Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ID
Catherine Masoud
55020
Haya Nassrullah
55344
Fares Hesham
52268
Marah Ali
53450
Ahmed Radwan
49969
Abstract
In this experiment, we have been observing the effect of varying the hot
water flow rates and the stirrer speeds on the overall heat transfer
coefficient of the jacket (U). Five different hot water flowrates, which range
from 1.3 L/min to 2.39 L/min, were examined at stirring speeds of 0%, 50%
and 100%. At a stirring speed of 0%, it was observed that the overall heat
transfer coefficient increased from 172.56 W/m 2 K at 1.3 L/min to 366.229
W/m2 K at 2.39 L /min. A positive trend was observed to confirm the
relationship between the hot water flowrate and the overall heat transfer
coefficient at a particular stirring speed. The results show that overall heat
transfer coefficient fluctuates as the hot water flowrate increases probably
due to software errors, but the overall trend observed was positive. At a
stirring speed of 0%, U increased from 172.56 W/m2 K at 1.3 L/min to 571
W/m2 K at 2 L/min. Then, a large drop in the overall heat transfer coefficient
is observed as the hot water flow rate increases to 2.1 L/min, with U= 45.8
W/m2 K. As the hot water flowrate increases to 2.39 L/min, the overall heat
transfer coefficient increases again to a value of 366.229 W/m 2 K. These
fluctuations are due to heat losses to the surroundings, although the
apparatus is designed to be adiabatic. In addition, the cold water was
assumed to be constant at a value of 1 L/min. However, the data recorded
shows variations in the cold water flowrate. Last but not least, each tested
hot water flowrate was not constant throughout the run, which could have
affected the overall heat transfer coefficient calculated. To observe a clear
2
trend, the experiment should be repeated ensuring that all variables other
than the hot water flowrate remain constant.
Table of Contents
Cover Page..................................................................................................1
Abstract.......................................................................................................2
List of Tables................................................................................................4
List of Figures..............................................................................................5
Data, Results and Sample Calculations.......................................................6
Catherine Masoud.....................................................................................6
Haya Nassrullah......................................................................................10
Marah Ali................................................................................................13
Ahmed Ahmed........................................................................................17
Fares Hesham.........................................................................................19
Discussion.................................................................................................22
Conclusion.................................................................................................25
References.................................................................................................26
List of Tables
Table 1: Data at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.39L/min
....................................................................................................................6
Table 2: Constant Properties........................................................................6
Table 3: Results for Tank at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.39L/min .....................6
Table 4: Results for Jacket at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.39L/min....................7
Table 5: Overall Results at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.39L/min ......................7
Table 6: Data at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.1L/min.......................................10
Table 7: Constant Properties......................................................................10
Table 8: Results for Tank at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.1L/min......................10
Table 9: Results for Jacket at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.1L/min....................11
Table 10: Overall Results at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.1L/min.....................11
Table 11: Data at Hot Water Flowrate = 2.05L/min...................................13
Table 12: Raw data from the jacketed vessel............................................17
Table 13: Processed Results.......................................................................17
Table 14: Data for Hot Water Flowrate= 1.3 L/min....................................19
Table 15: Constants...................................................................................19
Table 16: Processed Data for the Jacket at Various Stirrer Speeds............19
Table 17: Processed Data for the Tank at Various Stirrer Speeds ..............19
4
List of Figures
Figure 1: Properties of stream at T=32.45
....................................................................................................................7
Figure 2: Graph of Ujacket vs Stirrer Speed for Hot Flowrate=2.39 L/min...9
Figure 3: Graph of Ujacket vs Stirrer Speed for Hot Flowrate=2.10 L/min.12
Figure 4: Graph of Ujacket vs Stirrer Speed for Hot Flowrate=2.05 L/min.16
Figure 5: Overall heat transfer coefficient vs. Stirrer spee
..................................................................................................................17
Figure 6: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Jacket ..........................20
Figure 7: T(hot) vs. Hot Water Flow Rate................................................22
Figure 8: T(cold) vs. Hot Water Flow RateY.............................................23
Figure 9: Qjacket vs. Hot Water Flow Rate.....................................................23
Figure 10: U
jacket
Hot Water
Flowrate qvh
(L/min)
Cold Water
Flowrate qvc
(L/min)
Stirrer
Speed
(%)
T1
(C)
T2
(C)
T3
(C)
T6
(C)
2.39
0.21
0.00
42.1
46.8
46.3
22.8
2.39
0.21
50.00
39.7
45.8
45.2
22.4
2.39
0.21
100.00
42.5
47.6
46.9
22.5
0.1524
do (m)
0.1542
davg (m)
0.1533
l (m)
0.0800
A (m2)
0.03853
Ttank,avg (C)
tank
(kg/m3)
Cptank
(kJ/gK)
mtank
(kg/s)
Qtank (W)
0.00
32.5
994.87
4.1783
0.003482
0
280.796
50.00
31.1
995.31
4.1784
0.003483
5
251.815
100.00
32.5
994.87
4.1783
0.003482
0
290.980
Tjacket,avg
(C)
jacket
(kg/m3)
Cpjacket
(kJ/gK)
mjacket(kg/
s)
Qjacket
(W)
0.00
46.53
989.57
4.1797
0.039418
-82.377
50.00
45.70
989.92
4.1797
0.039432
-98.888
100.00
47.31
989.23
4.1799
0.039404
-115.294
HL (W)
T lm
Uj (W/m2K)
0.00
363.174
4.4453
480.976
50.00
350.703
5.7948
442.915
100.00
406.275
4.7414
631.132
Sample Calculations:
7
Properties of hot and cold water streams such as heat capacity and density
values were obtained from an empirical data calculator found at:
http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/javascript/water-properties.html.
A screenshot of data obtained at Ttank,avg = 32.45C is shown below. [1]
2
2
994.87 kg
0.21 L
m3
1 L
Min
1 Min
1000 m3
0.003482 kg
Tank Mass Flowrate :mtank = tankqvc =
=
60 s
s
0.003482kg
4.17831000 J
s
J
Qtank=mtankC ptank( T 1T 6 )=
( 42.122.8 ) =280.79 W
kgK
s
( )
2. Jacket Calculations:
T 2+T 3 (46.8+ 46.3)
T jacket , avg=
=
=46.55
2
2
989.57 kg
2.39 L
m3
1 L
Min
1 Min
1000 m3
0.03942 kg
Jac ket Mass Flowrate: m jacket = jacketqvh=
=
60 s
s
0.03942 kg
4.17971000 J
s
J
Q jacket =m jacketC p jacket( T 3T 2 ) =
( 46.346.8 ) =82.377 W
kgK
s
( )
3. Overall Calculations
Heat Loss : HL=Q tank Q jacket ( 280.79|82.377|) W =363.173 W
T lm=
A jacket=DL=0.1533m0.0800 m= 0.03853 m2
Q jacket
|82.377 W |
366.229 W
=
=
A jacket T lm 0.03853 m24.445 K
m2 K
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient :U =
500.000
400.000
20
40
60
80
100
120
Figure 2: Graph of Ujacket vs Stirrer Speed for Hot Water Flowrate = 2.39
L/min
9
Hot Water
Flowrate qvh
(L/min)
Cold Water
Flowrate qvc
(L/min)
Stirrer
Speed
(%)
T1
(C)
T2
(C)
T3
(C)
T6
(C)
2.1
0.80
0.00
31.0
47.5
47.3
22.2
2.1
0.73
50.00
33.0
49.6
47.0
21.5
2.1
0.69
100.00
33.4
50.3
46.6
22.2
di (m)
0.1524
do (m)
0.1542
davg (m)
0.1533
l (m)
0.0800
A (m2)
0.03853
Ttank,avg (C)
tank
(kg/m3)
Cptank
(kJ/gK)
mtank
(kg/s)
Qtank (W)
0.00
26.6
995.3
4.178
0.01327
487.89
50.00
27.25
994.7
4.178
0.01210
581.37
100.00
27.8
994.6
4.178
0.01144
535.32
Tjacket,avg
(C)
jacket
(kg/m3)
Cpjacket
(kJ/gK)
mjacket(kg/
s)
Qjacket
(W)
0.00
47.4
989.2
4.180
0.03462
-28.94
50.00
48.3
988.8
4.180
0.03461
-376.14
100.00
48.45
988.7
4.180
0.03460
-535.12
11
Stirrer Speed
(%)
HL (W)
T lm
Uj (W/m2K)
0.00
458.95
16.40
45.80
50.00
205.23
15.26
639.73
100.00
0.2
14.97
927.75
Sample Calculations:
For data obtained at stirring speed = 0.00%:
1. Tank/Vessel Calculations:
T 1+T 6 (31+22.2)
=
=26.6
2
2
T tank ,avg=
995.3 kg
0.8 L
3
m
1m3
Min
1 Min
1000 L
0.01327 kg
Tank Mass Flowrate :mtank = tankqvc =
=
60 s
s
0.01327 kg
4.1781000 J
s
J
Qtank=mtankC ptank ( T 1T 6 )=
( 3122.2 ) =487.89 W
kgK
s
()
2. Jacket Calculations:
T 2+T 3 (47.5+ 47.3)
=
=47.4
2
2
T jacket , avg=
989.2 kg
2.1 L
3
m
1 m3
Min
1 Min
1000 L
0.03462 kg
Jacket Mass Flowrate :m jacket = jacketqvh=
=
60 s
s
12
0.03462 kg
4.1801000 J
s
J
Q jacket =m jacketC p jacket( T 3T 2 ) =
( 47.347.5 ) =28.94 W
kgK
s
()
3. Overall Calculations
|28.94 W |
45.80 W
=
=
A jacket T lm 0.03853 m216.4 K
m2 K
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient :U =
Q jacket
400
200
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
stirrer speed %
Figure 3: Graph of Ujacket vs Stirrer Speed for Hot Water Flowrate = 2.1
L/min
13
Hot
Water
Flowrat
e
average
0%
50%
100%
[l/min]
2.02
2.07
2.03
Cold
Water
Flowrat
e
averag
e
[l/min]
0.63
0.53
0.49
Cold
Water
Outlet
Temp
T1
Hot
Water
Inlet
Temp
T2
Hot
Water
Outlet
Temp
T3
Cold
Water
Inlet
Temp
T6
[C]
33.3
34.8
37.0
[C]
50.0
49.6
47.7
[C]
46.8
45.8
44.8
[C]
23.0
23.8
23.8
0.1524+ 0.1542
m 0.08 m=0.0385 m2
2
14
Stirrer Speed: 0%
Mass Flow Rate:
3
hot =V hot hot =2.02 L 989.5 kg3 1 m 1 min =0.0333 kg
m
min
s
m 1000 L 60 s
3
cold=V cold cold =0.63 L 994.2 kg3 1 m 1min =0.0104 kg
m
min
s
m 1000 L 60 s
kg
kJ
kJ
4.179
( 33.323 ) =0.448
s
kg K
s
Q jacket =m
hot C p ( T 2T 3 )=0.0333
kg
kJ
kJ
4.179
( 5046.8 ) =0.445
s
kg K
s
t 2 t 1
ln
t2
t1
2713.5
=19.48
27
ln
13.5
( ) ( )
Q vessel
0.448
kJ
=
=0.597
A vessel T lm 0.0385 19.48
s . m2 .
U jacket =
Q jacket
0.445
kJ
=
=0.571
2
A jacket T lm 0.040 19.48
s . m .
15
3
cold=V cold cold=0.53 L 994.2 kg3 1 m 1min =0.00878 kg
m
min
s
m 1000 L 60 s
Qvessel =m
cold C p ( T 1T 6 )=0.00878
Q jacket =m
hot C p ( T 2T 3 )=0.0341
kg
kJ
kJ
4.179
( 49.645.8 ) =0.542
s
kg K
s
t 2 t 1
ln
t2
t1
25.811
=17.36
25.8
ln
11
( ) ( )
Q vessel
0.404
kJ
=
=0.604
A vessel T lm 0.0385 17.36
s . m2 .
U jacket =
Q jacket
0.542
kJ
=
=0.781
A jacket T lm 0.040 17.36
s . m2 .
kg
kJ
kJ
4.179
( 3723.8 ) =0.449
s
kg K
s
16
Q jacket =m
hot C p ( T 2T 3 )=0.0335
kg
kJ
kJ
4.179
( 47.744.8 ) =0.406
s
kg K
s
t 2 t 1
ln
t2
t1
23.97.8
=14.37
23.9
ln
7.8
( ) ( )
Q vessel
0.449
kJ
=
=0.812
A vessel T lm 0.0385 14.37
s . m2 .
U jacket =
Q jacket
0.403
kJ
=
=0.701
A jacket T lm 0.040 14.37
s . m2 .
500
Ujacket (J/m^2 s C))
400
300
200
100
0
0
0.5
1.5
Stirrer Speed%
Figure 3: Graph of Ujacket vs Stirrer Speed for Hot Water Flowrate ~ 2.05
L/min
17
Stirrer
speed [%]
Q
jacketed
[kw]
Q vessel
[kw]
Area of
the
jacket[m^
2]
Log mean
temperat
ure [K]
0
50
100
0.1211
0.096
0.497
0.323
0.308
0.328
0.0385
0.0385
0.0385
13.85
9.79
11.93
Over all
heat
transfer
coefficient
[kw/m^2*
k]
0.227
0.252
1.081
Mass
flowrate
h [kg/s]
0
50
100
0.029
0.029
0.029
Mass
T1 [
flow
Co ]
rate
c
[kg/s]
0.006
37.4
0.006
37.2
0.006
38.0
T2 [ T3 [ T6 [ CPh
[kj/kg.
Co
Co
Co
K]
CPc
[kj/kg.
K]
45.1
47.4
52.1
4.178
4.178
4.178
45.2
46.6
48.0
24.5
24.7
24.9
4.179
4.180
4.180
18
Column2
0.4
0.2
0
0
20
40
60
80 100 120
Stirrer speed %
d o +d i
2
d mean=
0.1542+0.1524
= 0.1533 m
2
A j= . d mean . L
A j= . d mean .0.08 =0.0385 m^2
19
T lm=
( T 2T 1 )( T 3T 1 )
ln
T lm=
T 2T 1
T 3T 1
( 318.1310.4 ) (318.2297.5 )
318.1310.4
=13.85 k
ln
318.2297.5
U j=
QJacket
A j . T lm
U j=
0.1211
0.03885.13 .85 =0.227 kW/m^2*K
Where:
Vessel wall inside diameter
di = 0.1524 m
do = 0.1542 m
Overflow height
L=0.08
Fcold
Speed
(L/min)
(%)
T1 (C)
T2 (C)
T3 (C)
0.33
0
41.0
45.2
44.9
0.33
50
36.5
45.6
44.7
0.32
100
36.8
46.1
45.2
Table 14: Data for Hot Water Flowrate= 1.3 L/min
T6 (C)
24.8
24.9
24.1
20
Vessel
wall
outsid
e
diamet
er,
do(m)
0.1542
Vessel
Diameter, dmean
(m)
Length,
L (m)
0.1533
0.08
Results
Table 16: Processed Data for the Jacket at Various Stirrer Speeds
Spe
ed
(%)
0
50
100
Specific Heat of
Hot Fluid,
Cp,h(J/Kg K)
4179
4179
4179
Density of Hot
Fluid(kg/m3)
m jacket
(kg/s)
990.2
990.2
989.9
0.0217
0.0207
0.0209
Q
jacke
t (W)
26.61
75.93
85.35
Table 17: Processed Data for the Tank at Various Stirrer Speeds
Spe
ed
(%)
0
Specific Heat of
Cold Fluid,
Cp,h(J/Kg K)
4178
Density of Cold
Fluid(kg/m3)
mc (kg/s)
991.8
0.006
50
4178
993.5
0.005
100
4178
993.4
0.005
Q
tank
(W)
375.0
5
265.3
4
284.9
3
Table 18: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Jacket at Different Stirrer
Speeds
Spee
d (%)
LM
Area
Jacket
U jacket
(W/m2.K)
21
0
50
100
(m2)
0.039
0.039
0.039
4.00
8.59
8.83
172.56
229.51
250.90
20
40
60
80
100
120
991.8 kg
0.33 L
3
m
1 L
Min
1 Min
1000 m3
Cold Water Mass Flowrate:mc = cFcold=
=0.006 kg /s
60 s
0.006 kg
4178 J
s
Qtank=mtankC ptank ( T 1T 6 )=
( 4124.8 ) =375.05 W
kgK
2. Jacket Calculations:
22
990.2 kg
1.32 L
3
m
1 L
Min
1 Min
1000 m3
0.0217 kg
Hot Water Mass Flowrate: mh =hFhot =
=
60 s
s
0.0217 kg
4179 J
s
Q jacket =mhC p h( T 2T 3 ) =
( 45.244.9 ) =26.61W
kgK
3. Overall Calculations
T lm=
d mean=
d i +d o 0.1524+0.1542
=
=0.1533 m
2
2
Q jacket
26.61 W
172.56W
=
=
A jacket T lm 0.039 m24.00 K
m2 K
23
Discussion
This experiment was designed in order to study the effect of stirrer speed on
the overall heat transfer coefficient of a stirred vessel heated by an outer
jacket using LMTD. It was found that as the stirring speed increases, the
overall heat transfer coefficient also increases due to an increased heat
transfer rate. The effect of flow rate is studied in the following graphs. The
obtained results for 0% stirring speed are tabulated below.
Hot
Thot
Tcold
Qjacket
Ujacket
Water
(J/s)
(W/kgC
Flow
)
Rate
1.3
0.3
16.2
25.84
370.58
1.8
0.1
12.9
121.1
227
2.0
3.2
10.3
445
571
2.1
0.2
8.8
28.94
45.8
2.4
0.5
19.3
82.37
481
Table 19: Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient at different flow rates
In order to compare the data further, each of the four calculations is graphed
against the hot water flow rate:
24
1.6
1.8
2.2
2.4
2.6
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.2
2.4
2.6
25
while the Thot decreases, and the discrepancy can be contributed to the
experimental errors caused by the computerized data recording system.
100
0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.2
2.4
2.6
300
200
100
0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.2
2.4
2.6
Figure 10: U
jacket
The graphs above show that as the hot water flow rate inside the jacket
increases, the heat transfer rate and the overall heat transfer coefficient
both increase. This implies that a higher flow rate results in a higher heat
26
Conclusion
The objective of the experiment was to determine the effect of the
stirring speed and flow rate on the overall heat transfer coefficient of a
jacketed vessel, and this objective was achieved. According to the results, an
increase in either the hot water flow rate or the stirring speed causes the
overall heat transfer coefficient to increase, implying a positive correlation
between the variables. However, as evident in the graphs, there were
several outliers brought about by experimental errors. These errors include:
27
Not waiting for the apparatus to reach steady state before taking the
temperatures
Heat losses to the surroundings
Instrumental errors leading to inaccurate stirring speeds
References
[1] Properties of air-free water at 1 atm. Available [Online]:
http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/javascript/water-properties.html
Retrieved: November 29, 2015.
[2] Aidan, A. 2015. Jacketed vessel with coil and stirrer heat exchanger. CHE 350 Lab Handout.
AUS, Sharjah, UAE.
28