macro-level trends.
Figure 2
Advanced economies will increase their contribution to world economic growth
GDP growth
$ trillion
Emerging economies
Emerging Emergence
Forecast
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.7
1.1
0.6
1.6
0.6
1.8
1.8
0.8
0.9
0.7
1.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
0.7
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.2
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.1
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.5
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
1.4
0.7
0.8
Renewed normal
1.3
1.0
1.5
Advanced economies
1.1
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Notes: GDP is based on constant dollars at market exchange rates. Numbers may not resolve due to rounding.
Sources: Oxford Economics; A.T.Kearney analysis
In the United States, the economic outlook is stronger than it has been in years, bolstered by
financial sector stability, private sector growth, and rising demand. Despite some lingering
signs of weakness, U.S. economic stability has increased thanks to stronger financial markets
increasing the provision of credit, the wealth effect from greater stability in the housing market,
and improved worker mobility. Private sector activity is also much stronger as companies
Beyond the Crisis: Sustained Global Economic Growth?
increase their level of fixed investment and begin to employ more workers. Private sector
employment surpassed its precrisis peak for the first time in March, reaching 116 million jobs.4
Aggregate demand is rising as a result of both these stronger employment numbers and the
steady repair of household balance sheets as debts accumulated prior to the Global Financial
Crisis have been paid off. The reduced level of federal government fiscal consolidation and
greater fiscal policy stability is also providing a boost to U.S. economic growth. Finally, the
shale energy revolution has played a central role in jump-starting the economic recovery.
Domestic oil production leapt 44 percent between 2008 and 2013.5 This increased U.S. oil
and gas production has positive ramifications throughout the economy by reducing the cost
of domestic energy and thus improving the competitiveness of U.S. firms, and by generating
new opportunities and employment in petrochemical processing industries.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey,
accessed on 5 August 2014
Economist Intelligence Unit, EIU Country Data, accessed on 19 August 2014. All GDP numbers used throughout the rest of this section
are drawn from the same source.
Across emerging markets, growth through 2020 will be lower and more divergent than in the
Emerging Emergence period. In the near term, GDP growth in emerging economies is projected
to drop slightly, with expected growth of about 5.0 percent per year through 2020, compared
to 5.3 percent per year in the period between 2008 and 2013. This slowdown is primarily driven
by China, where the EIU forecasts that growth will moderate from an average of 9 percent annually
in 20082013 to somewhat more than 6 percent through 2020. Even with the slowdown in China,
the highest regional growth rates through 2020 will be in East and South Asia, followed by
Sub-Saharan Africa. Although growth will slow in emerging markets, it is important to note that
their growth outlook still outpaces that of advanced economies, so emerging markets will
continue to increase as a share of the global economy (see figure 3). As more emerging markets
achieve middle-income status, their global economic and political clout will rise accordingly.
Figure 3
Shifting leaders of global economic output
Leading segment
Year
Advanced economies
2000
35%
65%
Advanced economies
2010
45%
55%
Emerging economies
2020f
53%
47%
China will continue to lead the BRICs in economic growth rates through 2016, but India could
pull ahead of the pack closer to 2020 (see figure 4 on page 7). However, all of the BRIC
economies will increasingly face significant cyclical and structural constraints to growth.
Chinas constraints are primarily structural, due to an economy that is imbalanced both domestically and internationally. A critical medium-term uncertainty is Chinas ability to reduce its
reliance on investment for growth and achieve the soft landing it seeks by rebalancing its
economy toward consumer-driven growth. India faces both cyclical and structural constraints.
Its economy was hit hard by the U.S. Federal Reserves tapering talk in 2013, as growth slowed,
inflation rose, and the currency depreciated. At the same time, Indias economy has structural
inefficiencies due to protectionist policies and poor infrastructure. However, Indias economic
growth could be unleashed by newly elected Prime Minister Narendra Modis proposed reform
agenda. Cyclical forces associated with lower oil prices and geopolitical tensions are damaging
Russias economic prospects in the near term. Russia also has several structural weaknesses,
Figure 4
Economic growth in the BRICs
Real annual GDP growth rate
%
Brazil
China
India
Russia
Forecast
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2
4
6
8
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014f
2015f
2016f
2017f
2018f
2019f
2020f
including an aging population, politicized enforcement of business regulations, and an overreliance on the oil and gas sector. Brazil has similarly been hurt by the cyclical factor of falling
commodity prices. Its decline in economic growthfrom an average of 3.1 percent in 20082013
to just 2.3 percent expected in 20142020has been exacerbated by structural factors, including
poor infrastructure and burdensome business and taxation regulations.
All of these challenges demonstrate the growing extent to which policy choices will determine
the economic trajectories of the BRICs. In fact, structural reforms will be critical in determining
the growth outlook for a broader set of both advanced and emerging economies. Advanced
economies face the challenge of enacting policies that address underlying competitiveness
issues including long-term debt, education, innovation, inequality, aging, and unresolved
postcrisis institutional weaknessparticularly in the eurozone. Many emerging markets
continue to be under near-term stress from U.S. monetary tapering, the structural limits of their
growth models, or both. Emerging-market governments must begin to implement reforms in
labor markets, rules governing FDI, education, infrastructure, and other areas in order to attract
both domestic and foreign investment and drive more balanced consumption-driven growth.
The 2020Seven
In order to determine which emerging markets are likely to drive investment opportunities and
growth between 2014 and 2020, the A.T. Kearney Global Business Policy Council (GBPC) analyzed
the 25 largest emerging marketsas measured by the size of the economy, population, and per
capita GDP at purchasing power parityacross eight key factors (see figure 5). This analysis goes
beyond simply comparing GDP and related economic forecasts, which have a tendency to be
volatile, to include structural factors that position markets to withstand unforeseen economic
shocks and foster longer-term economic growth and stability. Most of the factors are economic,
including the current size of the economy, expected economic performance, economic resilience (arising from the availability of financial resources), and the risk of economic or financial
imbalances. The Council also analyzed two policy factors: how regulations and governance
affect economic activity, and the status of needed structural economic reforms. Finally, the
Council analyzed two additional factors that are important facilitators of economic growth and
business opportunity: the size and quality of the labor force, and the quality of the countrys
infrastructure. From this comprehensive analysis, seven markets emerge as the likely drivers
of growth in the next few years. These are the 2020Seven growth markets.
Figure 5
The 2020Seven growth markets
Scores
Size of
economy
Very low
Low
Economic
Economic
performance resilience
Moderate
Economic
imbalances
High
Very high
Labor
force
Infrastructure
Regulations
and
governance
Reform
status
Growth
market
China
Chile
Malaysia
Peru
Poland
Philippines
Mexico
Colombia
Turkey
India
Vietnam
Indonesia
Bangladesh
Nigeria
Thailand
Brazil
South Africa
Hungary
Russia
Argentina
Algeria
Pakistan
Iran
Egypt
Venezuela
Sources: EIU, IMF, World Bank, World Economic Forum, United Nations; A.T.Kearney analysis
Despite the risks associated with rebalancing, China remains an important growth market. With
1.4 billion people, China is the most populous country in the worldproviding both a large labor
force and a huge consumer market. The World Bank predicts that China will overtake the United
States this year as the largest economy in the world in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms.7
Adding to its consumer market gravitas, Chinas GDP per capita in PPP terms has risen rapidly
in recent years, from $5,040 in 2005 to $11,940 in 2013and the EIU projects that it will rise
to $20,810 in 2020.8 In addition to its sheer size, Chinas large infrastructure investments have
improved logistics in the countrya competitive advantage over many other emerging markets.
Chiles strong institutions and liberal economic policies provide a stable macroeconomic
environment. Its reforms in the 1980s put the country on a more sustainable economic growth
path than many of its peers, and it continues to be very open to foreign investment and trade.
Chile is also known for having the most transparent governance and best rule of law in the region.
As the worlds largest copper producer, Chiles economy benefited from the recent commodity
boom cycle, and the government has used the windfall revenues to create a rainy-day fund that
increases the economys resilience to future commodity price swings. In addition, newly
reelected President Michelle Bachelet has proposed an increase in corporate taxes to fund education reform, which should improve the quality of the labor force and enhance social stability.
Malaysias business-friendly regulatory environment and relatively high per capita income
provide growth opportunities. The economy has recently begun to transition toward being
driven by domestic demand, helped along by government policies such as the strengthening of
the social safety net. In addition, the populations education level continues to improve, with
about 80 percent of the labor force having secondary or tertiary degrees.9 As a key member of
the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the TPP negotiations, Malaysia is a very
open economy with trade volumes amounting to 162 percent of GDP in 2012. The country is also
well-placed to withstand any global capital markets turmoil due to its strong regulatory institutions, flexible exchange rate, and high international reserves level.
The economic fortunes of Peru are also on the rise following recent structural reforms and
continued economic liberalization. Economic growth of late has been driven in part by Perus
endowment of minerals and natural gas, but natural resources only account for 11 percent of the
countrys output.10 After decades of populist or authoritarian politics, Perus government has
become part of Latin Americas new, more pragmatic left, combining liberalization with social
spending. As a result of this orthodox policy mix, the EIU predicts that Perus productivity
growth will average 1.1 percent annually between 2014 and 2020.11 Perus membership in the
Pacific Alliance and its involvement in TPP negotiations highlight the countrys outward-looking
policies, as well as its higher growth potential once TPP is enacted.
Polands diversified economy, business-friendly regulations, and educated labor force make
it a strong growth market. Its proximity to Germanythe economic powerhouse of Europe
and its access to the Baltic Sea provide the country with structural geographic advantages.
But policy choices are also an important factor in Polands economic strength. The government
embraced economic liberalization in the early 1990s and has implemented other policies,
such as investments in infrastructure and education, which have fostered sustained economic
7
World Bank, International Comparison Program, The Summary of Results and Findings of the 2011 International Comparison Program,
30 April 2014
Economist Intelligence Unit, EIU Country Data, accessed on 19 August 2014
10
11
growth. In fact, Poland was the only EU member to maintain positive economic growth throughout the Great Recession and eurozone crisis, giving it the highest average annual growth rate in
the EU between 2008 and 2013.12 Poland also ranks highest among its large Central and Eastern
European peers on the World Banks Doing Business indicators.13
12
13
14
15
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision, accessed on 5 August 2014
16
Economist Intelligence Unit, EIU Country Data, accessed on 19 August 2014. Data represents a three-year moving average.
17
Mexico National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), Clases medias en Mxico, Boletn de investigacin no.. 256/13, 12 June 2013
18
19
globalized. For instance, exports to the BRICs increased from 9 percent of total Sub-Saharan
African exports in 2000 to 34 percent a decade later.20 In addition, international tourism
has boosted many African economies, growing 5.3 percent in 2013 and reaching a record
of 36 million tourists.21
Sub-Saharan Africa has a variety of strengths that poise it for continued economic growth
and rising prosperity. Although most domestic African markets remain small, regional trade
agreements and other economic unions provide greater scale for investments (see figure 6).
Another growth driver is urbanization. About 37 percent of the Sub-Saharan African population
lives in cities, and the urban population is expected to grow 3.8 percent annually between
2015 and 2020.22 In particular, the Sub-Saharan African cities in A.T. Kearneys 2014 Emerging
Figure 6
Economic unions create larger markets
Regional economic unions in Sub-Saharan Africa
Economic Community
of West African States
Economic and Monetary
Community of Central Africa
Southern African
Customs Union
East African
Community
Senegal
Gambia
Guinea
GuineaBissau
Sierra
Leone
Liberia
Southern African
Development Community
Mali
Niger
Chad
Burkina
Faso
Nigeria
Ghana
Cte dlvoire
Togo
Lagos
Rwanda
Uganda
Cameroon
Benin
Equatorial
Guinea
Kenya
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo
Gabon
Tanzania
Congo
Angola
Mozambique
Zambia
Botswana
Zimbabwe
Malawi
Madagascar
Nambia
Swaziland
South Africa
Lesotho
Notes: Cape Verde, not pictured, is a member of the Economic Community of West African States. Mauritius and Seychelles are members
of the Southern African Development Community.
Sources: World Trade Organization; A.T. Kearney analysis
20
Ibid.
21
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, accessed on 5 August 2014
22
Cities Outlook will continue to spur growth in their respective countries and will increasingly
play a role on the global stage. These include Addis Ababa, Nairobi, Johannesburg, Cape Town,
and Lagos.23
Of course, Sub-Saharan Africa is an incredibly diverse region, and not all markets will contribute
as much to global growth as others. An analysis of several measures of economic size and
performance points to 18 dynamic Sub-Saharan Africa markets that have the potential to drive
global growth through 2020 (see figure 7). Economic opportunities in these markets will be
highest in three key areas: retail, natural resources, and manufacturing.
Many retailers consider Sub-Saharan Africa the next big thing thanks to its rapidly urbanizing
population of nearly 900 million people and the proliferation of Internet and mobile phones.
In addition, the regions fast economic growth in recent years has promoted both increased investment and improved living standards. A middle class is now emerging, providing opportunities
for retailers and consumer goods firms. A.T. Kearneys 2014 African Retail Development Index
highlights ten Sub-Saharan African markets that provide particularly strong opportunities for
the retail sector as growing consumer markets.24 The index ranks Sub-Saharan Africa countries
on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores meaning there is greater urgency to enter the
country (see figure 8 on page 13).
Figure 7
Sub-Saharan Africa growth markets
Real GDP
($ billion)
GDP at PPP
($ billion)
Population
(million)
Average real
GDP growth,
2008-2013
(%)
Average annual
inflation,
2008-2013
(%)
Angola
60.8
119.2
7,250
22.1
5.7
12.2
Botswana
14.9
31.4
18,190
2.0
3.5
8.3
Cameroon
23.0
48.4
2,520
22.7
3.7
2.9
Cte d'Ivoire
22.1
40.6
2,300
20.8
3.6
2.7
12.7
27.9
474
69.4
6.4
21.9
Ethiopia
26.5
102.0
1,250
96.5
8.7
20.8
Gabon
12.3
25.2
17,540
1.7
3.9
2.2
Ghana
33.6
81.9
3,630
26.6
8.6
12.3
Kenya
28.4
72.7
1,880
45.6
4.0
11.4
Liberia
1.3
3.1
820
4.4
10.4
9.2
Mozambique
12.1
25.5
1,180
26.5
7.0
7.2
Namibia
10.8
16.1
8,130
2.3
3.9
6.8
Nigeria
319.1
700.2
4,610
179.0
7.0
11.4
Rwanda
5.0
14.9
1,450
12.1
7.6
7.4
South Africa
320.7
526.8
11,680
53.1
2.2
6.3
Sudan
34.8
78.7
3,030
30.6
0.8
22.6
Tanzania
25.8
73.7
1,710
50.8
6.8
10.9
Uganda
17.5
50.3
1,590
38.9
5.9
11.2
Notes: Real GDP is at constant 2005 prices and market exchange rates. PPP is purchasing power parity.
Sources: EIU; A.T.Kearney analysis
23
See Global Cities, Present and Future: 2014 Global Cities Index and Emerging Cities Outlook at www.atkearney.com
See Seizing Africas Retail Opportunities: The 2014 African Retail Development Index at www.atkearney.com
24
Figure 8
A.T.Kearneys 2014 African Retail Development Index
ARDI score
70.3
64.2
100
89
Time pressure
60.2
59.5
79
65
71
75
71
Rwanda
55
61
Nigeria
Namibia
55.5
54.3
41
28
0
35
23
Tanzania
17
Gabon
65
53.7
38
72
100
81
100
50
54.2
Market size
94
100
80
56
Country risk
56.9
71
79
71
Market saturation
87
94
22
58.9
19
34
Ghana
South
Africa
66
62
48
19
29
Notes: Rankings are based on 2012 data. Each of the four factors (time pressure, market saturation, country risk, market size) is worth 25 percent.
Maximum value for each factor is 100.
Sources: Euromoney, Population Reference Bureau, World Bank, EIU; A.T. Kearney analysis
Sub-Saharan Africa also has vast natural resourcesmany of which remain untapped and
provide future investment opportunities (9 on page 14). The region has 63.2 billion barrels of
proven crude oil reserves and 6.3 trillion cubic feet of proven natural gas reserves.25 In addition,
32 percent of the worlds bauxite, the main source of aluminum, is in Sub-Saharan Africa.26 The
region also produced about 84 million tons of iron ore in 2012.27 Particularly mineral-rich markets
include the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Zambia, which are the largest producers of
copper in Sub-Saharan Africa, each with about 20 million tons of proven copper reserves.28
26
27
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2013
Natural Environment Research Council, British Geological Survey, World Mineral Statistics Data, accessed on 5 August 2014
28
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2013
29
Figure 9
Resource wealth in Sub-Saharan Africa
Oil
Coal
Natural gas
Aluminum
Copper
Iron ore
Mauritania
Sudan
Nigeria
Guinea
Sierra
Leone
Liberia
South
Sudan
Cameroon
Lagos
Cte dlvoire
Kenya
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo
Equatorial
Guinea
Tanzania
Zambia
Angola
Mozambique
Zimbabwe
Namibia
Botswana
South
Africa
Swaziland
Sources: African Development Bank, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Energy Information Administration; A.T.Kearney analysis
Despite all of these advantages and opportunities, Sub-Saharan Africa is still grappling with
development challenges that could put this promising economic outlook in jeopardy. First among
these is poverty. Living standards have improved in recent yearsfor instance, regional GDP per
capita grew 28 percent from 1990 to 2010, to $3,057 on a PPP basisbut 70 percent of the regions
population still lives on less than $2 per day.30 The second challenge is poor infrastructure.
According to the World Bank, the region needs $60 billion in annual new infrastructure investments in order to provide adequate electricity, transportation, and other services.31 Finally, weak
governance continues to pose a challenge in many African countries. Corruption is prevalent in
many markets, and the rule of law is often weak, creating an uncertain and often costly business
environment.32 For Sub-Saharan African markets to live up to their promise, governments will
need to address these three critical issues.
30
31
Vivien Foster and Cecilia Briceo-Garmendia (eds.), Africas Infrastructure: A Time for Transformation, World Bank, 2010
32
Wildcards
Despite the positive force of all of these growth-driving economies, the projected global
economic growth of 3 to 4 percent annually through 2020 is subject to downside disruption
from a remarkably wide range of contingencies. In particular, seven significant risks could
produce negative economic shocks and derail the nascent economic recovery.
The first of these is the U.S. Federal Reserves tapering of its bondbuying program, including its timing and communication, which
could expose risks in the U.S. financial system and macroeconomy.
In September 2012, the Fed announced its third round of quantitative
easing since the Global Financial Crisis, providing continued monetary
support to the weak U.S. economy. However, with the economic
recovery gaining steam, the Fed began tapering its bond-buying program in January 2014.
At its current pace of tapering, the Fed would end the quantitative easing program in late 2014.
Although Fed Chair Janet Yellen has conveyed her intention to maintain historically low interest
rates after bond buying ends, markets are understandably nervous about the withdrawal of this
historic monetary stimulus. As a recent Deutsche Bank report stated, Theres still too much
leverage for us to believe that accidents wont happen with the removal of stimulus[which]
may force the Fed into a much slower tapering path.33
The second key uncertainty is related to the first: namely, the extent
and degree of emerging market vulnerability to rapid capital
outflowswhether driven by Fed tapering or some other global financial
development. With rising rates of return in advanced economies,
capital is leaving many emerging market debt and equity markets and
causing volatility. Some emerging market currencies are likely to come
under increased pressure if capital outflows continue. Raising interest rates would help to prop
up currencies, but could also dampen domestic economic activity and potentially widen fiscal
deficits. Given this very real possibility of no-win policy choice scenarios, each emerging market
must be carefully and continually monitored. As with past emerging market financial crises,
if one or more markets come under intense pressure, the risks of contagion will be high.
Economic instability in the eurozone is another risk to the global
economic outlook. Although the crisis there appears to have subsided,
key vulnerabilities remain. The eurozone economy contracted by
about 0.3 percent in 2013 and is forecast to grow only 1.0 percent this
year, as it is being squeezed internally by a collapse in credit creation
and a lack of domestic demand and externally by the euros strength.34
The ECB has pledged to keep interest rates at or below current levels (0.25 percent) to support
the eurozone economy. However, competitiveness issues could hold back growth; for instance,
France has low labor market flexibility due to strict rules on hiring and firing and a very high
tax rate. Unemployment, especially for youth, is another critical indicator, with Greece and
Spain recording unemployment of more than 25 percent.35 These vulnerabilities could spark
a new wave of instability in the eurozone, which would likely spill over to damage global
growth prospects.
33
Deutsche Bank Markets Research, Credit Outlook 2014: The Bubble-Taper Tightrope, 10 December 2013
34
35
37
38
Bank for International Settlements, 84th Annual Report: 1 April 201331 March 2014, 29 June 2014: 7475
39
Bloomberg News, China Banks Bad Loans Reach Highest Since Financial Crisis, 14 February 2014
40
than $2 trillion in the past two decades.41 With current global dietary and population trends,
the world will need to produce 60 percent more food in 2050 than it does today and 10 million
square kilometers (nearly 3.9 million square miles) will need to be cleared for agricultural
production.42 As such, food scarcity is another concern, as past episodes of food price
inflation have led to social unrest, including the Arab Spring.
Finally, in this fragile global environment, a number of potential
geopolitical flashpoints represent particularly significant risks to the
global economic outlook. There are currently three main pockets of
geopolitical risks: East Asia, the Middle East, and Sub-Saharan Africa.
In East Asia, the risks include North Korean instability and provocations,
tensions between China and Japan, and territorial disputes between
China and a variety of Southeast Asian countries in the South China Sea. In the Middle East, the
Syrian civil war is a continuing source of instability and geopolitical risk, as is Iran and its nuclear
program (despite progress in the P5+1 talks). In addition, recent events have demonstrated that
Iraq remains politically unstable. The geopolitical flashpoints in Sub-Saharan Africa are driven
in large part by Al-Shabaab in the Horn of Africa, Boko Haram in Nigeria, and Islamist militant
groups in the Sahel. In addition to these regional concentrations of risks, instability and
geopolitical tension also exist in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as well as between Russia and
Ukraine and its Western allies. In a transitional period of contested regional leadership, these
flashpoints represent major risks to global political, social, and economic stability.
41
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and United Nations Development Programme, Effective Law and
Regulation for Disaster Risk Reduction: A Multi-Country Report, 2014
42
Nikos Alexandratos and Jelle Bruinsma, World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision, ESA Working Paper 12-03, Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, June 2012; David Tilman, Christian Balzer, Jason Hill, and Belinda L. Befort, Global Food
Demand and the Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America 108, no. 50 (2011).
Beyond the Crisis: Sustained Global Economic Growth? 17
Authors
Paul Laudicina, chairman emeritus of
A.T. Kearney and chairman of the Global
Business Policy Council, Washington, D.C.
paul.laudicina@atkearney.com
The authors would like to thank Courtney Rickert McCaffrey for her valuable contributions to this report.
A.T. Kearney is a leading global management consulting firm with offices in more
than 40 countries. Since 1926, we have been trusted advisors to the world's foremost
organizations. A.T. Kearney is a partner-owned firm, committed to helping clients
achieve immediate impact and growing advantage on their most mission-critical
issues. For more information, visit www.atkearney.com.
Americas
Atlanta
Bogot
Calgary
Chicago
Dallas
Detroit
Houston
Mexico City
New York
Palo Alto
San Francisco
So Paulo
Toronto
Washington, D.C.
Asia Pacific
Bangkok
Beijing
Hong Kong
Jakarta
Kuala Lumpur
Melbourne
Mumbai
New Delhi
Seoul
Shanghai
Singapore
Sydney
Tokyo
Europe
Amsterdam
Berlin
Brussels
Bucharest
Budapest
Copenhagen
Dsseldorf
Frankfurt
Helsinki
Istanbul
Kiev
Lisbon
Ljubljana
London
Madrid
Milan
Moscow
Munich
Oslo
Paris
Prague
Rome
Stockholm
Stuttgart
Vienna
Warsaw
Zurich
Middle East
and Africa
Abu Dhabi
Doha
Dubai
Johannesburg
Manama
Riyadh
For more information, permission to reprint or translate this work, and all other
correspondence, please email: insight@atkearney.com.
The signature of our namesake and founder, Andrew Thomas Kearney, on the cover
of this document represents our pledge to live the values he instilled in our firm and
uphold his commitment to ensuring essential rightness in all that we do.
A.T. Kearney Korea LLC is a separate and independent legal entity operating under the A.T. Kearney name in Korea.
A.T. Kearney operates in India as A.T. Kearney Limited (Branch Office), a branch office of A.T. Kearney Limited,
a company organized under the laws of England and Wales.
2014, A.T. Kearney, Inc. All rights reserved.