Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the number of articles in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (BJOMS) written by consultants and
trainees within deaneries in the UK. We reviewed the authorship of articles published between January 2010 and July 2011, and subdivided
them by deanery and first author. In total, 76 full length articles were published (30 written by consultants and 46 by trainees), and half came
from the London, Wessex, and Mersey deaneries. Technical notes were mostly written by trainees; 5 of the 22 published came from London.
A total of 38 short communications were published; most were from the Wessex (21%), Yorkshire and Humber (29%), and Mersey (13%)
deaneries, and in 32% a consultant was first author. A league table of all publications showed that most came from Wessex (n = 25), Mersey
(n = 23), and Yorkshire and Humber (n = 23). Most publications by trainees came from Wessex (n = 20), followed by Yorkshire (n = 18) and
London (n = 11). The study shows that the amount of published material varies considerably between oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS)
units in the UK. To realise their ambitions, potential trainees with an interest in research and publications may consequently find the best
support in these deaneries.
2012 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Research; Publications; Training
Introduction
The British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
(BJOMS) publishes review papers, full length articles, short
communications, technical notes, and letters, and is probably
the most widely read journal by British oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS). Its impact factor rose in 2010 to
1.89 making it 58th out of 187 journals of surgery, and 21st
out of 74 journals of dentistry, oral surgery, and medicine. A
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 191 222 8290; fax: +44 191 222 6137.
E-mail address: michaelagoodson@hotmail.com (M.L. Goodson).
0266-4356/$ see front matter 2012 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.03.022
D. Hammond et al. / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50 (2012) 654661
Method
We assessed the authorship of the full length articles in
BJOMS by hand searching the journals published between
April 2006 and July 2011. The geographical location of the
publishing unit was taken to be the workplace of the first
author at the time of publication and was categorised by
deanery.
A second search was done to look at all non-commissioned
articles published from January 2010 to July 2011, again subdivided by deanery and first author. They included full length
papers, short communications, and technical notes. Articles
655
Table 1
Number of full length publications April 2006 to July 2011 subdivided by
deanery (n = 200).
Deanery
No. (%)
London
Wessex
Mersey
Scotland
Yorkshire and Humber
West Midlands
East Midlands
South West
Wales
Severn
Northern Ireland
Northern
Oxford
North Western
East of England
40 (20)
30 (15)
25 (13)
18 (9)
16 (8)
14 (7)
11 (6)
9 (5)
7 (4)
7 (4)
7 (4)
7 (4)
4 (2)
3 (2)
2 (1)
Results
Deaneries that currently exist in the UK include the Defence
Postgraduate Medical Deanery; East of England MultiProfessional Deanery; London Deanery; Northern Deanery;
Oxford Deanery; South West Peninsula Deanery; NHS
West Midlands Workforce Deanery; East Midlands Healthcare Deanery; Kent, Surrey, and Sussex Deanery; Mersey
Deanery; North Western Deanery; Severn Deanery; Wessex
Deanery; Yorkshire and Humber Deanery; and the Northern
Ireland Deanery.
We were not able to ascertain which trainees were registered in the Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery so
publications for this deanery were grouped with results from
the training unit of the Defence trainee.
In total, discounting BAOMS abstract supplements, 40
issues of BJOMS were published between April 2006 and
July 2011 comprising a total of 200 full length articles from
units within the UK. Table 1 shows the numbers of full length
articles published by deanery in that period. Almost half came
from the London, Wessex, and Mersey deaneries, and many
of the papers from these centres had the same first authors.
The second search included identification of all noncommissioned articles in BJOMS from January 2010 to July
2011. In total, 76 full length articles were published from
units within the UK.1085 Of these, 30 had a consultant as first
author, and a trainee was the first author in 46. The authors
of over half the full length articles were from the London,
Wessex, and Mersey deaneries.
Table 2 shows the number of full length articles by consultants and trainees subdivided by deanery over the 18-month
period. In the Scotland, Mersey, London, and Severn deaneries over 60% of the publications had a consultant as first
author, but in the Northern, Oxford, West Midlands, and
656
D. Hammond et al. / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50 (2012) 654661
Table 2
Number of full length publications January 2010 to July 2011 subdivided
by deanery and first author (n = 76).
Table 4
Short communications January 2010 to July 2011 subdivided by deanery
and first author (n = 38).
Deanery
No. by
consultants
No. by trainees
Deanery
No. by
consultants
No. by trainees
London
Wessex
Mersey
Scotland
Yorkshire and Humber
West Midlands
East Midlands
South West
Wales
Severn
Northern Ireland
Kent, Surrey, Sussex
Northern
Oxford
North Western
East of England
8 (11)
14 (18)
18 (24)
6 (8)
9 (12)
2 (3)
4 (5)
5 (7)
2 (3)
1 (1)
0
2 (3)
3 (4)
2 (3)
0
0
5
3
11
4
0
0
2
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
11
7
2
9
2
2
3
1
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
London
Wessex
Mersey
Scotland
Yorkshire and Humber
West Midlands
East Midlands
South West
Wales
Severn
Northern Ireland
Northern
Oxford
North Western
East of England
3 (8)
8 (21)
5 (13)
2 (5)
11(29)
2 (5)
2 (5)
1 (3)
0
1 (3)
1 (3)
1 (3)
0
1 (3)
0
0
2
2
0
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
3
6
3
2
8
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
technical notes. Of the 136 articles in the study, 48 were written by consultants and 88 by trainees. The largest number of
publications came from the Wessex, Mersey, and Yorkshire
and Humber deaneries, and the greatest number by trainees
came from Wessex, followed by Yorkshire and Humber, and
London.
Discussion
This study does not attempt to reflect all publishing of work
within UK oral and maxillofacial units; it merely represents
publications in our journal. Most OMFS units that are actively
involved in research will also publish in other scientific journals. Indeed, one potential failing of this study is that high
quality research, particularly basic scientific work, will probably be published in higher impact journals, both in clinical
Table 3
Technical notes January 2010 to July 2011 subdivided by deanery and first
author (n = 22).
Table 5
League table of total publications by deanery, January 2010 to July 2011
(n = 136).
Deanery
London
Wessex
Mersey
Scotland
Yorkshire and Humber
West Midlands
East Midlands
South West
Wales
Severn
Northern Ireland
Kent, Surrey, Sussex
Northern
Oxford
North Western
East of England
No. by
consultants
No. by trainees
Deanery
No. by
consultants
No. by trainees
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
London
Wessex
Mersey
Scotland
Yorkshire and Humber
West Midlands
East Midlands
South West
Wales
Severn
Northern Ireland
Kent, Surrey, Sussex
Northern
Oxford
North Western
East of England
16 (12)
25 (18)
23 (17)
9 (7)
23 (17)
6 (4)
8 (6)
7 (5)
4 (3)
3 (2)
1 (1)
3 (2)
4 (3)
2 (2)
2 (2)
0
5
5
13
4
5
1
4
3
2
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
11
20
10
5
18
5
4
4
2
0
0
2
4
2
1
0
D. Hammond et al. / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50 (2012) 654661
(such as Head and Neck, and Oral Oncology) and pure science journals. This may be because they are more specific to
the type of research, or the quality of the work merits a higher
profile journal. However, BJOMS is probably the most commonly read journal amongst OMFS trainees and consultants,
and consequently is a logical choice for publication and to
get oneself known by ones peers.
This study has shown overall that there is considerable
variation in publishing practice within UK oral and maxillofacial units. A relatively small number of units seem to be
producing most of the publications on behalf of the specialty,
and from our study it seems that trainees are well supported
in their aspirations to contribute to this process. In general
we found that trainees were first authors of more papers in
BJOMS than consultants, which may reflect changing practice now that trainees in some regions are now required
to publish research and clinical work for ARCP and RITA
assessments.
Based on our results it seems that trainees tend to prefer to
write shorter articles; 77% of technical notes and 65% of short
communications had trainees as first authors, but a trainee was
first author in only 61% of full length articles. This may reflect
the fact that large numbers of audits are being submitted as
short communications, or that shorter papers are perceived as
being easier to produce and write up than full length articles.
Full length articles often include data derived from research
projects that require funding, ethical approval, and numerous
other obstacles for which trainees may not have the necessary
time, ability, or support. Several of the full length articles by
trainees were written by the same people and of these, many
were in grant-funded MD and PhD programmes and were
supported by OMFS consultants with an academic interest.
The future of the specialty is in the hands of the current
generation of registrars and young consultants, and unless
trainees are encouraged to produce high quality research
and publish papers, progress in the specialty is in danger
of slowing or coming to a halt. Interestingly, in most issues
of BJOMS from January 2010 to July 2011, around half the
full length articles were from units outside the UK, and they
came from countries including China, Japan, Netherlands,
Germany, Israel, France, Greece, and Switzerland. Contributions to the journal from other countries provide readers
with an insight into OMFS practice elsewhere in the world,
but in reality, our view is that the UK should produce more
high quality research to support the specialty in the coming
years.
References
1. Gulati A, Scott J, Blythe JN, Southorn B, Brennan PA. Review of
salivary gland papers published in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery during 20092010. The British Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:6279.
2. Blythe JN, Southorn BJ, Gulati A, Cascarini L, Brennan
PA. A synopsis of technical notes published in the British
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 20092010. The
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
657
658
D. Hammond et al. / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50 (2012) 654661
23. Kanatas AN, Fisher SE, Lowe D, Ong TK, Mitchell DA, Rogers SN. The
configuration of clinics and the use of biopsy and photography in oral
premalignancy: a survey of consultants of the British Association of Oral
and Maxillofacial Surgeons. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery 2011;49:99105.
24. Scott B, DSouza J, Perinparajah N, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Longitudinal
evaluation of restricted mouth opening (trismus) in patients following
primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:10611.
25. Ketabchi A, Kalavrezos N, Newman L. Sarcomas of the head and neck:
a 10-year retrospective of 25 patients to evaluate treatment modalities, function and survival. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery 2011;49:11620.
26. Edler RJ, Wertheim D, Greenhill D, Jaisinghani A. Quantitative use of
photography in orthognathic outcome assessment. The British Journal
of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:11620.
27. Howley C, Ali N, Lee R, Cox S. Use of the alar base cinch suture
in Le Fort I osteotomy: is it effective. The British Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:12730.
28. Ethunandan M, Evans BT. Linear trapdoor or white-eye blowout fracture
of the orbit: not restricted to children. The British Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:1427.
29. Penfold C, Dominguez-Gonzalez S. Bilateral cleft lip and nose
repair. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:
16571.
30. McMahon JD, Devine JC, Hetherington J, Bryson G, McLellan D,
Maciver C, et al. Involved surgical margins in oral and oropharyngeal carcinomaan anatomical problem. The British Journal of Oral
& Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:1725.
31. Rogers SN, Hunter R, Lowe D. Awareness of oral cancer in the
Mersey region. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
2011;49:1768.
32. ORegan B, Mather CI. Ipsilateral removal of sublingual gland after
excision of submandibular gland for benign disease: 10-year prospective
study and comprehensive review 19782008. The British Journal of
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:1869.
33. Elrasheed A, Toma Q, Cousin GC. Mandibular fractures that have healed
are not weakened permanently: series of nine patients who sustained
mandibular fractures at different sites on two separate occasions. The
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:20912.
34. Antoun JS, Steenberg LJ, Lee KH. Maxillofacial fractures sustained by
unmounted equestrians. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery 2011;49:2136.
35. Ponduri S, Pringle A, Illing H, Brennan P. Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index outcomes for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery
patients. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
2011;49:21720.
36. Patel V, McLeod NM, Rogers SN, Brennan PA. Bisphosphonate
osteonecrosis of the jawa literature review of UK policies versus international policies on bisphosphonates, risk factors and prevention. The
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:2517.
37. Chalmers A, Elliott S. What is new in maxillofacial anaesthesia. The
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:25860.
38. Burke CJ, Thomas RH, Howlett D. Imaging the major salivary glands.
The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:2619.
39. Tighe DF. Utility of a generic risk prediction score in predicting outcomes after orofacial surgery for cancer. The British Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:2815.
40. ORegan B, Bharadwaj G. Comparison of facial nerve injury and recovery rates after antegrade and retrograde nerve dissection in parotid
surgery for benign disease: prospective study over 4 years. The British
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:28691.
41. Al-Khaldi N, Sleeman D, Allen F. Stability of dental implants in grafted
bone in the anterior maxilla: longitudinal study. The British Journal of
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:31923.
42. McLeod NM, Patel V, Kusanale A, Rogers SN, Brennan PA. Bisphosphonate osteonecrosis of the jaw: a literature review of UK policies
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
D. Hammond et al. / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50 (2012) 654661
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
659
660
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
D. Hammond et al. / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50 (2012) 654661
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2010;
48:5556.
Sood V, Misra A, Brown I, Devine J. Technique for transfer of a template
in free flap design. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
2010;48:557.
Goddard R, Witherow H. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE). The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
2011;49:656.
Falla L, Shekar K, Singh M, Brennan PA. Manipulation of images on
radiographs to enhance picture quality. The British Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:1489.
Gahir D, Clifford N, Avery C. A periosteal retraction technique to facilitate access and closure of the surgical approach to the orbit. The British
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:1523.
Rogers SN, Lowe D, Paleri V. A survey of head and neck surgical
oncologists regarding the inclusion of level IIb in a neck dissection
of the node negative neck. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery 2011;49:2302.
Cobb AR, McCarthy E, Van Zyl M, Ayliffe PR. Alveolar bone grafting:
use of the Jacobs chuck with trephine to harvest iliac crest cancellous bone. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
2011;49:23940.
Barrett AW, Barbaccia C, Lavery KM. Wegeners granulomatosis of the
parotid gland and surrounding tissues. The British Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:2412.
Ramsay-Baggs P. The Ulster hook for intermaxillary fixation. The
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:3245.
Goddard R, Madigan J, Mehanna P. Unusual case of spontaneous discharge of pus (infected cyst) through the dorsum of the tongue. The
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:679.
Albasri H, Eley KA, Saeed NR. Chronic pain related to first bite syndrome: report of two cases. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery 2011;49:1546.
Ridha H, Thompson MK, Cameron MG, Durrani AJ. Anatomical variation in deep inferior epigastric pedicles and implications for harvest
of lower abdominal flaps. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery 2011;49:2334.
Shakib K, Sinanan M. Stratification of the risk of serious allergic
cutaneous reactions with therapeutic management of trigeminal neuralgia. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:
2356.
Woodhouse NR, Gok G, Howlett DC, Ramesar K. Warthins tumour
and facial nerve palsy: an unusual association. The British Journal of
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:2378.
Kanatas AN, Jenkins GW, Sutton D, McCaul JA. Lugols iodine
identifies synchronous invasive carcinomatime for a clinical trial.
The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;49:
40911.
Hodges S, Williams MD, Moody AB, Ramesar K, Howlett DC.
Ultrasound-guided core biopsy for investigation of cervical lymph
node: chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and metastatic squamous cell
carcinoma. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
2010;48:467.
Prabhu S, Smitha RS, Punnya VA. Merkel cell carcinoma of the alveolar
mucosa in a young adult: a rare case report. The British Journal of Oral
& Maxillofacial Surgery 2010;48:4850.
Smyth J, Marley J. An unusual delayed complication of inferior alveolar nerve block. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
2010;48:512.
Kashyap SA, Patterson AR, Loukota RA, Kelly G. Tapias syndrome
after repair of a fractured mandible. The British Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Surgery 2010;48:534.
Coombes DM, Norris PM, Barrett AW, Brown AE. Malakoplakia of
the face: a rare but important diagnosis. The British Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Surgery 2010;48:557.
Sriskandan N, Moody A, Howlett DC. Ultrasound-guided submandibular gland injection of botulinum toxin for hypersalivation in
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
139.
D. Hammond et al. / British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 50 (2012) 654661
140. Patel M, Shekar K, Mackenzie N, Pratt C. Blunt injury of the neck resulting in life-threatening compromise of the airway. The British Journal
of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2010;48:31921.
141. Burnham R, Bhandari R, Holmes S. Divers harpoon gun: facial injury
caused by an unsual weapon. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2010;48:4823.
142. Avery CM, Parmar S, Martin T. The use of a T-shaped contoured unilocking titanium radial plate for prophylactic internal fixation of the radial
osteocutaneous donor site. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery 2010;48:64850.
661