Civilization in Transition | Site Title

9/13/16, 2:01 PM

Civilization in Transition
SEPTEMBER 13, 2016SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 / CHEFJEMICHEL /
Welcome to my first post at this newly created WordPress site! The ongoing theme here is most largely
devoted to These Truths.
The following is a reprint of my CureZone.com blog post that represents one of my current research
projects. This independent research issues from my studies with The Organic Laws Institute and the
professorship of Dr. Ed Rivera whom I have been a student of for several years.
Re-writting History
Inspired during my hearing of a report from a professor friend regarding political debates in America that
included a general reference made to The Constitution. I replied saying the idea that government is
based solely on this Constitution doesnt follow historical fact as it is only one fourth of the Organic
Laws and as such is required to be read in light of the other three Organic Laws. The professor agreed!
American History has been re-written!
Date: 7/29/2016
1984[1] is possibly the leading narrative on the necessity for re-writing history whenever government
deems it in its best interest.
We in the u.s. of A. have been long past 1984 as a (de facto) reality. The history here that has long been
re-written (as early as September 17, 1787) when the fourth Organic Law in the form of the writing of
the Constitution was completed. Probably, the most important particular history that was re-written
at that time was in regards to the validity of the second Organic Law: The Articles of Confederation
(1777).
The new Federalist claimed that their new Constitution replaced the second Organic Law however
replacement would have required a lawful repealing of the later and that Lawful requirement simply
never ever occurred! The difference between the historical truth and rewritten history in this instance is
the difference between true liberty and doublethink that says war is freedom.
***
August 2nd, 2016
Im posting the following here rather than start a new blog-post as I begin to research about The
California Republics original constitution that I believe guaranteed free higher education to its
Citizens.
In the process of my research I found this to be of interest:
Although tradition speaks of the unfurling of the Stars and Stripes immediately after the Declaration
of Independence, there is no definite evidence of the use of the flag of thirteen stars and thirteen stripes
prior to its adoption by the American Congress. George Henry Preble, Rear Admiral, U. S. N., in his
History of the Flag of the United States of America, has
this to say :
Beyond a doubt, the thirteen stars and stripes were unfurled at the battle of Brandywine, September 11,
1777, eight days after the official promulgation of them at Philadelphia, '[2]
The following is from the archive[2] and may be my main reference and basis for a letter to the UC
regents:
ARTICLE I.

https://thesetruthssite.wordpress.com/2016/09/13/civilization-in-transition/

Page 1 of 7

Civilization in Transition | Site Title

9/13/16, 2:01 PM

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS.
Inalienable rights.
Section 1. All men are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which
are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; and
pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness. [Constitution of 1849, Art. I, 1]
[Comment]
The superior Declaration of Rights should be based on the phrase unalienable Rights exactly as it is
written in the first Organic Law: The Declaration of Independence.
The two terms: unalienable and inalienable have distinctively different meanings.[3]
[Now (11:06 AM on Tuesday, August 2nd) Im convinced that this particular post: Re-writting History
is the perfect place for this additional posting as I read at the adask.wordpress.com:
the Jefferson Memorial includes an excerpt from the Declaration of Independence attributed to
Jefferson that referred to our inalienable Rights. But the text of the Declaration of Independence
expressly refers to our unalienable Rights. Thus, the Declaration of Independence is misquoted in 12
high letters that are carved in stone.
Purpose of government.
Sec. 2. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security,
and benefit of the people, and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public good
mav require it. [Constitution of 1849, Art. I, 2]
[Comment] Do UC Regents declare any kind of oath of office that includes supporting this
constitution? Ive not seen one. If the Regents do declare their allegiance to the spirit of the (American
and then California) Law then the people need to hold the Regents accountable to their declarations and
to supporting the protection of the people who in this instance are students firstly by protecting
their unalienable Rights to enjoying and defending (their) life and liberty; pursuing and obtaining
safety and happiness without risk of injury (as is known to have occurred with vaccinations).
[9/13/16 Received a reply from UC Regents Administration offices indicating that the Regents do declare
an oath. I responded with a request to view these oaths.]
***
The 6th of August

The Regents apparently co-wrote the University of Californias new requirement, that they passed last
year, for all students to have their MMR, TdaP, Varicella and Meningococcal conjugate shots before the
first day of school. There are several areas of issues regarding this including legal issues however I
present an additional perspective that some may automatically think is legal whereas the foundation I
am pointing is actually one of fundamental Law namely the Organic Laws of the United States of
America. It is somewhat a knee-jerk reaction to think in legal terms as is so often the case in a litigious
society and in doing so too often loose sight of what comes before the legal system. In such a culture I
feel the necessity to return to the foundation in Law, not only for the Regents to refer to but especially for
the students to be empowered by these Truths (possibly enlightened by them).
I count it a real misfortune that American history as it is taught in the school system is compromised. If
we are to continue on course as a people who embody the true spirit of America then we must recover
our history from the perspective of our Organic Laws. You could say that Im on a mission for that
purpose The Recovery of American History According to The Organic Laws of the United States of
America (RahAtOLusA).
The Declaration of Independence is the first of four Organic Laws the cornerstone of American Law.
Without it we do not have American Law or an American Nation. The Constitution of September 17, 1787
is the fourth Organic Law and it naturally comes after the first. Referring to this Constitution as if it were
the only foundation for America is truly problematic because its true standing (if any) can only be within
the context of the first Organic Law. If the Constitution is divorced from the Declaration of
Independence then we are without our North Star as our guiding light. We must hold these truths to
be self evident or we are subject to whatever the prevailing political winds of the day may be. We must
know that Life includes our individual health and total well-being that is our natural unalienable Right
meaning that it can not be given away or compromised by anything including an institutions
requirement under color of institutional law and/or in the name of public health. Aside from law
there is no public health without healthy individuals the only place where health begins. (Health issues
are an additional arena of issues regarding vaccinations.)

https://thesetruthssite.wordpress.com/2016/09/13/civilization-in-transition/

Page 2 of 7

Civilization in Transition | Site Title

9/13/16, 2:01 PM

The second Organic Law is The Articles of Confederation wherein every State is bond to honor the
freedom of its free inhabitants. Any American who is not in voluntary servitude to the United
States is free from external government in complete congruence with the first Organic Law that finally
rejected external government.
***
10th of August, 2016
Continuing on the above theme regarding vaccinations even though I have sent off my letter to the UC
Regents as I now have some additional leads regarding deep issues with the law.
In the process I discovered the following book: Restore The Republic. Serendipitously the forward by
Ron Paul speaks to a redefinition that is expressed in a Congressional Research Service report that I
took note of regarding the Commerce Clause (the redefining of which I do not agree with).
the commerce clause originally was intended as a limited grant of federal power to allow the federal
government to ensure free-trade between the states. Progressive lawyers, judges, politicians, and
academics attacked this accepted understanding, however, and redefined the commerce clause as a
general grant of power to regulate all areas of our economic and personal lives. Ron Paul in the
Forward to Jonathan Emords book Restore the Republic (2012).[4]
Jonathan begins his Introduction (after a quote from Madison) with: The United States has lost its
constitutional identity.
I dont think there is more precise wording that can be assembled to express the mammoth truth of this
statement. The more I contemplate it the more profound it becomes in my awareness! To know the depth
and breadth of the truth in this statement (IMO) requires a graduate level understanding of the four
Organic Laws of The United States of America. That is because the three preceding Organic Laws are
required as a collective context for a true understanding of the last Organic Law: the Constitution of
September 17, 1787. This last Organic law didnt suddenly appear out of no where! The facts at Law
indicate that it is a direct extension of the second Organic Law: The Articles of Confederation, a Law
that is recognized by the United States Government Printing Office in the publication of United States
Code where on the title page of Volume One it reads: Organic Laws followed by Title 1.
Understanding the four Organic Laws will give you a true historical perspective of the United States
whereby you will see that that the United States is distinctly preceded by The United States of
America in both the first and second Organic Laws; that the United States pertains to property owned
by The United States of America as set forth in the Northwest Territory as represented in the third
Organic Law: Ordinance of 1787: The Northwest Territorial Government. What amounts to as a
myopic focus on the Constitution typically does not include the greater and very essential
context/the complete foundation for the last Organic Law: the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
Also More on Unalienable:
1778, John Jay in an essay entitled. A Freeholder, A Hint to the Legislature of the State of New
York The undoubted right and unalienable privilege of a freeman :
[4]
***
The 11th of August, 2016
From Blacks Law Dictionary
Unalienable:
Incapable of being aliened, that is, sold and transferred.[5]
vs.
Inalienable:
Not subject to alienation [6]
Although both of these legal terms share the core term of lien[7] these are actually two different terms
with separate and distinct meanings. The difference is between incapable and not subject to.
***
The 12th
Alfred Adask explains the difference:
At first glance the two terms seem pretty much synonymous. However, while the word inalienable is
not subject to alienation, the word unalienable is incapable of being aliened. I believe the
distinction between these two terms is this:

https://thesetruthssite.wordpress.com/2016/09/13/civilization-in-transition/

Page 3 of 7

Civilization in Transition | Site Title

9/13/16, 2:01 PM

Unalienable is incapable of being aliened by anyone, including the man who holds something
unalienable. Thus, it is impossible for any individual to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of an
unalienable Right. It is impossible for you to take one of my unalienable rights. It is likewise
impossible for me to even voluntarily surrender, sell or transfer one of my unalienable rights. Once I
have something unalienable, its impossible for me to get rid of it. It would be easier to give up the
color of my eyes or my heart than to give up that which is unalienable.
That which is inalienable, on the other hand, is merely not subject to alienation. Blacks 2nd does not
declare that its absolutely impossible for that which is inalienable to be sold, transferred or assigned.
Instead, I believe that inalienable merely means that inalienable rights are not subject to alienation
by others. That is, no one can compel me to sell, abandon or transfer any of my inalienable rights. I am
not subject to compelled alienation by others.
But that leaves open the question of whether I may am entitled to voluntarily and unilaterally sell,
transfer, abandon or otherwise surrender that which is inalienable. Thus, while it is impossible for me
to abandon, or for government to take, my unalienable rights, it is possible for me to voluntarily waive
my inalienable rights. I strongly suspect that our gov-co presumes that our rights are at best
inalienable, and that since we have not expressly claimed them, we could have and therefore must have
waived them.[8]
I highly encourage your clear understanding of the above distinction. Let there be no doubt in your
thoughts or in your heart about all your Rights both your natural unalienable Rights as well as your
inalienable rights.
Alfred Adask continues to articulate the difference:
If we look at Bouviers Law Dictionary (A.D. 1856) well see:
INALIENABLE. A word denoting the condition of those things the property in which cannot be lawfully
transferred from one person to another.
UNALIENABLE. Incapable of being transferred. Things which are not in commerce, The natural
rights of life and liberty are unalienable.
Clearly, the words are not synonymous. While inalienable rights cant be lawfully transferred to
another, they might nevertheless be waived by the holder or perhaps unlawfully (privately??)
transferred to someone else. However, those rights which are unalienable are absolutely incapable of
being transferred lawfully, unlawfully, administratively, privately or by implication or operation of law.
That which you have, which is unalienable, is your wrists in an absolute sense that cannot possibly be
discarded, transferred, sold, or otherwise abandoned.
Also, note that the word unalienable describes things which are not in commerce. However, it
appears that those things which are inalienable could be in commerce. As you know, much of the
trouble we have with the modern government is based on governments claim of power to regulate all
that is involved in interstate commerce. In so far as you may be able to prove that any item or right you
seek to use or exercise is unalienable, that item or right would be beyond the power of our government
to regulate under interstate commerce. You can see the power potential in unalienable.
Most importantly, as declared in the Declaration of Independence, all men are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights. Our unalienable rights flow from God and are not subject to
mans meddling. Bouviers agrees by defining unalienable as including our natural rights (which
flow from natures God).
I would encourage you to underscore: You can see the power potential in unalienable' in every way
that you can. What is unalienable is absolutely beyond the jurisdiction of Congress! What is beyond the
jurisdiction of Congress is not subject to governmental regulations. Let your unalienable Rights be your
reality! Let all things to the country be the illusionary fiction that they truly are.
August 13, 2016
The importance of human history lies in its meaning. Answering this question (one of eight) is a
requirement that helps characterize ones world view: What is the meaning of human history?[9]
***
the 24th
Although we have a virtually undisputed history in the court room referred to below you wont find the
inspiration for the making of the German dictator included in the United States history books.
In a suggested letter by Ed Rivera to presidential candidates Ed quotes from a DVD version of the
Nuremberg Trial. I had to verify that quote before posting it here. I just found it at Amazon:

https://thesetruthssite.wordpress.com/2016/09/13/civilization-in-transition/

Page 4 of 7

Civilization in Transition | Site Title

9/13/16, 2:01 PM

Stahmer cued Goring to explain where the idea had come from to combine the ceremonial head of state
and the head of government in one person, Adolf Hitler. That was simple, Goring explained. They had
taken their example from the similar dual roles of the president of the United States.
Nuremberg : Infamy on Trial Reprint Edition
by Joseph E. Persico[10]
I find this a rather electrifying verification. Now Id like to see how close I can get to the court transcripts!
In the meanwhile heres another reference to the above:
Goring even claimed that when Hitler subverted Germanys republican constitution by amalgamating
the offices of chancellor and president, he was merely emulating the powers of the office of President of
the United States, which merged the roles of head of government and head of state.[11]
Author of the above quoted article provided me with two links. One to: The International Military
Tribunal for Germany Contents of The Nuremberg Trials Collection at the Lillian Goldman Law
Library 127 Wall Street, New Haven, Conn.. I need to contact their librarian.[12]
***
August 26th, 16
There are two different offices of President referred to in the American Constitution of September 17,
1787.[13]
Also found an impressive old newspaper with article on the combined offices that were given to Hitler.
[14]
Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany on January 30, 1933. in private Hitler had expressed
hope that the old reactionary would die soon so that he could merge the two offices of president and
Chancellor together. [15]
Plus: A course was adopted for curtailing the (separate) powers of the president. One prerogative
after another was taken from Hindenburg, as in the second Reichstag Fire Decree the right to appoint
national commissioners , and in the Enabling Act the right to issue decree laws. As for the balance,
Hindenburgs death was awaited. When he did die in August 1934, Hitler could have had himself or
some puppet elected president. But he preferred combining the two offices of president and chancellor by
decree, subsequently sanctioned by plebiscite.[16]
***
August 28th, 16
Cont. research Re: the Nuremberg Trials:
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Allied Control Council (ACC)
Law No. 10, October 1946-April 1949.
Originally, a second international trial at Nuremberg was to have focused primarily on the activities of
German finance and industry during the Third Reich. The so-called industrialists trial, was widely
regard(ed) as of equal importance to the prosecution of the Nazi and SS high command. The United
States vetoed this plan, declaring in the autumn of 1945 that it would refuse to participate in any further
international trials and would hold separate prosecutions on its own.[17]
***
29th
Sent email message to author Joseph Persico asking for his assistance in accessing an online source of the
Nuremberg trial transcripts.
***
September 12,
Got a reply from a family member of Joseph Persico informing me that he had crossed the threshold.
Further research regarding Hitlers rise to power gave me (what I call) the lions share of an overview of
inter-connecting surface dots except for the financial backing. Now I have both surface and backing in
one article.[18]
***********^***********
Notes:
[1] Nineteen Eighty-four (published in 1949), a novel (George Orwell) wrote as a warning after years of
brooding on the twin menaces of Nazism and Stalinism. The novel is set in an imaginary future in which
the world is dominated by three perpetually warring totalitarian police states. The books hero, the
https://thesetruthssite.wordpress.com/2016/09/13/civilization-in-transition/

Page 5 of 7

Civilization in Transition | Site Title

9/13/16, 2:01 PM

Englishman Winston Smith, is a minor party functionary in one of those states. His longing for truth and
decency leads him to secretly rebel against the government, which perpetuates its rule by systematically
distorting the truth and continuously rewriting history to suit its own purposes.:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/George-Orwell
(https://www.britannica.com/biography/George-Orwell)
[2] https://archive.org/stream/constitutionofs00cali/constitutionofs00cali_djvu.txt
(https://archive.org/stream/constitutionofs00cali/constitutionofs00cali_djvu.txt)
[3] https://adask.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/unalienable-vs-inalienable/
(https://adask.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/unalienable-vs-inalienable/)
[4] https://www.amazon.com/Restore-Republic-Jonathan-Emord/dp/098499131X/ref=sr_1_1?
ie=UTF8&qid=1331529625&sr=8-1 (https://www.amazon.com/Restore-Republic-JonathanEmord/dp/098499131X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1331529625&sr=8-1)
[5] http://thelawdictionary.org/letter/u/page/3/ (http://thelawdictionary.org/letter/u/page/3/)
[6] http://thelawdictionary.org/letter/i/page/24/ (http://thelawdictionary.org/letter/i/page/24/)
[7] Lien
A qualified right of property which a creditor has in or over specific property of his debtor, as security
for the debt or charge or for performance of some act. :
http://thelawdictionary.org/letter/l/page/41/ (http://thelawdictionary.org/letter/l/page/41/)
[8] https://adask.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/unalienable-vs-inalienable/#comment-67648
(https://adask.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/unalienable-vs-inalienable/#comment-67648)
[9] The Universe Next Door A BASIC WORLDVIEW CATALOGUE; September 2010 Introduction:
http://www.takeittothestreets.info (http://www.takeittothestreets.info/)
http://www.scribd.com/takeittothestreets (http://www.scribd.com/takeittothestreets)
[10] https://www.amazon.com/Nuremberg-Infamy-Trial-Joseph-Persico/dp/014016622X
(https://www.amazon.com/Nuremberg-Infamy-Trial-Joseph-Persico/dp/014016622X)
Also: http://josephpersico.com (http://josephpersico.com/)
[11] http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865587554/This-week-in-history-Nazi-criminals-sentencedat-Nuremberg.html?pg=all (http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865587554/This-week-in-historyNazi-criminals-sentenced-at-Nuremberg.html?pg=all)
[12] http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/imt.asp
(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/imt.asp)
[13] http://www.meetup.com/fr-FR/NationalLibertyAlliance/messages/62188342/
(http://www.meetup.com/fr-FR/NationalLibertyAlliance/messages/62188342/)
[14] TAUNTON DAILY GAZETTE, Massachusetts, August 2, 1934
* Germany President Paul Von Hindenburg death
* Adolph Hitler becomes president
* Nazis begin climb to full power of Germany:
http://www.rarenewspapers.com/view/569710 (http://www.rarenewspapers.com/view/569710)
[15] Phoenix Rising: The Rise and Fall of the American Republic By Donald G. Left:

id=ZPA_iRdmJa0C&pg=PA364&lpg=PA364&dq=%22two+offices+of+president%22hitler&source=bl&ots=wPUa5PKiFt&sig=6FsurDWw8x45nM7NILNAjPPdJS4&hl=en
<ahref=https: books.google.com= books?=>https://books.google.com/books?%5B15%5D
(https://books.google.com/books?%5B15%5D)
[16] Political Education of Arnold Brecht: An Autobiography, 1884-1970 by Arnold Brecht:

https://books.google.com/books?
id=1lN9BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA430&lpg=PA430&dq=%22two+offices+of+president%22hitler&source=bl&ots=qTU5X6CC2&sig=jW3WQl6iRIQpc2e2P4dH8az5miA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFoLr1jOHOAhVeHGMKHQ70BV0Q6AEIJDAC#v=onepage&q=%22two%20offices%20of%
(https://books.google.com/books?
id=1lN9BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA430&lpg=PA430&dq=%22two+offices+of+president%22hitler&source=bl&ots=qTU5X6CC2&sig=jW3WQl6iRIQpc2e2P4dH8az5miA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjFoLr1jOHOAhVeHGMKHQ70BV0Q6AEIJDAC#v=onepage&q=%22two%20offices%20of%

https://thesetruthssite.wordpress.com/2016/09/13/civilization-in-transition/

Page 6 of 7

Civilization in Transition | Site Title

9/13/16, 2:01 PM

Arnold Brecht witnessed and participated in the course of German history from the late 19th century to
the present. Serving under seven Reich chancellors, he became acting Secretary of State, and was finally
removed from office by Hitler in 1933.:
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/180.html (http://press.princeton.edu/titles/180.html)
Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Brecht (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Brecht)
[17] http://www.archives.gov/iwg/research-papers/trial-of-war-criminals-before-imt.html
(http://www.archives.gov/iwg/research-papers/trial-of-war-criminals-before-imt.html)
[18] http://nstarzone.com/HITLER.html (http://nstarzone.com/HITLER.html)
Uncategorized
AMERICAN
CIVILIZATION
CONSTITUTION
FREE
INHABITANT
FREEDOM
GOVERNMENT
HISTORY
LIFE
ORGANIC LAWS
PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS

LAW

LIBERTY

CREATE A FREE WEBSITE OR BLOG AT WORDPRESS.COM.

https://thesetruthssite.wordpress.com/2016/09/13/civilization-in-transition/

Page 7 of 7