Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This chapter focuses on the presentation, analysis and interpretation of the data
gathered. The data gathered were analyzed using the statistical methods mentioned in the
previous chapter. Interpretation was indicated according to the datas statistical
significance.
Frequency (f)
15
15
30
Percentage (%)
50
50
100
Table 3 shows the frequency and percentage of the entry- level accountants
respondents according to their gender. There are thirty (30) entry-level accountants
respondents for the study, fifteen (15) of which are male, which represents 50% of
the sample and fifteen (15) are female, which represents, 50% of the sample of
entry- level accountants of thirty (30) respondents.
According to Brahmasrene and Whitten as cited by (2001) gender differences
in accounting performance suggest that female students tend to exhibit more skills
and proficiency than their male counterparts because they work harder, have better
study skills, attend classes regularly, and strike a good balance between their social
life and academic life. The opposite is true with men.
1.2 Area of Work in Accounting
Table 4
Entry-Level Accountants Frequency and Percentage Distribution
of the Respondents Profile According to Area of Work in Accounting
Area in Accounting
Public
Private
Total
Frequency (f)
15
15
30
Percentage (%)
50
50
100
Frequency (f)
14
16
30
Percentage (%)
46.7
53.3
100
Frequency (f)
15
15
30
Percentage (%)
50
50
100
respondents for the study, fifteen (15) of which came from public industry ,
which represents fifty- percent (50%) of the sample and another fifteen (15) came
from the private industry , which similarly , represents fifty- percent (50%) of the
sample supervisors of thirty (30) respondents.
Valentine (2001), results showed that there is a significant difference on
the perceived competencies of entry-level accountants as perceived by the
supervisors when they are grouped according to their areas of work in accounting.
3. Perceived Competencies of Entry- level Accountant Respondents as Perceived by
Themselves in Terms of:
The following tables below summarizes and presents the perceived
competencies of entry-level accountants on the following competencies; namely;
functional, personal and business or organizational skills.
3.1 Functional Competencies
Table 7
Perceived Competencies of Entry- level Accountant Respondents as
Perceived by Themselves in Terms of Functional Competencies
Indicator
Functional
Decision-making:
Risk analysis:
Measurement
Reporting
Research
Leverage technology
OVERALL
Composi
te
Mean
3.02
2.97
2.97
3.13
2.72
2.82
SD
Adjectival
Description
.62
.72
.63
.63
.74
.62
3.00
.56
High Competence
High Competence
High Competence
High Competence
High Competence
High Competence
High
Competence
Interpretation
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
entering the accounting profession should display effective problem solving and decisionmaking skills, good insight, and judgment, as well as innovative and creative thinking.
Table 8
Perceived Competencies of Entry- level Accountant Respondents as Perceived by
Themselves in Terms of Functional Competencies With Corresponding Statements
Indicator Functional
Statement
#
#1
#10
Composite
Mean
Of
Decision
Making
#2
Composite
Mean Of
Risk
Analysis
Mean
SD
Adjectival
Description
Interpret
ation
Agree
Decision Making
Decision-making: having the
ability
to
conceptually
structuralize the situation and
select one amongst available
options.
The ability to analyse and
reason logically: supporting
your
arguments
with
theoretical
analysis
or
objective
or
subjective
reasoning process.
3.07
.69
High
Competenc
e
2.97
.72
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.02
.62
High
Competenc
e
Agree
High
Competenc
e
Agree
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Risk Analysis
Financial
risk
analysis:
having the ability to assess
the
factors
that
may
jeopardize the project such as
2.97 .72
knowing
cost
benefit
analysis,
ratio
analysis,
portfolio management, NPV,
IRR, sensitivity analysis etc.
2.97
.72
Measurement
#9
#3
Economics
background:
analysing the production,
distribution and consumption
of goods and services such as
knowing how to measure
GDP, GNP, demand and
supply curve, equilibrium,
and price elasticity etc.
Financial
accounting:
classifying
of
financial
transactions
to
proper
accounts.
Composite
Mean of
Measurem
ent
3.13
.78
High
Competenc
e
2.80
.66
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.97
.63
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.13
.63
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.13
.63
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.63
.81
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.80
.76
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.72
.74
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Agree
Reporting
#8
Cost
and
management
accounting: study of the
accounting information to
managers
within
organizations, to provide
them with the basis to make
informed business decisions
such as knowing budgeting
techniques,
costing,
accounting for labour, and
accounting for overheads etc.
Composite
Mean of
Reporting
Research
#6
#7
Composite
Mean of
Research
Leverage Technology
.86
Low
Competenc
e
Disagree
3.13
.73
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.82
.62
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.00
.56
High
Competenc
e
Agree
#4
2.50
#5
Information
technology
competence:
having the
ability to use computer
software such as knowing
MS
Office,
Excel,
Powerpoints
Composite
Mean of
Leverage
Technolog
y
OVERAL
L MEAN
OF
FUNCTI
ONAL
COMPET
ENCY
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Indicator
Composit
e
Mean
SD
Adjectival
Description
Interpretat
ion
High
Agree
Competence
High
Problem Solving and Decision
3.30
.60
Competen
Agree
Making
ce
High
Interaction
3.10
.56
Agree
Competence
High
Leadership
3.30
.60
Agree
Competence
High
Communication
3.04
.67
Agree
Competence
Project Management,
High
3.00
.59
Agree
Competence
High
OVERALL
3.12
.47
Agree
Competence
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ;
Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Professional Demeanor
3.10
.48
As shown also in the table, the sub-variables Problem Solving and Decision
Making and Leadership show the highest composite of mean of 3.30. On the other hand,
the sub-variable Communication and Project Management has the lowest mean of 2.38.
Developing skills and attributes to equip them for a career in the accounting profession is
needed.
The findings of the study of Kavanagh and Drennan (2008) reveal that students
rated continuous learning as the most important skill to future careers and were focused
on developing routine technical expertise, oral and written communication skills,
analytical and problem solving skills and appreciative skills including decision making
and critical thinking. In conclusion, Individuals entering the accounting profession should
behave in a manner that is consistent with the character and standards of the discipline of
accounting, as well as the norms of the environment in which they interact.
Entry-level accountants often asked and seen to discern the true nature of a
situation and then developing skills and attributes to equip them for a career in the
accounting profession
Table 10
#17
#23
#26
Composite
Mean
Of
Profession
al
Demeanor
#11
#21
Mean
SD
Adjectival
Description
Interpret
ation
Professional Demeanor
Think and behave ethically:
professional behavior of
accountants
must
be
according to accounting code
of ethics
Personal attributes: having
confidence, identifying owns
strengths and weaknesses,
motivation
level,
selfpromotion
and
selfmanagement etc.
Presentation
skill:
appropriately present
and
construct financial statement
or audit opinion
Focused on outcomes: ability
to focus on objective and
subjective outcomes such as
meeting financial targets and
deadlines
.72
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.03
.18
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.80
.76
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.20
.71
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.10
.48
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.37
Agree
Agree
Composi
te Mean
Of
Problem
Solving
and
Decision
Making
3.13
.51
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Interaction
#14
#19
#24
#25
Composite
Mean of
Interaction
3.27
.74
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.27
.58
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.79
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.76
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.56
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Agree
2.83
3.03
3.10
Leadership
#20
#27
Composite
Mean of
Leadershi
p
3.23
.74
High
Competenc
e
3.37
.61
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.60
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.30
Communication
#15
#16
#18
#22
Composite
Mean of
Communi
cation
#12
Composite
Mean of
Project
Managem
ent
OVERAL
L MEAN
OF
PERSON
AL
COMPET
ENCY
2.87
.78
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.07
.83
High
Competenc
e
Agree
3.00
.74
3.23
.77
3.04
.67
High
Competenc
e
High
Competenc
e
High
Competenc
e
Project Management
Project management: having
High
the ability to establish and 3.00 .59 Competenc
run new projects
e
3.00
.59
High
Competenc
e
3.12
.47
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Composi
te
Mean
SD
Strategic/Critical Thinking
3.10
.48
Industry/Sector Perspective
3.00
.59
International/Global
Perspective
2.77
.82
3.27
.64
3.00
.54
3.00
.64
2.92
.55
Resource Management,
Legal/Regulatory Perspective
Marketing/Client Focus,
OVERALL
Adjectival
Description
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
Interpretat
ion
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
For Marketing/Client Focus, it has a composite mean of 3.00 and an interpretation of low
competence.
As shown also in the table, the sub-variable Strategic/Critical Thinking shows the
highest composite of mean of 3.10. On the other hand, the sub-variable
International/Global Perspective has the lowest mean of 2.77.
In the study of Kavanagh and Drennan (2008), he revealed that students were
focused on developing routine technical expertise, oral and written communication skills,
analytical and problem solving skills and appreciative skills including decision making
and critical thinking. In conclusion entry-level accountants should have familiarization
and awareness of the industry they are working into for them to maintain the performance
in their work.
In conclusion, accounting encompasses the ability to link data, knowledge, and
insight together from various disciplines to provide information for decision-making.
Being in tune with the "big picture" perspective is a necessary component for success.
Individuals entering the accounting profession should be able to communicate to others
the vision, strategy, goals, and culture of organizations.
Table 12
Perceived Competencies of Entry- level Accountant Respondents as Perceived by
Themselves in Terms of Business or Organizational Competencies With
Corresponding Statements
Indicator Functional
Statement
#
Mean
SD
Adjectival
Description
Strategic/Critical Thinking
Interpret
ation
#30
Composite
Mean
Of
Strategic/
Critical
Thinking
#34
Composi
te Mean
Of
Industry
/Sector
Perspect
ive
#28
Composi
te Mean
of
Industry
/Sector
Perspect
ive
3.10
3.10
.48
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.48
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Industry/Sector Perspective
Work
effectively
in
diversified cultural settings:
High
understanding cultural norms
3.00 .69 Competenc
and values to work in
e
diversified
culture
or
multinational firms
3.00
.69
High
Competenc
e
International/Global Perspective
International
global
perspective: Knowledge and
understanding
of
High
international
financial 2.76 .82 Competenc
reporting standards and of
e
current developments in the
accounting profession
2.77
.82
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
#35
Composite
Mean of
Resource
Managem
ent
#29
#32
Composi
te Mean
of
Legal/Re
gulatory
Perspect
ive
#31
Resource Management
Engage in lifelong learning:
attending
professional
High
development, seminars , team 3.27 .64 Competenc
buildings and
programs
e
required in the profession.
3.27
.64
High
Competenc
e
Legal/Regulatory Perspective
Legal regulatory perspective:
knowledge of the legal
High
structure of the state such as 2.87 .63 Competenc
corporate law, taxation and
e
auditing standards
Inter or multidisciplinary
perspective: while doing
accounting
considering
High
others
disciplinary 3.13 .68 Competenc
perspective such as strategic
e
management, corporate law
and taxation etc.
3.00
.54
High
Competenc
e
Marketing/Client Focus
Marketing/clients
focus:
customer care orientation
High
such as knowing marketing 2.93 .78 Competenc
tactics in order to deal with
e
clients
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
#33
Strategic
management:
concerned with the study of
understanding organisation
strategic requirements such
as knowing porter's 5 forces,
SWOT
analysis,
price
differentiation
strategies,
product development, market
penetration etc
Composi
te Mean
of
Marketi
ng/Clien
t Focus
OVERAL
L MEAN
OF
ORGANIZ
ATIONAL
COMPET
ENCIES
3.07
3.00
2.92
.74
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.64
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.55
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Table 13
Overall Assessment on the Perceived Competencies of Entry- level Accountant
Respondents as Perceived by Themselves
Indicator
Mean
SD
Functional
3.00
.56
Personal
3.12
.47
Organizational or
Business
2.92
.55
Overall Mean
3.01
.47
Adjectival
Interpretation
Description
High
Agree
Competence
High
Agree
Competence
High
Agree
Competence
High
Agree
Competence
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
SD
Adjectival
Description
.53
.63
.53
.40
Research
2.38
.50
Leverage technology
2.77
.40
2.7
7
High Competence
High Competence
High Competence
High Competence
Low
Competence
High Competence
Indicator
Functional
Decision-making
Risk analysis
Measurement
Reporting
OVERALL
.40
Interpretation
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
High
Competence
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Mea S
Adjectival
n
D Description
Decision Making
Interpretatio
n
#1
#10
Composite
Mean
Of Decision
Making
#2
Composite
Mean Of Risk
Analysis
Decision-making:
having the ability to
conceptually
structuralize
the
situation and select
one
amongst
available options.
The ability to analyse
and reason logically:
supporting
your
arguments
with
theoretical analysis or
objective
or
subjective reasoning
process.
2.93
.
58
High
Competence
Agree
2.87
.
73
High
Competence
Agree
2.90
.
53
High
Competenc
e
Agree
High
Competence
Agree
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Risk Analysis
Financial
risk
analysis: having the
ability to assess the
factors that may
jeopardize the project
.
such as knowing cost 2.87
63
benefit analysis, ratio
analysis,
portfolio
management, NPV,
IRR,
sensitivity
analysis etc.
2.87
Measurement
.
63
#9
#3
Economics
background:
analysing
the
production,
distribution
and
consumption
of
goods and services
such as knowing how
to measure GDP,
GNP, demand and
supply
curve,
equilibrium, and price
elasticity etc.
Financial accounting:
classifying
of
financial transactions
to proper accounts.
Composite
Mean of
Measurement
#8
Composite
Mean of
Reporting
#6
3.20
.
76
High
Competence
Agree
2.70
.
53
High
Competence
Agree
High
2.95
Competenc
e
Reporting
.
53
Agree
2.90
.
61
High
Competence
Agree
2.90
.
61
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.
56
Low
Competence
Disagree
Research
Use of modeling and
quantitative analysis 2.37
techniques
#7
Composite
Mean of
Research
#4
#5
Composite
Mean of
Leverage
Technology
OVERALL
MEAN OF
FUNCTIONAL
COMPETENC
Y
2.40
.
62
Low
Competence
Disagree
2.38
.
50
Low
Competenc
e
Disagree
Low
Competence
Disagree
High
Competence
Agree
2.63
.
66
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.77
.
40
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Leverage Technology
Utilize
specialized
.
software
(SPSS, 2.23
86
accounting and tax).
Information
technology
competence: having
the ability to use
.
3.03
computer
software
72
such as knowing MS
Office,
Excel,
Powerpoints
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Table 16
Perceived Competencies of Entry- level Accountant Respondents as Perceived by
Supervisors in Terms of Personal Competencies
Composit
e
Mean
SD
Professional Demeanor
2.93
.57
2.88
.47
Interaction
2.91
.55
Leadership
2.72
.37
Communication
2.38
.32
2.38
.32
2.72
.37
Indicator
Project Management
OVERALL
Adjectival
Description
High
Competence
High
Competen
ce
High
Competence
High
Competence
Low
Competence
Low
Competence
High
Competence
Interpretat
ion
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Indicator Functional
Statement
#
#13
Mean
SD
Adjectival
Description
Interpret
ation
Professional Demeanor
Think and behave ethically:
professional behavior of
accountants
must
be
according to accounting code
of ethics
3.27
.74
High
Competenc
e
Agree
#17
#23
#26
Composite
Mean
Of
Profession
al
Demeanor
#11
#21
3.03
.72
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.57
.77
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.83
.75
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.93
.57
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Composi
te Mean
Of
Problem
Solving
and
Decision
Making
2.88
Agree
Agree
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.74
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.73
High
Competenc
e
Agree
.47
Interaction
#14
#19
3.00
3.23
#24
#25
Composite
Mean of
Interaction
2.67
.80
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.73
.74
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.91
.55
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Leadership
#20
#27
Composite
Mean of
Leadershi
p
#15
#16
#18
#22
Composite
Mean of
Communi
cation
2.80
.71
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.83
.65
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.82
.56
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Low
Competenc
e
Disagree
Low
Competenc
e
Disagree
Communication
Communicate orally: having
the ability to speak fluently in
English, using appropriate 2.10 .66
tone to address your boss and
subordinates.
Communicate in written
format: having the ability to
2.50 .57
draft inter office memos and
letters.
English language: having the
ability to read, write, listen 2.43 .63
and speak in English.
Listen effectively: listen
attentively and understanding 2.50 .63
what others are saying.
2.38
.32
Low
Competenc
e
Low
Competenc
e
Low
Competenc
e
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Project Management
Project management: having
High
the ability to establish and 2.73 .64 Competenc
run new projects
e
#12
Composite
Mean of
Project
Managem
ent
OVERAL
L MEAN
OF
PERSON
AL
COMPET
ENCY
Agree
2.73
.64
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.72
.37
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Composi
te
Mean
SD
Strategic/Critical Thinking
2.70
.60
Industry/Sector Perspective
2.77
.73
International/Global
Perspective
2.67
.71
2.67
.71
2.72
.58
2.53
.57
2.68
.51
Resource Management
Legal/Regulatory Perspective
Marketing/Client Focus
OVERALL
Adjectival
Description
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
High
Competence
Interpretat
ion
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Agree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Table 19
Perceived Competencies of Entry- level Accountant Respondents as Perceived by
Supervisors in Terms of Business or Organizational Competencies With
Corresponding Statements
Indicator Functional
Statement
#
#30
Composite
Mean
Of
Strategic/
Critical
Thinking
#34
Composi
te Mean
Of
Industry
/Sector
Perspect
ive
#28
Mean
SD
Adjectival
Description
Interpret
ation
Strategic/Critical Thinking
Critical thinking: having a
sight to see things beyond its
apparent meaning and not
accepting anything until
proven with logical reasoning
or through some evidence
2.70
.60
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.70
.60
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Industry/Sector Perspective
Work
effectively
in
diversified cultural settings:
High
understanding cultural norms
2.77 .73 Competenc
and values to work in
e
diversified
culture
or
multinational firms
2.77
.73
High
Competenc
e
International/Global Perspective
International
global
perspective: Knowledge and
understanding
of
High
international
financial 2.67 .71 Competenc
reporting standards and of
e
current developments in the
accounting profession
Agree
Agree
Agree
Composi
te Mean
of
Industry
/Sector
Perspect
ive
#35
Composite
Mean of
Resource
Managem
ent
#29
#32
Composi
te Mean
of
Legal/Re
gulatory
Perspect
ive
#31
2.67
.71
High
Competenc
e
Resource Management
Engage in lifelong learning:
attending
professional
High
development, seminars , team 2.67 .71 Competenc
buildings and
programs
e
required in the profession.
2.67
.71
High
Competenc
e
Legal/Regulatory Perspective
Legal regulatory perspective:
knowledge of the legal
High
structure of the state such as 2.67 .71 Competenc
corporate law, taxation and
e
auditing standards
Inter or multidisciplinary
perspective: while doing
accounting
considering
High
others
disciplinary 2.77 .68 Competenc
perspective such as strategic
e
management, corporate law
and taxation etc.
2.72
.58
High
Competenc
e
Marketing/Client Focus
Marketing/clients
focus:
customer care orientation
Low
such as knowing marketing 2.43 .68 Competenc
tactics in order to deal with
e
clients
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Disagree
#33
Strategic
management:
concerned with the study of
understanding organisation
strategic requirements such
as knowing porter's 5 forces,
SWOT
analysis,
price
differentiation
strategies,
product development, market
penetration etc
Composi
te Mean
of
Marketi
ng/Clien
t Focus
OVERAL
L MEAN
OF
ORGANIZ
ATIONAL
COMPET
ENCIES
2.63
.61
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.53
.57
High
Competenc
e
Agree
2.68
.51
High
Competenc
e
Agree
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Table 20
Overall Assessment on the Perceived Competencies of Entry- level Accountant
Respondents as Perceived by Supervisors
Indicator
Mean
SD
Functional
2.77
.40
Personal
2.72
.37
Organizational or
Business
2.68
.51
2.72
.34
Overall Mean
Adjectival
Interpretation
Description
High
Agree
Competence
High
Agree
Competence
High
Agree
Competence
High
Agree
Competence
Legend: Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.50 ; Disagree 1.51-2.50 ; Agree 2.51-3.50 ; Strongly Agree 3.51 4.00
Velasco (2012) indicates that employers value, more aspects related with personality and other
personal qualities of young graduates. Also, Tenedero and Vizconde (2015) explore the
personal relevant skills in the workplace tasks of entry-level employees.
However this does not mean that other competencies could be forgone altogether.
A study conducted by Oliver (2011), both accounting employers and teaching staff consider that
important capabilities need to be better demonstrated by new graduates. This study suggests that
there should be a given importance-performance analysis for prioritizing particular capabilities
for immediate attention in particular, work related knowledge and skills, writing clearly and
effectively, communicating with clients, thinking critically and analytically, solving complex,
real-world problems and developing general industry awareness because these would be of great
help in the workplace which can be improved to enhance their early professional success. The
findings that reveal students rated and need continuous learning is the most important
skill to their future careers and focused on developing oneself is another.
Table 21
Differences in Perceived Competencies of Entry-level Accountants
as Perceived by themselves when Grouped According to Gender
Competencies
Functional
Competencies
Personal
Competencies
Organizational
and Business
Competencies
Over-all
Gender
Mean
SD
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
2.88
3.08
3.01
3.19
2.71
.35
.66
.32
.55
.33
Female
3.06
.626
Male
Female
2.87
3.11
.24
.56
tvalue
Sig
Decision
on Ho
Interpretatio
n
-.97
.34
Accepted
Not
Significant
-1.01
.31
Accepted
Not
Significant
-1.75
.09
Accepted
Not
Significant
-1.40
.17
Accepted
Not
Significant
Table 22
Differences in Perceived Competencies of Entry-level Accountants
as Perceived by themselves when Grouped According to Work Area
Competencies
Functional
Competencies
Personal
Competencies
Organizational
and Business
Competencies
Over-all
Work
Area
Mean
SD
Public
Private
Public
Private
2.75
3.26
2.91
3.33
.66
.25
.45
.41
Public
2.76
.55
Private
3.08
.51
Public
Private
2.81
3.22
.51
.33
tvalue
Sig
Decision
on Ho
Interpretatio
n
-2.75
.01
Rejected
Significant
-2.70
.01
Rejected
Significant
-1.62
.12
Accepted
Not
Significant
-2.66
.01
Rejected
Significant
Competencies
Functional
Competencies
Personal
Competencies
Organizational
and Business
Competencies
Over-all
Gender
Mean
SD
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
2.74
2.80
2.72
2.71
2.70
.38
.42
.37
.38
.46
Female
2.66
.56
Male
Female
2.72
2.72
.29
.38
tvalue
Sig
Decision
on Ho
Interpretatio
n
-.43
.668
Accepted
Not
Significant
.07
.946
Accepted
Not
Significant
.21
.833
Accepted
Not
Significant
-.04
.970
Accepted
Not
Significant
In the given data above, it showed that all of the competencies have a significance value
greater than 0.05 that means there is no difference on the perceived competencies of entry-level
accountants as perceived by the supervisors when grouped according to gender. It contradict the
study of Brahmasrene and Whitten as cited by (2001) gender differences in accounting
performance suggest that female students tend to exhibit more skills and proficiency than their
male counterparts because they work harder, have better study skills, attend classes regularly, and
strike a good balance between their social life and academic life.
Table 24
Difference on the perceived competencies of entry-level accountants as
Perceived by the Supervisors when Grouped according to Work Area
Competencies
Functional
Competencies
Personal
Competencies
Organizational
and Business
Competencies
Over-all
Work
Area
Mean
SD
Public
Private
Public
Private
2.59
2.95
2.50
2.93
.37
.35
.32
.26
Public
2.62
.33
Private
2.73
.65
Public
Private
2.57
2.87
.262
.35
tvalue
Sig
Decision
on Ho
Interpretatio
n
-2.70
.01
Rejected
Significant
-4.04
.00
Rejected
Significant
-.56
.58
Accepted
Not
Significant
-2.67
.01
Rejected
Significant
In the given data above, it showed that functional competencies and personal
competencies have a significance value lower than 0.05 it mean that there is difference on the
perceived competencies of entry-level accountants as perceived by the supervisors when grouped
according to work area while organizational and business competencies is greater than 0.05, it
mean that there is no difference on the perceived competencies of entry-level accountants as
perceived by the supervisors when grouped according to work area.
The over-all significance value is 0.01 and it is lower than 0.05 it mean that there is
difference on the perceived competencies of entry-level accountants as perceived by the
supervisors when grouped according to work area. The data agree on the study of Valentine
(2001),that there is a significant difference on the perceived competencies of entry-level
accountants as perceived by the supervisors when they are grouped according to their areas of
work in accounting.
Computed
r
Sig
Decision
on Ho
Interpretation
0.50
.79
Accepted
Not Significant
In the given data above, presents the relationship on the Perceived Competencies of
entry-level accountants as perceived by the Supervisor respondents and entry-level
Accountants themselves. It showed that the significance value .79 is greater than 0.05, it
means that there is no relationship on the perceived competencies of entry-level
accountants as perceived by the supervisor and themselves. It only contradict the study of
Martinez (2008) that indicates that there is a relationship on the perceived competencies
of entry-level accountants and their employers.
The data above only states that the competencies (Personal, Functional and
organizational or business competencies) doesnt affect the perceived competencies of
entry-level accountants as perceived by the supervisor and themselves.
Competencies
Objectives
Procedures
Time
Fram
e
Person-incharge
Key Result
Indicator
Leverage
Technology to
Develop and
Enhance
Functional
Competencies
To enable
the
participan
ts acquire
the
necessary
skills to
use
technolog
y and
technolog
y tools
effectivel
y and
efficiently.
Lecture based
on
PowerPoint
presentations
about
software used
in
the
accounting
environment
The
facilitator
will
familiarize
and teach the
students
about
the
concepts and
theories
in
accounting
information
system
The
facilitator
will take the
participants
to computer
lab and use
the computer
for
data
analysis.
Financial
statements
would
be
prepared
using
computer
with
the
installed
software.
Matching of
manual
output with
the
computerized
output.
1
month
Facilitator/
s
Participants
performanc
e of
assigned
tasks on
computer
Research
To enable
the
participan
ts apply
to have
strong
research
skills to
access
relevant
guidance
or other
informati
on,
understan
d it, and
apply it.
The
facilitator
will
give
case
studies
related to
the course
of
the
students
which are
to
be
solved by
the
students
for a year.
Procedures
related to
Statistics
are to be
applied by
the
students in
conducting
the
case
studies
The
facilitators
would
evaluate
the
case
studies
solved
1 year
Facilitator/
s
Techniques
used by the
participants
Marketing
/Client Focus
To enable
the
participants
anticipate
and meet
the
changing
needs of
clients,
employers,
customers,
and
markets.
Facilitators
would
expose the
students in
the working
environment
and
give
lectures on
the
client
targeting
Facilitators
would give
effective and
efficient tips
on how to
interact and
1
discuss better
with clients.
month
A one-on-one
interaction
with
the
facilitator
acting as the
client
will
serve as a
practice
Participants
would work
as
client
assistant to
gain
experience in
interacting
with clients.
Facilitator/
s
Participants
number of
clients
Communicatio
n
To have the
ability to
listen,
deliver
powerful
presentation
s and
produce
examples of
effective
business
writing.
The
facilitator
would
discuss
theories on
how
to
communicate
orally
and
through
writing.
A marketing
plan must be
produced by
1
the students.
month
The
marketing
plan would
be checked
by
the
facilitator.
The students
would orally
defend
the
marketing
plan with the
panel and the
facilitator.
Facilitator/
s
Grade
provided by
the
facilitator
in the
marketing
plan and
oral defense