Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EXPERIMENTAL
The experiment started with preparations of solutions and getting LabQuest
set up. There were two solutions to be made, one was 2M HCL and the other was
2M NaOH. The 2M HCl solution was created by adding 200mL of deionized water
into a to a beaker that had be named 2M HCl. To this deionized water, 100mL of
6M HCl were placed in a beaker to then to then be measured out by a graduated
cylinder and placed in the beaker that contained the deionized water. When mixing
the solution, the acid to water concept was followed. For the creation of 2M NaOH,
the same approach of adding 50 mL of deionized water in the beaker that was
named 2M NaOH was used. In addition, once again repeating the process of
placing the stock solution, this time being 3M NaOH, was placed in a beaker and
then measured by a graduated cylinder to get 100mL. Since there was a reaction
between the chemicals, the solutions were left to cool while LabQuest was set up.
The settings were changed on the LabQuest to appear as 15 s/sample for the
interval box, and the duration was placed at 180s.
The first sub-reaction that was preformed was hydrochloric acid and sodium
hydroxide. 50 mL of 2M HCl were added to a graduated cylinder and placed inside
the Styrofoam cups. The Styrofoam cups, stacked on top of each other, were placed
in a beaker to be used as the coffee cup calorimeter. Once the solution had been
put in, the lid and temperature probe were placed. Next, 50mL of NaOH were
obtained in a graduated cylinder and placed aside. Using the LabQuest, three initial
temperatures were taken of just the 2M HCl solution. After the initial temperatures
had been recorded, the solution of NaOH was placed in the cup. As the solutions
mixed, the LabQuest recorded the temperature changes until it reached a maximum
and then came down. The mixture was then disposed of properly and the
equipment used was cleaned to continue the next run. The mixture was placed in
the waste container in the vent hood, as for the equipment was cleaned with
deionized water.
Sodium hydroxide and ammonium chloride were the next sub-reaction to be
tested. LabQuest was placed to take data for run two. The clean Styrofoam cups
were once again stacked on top of each other to be used again. 50mL of 2M NaOH
were placed in the Styrofoam cup. The temperature probe was placed inside with
the lid on. The three initial temperatures were obtained and then 50mL of 2M
NH 4 Cl were placed into the solution. As they mixed, LabQuest continued to take
the temperature changes until it reached a peak and then began to go down. The
mixture was then disposed of properly and once again the equipment was cleaned.
Condition
T Max (oC)
Reaction 1
Reaction 2
Reaction 3
36.9
23.1
34.3
T Inital (oC)
23.5
21.9
22.5
T (oC)
13.4
1.2
11.8
28.455
29.455
28.455
WG + Residue
28.460
WG + Mg
28.954
inside. The temperature probe and lid were placed in as well. To make the solution
react, 0.5 grams of Mg were needed. The same process for weighing the Mg was
done as was seen in sub reaction one in Part C. The three initial temperatures of the
solution 2M HCl were taken and Mg was then placed inside. As the solution mixed,
the temperature was taken until it reached a peak and then stabilized. After it had
stabilized, the solution was properly discarded and the changes in temperature for
both sub reactions were recorded. At the end of the experiment the information
received was once again saved onto a USB.
Condition
T Max (oC)
T Inital (oC)
T (oC)
21.5
21.7
13.4
19.8
Reacti
on
Hrxn
(KJ/mol)
-55.84
(l)
-3.62
heat
3
-52.22
The amount of heat energy (q) absorbed by the surroundings was then
calculated for all three sub-reactions in Part B. This was done by using the
equation q = (mwater x Cp x T) + (Ccal x T). This meant that the mass of
water times the specific heat capacity of water times change in temperature
plus the heat capacity of the calorimeter times the change in temperature
would give the amount of heat that was absorbed. Since the mass of water
was unknown, to get the mass for each sub reaction it was known the
density for all solutions was 1.03g/mL. This was multiplied by the amount of
solution that was used. For Part B, all three sub-reactions used one hundred
milliliters of solution meaning that the mass of the water for all three was
103 grams. The change in temperature was gotten from the LabQuest data
placed in Table 1. The specific heat of water was given known as 4.184 J/gOC
and the heat capacity of the calorimeter was also given known as 25.5 J/gOC.
All that was left to do was plug in all the number and get the amount of heat
energy that was absorbed by the surroundings. The results were gotten in
Joules but should be changed to kilojoules. For reaction one the amount of
heat absorbed by the surroundings was 6.116KJ, for reaction two 0.548KJ,
and for reaction three 5.386KJ. Now that the amount of heat energy
absorbed by the surroundings had been calculated, Hrxn was calculated for
reactions 1-3 by dividing negative heat energy absorbed by surroundings
q
over the amount of moles used in each reaction (H=
). The amount of
n
moles used for each reaction was gotten by looking at the molarity of each
solution placed in the reaction. Molarity was moles per liter, for reactions 1-3
the molarity was 2M so the amount of moles used was 0.1. The results of
Hrxn for reaction one were -61.16KJ/mol, reaction two -5.48KJ/mol, and
reaction three was -53.86 KJ/mol. To obtain the measured molar enthalpy
change for reaction three, reactions one and two had to be integrated. This
meant that reactions one and two had to be arranged in a way that the
reactants and products could cancel out to get the goal reaction, that being
reaction three. Hesss Law of Heat Summation was the process used to
obtain the value. Hesss Law of Heat Summation states no matter how many
steps there was in the reaction, the total enthalpy change for the reaction
studied would be the addition of all those changes.1
Reaction three, H+ (aq) + NH3 (aq) NH4+ (aq) + heat, was seen to have
the ammonium ion on the right side. This meant reaction two had to flip
around so the ammonium ion could be on the right side and thus canceling
out the remaining reactants and products to obtain the final equation being
6
reaction three. When reaction two was flipped, this also meant the sign for
the H0 value of this reaction changed to positive. Once the sign had been
changed in reaction two, all that was left to do was add the H0 values up
giving us the measured molar enthalpy change for Reaction three. The H0
values for each sub-reaction were gotten from the previous sets where the
H0 for each sub reaction was calculated individually.
Reaction 1: H+ (aq) + OH (aq) H2O(l) + heat
H0=
-61.16
Reaction 2: OH (aq) + NH4+ (aq) NH3 (aq) + H2O (l) + heat
H0= -5.48
Reaction three to be obtained:
H0=
-61.16
H0= 5.48
Reaction 3: H+ (aq) + NH3 (aq) NH4+ (aq) + heat
H0= -55.68KJ/mol
TheHrxnvaluesforreactionthreecouldbeobtainedusingthreedifferentways.Thefirst
waythatitwasgottenbywasusingthetheoreticalvaluesthisgave52.22KJ/mol.Forthe
secondoption,usingHessLawofSummationthemeasuredvaluewasgottenandthevalue
was55.68KK/mol.Thethirdoptionconsistedofdeterminingthetemperaturedifferencefor
reactionthreeandthevaluegottenwas53.86KJ/mol.Thevaluesgottenfromtheexperiment
werelowerthanthetheoreticalvalue.Whencomparingthevalues,thepercenterrorwas6.63%.
ThismeantthattheHrxnvaluewascorrectsinceitwasbelow15%error.
Sign
flips
ForPartCoftheexperimentthereweretwosubreactionsthatwereexperimentedon.
WhenlookingattheH0valuestheyareallnegative.Thismeansthatallthereactionswere
exothermic.Anotherwaytotellifthereactionwasexothermicwaswhenthereactionwasfelt
thecalorimeterwaswarmbecauseoftheheatgivenoff.Itwasnecessarytousetwodifferent
concentrationsofHClinthereactionsbecausethe2MHClthatwasplacedinMg(metalfilings)
wouldproduceanexothermicreaction.Ifthe6MofHClwereplacedintotheMg(metalfilings)
itwouldhavecausedaviolentreaction.Thismeantthatthisspecificreactionwasmore
exothermic.AsfortheMgO(powder),6MofHClhadtobeusedbecausemoremolarityforthis
reactionwouldcausethereactiontobeexothermic.If2MofHClwereusedintheMgOpowder
solutiontherewouldnotbeabigenoughchangetotellthatanexothermicreactionoccurred.To
obtaintheenthalpyofformationofmagnesiumoxidemanysubstepsweredonebeforethiswas
obtained.Twastheonlynumberknownwhentheexperimentwasconducted,butwithTthe
amountofheatthatwastakeninbythesurroundingforbothsubreactionscouldbecalculated.
qwasobtainedbymultiplyingthemassofwatertimesthespecificheatofwatertimesthe
changeintemperatureplustheheatcapacityofthecalorimetertimesthechangeoftemperature.
Themassofwaterwasunknown;togetthisnumberthedensitywasknowntobe1.01g/mL,by
multiplyingtheamountofmillilitersusedforeachsubreactionbythedensitythisgavethe
mass.InthecaseofsubreactionsoneandtwoforPartC,theamountofmillilitersusedwas
100mL.Oncethecalculationsweredonethemassofwaterwas101gforbothreactions.Allthat
waslefttodowaspluginthenumbersintotheequation.Inreactiononeqwasequalto
6.004KJ,inreactiontwoqwasequalto10.545KJ.Nowthattheamountofheatthatwastaken
inbythesurroundingswasknown,H0couldbeobtainedbysimplyplacinganegativesignin
frontofthisnumber.Theamountofmolesusedforeachsubreactionhadtobeobtainedaswell
soHrxncouldbefound.Thenumberofmoleswasobtainedbydividingtheamountofgrams
usedforeachsubreaction,reactionone.995grams,reactiontwo.499grams,overthemolar
massofeachreaction.ReactiononewouldgivemolesofMgOandreactiontwomolesofMg.
Thisinreturngave0.025molesusedforMgOand0.021molesusedofMg.Sinceboththe
amountofheatabsorbedbythesurroundingandthenumberofmolesusedinthereactionwas
known,Hrxnwasobtainedbydividingnegativeqovertheamountofmolesused.The
numbersgottenforHrxnwere240.16KJ/molforsubreactiononeinPartCand502.14forsub
reactiontwoinPartC.TheHrxnforequationthree,being285.83,wasgivenbecausethe
experimentwasnotpreformed.Thegoalintheendwastoobtaintheenthalpyofformationof
magnesiumoxideandtodothis,equations13seeninTable7weremovedaroundtoendup
withjustmagnesiumoxide.HessLawofSummationstatednomatterhowmanystepsittookto
gettothereaction,theadditionallthosechangeswouldgivethecompleteenthalpychangefor
thereaction.1Inordertoformmagnesiumoxide,equationoneinTable7hadtoflip,whichin
returnalsochangedthenegativesignontheHrxntopositive.Byflippingequationone,when
summingupallthreeequationsthecompoundsMgCl2,H2O,2HCl,andH2canceledoutleaving
ustheformationsofmagnesiumoxide.AllthatwasthenlefttodowasadduptheHrxnvalues,
keepinginmindthatforequationonethesignchangedgivingus547.81KJ/mol.
Equati
on
Reaction
H rxn
(KJ/mol)
-240.16
-502.14
-285.83
(l)
-547.81
H0=
H0=
H0=
Equation 4 to be obtained:
Reaction 1: MgCl2 (aq) + H2O(l) MgO(s) + 2 HCl(aq)
H0= 240.16
Sign
flips
H0=
H0= -285.83
H0=
11