Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PLAY
LEARN
Chess.com
SHARE
FORUMS
Search
MORE
Sitting in a coffee shop in Tokyo thats little known but adored by those who frequent it, I was
staring at the most beautiful and delicious cappuccino on Earth. This was my second one, but
before I downed my drink I thought of IM John Grefe and IM Jay Whitehead, both now deceased.
Once close to both these players, we had drifted apart.
Report ^
Olympiad
by News
31 hours ago
Bluffing In Chess
by GM Gserper
5 days ago
Can You Understand These Positions?
by IM Silman
7 days ago
IM Jay Whitehead
Report ^
IM Jack Peters
Glancing at his scoresheets, I noticed something odd: He played several children, drawing all of
them. I looked at him with pity. Come on, Jack, you cant beat little children? All you have to do
is play a solid positional game, and they will fold.
Nope, said Jack, That doesnt work anymore.
Then he showed me the following game. His opponent was 12 years old.
J # , . @
Apparently, after 33...h6 White cant make progress. A lucky save for Peters. Anthony Ge played
quickly (often just taking 10 or 15 seconds a move), and his style made it clear that positional
chess was his bread and butter.
After watching a strong player like Peters get kicked around by several kids, I got curious. Are
children from 8 years of age and up really that strong? I havent played in a tournament since
1999 (!!!), and I started to get a creepy feeling that I was in a coma for 17 years and, when I woke
up, I discovered that anyone over 18 years of age was, regarding chess, over the hill.
Had I walked into a different reality? I called a friend who is into chess and asked him about this
kids vs. adults battle. He said, Im glad I retired from tournament chess twelve years ago. My
pal Jumpin Jim still competes, and hes been held to a draw by a six-year-old boy and a nineyear-old girl, and he was beatenrather badlyby an eight-year-old boy.
Good grief! It was worse than I imagined!
That night, freaked out and still suffering from jet lag, I fell into a deep, dark sleep. A nightmare
followed:
Grandmaster Tarjan, who plays at least two 8 year olds every tournament, told me that its best
(if you want to avoid defeat) to offer an immediate draw. Seirawan agreed to quit talking about
live grandmaster games, instead recommending the creation of a group of six-year-old kids
showering their wisdom on the spectators. And then, realizing the seriousness of the situation, I
had an epiphany: Hundreds of thousands of little children are members of sleeper cells that cover
the globe. With a key word on a text message sent by their leader (an evil five-year-old supergenius with gigantic frontal lobes), they will rise up, win every chess tournament in every city on
the planet, and then announce to the worlds adult players that they have solved the game of
chess once and for all.
I woke up in a cold sweat to the ringing of my phone. It was Cyrus Lakdawala, who said (as if he
was tuned into my dream), These kids terrorize us old guys. Yesterday my 9-year-old student
won the Gambito tournament!
Famed science fiction writer, retired English professor, and chess aficionado Vance Aandahl sent
me the following bit of chess history:
Al Wallace was a strong player who won the 1960 Denver Open. He loved chess and was one of
the most active players in the state, entering every tournament he could, year after year, until
he was murdered by his wife for playing too much chess. To honor his memory, Denver chess
organizers held an annual tournament called the Al Wallace Memorial for a couple of decades.
Vances tale reminded me that, decades ago, women married to chess players were referred to
as, chess widows. I brought this up because my own wife has been making mutterings about
too much chess, and the new knife set she recently purchased made me a bit fidgety. Thus, a
trip away from home sounded like a very good idea!
A FORUM OF FOUR
Cyrus Lakdawala, ready for his tryout for a Star Wars Movie
The young may be talented, but the years have sown into us something even bettera devious
mind. Just swap pieces and the kids become fish.
SILMAN
[code name: Honey Badger]
Jeremy Silman, "You talking to me? Nobody else is here. You talking to me?"
Cyrus, I didnt realize that you were a poet!
WATSON
[code name: Cairn Terrier]
5. When you stand better or are winning, always take the safe route over the tricky quicker
route. When we blow a promising position, we hold the winning lottery ticket, and then misplace
it. Keep it simple and when given a choice between the integral and the singular, always choose
the latter.
6. Pick the dullest, most solid, most old-manish opening repertoire possible. For example:
Colle/London with White and Caro-Kann/Slav with Black. Dont worry about extracting an
advantage as White. Just be sure to enter positions which require judgment and strategic
intuition over calculation. A safe/familiar opening repertoire also means that we wont be
dragged into time pressure due to our fading ability to calculate. I lament and shake my head
sadly when I see my deeply misguided fellow elderly titled players agree to play Open Sicilians
and Four Pawns Attacks versus Kings Indian (Im talking about you, John Watson and Jack
Peters!). The other virtue of such openings is the need for memorization is downplayed. When we
play a kid-opening (like the Najdorf) and mix up our lines, it just doesnt cut it to cite a loathing
for administrative detail.
SILMAN
Cyrus, youve solved the kid-problem! If we keep up this pace we might end up solving climate
change. Unfortunately, since we are chess writers, nobody wants us to talk about boxing or
physics or our favorite movies. They want us to talk about chess books. So, lets do it!
Why are There so Many Chess Books?
SILMAN
I love chess books! Who wouldnt want a chess book? They are addictive, and once you get one,
you will want another and another until you have to buy a larger house. My first chess book, at
the age of 12, was "New York 1924" by Alekhine and I almost swooned when I held it in my hand.
Ah, what a book! I knew right then and there that I needed more. But how could a 12-year-old get
money for books?
After pondering this problem, I went to a nearby swamp, captured various non-poisonous snakes,
hid them in the basement (my parents would have freaked out), and sold them as pets. Where
theres a will, theres a way!
DONALDSON
There are many reasons, but if I had to give just one I would say chess notation. Being able to
replay a game from yesterday, last year or a hundred years ago and enjoy it is what makes chess
special and unique. Authors of books on other games like poker and backgammon really dont
have that advantage.
Donaldson, aka the Enforcer (standing), protects us from the thousands of rabid chess fans.
WATSON
A chess publishers lament! Two factors come to mind: 1. Much as in the restaurant business,
everyone thinks that starting a chess publishing company is easy and profitable (to their regret);
2. The glut of wannabe chess authors results in low-cost labor, encouraging volume publication to
make up for low-margins.
LAKDAWALA
Chess players tend to be fanatical about their games, and books are their drug of choice. Right
now, I kind of think there are too many books which spread across the limited market like a
prairie field fire fanned by a strong wind. This makes it tough for publishers to survive in
the over-saturated field.
What is the Quality [of chess books] Today Compared to the Past?
WATSON
Overall, much better, if only because the analysis is protected from blunders by engines and the
material available with a mere click has broadened exponentially. If you see an idea in a game,
you can easily call it up years later, rather than scrambling to locate the players for a scoresheet,
or working from some notes on a misplaced index card. Transfer from a game in ChessBase to a
Word file is a click away.
On the other hand, for reasons Im not clear about, you see very few original ideas or even
observations in modern chess books (apart from opening innovations, of course). Masses of books
blindly repeat dull (or even dead) stereotypes about strategy, players, chess tips, etc. In
annotations, simplistic interpretations abound regarding why strong players make mistakes; we
are told, implausibly, that they mysteriously fail to understand elementary positional ideas.
LAKDAWALA
Technically, the quality is higher since all writers use computers today. But from a
prose/explanation standpoint, its the same now as in the past.
DONALDSON
There were great books in the past, but the overall quality is much higher now. There are more
strong players writing and ChessBase and god-like computer enginesall of these things are very
useful tools.
Personally, I write for players in the 1000 to 2100 range (depending on the book). I also use humor
to make the book more readable and thus more enjoyable. Though masters and beyond might
want reams of moves, the vast majority of chess players get bogged down by that and instead
prefer explanations as to whats going on, and how to make use of that new knowledge.
LAKDAWALA
I have an odd writing style which people tend to either love or hate. I view chess as a metaphor
for life, so I have no problems writing about my terriers neurosis, or any strange thought which
pops into my head, as long as it relates to the position. Also, I advocate the blasphemous thought
of often rejecting fashionable theory and maybe opting for an opening line which suits the
readers temperament, rather than always going for that theoretical +=, and then landing in a
position for which they may be unsuited.
We are all slaves to suggestion. If a line is championed by a top GM, then we, in lemming-like
fashion, are tempted to take it up as well, even if the line is totally unsuited to our style. For
instance, a natural strategist may wander into the theoretical wasteland of the Najdorf (when he
or she should be playing Caro-Kann!), which is littered with the bleached bones of the unprepared
and the unsuited. It is one thing to take risks in the hopes of future gain, and it is quite another
to endanger ourselves for the purpose of being in fashion!
In the opening stage, most of us tend to be loyal to both orthodoxy and precedent (perhaps out of
some atavistically misguided self-preservatory instinct), but this also has the effect of suppressing
creativity. I encourage readers to play many openings, just for the creative release. If you play
too narrow an opening repertoire, the endless repetition exerts a numbing effect on our minds, as
we thoughtlessly go through the opening stage motions. When it comes to our opening repertoire,
our biggest decision is: specialize or diversify? If you look at the worlds top 10 players, we see
that all of them have huge and varied repertoires. I try to focus on a positions salient essence,
rather than its details. The reader should not be accosted by crowded and conflicting impulses
without clear explanation. Instead, the reader must be given permission to dream and to create.
DONALDSON
I write about subjects that interest me and havent been well-covered.
SILMAN
Cyrus! I used the word spew a while ago and now youre stealing it by using spewing. Okay,
its a great word. Insane minds think alike.
DONALDSON
Zurich 1953 was a great tournament. It had pretty much all the great players of the time (except
Botvinnik) playing a 15-player double round robin. The Candidates' tournament in its current
format is something special, but this mammoth event was 28 rounds and lasted nearly two
months!
Bronstein was a participant in the tournament and one of the best players in the world (drawn
match with Botvinnik in 1951 and equal second in this tournament) so he was well-qualified to
write a book on it. The analysis is important, but what gives this work lasting value is his prose
commentary which reads well. Bronstein credits this to his collaborator Boris Vainstein. Keep in
mind I dont read Russian and am referring to the Dover publication translation of "Zurich 1953" by
James Marfia. It may be even better in the original.
There are many other great books, and limiting ones answer to just one title is pretty much
impossible. "Zurich 1953" is a safe default choice in much the same way that the "Master and
Margarita" by Bulgakov is for Russian grandmasters when giving the title of their favorite book in
Just Checking.
Saidy, Donaldson, and Larry Finley, who was a childhood friend of Bobby Fischer
WATSON
First, tradition. In some countries (definitely in the United States) the Bronstein version was for
many years one of a small number of chess books available in conventional bookstores and at a
very low price. Everyone grew up with it, and when choosing favorites we tend to be more
nostalgic than objective. I wouldnt be surprised if something similar applied in England and
perhaps even Russia as well. Its certainly not on my list of favorite books at all, but as
connoisseurs have pointed out for decades, the Najdorf book about the same tournament
(recently republished with extra features by Russell Enterprises) is a superb book; it is far more
complete and absorbing, with better analysis and writing.
What is Your Dream Book, a Book you Wished that You (or Someone Else) Would Write?
WATSON
It would take a hard-working author with considerable chess understanding, but someone might
write a book on Petrosian that includes plenty of biographical material and annotated games, but
also, most importantly, a discerning, non-stereotyped discussion of his style.
Guess what guys, while you were talking I wrote another chess book!
Are There Books/Authors Which are Undervalued?
SILMAN
Lots of books are undervalued. For example, books on chess history dont sell well, even though
they might be absolutely fantastic. In general, players really dont know what they need so they
buy opening books or bland endgame books that end up confusing them and, in many cases, freak
them out. Books like that end up in the bookcase, never to be used again.
Books on chess history not only makes you feel like youre part of something noble and rich and
important, but the games that go along with it help you get better.
Nowadays people think that only new things have any value. Due to this shallow view, they miss
many wonderful books by Edward Lasker, Irving Chernev, and Fred Reinfeld. These chess pioneers
wrote a lot of quality, easy-to-understand instructional books, and also wonderful books on chess
history and players that are rapidly vanishing from our collective consciousness, but should be
read by every person who loves chess.
LAKDAWALA
There are many wonderful books, which for one reason or another, just dont sell. Also, you can
have a fantastic writer who is with a small publisher, so his or her work goes under the radar and
isnt noticed.
DONALDSON
Al Horowitzs monthly magazine Chess Review, which ran from 1933 to 1969, comes to mind. The
magazine had many interesting articles and pictures and still makes for great reading.
SILMAN
Quite right, JD! Chess Review is absolutely amazing. An unbelievable mix of nostalgia, great
analysis, stories, news, and, as John said, incredible photos. I never tire of sitting back and
reading an issue or ten. They are completely addictive. Come to think of it, our love for Chess
Review shows our age.
WATSON
Undervalued is tough to pin down. One interesting subset would be authors who may be held in
lesser esteem because they have written a few too many unexceptional books, perhaps quickly
written popular ones, when people arent aware that theyve also done some brilliant and
original work. Andy Soltis seems to fit this description; in his case, I particularly admire "Soviet
Chess," "Why Lasker Matters," "Bobby Fischer Rediscovered," and "Mikhail Botvinnik," among
others. Tim Harding also seems to escape notice; his work has steadily improved, and it includes a
number of wonderful books on both historical subjects and correspondence chess. Tibor Karolyi is
an author who has put out many terrific books in recent years yet doesnt seem to be widely
recognized.
Some popular authors (e.g., of elementary books) are probably undervalued by relatively
sophisticated readers (in the old days, we had writers like Reinfeld and Chernev who got little
credit due to their subject matter and the volume of their work). There are other fine writers
who fit this category, mainly because they havent written enough to become widely known.
Is it True That Chess Books Today are Better Than Ever?
LAKDAWALA
I think so. The variety and writing styles have expanded, offering the reader greater choices. A
chess opening, like Count Dracula, is a creature of eternal resurrection. You can write a book on
the London System, and then eight years later the theory has altered so much that the publisher
Jeremys "How to Reassess Your Chess." I realize this book was written for players rated between 8001500, but by reading it (I thought it would help me become a better teacher) my rating, which was stuck
for years just under 2500, inexplicably soared to 2598. There was some magical influence in it which
kicked in, but to this day I still cant identify what this substance is!
Tals 1960 match book against Botvinnik. I model my books on Tals book, where he doesnt just analyze
the position, but describes in great detail to the reader all this thoughtsrational or irrationalto the
reader.
"Zurich Candidates 1953," By David Bronstein. This book is the predecessor to Tals book. Bronstein also
digs deeply into his own mind, rather than merely focus on the analysis.
Kotovs "Think Like a Grandmaster," which is the blueprint of how to analyze a critical position.
Fischer getting the Key to New York. Saidy, who wrote Fischer's speech, is to Fischer's left.
SILMAN
Ill avoid the obvious answers (with the exception of the books by Botvinnik and Larsen). Ill also
avoid great books like Edward Laskers "Chess Secrets" and Chernevs book on Capablanca since
Cyrus already mentioned them.
Books that I never tire of are:
"Aron Nimzowitsch: On the Road to Chess Mastery 1886-1924" by Skjoldager
"The Turk, Chess Automaton" by Levitt
"A Alekhine, Agony of a Chess Genius"
"Botvinnik: One Hundred Selected Games"
"Bent Larsens Best Games" by Larsen
"Bobby Fischers Conquest of the Worlds Chess Championship" by Reuben Fine. Its so hideously bad that
its actually good (whenever I feel down, I pick up this book and laugh).
John Donaldsons two book set on Akiba Rubinstein.
"New York 1924" by Alekhine
"Pachmans Decisive Games" by Pachman
"The King" by Donner.
incredibly instructive. He somehow makes you feel that he really wants to help you improve. Not
many writers are capable of doing that.
WATSON
In general, no, although there are exceptions. "My System" is still a masterpiece, and incredibly
entertaining. Extending the question a few years past age 20, "The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal"
is another book that wears well. And of course there are other excellent older books. But most of
the classics by grandmasters and world champions before 1940 now seem dry and/or too obvious.
Several games collections and tournament books are really great, but I wouldnt call them
favorites.
DONALDSON
Most of my favorite books today were written in the past decade, but I still like many books that I
read when I was young including Tals book on his 1960 match with Botvinnik, his collection of
best games ("The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal"), "My 60 Memorable Games" by Fischer and
"Larsens Selected Games of Chess."
My favorite tournament book is on the Second Piatigorsky Cup, which was a ten player double
round robin with many of the top players in the world (Petrosian, Spassky, Fischer, Portisch,
Larsen to name a few) participating. Even though Fischer did not write it, this book is something
special. All the players annotated each of their games except Fischer who did only one and
Donner who made comments to all but his last round game, a horrible loss which ended a
miserable tournament. Comparing different annotations to the same game, especially in the precomputer era, is always interesting.
Before I forget, congrats to the U.S. Olympiad team, including super captain Donaldson.
Is Writing About Chess a Means of Income in the US Today?
DONALDSON
Maybe for writers like Cyrus, Jeremy and John, but definitely not me! Ive written 37 books,
primarily game collections. Many of them were never intended to be nor did they turn out to be
commercially successful! Most chess professionals in the United States earn their living from
teaching. Writing, playing and commentary can be important, but teaching and instructing at
camps is much more lucrative.
WATSON
I can hardly imagine anyone making a decent income solely from chess writing, and there are only
a couple of exceptions I know of. They are authors of beginners books and elementary training
books, the biggest market by a wide margin, with the least selective (and knowledgeable)
readership.
LAKDAWALA
I make a lot more per hour teaching, but I write for the joy of it, rather than the money. Most
professional chess players are burdened by fate with the soul of a poet. The problem is if we
enter chess as a profession, we must prepare to have the bank balance of a poet as well!
studied chess history finally get their chops into something that is extremely important in chess:
the great players that came before us, their sacrifices, and the things they discovered that,
ultimately, helped chess become what it is today.
Are Club Players Able to Value Good Books?
LAKDAWALA
Some are, and others are swayed by a writers rating, where they praise a crappy book, based on
a writers super-GM status, or bash a very well written book based on the writers relatively lower
rating of an IM or FM, rather than the actual content of the book.
WATSON
Of course. There may be some books that are too technical or esoteric for any but the hardestworking amateur, but most good chess books will appeal to a very broad range of chess strengths.
DONALDSON
Yes, but they tend to buy more opening books than is good for them.
SILMAN
Sometimes a player can appreciate a good book, and sometimes a player falls victim to something
horrible. The problem is that many low-rated players dont know what is or isnt good for them.
Its a sad thing because if they make a bad book gospel they will never improve and never really
understand why.
I should add that I have the first three of Donaldsons magnificent Fischer series (the final one
will arrive in a few months), and it looks great in electronic form. For some reason that I dont
understand, it would look good on paper or in electronic form. Of course, time marches on, and as
tech gets better and better Im sure paper books will go the way of the dinosaurs.
How Many Chess Books do You Have Yourself?
LAKDAWALA
I dont know if you mean how many I have written, or how many I own, so I will answer both: I
just finished my 30th chess book for Everyman, and for the books I own, have limited bookshelf
space, and tend to donate old books (often with deep regret!) to the San Diego chess clubs
library. My wife tells me I own around 500-600 books, but I have bought thousands over my life.
SILMAN
I had around 6,000 chess books. However, it took up too much space so I got rid of around 1,500
books (I was insane... I miss them now!), shipped another 1,500 chess books to my house in
Tokyo, have another 1,000 in my West Hollywood house and another 2,000 in storage.
DONALDSON
Anyway, I have around 1500, with about half bound periodicals like British Chess Magazine, Chess
Review, Chess Life and the American Chess Bulletin. I would have more, but the library of the
Mechanics Institute of San Francisco where I work, has close to 3000 chess books which fills in a
lot of gaps for me.
SILMAN
Sorry, but I have to jump in. Donaldsons bound magazines are magnificent. Beautiful binding,
every magazine in wonderful condition. Im envious.
WATSON
I honestly havent counted. Im not a collector, but have accumulated books for many years. A
wild guess, trying to incorporate the scores of box loads in my garage without counting, would be
3000, very few of them collectors items, and many in awful condition.
Is Writing About Chess Good for Your Health?
for 8 to 12 hours while the other hand funnels potato chips and chocolate into my mouth, then I
exercise by climbing the staircase to my bedroom so I can take a nap, then a movie or two
(nibbling on a pizza or a sandwich), then (around 4 or 5AM) I pass out. Repeat, repeat, day after
day. Occasionally I look in the mirror to make sure my lovely pear shaped body is in peak
condition. Then back to work I go, a human hamster on a never ending treadmill.
Lakdawala in 2008
John Watson
Jeremy Silman. I am the one at the end with the hair and white shirt.
Comments
NM Raymaster2500
Oldies but goodies !!! Remembering the past !!! I believe that old chess masters are like
old wine that taste better than new wine !!!
bbeltkyle89
This article was fantastic! i enjoyed it very much. Thank you IM Silman.
2 hours ago
Quick question IM Silman. You mentioned that chess history books are undervalued and I
completely agree. In fact, I have been looking for a chess book about the Hollywood
chess scene in the early twentieth century. Are you familiar with such a book?
HPocket
3 hours ago
ProMaster231
5 hours ago
Nice one!
Kevin-Smith-1
5 hours ago
or
Join
Home | Why Join | Chess Topics | About | FAQs | Help & Support | Site Map
Privacy Policy | Legal | 2016 Chess.com Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!