Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

STATCON list of cases

Atty. Kat Suyat


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.

1F

Morales vs Subido
Tanada vs Tuvera
People vs Que Po Lay
PNB vs CA
National Marketing Corp vs Tecson
Garvida vs Sales
Cervantes vs Auditor General
Caltex Inc vs Palomar
Tanada vs Cuenco
Republic Flour Mills Inc vs Commissioner of Customs
Roman Catholic Apostolic Administration of Davao vs Land Registration Commission
US vs Ang Tang Ho
Torres vs Limjap
Belgica vs Ochoa
Manila Jockey Club Inc vs Games and Amusements Board
Manila Lodge No 761 vs CA
Civil Liberties Union vs Executive Secretary
Manila Prince Hotel vs GSIS
Primicias vs Municipality of Urdaneta
Endencia vs David
Paat vs CA
Paras vs COMELEC
Morales vs Subido
US vs Ang Tang Ho
National Food Authority vs Masada Security Agency
People vs Rivera
Alalayan vs National Power Corporation
City of Baguio vs Marcos
People vs Purisima
People vs Echaves
US vs Hart
Agcaoili vs Suguitan
Section 15 Revised Administrative Code
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs TMX Sales Inc
Aisporna vs CA
Manila Lodge No 761 vs CA
Estrada vs Sandiganbayan
Greenfield vs Meer
David vs COMELEC
People vs Lidres
Chang Yung Fa vs Gianzon
Manila Jockey Club Inc vs Games and Amusements Board
Palanca vs City of Manila
Song Kiat vs Central Bank
People vs Manantan (July)
People vs Manantan (August)
Commissioner of Customs vs CA
Go Chioco vs Martinez
Commissioner of Customs vs Caltex
Nestle Philippines vs CA
Philippine Sugar Central Agency vs Collector of Customs
Victorias Milling Co Inc vs Social Security Commission

53. Regalado vs Yulo


54. Hui vs Rodriguez15

55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.

National federation of labor vs NLRC, 327 scra 158


Rizal commercial banking corp vs LAC, 320 scra 279
Go vs anti Chinese league, 84 phil 468
Santiago vs COMELEC, 270 scra 106
Hidalgo vs Hidalgo, 33 scra 105
Macondray vs manila yellow taxi, 80 phil 833
Sarcos vs Castillo, 26 scra 853
Soriano vs. offshore, 177 scra 513
King vs Hernandez, 144 phil 730
US vs toribio, 15 phil 85
Comendador vs De Villa
Oloveros vs Villaluz, 57 scra 163
Demafiles vs COMELEC, 21 scra 1462
Go Chico vs Martinez, 45 phil 256
Gatchalian vs COMELEC, 34 scra 435

70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.

People v. Buenviaje, 47 Phil. 536 (1925)


Mustang Lumber, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 257 SCRA 430 (1996)
Marcos v. Chief of Staff, AFP, 89 Phil 239 (1951)
C&C Commercial Corp. v. National Waterworks, GR No. 27275, November 18, 1967
San Miguel Corp. v. Municipal Council of Mandaue, GR No. 30761, July 11, 1973
Krivenko v. Register of Deeds, 79 Phil 461 (1974)
Guerrero v. COMELEC, GR No. 137004, July 26, 2000
Peralta v. CSC, GR No. 95832, August 10, 1992
People v. Martin, GR No. 33487, May 31, 1971
Rumarate v. Hernandez, 489 SCRA 317 (2006)
Carandang v. Santiago, 97 Phil 94 (1955)
Motoomul v. Dela Paz, 187 SCRA 743 (1990)
Mutuc v. COMELEC, GR No. 32717, November 26, 1970
Colgate-Palmolive v. Gimenez, GR No. 14787, January 28, 1961
US v. Santo Nino, 13 Phil. 141 (1909)
Parayno v. Jovellanos, GR No. 148408, July 14, 2006
Coconut Oil Refiners Association v. Torres, G.R. No. 132527, July 29, 2005
People v. Manantan, 115 Phil 657 (1962)
Pangilinan v. Alvendia, 101 Phil 794 (1957)
Amadora v. Court of Appeals, 160 SCRA 315 (1988)
Mercado, Sr. v. NLRC G.R. No. 79869. September 5, 1991
Manila Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Employees Association, 79 Phil 409 (1947)

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen